info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 16
20 views
Skip to first unread message
Gil Jesus
Oct 26, 2023, 4:36:38 AM10/26/23
to
There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable"
one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
QUESTION # 16: Were the bullet fragments found in the limousine photographed in their positions in the limousine as found ?
one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
QUESTION # 16: Were the bullet fragments found in the limousine photographed in their positions in the limousine as found ?
John Corbett
Oct 26, 2023, 8:03:53 AM10/26/23
to
ago is because you keep focusing on stupid shit like this.
Ben Holmes
Oct 26, 2023, 9:18:36 AM10/26/23
to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:03:52 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
RAN AGAIN!!! LIKE THE COWARD CORBUTT IS!
The answer, of course, is no. And Corbutt isn't honest enough to give
it.
Or explain why he's afraid of these facts...
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
The answer, of course, is no. And Corbutt isn't honest enough to give
it.
Or explain why he's afraid of these facts...
Bud
Oct 26, 2023, 5:59:08 PM10/26/23
to
On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 4:36:38 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:26 AM10/27/23
to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
0 new messages