~~ Supposed "LBOH wound witness" Dr Clark's WC testimony ~~
eca...@tx.rr.com
AK OFFERS AS A LBOH WOUND WITNESS:
"6). Dr. Clark: Head wound was "LARGE, gaping loss
of tissue" located at the "BACK OF HIS HEAD...
principally on his right side."
Yet here's Clark's testimony under oath which is
dramatically different:
----- ON: -----
Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe the President's
condition to be on your arrival there?
Dr. CLARK. The President was lying on his back on
the emergency cart. (6 H 20)
Mr. SPECTER: Now, you described the massive wound
at the top of the President's head, with the brain
protruding; did you observe any other hole or
wound on the President's head?
Dr. CLARK. No, sir; I did not.
Mr. SPECTER: Did you observe, to make my question
very specific, a bullet hole or what appeared to
be a bullet hole in the posterior scalp, approximately
2.5 cm. laterally to the right, slightly above the
external occipital protuberant, measuring 15 by 6 mm.
Dr. CLARK. No, sir; I did not. This could easily
have been hidden in the blood and hair.
Mr. SPECTER: Did you observe any bullet wounds or any
other wound on the back side of the President?
Dr. CLARK. No, sir; I did not.
----- OFF -----
As for Aguilar's other LBOH wound witnesses the closer
you look, the more they come unraveled.. Clint Hill's
account has been widely misused even after he came out
in National Geographic and clarified his position
which overly enthusiastic CTers had cranked up several
notches. Hill explained the gaping wound was indeed
over the right ear.
NOW COMETH ONE EACH Saundra K. Spencer. With all due
respect, she is not taken any more seriously than I
would be if I said I had pictures of Oswald on the 6F
doing the actual shooting but they.. ( gULp ) are now
"missing."
(Shades of Travis Linn, Roger Craig, Ron Jenkins.)
Yeah, right. Oh yeah and Gordon Arnold's wants equal
time.. It seems his camera footage is also "missing."
Stolen by a guy with "a gun that looked this big."
HOWEVER my guess is just about all of the Parkland
Hospital (PH) witnesses meant well.. But virtually all
of there recollections have been used to deceive naive
newcomers and even pretty sharp new researchers.. The
later of these two minuscule factions catch on in
short order but those with their handy predetermined
"Oswald was innocent" agenda seldom get it.
There was no LBOH wound.
Here's what the PH people saw and why they were
mistaken for many years.. (Most have recanted after
seeing all the photographic proof btw):
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/480a57a2052cdd7a
Ed Cage
1148Sep1907