My Thanks To Ben....

[David Von Pein]

....for quoting me in the dozens of threads that he [Ben Holmes] has started recently here at acj. Lots of really good quotes in there too. There's not a single one of those quotes that I am ashamed of or would want to alter in any way at all.

So, thanks, Ben. I appreciate it.

And for lots more great quotes....

http://Quoting-Common-Sense.blogspot.com

DVP
:-)

[Ben Holmes]

On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 9:13:46 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> ....for quoting me in the dozens of threads that he [Ben Holmes] has started recently here at acj. Lots of really good quotes in there too. There's not a single one of those quotes that I am ashamed of or would want to alter in any way at all.
>
> So, thanks, Ben. I appreciate it.

First time I've ever been thanked by a liar for quoting his lies...

Truly amusing that David is so cowardly that he even refuses to defend his lies...

I'll continue to quote David's lies, since that is one of my reasons for posting, to prove beyond all doubt that it's impossible to be a knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission, and honest at the same time.

Thank you David, for helping me prove this.

[Jason Burke]

Does Bennie-boy have *any* marbles left?

[David Von Pein]

On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 12:20:45 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 9:13:46 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> > ....for quoting me in the dozens of threads that he [Ben Holmes] has started recently here at acj. Lots of really good quotes in there too. There's not a single one of those quotes that I am ashamed of or would want to alter in any way at all.
> >
> > So, thanks, Ben. I appreciate it.
>
>
> First time I've ever been thanked by a liar for quoting his lies...
>
> Truly amusing that David is so cowardly that he even refuses to defend his lies...
>
> I'll continue to quote David's lies,

Please do. I love it. Every time you do it, I smile broadly, because, as I said, all of those quotes are great. You just make a fool out of yourself every time you pretend my quotes are full of "lies".

since that is one of my reasons for posting, to prove beyond all doubt that it's impossible to be a knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission, and honest at the same time.
>
> Thank you David, for helping me prove this.

Anytime, Ben. I'm very glad to help you make a fool out of yourself as you create an absurdly large number of new threads day after day.

You're obviously a tad bit "obsessed" with me at this point in time. Why that is so, I haven't the foggiest. But I'm enjoying it immensely. Please continue...

[Ben Holmes]

On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:04:14 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 12:20:45 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 9:13:46 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> > > ....for quoting me in the dozens of threads that he [Ben Holmes] has started recently here at acj. Lots of really good quotes in there too. There's not a single one of those quotes that I am ashamed of or would want to alter in any way at all.
> > >
> > > So, thanks, Ben. I appreciate it.
> >
> >
> > First time I've ever been thanked by a liar for quoting his lies...
> >
> > Truly amusing that David is so cowardly that he even refuses to defend his lies...
> >
> > I'll continue to quote David's lies,
>
> Please do. I love it. Every time you do it, I smile broadly, because, as I said, all of those quotes are great. You just make a fool out of yourself every time you pretend my quotes are full of "lies".

And you demonstrate the truthfulness of my replies by your inability to respond.

> since that is one of my reasons for posting, to prove beyond all doubt that it's impossible to be a knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission, and honest at the same time.
> >
> > Thank you David, for helping me prove this.
>
> Anytime, Ben. I'm very glad to help you make a fool out of yourself as you create an absurdly large number of new threads day after day.

Ad hominem is simply a believer demonstrating that he knows he lost.

You can't explain why you're unable to defend yourself, so you simply sink to insults.

> You're obviously a tad bit "obsessed" with me at this point in time. Why that is so, I haven't the foggiest. But I'm enjoying it immensely. Please continue...

I'm "obsessed" with any knowledgeable believer who pretends to respond.

"Bud" can only show himself a troll - *YOU*, on the other hand, can demonstrate what I come here to prove...

That there's no such thing as an honest & knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission.

You should follow Henry Sienzant, Mark Ulrik, & John McAdams' examples, and simply refuse to respond to me. Undoubtedly someday, you will.

[Bud]

On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 3:19:38 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 10:04:14 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> > On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 12:20:45 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > On Friday, February 17, 2017 at 9:13:46 AM UTC-8, David Von Pein wrote:
> > > > ....for quoting me in the dozens of threads that he [Ben Holmes] has started recently here at acj. Lots of really good quotes in there too. There's not a single one of those quotes that I am ashamed of or would want to alter in any way at all.
> > > >
> > > > So, thanks, Ben. I appreciate it.
> > >
> > >
> > > First time I've ever been thanked by a liar for quoting his lies...
> > >
> > > Truly amusing that David is so cowardly that he even refuses to defend his lies...
> > >
> > > I'll continue to quote David's lies,
> >
> > Please do. I love it. Every time you do it, I smile broadly, because, as I said, all of those quotes are great. You just make a fool out of yourself every time you pretend my quotes are full of "lies".
>
>
> And you demonstrate the truthfulness of my replies by your inability to respond.
>
>
> > since that is one of my reasons for posting, to prove beyond all doubt that it's impossible to be a knowledgeable believer in the Warren Commission, and honest at the same time.
> > >
> > > Thank you David, for helping me prove this.
> >
> > Anytime, Ben. I'm very glad to help you make a fool out of yourself as you create an absurdly large number of new threads day after day.
>
>
> Ad hominem is simply a believer demonstrating that he knows he lost.
>
> You can't explain why you're unable to defend yourself, so you simply sink to insults.
>
>
>
> > You're obviously a tad bit "obsessed" with me at this point in time. Why that is so, I haven't the foggiest. But I'm enjoying it immensely. Please continue...
>
> I'm "obsessed" with any knowledgeable believer who pretends to respond.
>
> "Bud" can only show himself a troll -

I`m not sure if you run from my arguments more, or run from supporting your own claims more.

[David Von Pein]

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/index.html

http://jfk-assassination-as-it-happened.blogspot.com

http://dvp-video-audio-archive.blogspot.com/2016/12/dvp-audio-video-master-index.html

http://www.blogger.com/profile/12501570830179992520

[Ben Holmes]

An honest man would be willing to defend these URL's.

But you won't, will you David?

Even though you refuse to acknowledge your cowardice, you demonstrate it virtually every day.

You *STILL* refuse to answer honestly the two questions I asked you.

You KNOW FOR A FACT that Guinn's tests contradicted Killion's, and have publicly LIED about it.

[David Von Pein]

No, they didn't. (Unless you want to isolate the ONE Guinn test out of EIGHT that did, indeed, contradict Killion.)

Ben's a liar on this. Purely and simply.

[Ben Holmes]

I'm amused that trolls & believer continue to avoid the truth in this matter.

EVERY SINGLE TEST that Guinn did with the NAA came up positive, which is a *complete* contradiction to Killion's paraffin tests...

"Bud" knows this, but he's too dishonest to tell the truth.

"Bud" likes to pretend ignorance.

But, like David, "Bud" is a coward.

[Ben Holmes]

Oops... looks like I took it to be Bud answering, because I know he's more ignorant that David.

But David ABSOLUTELY KNOWS HE'S LYING...

Perhaps he's just too busy molesting the neighborhood children to pay any attention to Guinn's NAA tests.

[David Von Pein]

I'm not the one who is stupid enough to think that Guinn's NEUTRON ACTIVATION (NAA) tests can be compared to Killion's NITRATE test.

They are totally different tests, with totally different results. Just as Oswald's Nitrate and NAA tests are different tests, producing different results on the cheek cast (NAA was positive, while the Paraffin/Nitrate cheek test was negative).

So, Ben is a pathetic and unabashed liar. Plainly and simply.

[Ben Holmes]

They *BOTH* have the same goal - to determine whether someone fired a rifle or not... one test is highly reliable, one isn't.

You're quite frightened of that basic fact... and WILLING TO LIE ABOUT IT.

> They are totally different tests, with totally different results.

Indeed they are... yet the CONCLUSIONS contradict each other.

When I shoot you through the head at 100 yards with my M16A2, would you prefer the police to use the paraffin test or the NAA test to determine my guilt?

> Just as Oswald's Nitrate and NAA tests are different tests, producing different results on the cheek cast (NAA was positive, while the Paraffin/Nitrate cheek test was negative).

Yep... just as I ALREADY STATED... they contradict each other... and only *ONE* test is accurate.

> So, Ben is a pathetic and unabashed liar. Plainly and simply.

Yet you agree with me... you've acknowledged obliquely that the NAA contradicts the paraffin test - EXACTLY WHAT I STATED - and you called a lie.

You're quite despicable David... it's no wonder the local neighborhood keeps a close watch on their kids when you're around.

[David Von Pein]

Good. Then, per your rules, Oswald must be guilty (since his NAA cheek cast definitely was POSITIVE, not NEGATIVE).

Thanks for confirming you think Oswald did it, Ben.

[Ben Holmes]

Tut tut tut, David...

If you're going to admit that I'm right, then you owe me an apology for labeling it a lie.

*THEN* we can debate the test *YOU* claim is "positive".

> Thanks for confirming you think Oswald did it, Ben.

You're a moron again, David.

Stop molesting the children and start paying attention to the evidence.