More McAdams Motives

[John McAdams]

In article <4p8q2e$3...@news.telebyte.net> wpa...@kendaco.telebyte.net writes:
>> cnj...@amoco.com (Cecil N. Jones) writes:
>> In article n...@news.telebyte.net, wpa...@kendaco.telebyte.net writes:
>>
>> Easy to see why McAdams is an arrogant asshole ...
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>I meant to say "easy to see why McAdams is perceived as an arrogant
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>asshole...". Perhaps he
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>is really just a sweet guy just doing a dirty job which makes him
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>APPEAR to be an asshole!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Responding in kind only fans the flames.
>
>"Fanning the flames in THIS newsgroup would be a little like bringing your Bic lighter during a
>visit to the surface of the sun...
>
>> That's how this whole thing got started.
>>
>> Once it starts it doesn't matter who started it.
>>
>> If it's OK for you to call someone "an arrogant asshole",
>> why is it not OK for that someone to use similiar
>> language in reference to you?
>
>Who said it was not? It is fine with me, if I behave in an arrogant
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>anal sphincter-like manner, that
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>someone should point this out to me in plain language. I might even
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>consider my actions and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>change my behavior. Do you think McAdams ever will? Would "arrogant
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>know-nothing jerk" be
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>more acceptable to you as a description of McAdams?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> Exercise self-discipline. Just skip over those kinds of
>> posts from McAdams; most of them are evident from the
>> subject line.
>
>I usually do.
>
>But every now and then I choose to repsond in kind to McAdams. He
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>deserves it and needs it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Besides, I only insult him about once for every 20 or 30 (sometimes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>its closer to 100, he's hard
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>to keep up with) of his arrogant, insulting, supercilious,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>psuedo-cybercop, bandwith-wasting "I'm
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>a Professor and you're an ignorant buff" posts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>I've posted many substantive posts, but McAdams never responds or
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>reposts THEM. He is only
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>here to disrupt. The only thing I've ever seen him add to the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>group discussion is a series of
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^".
>
>Please repost frequently, .john
>

Happy to, Bill!

You keep repeating that I am "here to disrupt," and then leave a long
stream of insults. So I "disrupt" the group by reposting your insults.

Guess what would happen if you and the other buffs didn't leaving any
insulting posts? I would have any to repost.

What would be wrong with that?

>Bill Parker
>
>P.S. How's your censored newsgroup going? Last time I checked the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>stats on AOL, there were
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>over 500 posts to the real, uncensored group, and only about 50 in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
yours! (Posted by you and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>your co-censor Mr. "I refuse to deny that I was an FBI snitch,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>just because such was stated in
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>William Turner's book 'Hoover's FBI'" Harris?) Guess people aren't
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>as stupid as you thought, eh?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

More *excellent* repost material from Parker.

Don't these buffs leave such informative and edifying posts?

.John

[Keven S. Caddeo]

John McAdams wrote:
>
> Happy to, Bill!
>
> You keep repeating that I am "here to disrupt," and then leave a long
> stream of insults. So I "disrupt" the group by reposting your insults.

nothing to do with each other,
you are here to destroy the NG,
and thus, you get flamed.

you even admitted it yourself.

QUOTE ON

> But you have Bill. You buffs have been cooperating marvelously with my
> scheme to make this group a shambles.
>
> And you know the bizzare part? My scheme is not a secret. I have
> publicly announced it. I have made it perfectly obvious. I have rubbed
> you buffs' noses in it.
>
> It's blatantly obviously to everybody.
>
> .John

QUOTE OFF

>
> Guess what would happen if you and the other buffs didn't leaving any
> insulting posts? I would have any to repost.
>
> What would be wrong with that?

nothing,
except that, that doesn't work,
you and your cronies accuse people of being pedophiles
and expect others not to respond to such filth.
but the reaction is exactly what you want to elicit.
it's the whole point.
to get repost material (of the response ONLY)
to further you agenda to destroy the NG

--
Spam E-mail Will Be met with a gratefull reply of:
10,000 to 1 for first time offenders,
1,000,000 to one for second time offenders,
and total shutdown for third time offenders.
As I believe in the joy of giving, more than the joy of receiving,
Spammers take notice. ;-)

Keven S. Caddeo,
THE JFK ASSASSINATION PAGE,
HTTP://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/4523