Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 33

[Gil Jesus]

There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.

QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?

[Bud]

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?

They didn`t say.

NEXT!

[John Corbett]

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?

The WC decided not to.

[Hank Sienzant]

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>
> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?

Why should he have been? The police who found the rifle was called, and the policeman who photographed the rifle in situ, then picked up the rifle, examined it, and took it back to the DPD Crime Lab was called. His photos of the rifle made in at the scene and in the crime lab were entered into evidence.

Can you cite a court case where a news photographer who arrived at the scene after the commission of a crime and photographed the scene was called, when his photographs weren’t entered into evidence?

[Ben Holmes]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:40:57 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Ben Holmes]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 03:48:52 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

This is a lie. There's **NOTHING** that Corbutt can cite that shows
this.

[Ben Holmes]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 19:16:56 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

[Hank Sienzant]

On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 9:19:45 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 19:16:56 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
> <hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
>

> You've claimed…

Ben attempts to change the subject to something he pretends I said because he apparently can’t discuss this topic knowledgeably.

He’s reduced to trolling.

[Ben Holmes]

[John Corbett]

According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So
why does Gil think this answer is wrong?

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

>> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>>>
>>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?
>> The WC decided not to.
>
>According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So
>why does Gil think this answer is wrong?

Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported
speculation isn't an answer.

[Gil Jesus]

Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works. So here it is:

1. There is only one answer to the questions --- the correct answer. You can respond ( answer ) as many times as you like, but any responses other than the correct answer is considered the wrong answer and detracts from the score. For example, one correct answer and one comment = one correct answer out of two and a 50 % score. One correct answer, one comment and one insult = one correct answer out of three or a 33 % score, etc. The more comments, insults and other bullshit you post, detracts from any score you achieve.

Comments are considered wrong answers.
Insults are considered wrong answers.
Answering questions with questions are considered wrong answers.

This is to prevent all of the above, to encourage correct responses and penalize troll-like responses.

2. ANY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS AFTER I'VE SCORE THEM AND POSTED THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE COUNTED. For example, I've scored questions 1-20 so far. Those questions are CLOSED with regard to scoring and any responses to those questions will not be counted. I've given people 5 days to respond to the questions before I score them, that's why I'm doing the scoring five questions at a time. That's plenty of time to answer the question. It would not be fair to someone like Bud who has worked hard to achieve the failing score of 26% so far to see someone else come by and take the first place award away from him.

3. I never said Corbett responded to 37 questions. I said Corbett has responded 37 TIMES in the first 20 QUESTIONS and only once posted the right answer. That means that according to my rules, Corbett posted 36 wrong answers ( comments, insults and questions ) for the first 20 questions.

Since I haven't yet scored the questions past Question # 20, any correct answers he may have given to those questions has yet to be tallied. I've already explained this to him, but I can't seem to get that through his cement head.

[Bud]

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:09:10 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> > <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> > >>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
> > >>>
> > >>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?
> > >> The WC decided not to.
> > >
> > >According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So why does Gil think this answer is wrong?
> > Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported
> > speculation isn't an answer.
> Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works.

Who says it does?

[Bud]

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Says who?

Dishonest people ask dishonest questions then dishonestly decide if the answers are correct.

When do the people who can make conspiracy arguments show up?

[John Corbett]

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:09:10 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> > <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> > >>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
> > >>>
> > >>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?
> > >> The WC decided not to.
> > >
> > >According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So why does Gil think this answer is wrong?
> > Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported
> > speculation isn't an answer.
> Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works.

That's an indictment of you, not me.

> So here it is:

Oh, goody.

>
> 1. There is only one answer to the questions --- the correct answer.

The one Gil deems to be the correct answer. It's anybody's guess as to how he arrived at it.

> You can respond ( answer ) as many times as you like, but any responses other than the correct answer is considered the wrong answer and detracts from the score.

OK. What was the correct answer for question 33?

> For example, one correct answer and one comment = one correct answer out of two and a 50 % score. One correct answer, one comment and one insult = one correct answer out of three or a 33 % score, etc. The more comments, insults and other bullshit you post, detracts from any score you achieve.
>
> Comments are considered wrong answers.
> Insults are considered wrong answers.
> Answering questions with questions are considered wrong answers.

Answering with a true statement is considered a wrong answer.

>
> This is to prevent all of the above, to encourage correct responses and penalize troll-like responses.

Still waiting for the correct answer to question 33. How long are you going to keep us in
suspense?

>
> 2. ANY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS AFTER I'VE SCORE THEM AND POSTED THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE COUNTED. For example, I've scored questions 1-20 so far. Those questions are CLOSED with regard to scoring and any responses to those questions will not be counted. I've given people 5 days to respond to the questions before I score them, that's why I'm doing the scoring five questions at a time. That's plenty of time to answer the question. It would not be fair to someone like Bud who has worked hard to achieve the failing score of 26% so far to see someone else come by and take the first place award away from him.

Normally when I test is graded and answers are marked wrong, the grader provides the correct
answer. Do you even know what the correct answers are to your own questions?

>
> 3. I never said Corbett responded to 37 questions. I said Corbett has responded 37 TIMES in the first 20 QUESTIONS and only once posted the right answer. That means that according to my rules,

MY RULES being the operative phrase in this whole silly exercise. As is his custom, Gil likes to
make up his own rules for his silly exercises.

> Corbett posted 36 wrong answers ( comments, insults and questions ) for the first 20 questions.

