Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Cowardice Extreme!

18 views
Skip to first unread message

Ben Holmes

unread,
Feb 20, 2024, 1:03:54 PMFeb 20
to
For years, believers have tried to claim that nothing happened at
Bethesda prior to the 8pm start of the autopsy - yet they quite
desperately REFUSE to address the evidence showing that JFK's body
arrived much earlier than they can explain.

Believers know the silliness of trying to explain that JFK's body
simply laid there for an hour or more without anyone doing anything,
so they're forced to demonstrate their cowardice in facing the
evidence for the time of arrival of JFK's body.

And thus, evidence for a pre-autopsy autopsy.

Wounds were enlarged, the brain was removed, and quite certainly
bullet(s) were removed. But until believers can admit the evidence
showing the EARLY arrival of JFK, (indeed, *MULTIPLE* "arrivals!"),
they will simply continue to show that they don't believe the
evidence.

Watch folks, as not a *SINGLE* believer will respond listing the
evidence, ALL the evidence, for when JFK's body arrived at Bethesda.

I've predicted it - and I'll be proven correct yet again...

Hank Sienzant

unread,
Feb 20, 2024, 1:33:27 PMFeb 20
to
On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 1:03:54 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> For years, believers have tried to claim that nothing happened at
> Bethesda prior to the 8pm start of the autopsy - yet they quite
> desperately REFUSE to address the evidence showing that JFK's body
> arrived much earlier than they can explain.

What evidence? Post it here.


>
> Believers know the silliness of trying to explain that JFK's body
> simply laid there for an hour or more without anyone doing anything,
> so they're forced to demonstrate their cowardice in facing the
> evidence for the time of arrival of JFK's body.

What evidence? Post it here.


>
> And thus, evidence for a pre-autopsy autopsy.
>
> Wounds were enlarged, the brain was removed, and quite certainly
> bullet(s) were removed. But until believers can admit the evidence
> showing the EARLY arrival of JFK, (indeed, *MULTIPLE* "arrivals!"),
> they will simply continue to show that they don't believe the
> evidence.
>

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

So far, you’ve posted claims, but no evidence.


> Watch folks, as not a *SINGLE* believer will respond listing the
> evidence, ALL the evidence, for when JFK's body arrived at Bethesda.
>
> I've predicted it - and I'll be proven correct yet again...

There you go again!

Shifting the burden. We don't have any obligation to disprove your assertions. You need to post the evidence and stop making grand pronouncements you have no intention of supporting.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Feb 20, 2024, 2:27:15 PMFeb 20
to
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:33:26 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<hsie...@aol.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 1:03:54?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> For years, believers have tried to claim that nothing happened at
>> Bethesda prior to the 8pm start of the autopsy - yet they quite
>> desperately REFUSE to address the evidence showing that JFK's body
>> arrived much earlier than they can explain.
>
>What evidence? Post it here...

Simple denial won't work. The evidence has ALREADY been posted,
you've ONCE AGAIN proven yourself a coward.

But we already *KNOW* you're a coward:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?
0 new messages