info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Davy Von Penis Can't Reason...
57 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
Jan 25, 2023, 5:29:00 PM1/25/23
to
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
You can't make these things up, folks!
Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
offer a chain of custody for CE399.
Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
You can't make these things up, folks!
Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
offer a chain of custody for CE399.
Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
Bud
Jan 25, 2023, 5:37:28 PM1/25/23
to
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>
>
> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
So an actual judge`s opinion on a matter of law is sneered at , but the Dunning-Kruger hobbyists think their opinions about the chain of custody are meaningful.
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>
>
> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
> You can't make these things up, folks!
Ben Holmes
Jan 25, 2023, 6:13:58 PM1/25/23
to
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>
>>
>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>
> So an actual judge`s opinion...
Real court? Fake court?
Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>
> No, you can`t.
>
>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>
>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
Did I predict it or what???
Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
wrote:
>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>
>>
>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>
Real court? Fake court?
Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>
> No, you can`t.
>
>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>
>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
Bud
Jan 25, 2023, 6:37:54 PM1/25/23
to
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> >> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
> >>
> >>
> >> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> >> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
> >
> > So an actual judge`s opinion...
>
>
> Real court? Fake court?
Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
> >On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> >> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
> >>
> >>
> >> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> >> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
> >
> > So an actual judge`s opinion...
>
>
> Real court? Fake court?
> Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
Gil Jesus
Jan 26, 2023, 6:27:18 AM1/26/23
to
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>
>
> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>
> You can't make these things up, folks!
This is what they do......this is their "evidence".
> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>
>
> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>
> You can't make these things up, folks!
You mean all those defendants on "Perry Mason" were guilty in real life ?
ROFLMAO.
Bud
Jan 26, 2023, 1:49:26 PM1/26/23
to
Ben Holmes
Jan 26, 2023, 2:19:40 PM1/26/23
to
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:49:25 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Those who went to law school clearly learned what chain of possession
is. What we have here is another example of Dunning Kruger...
wrote:
is. What we have here is another example of Dunning Kruger...
Bud
Jan 26, 2023, 2:43:47 PM1/26/23
to
>What we have here is another example of Dunning Kruger...
Ben Holmes
Jan 31, 2023, 9:27:46 AM1/31/23
to
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:37:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
(Notice folks, that Chickenshit can't tell the difference between real
courts and made for TV courts. Neither could Von Penis.)
>> Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
>
> You ...
No, we're examining *YOUR* kooky ideas... as well as the nut-case Von
Penis.
>>>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>>>
>>> No, you can`t.
>>>
>>>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>>>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>>>
>>>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>>>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
>>
>> Did I predict it or what???
>>
>> Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
And AGAIN Chickenshit runs...
wrote:
>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>>>
>>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>>>
>>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
>>
>> Real court? Fake court?
>
> Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
So tell us moron, how many courts cite precedent from Judge Judy?
>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>>>
>>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>>>
>>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
>>
>> Real court? Fake court?
>
> Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
(Notice folks, that Chickenshit can't tell the difference between real
courts and made for TV courts. Neither could Von Penis.)
>> Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
>
No, we're examining *YOUR* kooky ideas... as well as the nut-case Von
Penis.
>>>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>>>
>>> No, you can`t.
>>>
>>>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>>>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>>>
>>>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>>>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
>>
>> Did I predict it or what???
>>
>> Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
Ben Holmes
Jan 31, 2023, 9:28:18 AM1/31/23
to
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:43:46 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Did Judge Burton go to law school?
>>What we have here is another example of Dunning Kruger...
>
> I don`t think...
That's the basic problem.
>>What we have here is another example of Dunning Kruger...
>
That's the basic problem.
David Von Pein
Feb 1, 2023, 5:30:38 PM2/1/23
to
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:28:18 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucius_Desha_Bunton_III
But just pretend Judge Bunton didn't know what the hell he was doing in 1986 at the Oswald mock trial.
"The admissibility of CE 399 (along with other items of evidence) was, indeed, dealt with in London by Judge Lucius Bunton at a pre-trial evidentiary hearing, and Bunton, a sitting federal judge in Texas at the time, ruled in my favor that CE 399 (not the actual bullet, of course, which we did not have in London) was admissible at the London trial." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Letter to DVP; August 22, 2009
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/vince-bugliosi-on-ce399.html
> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucius_Desha_Bunton_III
But just pretend Judge Bunton didn't know what the hell he was doing in 1986 at the Oswald mock trial.
