Who is Gary Puffer?

[aeffects]

Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.

http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?_encoding=UTF8&asin=0393045250&cdForum=FxVMQ58Y9WOJZ4&cdPage=2&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx3L36ZL9W89MBT&newContentID=Mx3ISWFLHQ7QYD7&store=books#Mx3ISWFLHQ7QYD7

[Ben Holmes]

In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...

>
>Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
>link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
>http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?_encoding=UTF8&asin=0393045250&cdForum=FxVMQ58Y9WOJZ4&cdPage=2&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx3L36ZL9W89MBT&newContentID=Mx3ISWFLHQ7QYD7&store=books#Mx3ISWFLHQ7QYD7

Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers who are
*reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com

[Sam McClung]

von plainochio?

or is it von playin'ochio?

oder von die anderer side of the trax? neben muckochio?

[Sam McClung]

so someone took a speed reading course and became so fast they could read
books before they author even came up with the idea for the book?

someone needs to lay off the wheaties in the morning

[timstter]

On Oct 19, 4:42 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>

> http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?...

Gary Puffer? Isn't he the guy who said:

QUOTE ON:

The Warren Commission Report is nearly 900 pages accompanied by 26
volumes of testimony and evidence (but no index).

QUOTE OFF

How, then, does Puffer explain THIS?:

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0452b.htm

Let's not forget all the OTHER ones DVP located for Puffer, eh, Dave/
Ringo?

Case CLOSED on the IDIOCY of Puffer, Dave/Ringo!!

What kind of IDIOT would claim that the WCR didn't have an index, Dave/
Ringo?!!

Do you know anyone ELSE who would be SO STUPID as to claim THAT?!!!

Concerned Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!




The Warren Commission Report is nearly 900 pages accompanied by 26
volumes of testimony and evidence (but no index).

[aeffects]

On Friday, October 19, 2012 4:31:23 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
> On Oct 19, 4:42 am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> >
>
> > http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?...
>
>
>
> Gary Puffer? Isn't he the guy who said:
>
>
>
> QUOTE ON:
>
>
>
> The Warren Commission Report is nearly 900 pages accompanied by 26
>
> volumes of testimony and evidence (but no index).

focus Fatboy... the debate (actually there's no debate) isn't about pages in a book, it's about the CONTENT (and lack thereof) in the book. Ya have to tighten up there Fatboy, you're gettin' your priorities confused as to why you're here.

Of course its about why DVP keeps getting his, Bugliosi's and the WCReports ass kicked here....

Get with the program Fatboy! For those trying to understand what this dipso Tim Brennan (aka: timstter, Tim Shell failed standup comic) go here:

http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html

Take 5 minutes, our buddy timstter-troll reeks of stuff!

[Ben Holmes]

In article <78735611-7205-473d...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...

>
>On Friday, October 19, 2012 4:31:23 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:

>> On Oct 19, 4:42=A0am, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the =

>link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>> >

>> > http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir?=

>...
>> Gary Puffer? Isn't he the guy who said:
>>
>> QUOTE ON:
>> The Warren Commission Report is nearly 900 pages accompanied by 26
>> volumes of testimony and evidence (but no index).

Yep... this is factually true. The kooks keep trying to assert otherwise, but
they're lying.


>focus Fatboy... the debate (actually there's no debate) isn't about pages i=
>n a book, it's about the CONTENT (and lack thereof) in the book. Ya have to=
> tighten up there Fatboy, you're gettin' your priorities confused as to why=

> you're here.
>
> Of course its about why DVP keeps getting his, Bugliosi's and the WCReports
> ass kicked here....
>

>Get with the program Fatboy! For those trying to understand what this dipso=

> Tim Brennan (aka: timstter, Tim Shell failed standup comic) go here:
>
>http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
>
>Take 5 minutes, our buddy timstter-troll reeks of stuff!
>
>> QUOTE OFF
>>
>> How, then, does Puffer explain THIS?:
>>
>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0452b.htm

He would probably point out that you're lying. Let's look again at the original
assertion: "The Warren Commission Report is nearly 900 pages accompanied by 26

volumes of testimony and evidence (but no index)."