I was trying to take it easy on you. I could have posted a lot more insults. It was low hanging
fruit.

>
> Since I haven't yet scored the questions past Question # 20, any correct answers he may have given to those questions has yet to be tallied. I've already explained this to him, but I can't seem to get that through his cement head.

Oh, that's good to know. Does that mean you are eventually going to tell us what the correct
answer to question 33 is, or is that going to remain a mystery?

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:54:28 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:09:10?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

>> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
>>> <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>>>>>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?
>>>>> The WC decided not to.
>>>>
>>>>According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So why does Gil think this answer is wrong?
>>> Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported
>>> speculation isn't an answer.
>> Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works.
>
>That's an indictment of you, not me.

A moron would think so.


>> So here it is:

>>
>> 1. There is only one answer to the questions --- the correct answer.
>>

>> You can respond ( answer ) as many times as you like, but any responses other than the correct answer is considered the wrong answer and detracts from the score.

>> For example, one correct answer and one comment = one correct answer out of two and a 50 % score. One correct answer, one comment and one insult = one correct answer out of three or a 33 % score, etc. The more comments, insults and other bullshit you post, detracts from any score you achieve.
>>
>> Comments are considered wrong answers.
>> Insults are considered wrong answers.
>> Answering questions with questions are considered wrong answers.
>
>Answering with a true statement is considered a wrong answer.

Of COURSE it is, stupid!!!

If I told Gil that the answer to ANY of his questions is: "The Earth
revolves around the Sun" - Gil would rightfully consider my correct
and true statement to be a WRONG ANSWER!

That you can't understand this reflects on you, not Gil.

>> This is to prevent all of the above, to encourage correct responses and penalize troll-like responses.
>>

>> 2. ANY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS AFTER I'VE SCORE THEM AND POSTED THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE COUNTED. For example, I've scored questions 1-20 so far. Those questions are CLOSED with regard to scoring and any responses to those questions will not be counted. I've given people 5 days to respond to the questions before I score them, that's why I'm doing the scoring five questions at a time. That's plenty of time to answer the question. It would not be fair to someone like Bud who has worked hard to achieve the failing score of 26% so far to see someone else come by and take the first place award away from him.
>
>Normally when I test is graded and answers are marked wrong, the grader provides the correct
>answer. Do you even know what the correct answers are to your own questions?

Even you do. If you'd like that proven true, simply come here to
Oxnard California, and stand within 5 feet of me... I'll be holding a
bat.

>> 3. I never said Corbett responded to 37 questions. I said Corbett has responded 37 TIMES in the first 20 QUESTIONS and only once posted the right answer. That means that according to my rules,
>>

>> Corbett posted 36 wrong answers ( comments, insults and questions ) for the first 20 questions.
>>

>> Since I haven't yet scored the questions past Question # 20, any correct answers he may have given to those questions has yet to be tallied. I've already explained this to him, but I can't seem to get that through his cement head.
>
>Oh, that's good to know.

Most people wouldn't need it explained to them.

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:09:08 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:

Both Corbutt & Chuckles seem to have IQ issues... Not their fault.

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:36:19 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:36:57 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>

[Hank Sienzant]

On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:09:10 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> > <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
> > >> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> > >>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
> > >>>
> > >>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before the Warren Commission ?
> > >> The WC decided not to.
> > >
> > >According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and it wasn't this one. So why does Gil think this answer is wrong?
> > Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported
> > speculation isn't an answer.
> Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works. So here it is:
>
> 1. There is only one answer to the questions --- the correct answer.

You mean what you consider the correct answer, which, as you don’t understand the Federal Rules of Evidence (established elsewhere today) are generally built upon false assumptions of your own infallibility.

> You can respond ( answer ) as many times as you like, but any responses other than the correct answer is considered the wrong answer and detracts from the score. For example, one correct answer and one comment = one correct answer out of two and a 50 % score. One correct answer, one comment and one insult = one correct answer out of three or a 33 % score, etc. The more comments, insults and other bullshit you post, detracts from any score you achieve.
>
> Comments are considered wrong answers.
> Insults are considered wrong answers.
> Answering questions with questions are considered wrong answers.

What about questions asking why you consider your questions worthy of a response?

>
> This is to prevent all of the above, to encourage correct responses and penalize troll-like responses.
>
> 2. ANY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS AFTER I'VE SCORE THEM AND POSTED THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE COUNTED. For example, I've scored questions 1-20 so far. Those questions are CLOSED with regard to scoring and any responses to those questions will not be counted. I've given people 5 days to respond to the questions before I score them, that's why I'm doing the scoring five questions at a time. That's plenty of time to answer the question. It would not be fair to someone like Bud who has worked hard to achieve the failing score of 26% so far to see someone else come by and take the first place award away from him.

You apparently are looking for a reason to avoid grading my responses. I understand.

>
> 3. I never said Corbett responded to 37 questions. I said Corbett has responded 37 TIMES in the first 20 QUESTIONS and only once posted the right answer. That means that according to my rules, Corbett posted 36 wrong answers ( comments, insults and questions ) for the first 20 questions.
>
> Since I haven't yet scored the questions past Question # 20, any correct answers he may have given to those questions has yet to be tallied. I've already explained this to him, but I can't seem to get that through his cement head.

What part of “Insults are considered wrong answers” (your rule) did you fail to understand.

[Hank Sienzant]

Gil? No response?

[Ben Holmes]

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:57:38 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant

[Ben Holmes]

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:59:04 -0700 (PDT), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

Huckster. No response?