"The admissibility of CE 399 (along with other items of evidence) was, indeed, dealt with in London by Judge Lucius Bunton at a pre-trial evidentiary hearing, and Bunton, a sitting federal judge in Texas at the time, ruled in my favor that CE 399 (not the actual bullet, of course, which we did not have in London) was admissible at the London trial." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Letter to DVP; August 22, 2009
http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/vince-bugliosi-on-ce399.html
Bud
Feb 1, 2023, 5:40:10 PM2/1/23
to
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:27:46 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:37:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> >>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> >>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
> >>>
> >>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
> >>
> >> Real court? Fake court?
> >
> > Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
> So tell us moron, how many courts cite precedent from Judge Judy?
She also has a real law degree. Where`s yours?
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:37:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
> >>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
> >>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
> >>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
> >>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
> >>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
> >>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
> >>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
> >>>
> >>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
> >>
> >> Real court? Fake court?
> >
> > Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
> So tell us moron, how many courts cite precedent from Judge Judy?
> (Notice folks, that Chickenshit can't tell the difference between real
> courts and made for TV courts. Neither could Von Penis.)
> >> Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
> >
> > You ...
>
>
> No, we're examining *YOUR* kooky ideas... as well as the nut-case Von
> Penis.
"You are stupid enough to think your Dunning-Kruger opinions are worth more than an actual judge`s."
> >>>> You can't make these things up, folks!
> >>>
> >>> No, you can`t.
> >>>
> >>>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
> >>>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
> >>>>
> >>>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
> >>>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
> >>
> >> Did I predict it or what???
> >>
> >> Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
> And AGAIN Chickenshit runs...
Ben Holmes
Feb 1, 2023, 5:58:18 PM2/1/23
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:30:37 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:28:18 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
>
> His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as
> a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:28:18 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
>
> His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as
> a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
\
David Von Pein
Feb 1, 2023, 6:08:31 PM2/1/23
to
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
What "claim" would that be?
> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
Bud
Feb 1, 2023, 6:10:02 PM2/1/23
to
Idiots with no expertise have been making empty claims about chain of possession in this forum for years, but these same idiots sneer at the opinions of an actual expert.
Dunning-Kroger much?
>
> \
Ben Holmes
Feb 1, 2023, 6:15:39 PM2/1/23
to
lurkers.
If you stop snipping the proof of your illiteracy, perhaps you could
figure it out.
David Von Pein
Feb 1, 2023, 6:19:01 PM2/1/23
to
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
Bud got Bunton's name wrong earlier, yes. I know that. But my first post today was in response to your (Ben Holmes') quote, in which you asked: "Did Judge Burton go to law school?"
> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
You seem to be implying there that the judge who presided at the 1986 mock Oswald trial just might not have gone to law school at all. Is that what you believe, Ben?
Ben Holmes
Feb 1, 2023, 6:24:24 PM2/1/23
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:18:59 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
>
>Bud got Bunton's name wrong earlier, yes. I know that.
THEN TELL US WHY, MORON, YOU RESPONDED TO MY POST?
<davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
>
>Bud got Bunton's name wrong earlier, yes. I know that.
> You seem to be implying there that the judge who presided at the
> 1986 mock Oswald trial just might not have gone to law school at all.
> Is that what you believe, Ben?
Ben Holmes
Feb 1, 2023, 6:26:03 PM2/1/23
to
Message has been deleted
David Von Pein
Feb 1, 2023, 6:38:42 PM2/1/23
to
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> THEN TELL US WHY, MORON, YOU RESPONDED TO MY POST?
Because it was you (not Bud) who said this ---- "Did Judge Burton go to law school?"
> THEN TELL US WHY, MORON, YOU RESPONDED TO MY POST?
Bud
Feb 1, 2023, 6:41:42 PM2/1/23
to
Ben Holmes
Feb 1, 2023, 6:48:48 PM2/1/23
to
Ben Holmes
Mar 8, 2023, 9:04:03 AM3/8/23
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:41:41 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
You need to address your complaints to Von Penis.
wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:18:59 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
>>>
>>>Bud got Bunton's name wrong earlier, yes. I know that.