Now, the index you just cited is for the WCR itself, but completely fails to
report any information whatsoever for the 26 volumes.

Only a moron or a liar would make such a mistake... so the natural presumption
(using history as our guide) is that once again, you're lying in an attempt to
snooker people who don't take the time to fact-check you.

>> Let's not forget all the OTHER ones DVP located for Puffer, eh, Dave/
>> Ringo?
>>
>> Case CLOSED on the IDIOCY of Puffer, Dave/Ringo!!
>>
>> What kind of IDIOT would claim that the WCR didn't have an index, Dave/
>> Ringo?!!

What moron would twist the assertion into something it never said?

>> Do you know anyone ELSE who would be SO STUPID as to claim THAT?!!!

Anyone interested in the factual truth... (that is, the *original* assertion,
not what you lied about...)

[David Von Pein]

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/10/reclaiming-history-talk.html

And, as Kook Holmes no doubt already knows, I pointed out to Puffer in
the article above, there are multiple "indexes" that tell the reader
exactly where to go in the 26 volumes to get the information they need
(either within the WCR itself or in Volume 15).

You need to know where to look for these indexes, that's true, but
once you know where they are, then it's a snap to access them at any
time in the future, particularly nowadays when every page of this
material is available on the Internet:

There's a "Witness" index (or "list", as it's called in the WCR on
Page 483), for the 552 witnesses who gave testimony in front of the WC
or its counsel:
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0254a.htm

And the Witness List linked above also tells the reader at a glance
whether the witness appeared before a Commission member or gave a
deposition to merely a WC counsel member or whether the witness made
just a statement ("S") or gave an affidavit ("A"), which is an extra
layer of detail that has likely been ignored by most conspiracy
theorists, with this extra layer of detail just being one example
(among many) of the kind of extreme attention to detail that does
indeed exist within the Warren Report.

There's also an "Exhibits" index (in Volume 15):
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0406a.htm

The above "Exhibits" index only goes up to CE1053, and that's because
it's an index that provides information as to what volume number and
page number to go to in order to find out when a particular exhibit
was first introduced into evidence with a witness on the stand. The
other 2,000 "CE" exhibits are not listed in that index, and that index
doesn't actually tell the reader where to go in the volumes to locate
a picture of the exhibit itself. But, of course, even a second-grader
who knows anything about the general structure of the WC volumes would
have no difficulty in locating photos of all the Commission exhibits
themselves -- just go to Volumes 16-26.

And there is an overall "Names" index (also in Volume 15):
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0382a.htm

And, as I also pointed out previously, the Table of Contents at the
front of the 888-page WCR is a very useful "index"-like tool unto
itself, with a detailed breakdown of subject matter. This "Table of
Contents" is, in effect, an index of "Subjects":

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0009a.htm

But apparently all of the above stuff isn't nearly enough for the
conspiracy theorists. They need still more indexes to figure anything
out -- like Sylvia Meagher's two "Master Indexes":

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0810813319?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0810813319&linkCode=xm2&tag=dvsre-20

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0045VT6SC?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativeASIN=B0045VT6SC&linkCode=xm2&tag=dvsre-20

[timstter]

On Oct 19, 1:52 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
> says...
>
>
>
> >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
> >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>

> >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?...

>
> Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers who are
> *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ben Holmes
> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com

LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.

Say, didn't YOU claim the WCR has no index too, Benny?

Puffer appears uninformed; YOU simply appear to have decided to LIE
with IMPUNITY just like your hero Mark Lane, Holmes.

Informative Regards,

[aeffects]

On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
> On Oct 19, 1:52 pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
>
> > says...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
>
> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> >
>
> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detup_redir?...
>
> >
>
> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers who are
>
> > *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Ben Holmes
>
> > Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com
>
>
>
> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.
>
>
>
> Say, didn't YOU claim the WCR has no index too, Benny?
>
>
>
> Puffer appears uninformed; YOU simply appear to have decided to LIE
>
> with IMPUNITY just like your hero Mark Lane, Holmes.

you getting a woody, again, Fatboy? Or are you just grateful for the attention?

>
>
> Informative Regards,
>
>
>
> Tim Brennan
>
> Fresno, Botswana
>
> *Newsgroup(s) Primo Suck-ass*
>
...

[Ben Holmes]

In article <53993953-5dcb-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
says...

>
>On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:

>> On Oct 19, 1:52=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aef=

>fects
>> > says...
>> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
>> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>>

>> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir=

>?...
>> >
>> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers
>> > who are *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>>

>> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.

Truth bother you? Name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that DVP has ceased championing
after being corrected...

>> Say, didn't YOU claim the WCR has no index too, Benny?

You're lying again...

You can't produce any such statement by me, and you'll refuse to retract your
lie.


>> Puffer appears uninformed;


Then have the guts to point out where, with citations.

But you won't.

>> YOU simply appear to have decided to LIE
>> with IMPUNITY just like your hero Mark Lane, Holmes.

And yet, strangely enough, you can't quote any such lie, along with the citation
that it contradicts... why is that, kook?

>you getting a woody, again, Fatboy? Or are you just grateful for the attention?

It's the attention, I suspect. He probably doesn't get it in his personal life.

[Bud]

On Oct 20, 11:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <53993953-5dcb-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
> says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
> >> On Oct 19, 1:52=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> >> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aef=
> >fects
> >> > says...
> >> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
> >> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> >> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir=
> >?...
>
> >> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers
> >> > who are *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> >> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.
>
> Truth bother you? Name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that DVP has ceased championing
> after being corrected...

<snicker> You should try applying that to yourself, retard.

[aeffects]

On Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:13:57 AM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
> On Oct 20, 11:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <53993953-5dcb-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
>
> > says...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
>
> > >> On Oct 19, 1:52=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aef=
>
> > >fects
>
> > >> > says...
>
> > >> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
>
> > >> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> >
>
> > >> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir=
>
> > >?...
>
> >
>
> > >> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers
>
> > >> > who are *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> >
>
> > >> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.
>
> >
>
> > Truth bother you? Name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that DVP has ceased championing
>
> > after being corrected...
>
>
>
> <snicker> You should try applying that to yourself, retard.

ahhhh dud-dufus, go ahead admit it, even YOU can't defend the non-defendable, the one, thee only, the KFC kid (that super .john composite, the non-existing, David Von Pein) <snicker..... lmfao!>

[Bud]

On Oct 20, 3:30 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:13:57 AM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 11:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> > > In article <53993953-5dcb-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
>
> > > says...
>
> > > >On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
>
> > > >> On Oct 19, 1:52=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> > > >> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aef=
>
> > > >fects
>
> > > >> > says...
>
> > > >> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
>
> > > >> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> > > >> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir=
>
> > > >?...
>
> > > >> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers
>
> > > >> > who are *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> > > >> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.
>
> > > Truth bother you? Name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that DVP has ceased championing
>
> > > after being corrected...
>
> >   <snicker> You should try applying that to yourself, retard.
>
> ahhhh dud-dufus, go ahead admit it, even YOU can't defend the non-defendable, the one, thee only, the KFC kid (that super .john composite, the non-existing, David Von Pein) <snicker..... lmfao!>

Were you able to purchase any drugs from master J?

[aeffects]

On Oct 19, 3:46 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/10/reclaiming-history-talk.html
>
> And, as Kook Holmes no doubt already knows, I pointed out to Puffer in
> the article above, there are multiple "indexes" that tell the reader
> exactly where to go in the 26 volumes to get the information they need
> (either within the WCR itself or in Volume 15).
>
> You need to know where to look for these indexes, that's true, but
> once you know where they are, then it's a snap to access them at any
> time in the future, particularly nowadays when every page of this
> material is available on the Internet:
>
> There's a "Witness" index (or "list", as it's called in the WCR on
> Page 483), for the 552 witnesses who gave testimony in front of the WC
> or its counsel:http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0254a.htm
>
> And the Witness List linked above also tells the reader at a glance
> whether the witness appeared before a Commission member or gave a
> deposition to merely a WC counsel member or whether the witness made
> just a statement ("S") or gave an affidavit ("A"), which is an extra
> layer of detail that has likely been ignored by most conspiracy
> theorists, with this extra layer of detail just being one example
> (among many) of the kind of extreme attention to detail that does
> indeed exist within the Warren Report.
>

> There's also an "Exhibits" index (in Volume 15):http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0...

>
> The above "Exhibits" index only goes up to CE1053, and that's because
> it's an index that provides information as to what volume number and
> page number to go to in order to find out when a particular exhibit
> was first introduced into evidence with a witness on the stand. The
> other 2,000 "CE" exhibits are not listed in that index, and that index
> doesn't actually tell the reader where to go in the volumes to locate
> a picture of the exhibit itself. But, of course, even a second-grader
> who knows anything about the general structure of the WC volumes would
> have no difficulty in locating photos of all the Commission exhibits
> themselves -- just go to Volumes 16-26.
>

> And there is an overall "Names" index (also in Volume 15):http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0...

>
> And, as I also pointed out previously, the Table of Contents at the
> front of the 888-page WCR is a very useful "index"-like tool unto
> itself, with a detailed breakdown of subject matter. This "Table of
> Contents" is, in effect, an index of "Subjects":
>
> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0009a.htm
>
> But apparently all of the above stuff isn't nearly enough for the
> conspiracy theorists. They need still more indexes to figure anything
> out -- like Sylvia Meagher's two "Master Indexes":
>

> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0810813319?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativ...
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0045VT6SC?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creativ...

is it possible you, YOU David Von Pein can stumble overyour own dick?
You can't even dance, an embarrassment to the lone nut cause... you;re
told old for this stuff Peinski.... Puffer kicked you and your 35 JFK
websites-15 JFK related blogs, 100,000 USENET posting sorry ass!

[Sam McClung]

he is the protagonist in walking tall part 3,
where beuford puffer kicks hacker, cracker, and plagiarist booty big time!

recall in episodes 1 and 2 where buford was kickin suthern redneck booty
what needed kickin

buford is back, a member of mouse and keyboard

some would even call him a ct

[timstter]

On Oct 21, 2:04 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
> In article <53993953-5dcb-4d3e...@googlegroups.com>, aeffects
> says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Saturday, October 20, 2012 12:31:13 AM UTC-7, timstter wrote:
> >> On Oct 19, 1:52=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>
> >> > In article <fba80555-b925-4ccb...@googlegroups.com>, aef=
> >fects
> >> > says...
> >> > >Another guy who turned Bugliosi's Reclaiming history into dust. In the
> >> > >link-thread below, he educates Von Pein & company.
>
> >> > >http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=3Dcm_cr_rev_detup_redir=
> >?...
>
> >> > Au contraire... you can't "educate" DVP... you can only educate readers
> >> > who are *reading* what DVP claims, and others refute.
>
> >> LOL! Oh sure thing, Benny.
>
> Truth bother you? Name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that DVP has ceased championing
> after being corrected...
>

I think it might be better to name *ONE SINGLE FACTOID* that Benny
Holmes has ceased championing after being corrected, Yellow Pants.

> >> Say, didn't YOU claim the WCR has no index too, Benny?
>
> You're lying again...
>

I'm lying again am I, Benny? So you DIDN'T author THIS?:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/bc4e8cd0391a8d10

> You can't produce any such statement by me, and you'll refuse to retract your
> lie.
>

Yes I can produce such a statement by YOU, Holmes. You said in the
above post the following:

QUOTE ON:

It's long been simply an historical FACT that the WCR didn't contain
an index to it's contents. One of Sylvia Meagher's great
accomplishments was to create one.

