Lying The Mark Lane Way # 3 (RTJ Film)

[timstter]

Hi All,

Say, according to this video interview by Mark Lane, Charles Brehm was
never called before the Warren Commission to testify:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YcPzPt8XcM

All well and good, but what Lane FAILS to tell the viewer is that
Brehm's DPD interview DID appear in the Warren Commission volumes.
Here it is, right here, right hand side of page:

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0434a.htm

Continues here, left hand side of page:

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol22_0434b.htm

Lane is simply LYING BY OMISSION in this footage, pretending that the
Warren Commission TOTALLY ignored Brehm and what he had to say. That
is not the case at all!

In fact, the guy who TOTALLY IGNORED what Brehm had to say was MARK
LANE! Brehm said the shots came from the general direction of the
TSBD, not the Grassy Knoll, and took UMBRAGE with the way Lane had
quoted him in a later interview for CBS!

Lane is a TOTAL research FRAUD, in my view. No wonder the KGB assisted
in funding his <snicker> *research* (if we could dignify it with such
a name...).

Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

[timstter]

On May 26, 9:27 am, timstter <timst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>

> Say, according to this video interview byMarkLane, Charles Brehm was

> never called before the Warren Commission to testify:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YcPzPt8XcM
>

> All well and good, but whatLaneFAILS to tell the viewer is that

> Brehm's DPD interview DID appear in the Warren Commission volumes.
> Here it is, right here, right hand side of page:
>

> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...

>
> Continues here, left hand side of page:
>

> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...
>
> Laneis simplyLYINGBY OMISSION in this footage, pretending that the

> Warren Commission TOTALLY ignored Brehm and what he had to say. That
> is not the case at all!
>

> In fact, the guy who TOTALLY IGNORED what Brehm had to say wasMARKLANE! Brehm said the shots came from the general direction of the

> TSBD, not the Grassy Knoll, and took UMBRAGE with thewayLanehad
> quoted him in a later interview for CBS!
>

> Laneis a TOTAL research FRAUD, in my view. No wonder the KGB assisted

> in funding his <snicker> *research* (if we could dignify it with such
> a name...).
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

BUMP! YOO HOO! HOLMES!

I thought you said you dealt with this lie by Lane, Benny.

I sure as Hell don't see your reply, Holmes.

Informative Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm