On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 6:42:20 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 17:33:00 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, May 13, 2019 at 5:57:32 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 May 2019 15:03:13 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 4:33:18 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 8 May 2019 10:51:10 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 11:16:09 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>>>> From the old Amazon forums... the anonymous "Dale" claims this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is no evidence of conspiracy in the Kennedy case - Ben
> >>>>>>> certainly has none.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Of course, this simply goes to show that believers aren't qualified to
> >>>>>> look at the evidence, and to judge the evidence.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Produce your evidence of conspiracy.
> >>>>
> >>>> You once again prove my point. You **KNOW FOR A FACT** that there's
> >>>> evidence of conspiracy. You simply discount it.
> >>>
> >>> How can I discount it when you refuse to produce it?
> >>
> >> You already know the evidence for conspiracy. You are, in fact,
> >> denying it's existence, just as Dale did.
> >
> > Less hot air and more producing of evidence of conspiracy.
>
>
> Certainly.
But nothing offered. For those interested, Ben brought up an old post to dispute someone`s claim that there is no evidence of conspiracy. So I said...
That was 2 weeks ago. Still nothing offered. Either Ben has no such evidence to produce or he is terrified to produce it.