>> THEN TELL US WHY, MORON, YOU RESPONDED TO MY POST?
>>> You seem to be implying there that the judge who presided at the
>>> 1986 mock Oswald trial just might not have gone to law school at all.
>>> Is that what you believe, Ben?
>> Stop molesting Chickenshit's mother... it's not nice.
Logical fallacy deleted.
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 6:24:24 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:18:59 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
>>>
>>>Bud got Bunton's name wrong earlier, yes. I know that.
>> THEN TELL US WHY, MORON, YOU RESPONDED TO MY POST?
>>> You seem to be implying there that the judge who presided at the
>>> 1986 mock Oswald trial just might not have gone to law school at all.
>>> Is that what you believe, Ben?
>> Stop molesting Chickenshit's mother... it's not nice.
You need to address your complaints to Von Penis.
Ben Holmes
Mar 8, 2023, 9:04:03 AM3/8/23
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:40:09 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> (Notice folks, that Chickenshit can't tell the difference between real
>> courts and made for TV courts. Neither could Von Penis.)
>>
>>>>>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you can`t.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>>>>>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>>>>>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
>>>>
>>>> Did I predict it or what???
>>>>
>>>> Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
>>
>> And AGAIN Chickenshit runs...
And AGAIN Chickenshit runs...
wrote:
>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:27:46 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:37:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>>>>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>>>>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>>>>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>>>>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>>>>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>>>>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>>>>>
>>>>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
>>>>
>>>> Real court? Fake court?
>>>
>>> Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
>>
>> So tell us moron, how many courts cite precedent from Judge Judy?
>
> She also has a real law degree. Where`s yours?
Couldn't answer. You lose!
>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:27:46 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:37:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 6:13:58 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:37:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:29:00 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT), David Von Pein
>>>>>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I like to occasionally point out the fact that the "stretcher
>>>>>>>bullet" (CE399) WAS admitted as evidence at the television Doco-Trial
>>>>>>>in London ("ON TRIAL: LEE HARVEY OSWALD"), which is something that
>>>>>>>almost all conspiracists think would be impossible to get admitted
>>>>>>>into evidence at a "real" trial. But Judge Bunton allowed CE399 to be
>>>>>>>talked about at various stages of the Mock Trial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here we see a moron using, as evidence that a real trial would accept
>>>>>> specific evidence, a fake "done for TV" trial.
>>>>>
>>>>> So an actual judge`s opinion...
>>>>
>>>> Real court? Fake court?
>>>
>>> Real law school degree. Where`s yours?
>>
>> So tell us moron, how many courts cite precedent from Judge Judy?
>
> She also has a real law degree. Where`s yours?
>> (Notice folks, that Chickenshit can't tell the difference between real
>> courts and made for TV courts. Neither could Von Penis.)
>>
>>>> Clearly, you're as stupid as Von Penis is.
>>>
>>> You ...
>>
>>
>> No, we're examining *YOUR* kooky ideas... as well as the nut-case Von
>> Penis.
Logical fallacy deleted.
>>>
>>> You ...
>>
>>
>> No, we're examining *YOUR* kooky ideas... as well as the nut-case Von
>> Penis.
>>>>>> You can't make these things up, folks!
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you can`t.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Watch...as not a *SINGLE* believer trying to defend Von Penis, will
>>>>>> offer a chain of custody for CE399.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or acknowledge the ballistic and medical testimony AGAINST CE399 being
>>>>>> the bullet in the so-called "SBT"
>>>>
>>>> Did I predict it or what???
>>>>
>>>> Cowards are SOOOOO easy to predict!
>>
>> And AGAIN Chickenshit runs...
Ben Holmes
Mar 8, 2023, 9:05:56 AM3/8/23
to
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:10:01 -0800 (PST), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:30:37 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:28:18 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
>>>
>>> His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as
>>> a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
>>
>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
Logical fallacy deleted.
wrote:
>On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 5:58:18 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:30:37 -0800 (PST), David Von Pein
>> <davev...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 9:28:18 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> Did Judge Burton [sic] go to law school?
>>>
>>> His name is Judge BUNTON, not Burton. And he served for 22 years as
>>> a U.S. District Court Judge in the state of Texas:
>>
>> Why are you responding to me? This was Chickenshit's claim.
0 new messages