QUOTE OFF

I can't retract a lie I never told in the first place, Holmes. Time
you retracted YOUR lies Benny!

> >> Puffer appears uninformed;
>
> Then have the guts to point out where, with citations.
>

Already have. His factoid about the WCR having no index.

> But you won't.
>

Already have. I linked to the start of the index in the WCR. Right
here:

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0452b.htm

> >> YOU simply appear to have decided to LIE
> >> with IMPUNITY just like your hero Mark Lane, Holmes.
>
> And yet, strangely enough, you can't quote any such lie, along with the citation
> that it contradicts... why is that, kook?
>

LOL! You know, Holmes, I've quoted MANY lies told by Mark Lane.
Perhaps you've simply missed them, skulking behind your killfilter or
fielding responses second hand via Healy. The KOOK is YOU, Benny!

<Balance of Dave/Ringo idiocy snipped>

Chomp on another lie by Mark Lane, coming right up, Benny!

[Ben Holmes]

In article <ff260615-9566-4b71...@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>,
aeffects says...

>
>On Oct 19, 3:46=A0pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>> http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/10/reclaiming-history-talk.html
>>
>> And, as Kook Holmes no doubt already knows, I pointed out to Puffer in
>> the article above, there are multiple "indexes" that tell the reader
>> exactly where to go in the 26 volumes to get the information they need
>> (either within the WCR itself or in Volume 15).
>>
>> You need to know where to look for these indexes, that's true, but
>> once you know where they are, then it's a snap to access them at any
>> time in the future, particularly nowadays when every page of this
>> material is available on the Internet:
>>
>> There's a "Witness" index (or "list", as it's called in the WCR on
>> Page 483), for the 552 witnesses who gave testimony in front of the WC

>> or its counsel:http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport=

>_0254a.htm
>>
>> And the Witness List linked above also tells the reader at a glance
>> whether the witness appeared before a Commission member or gave a
>> deposition to merely a WC counsel member or whether the witness made
>> just a statement ("S") or gave an affidavit ("A"), which is an extra
>> layer of detail that has likely been ignored by most conspiracy
>> theorists, with this extra layer of detail just being one example
>> (among many) of the kind of extreme attention to detail that does
>> indeed exist within the Warren Report.
>>

>> There's also an "Exhibits" index (in Volume 15):http://history-matters.co=

>m/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0...
>>
>> The above "Exhibits" index only goes up to CE1053, and that's because
>> it's an index that provides information as to what volume number and
>> page number to go to in order to find out when a particular exhibit
>> was first introduced into evidence with a witness on the stand. The
>> other 2,000 "CE" exhibits are not listed in that index, and that index
>> doesn't actually tell the reader where to go in the volumes to locate
>> a picture of the exhibit itself. But, of course, even a second-grader
>> who knows anything about the general structure of the WC volumes would
>> have no difficulty in locating photos of all the Commission exhibits
>> themselves -- just go to Volumes 16-26.
>>

>> And there is an overall "Names" index (also in Volume 15):http://history-=

>matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh15/html/WC_Vol15_0...
>>
>> And, as I also pointed out previously, the Table of Contents at the
>> front of the 888-page WCR is a very useful "index"-like tool unto
>> itself, with a detailed breakdown of subject matter. This "Table of
>> Contents" is, in effect, an index of "Subjects":
>>
>> http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0009a.htm
>>
>> But apparently all of the above stuff isn't nearly enough for the
>> conspiracy theorists. They need still more indexes to figure anything
>> out -- like Sylvia Meagher's two "Master Indexes":
>>

>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0810813319?ie=3DUTF8&camp=3D1789&creativ=
>...
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0045VT6SC?ie=3DUTF8&camp=3D1789&creativ=

>...
>
>is it possible you, YOU David Von Pein can stumble overyour own dick?
>You can't even dance, an embarrassment to the lone nut cause... you;re
>told old for this stuff Peinski.... Puffer kicked you and your 35 JFK
>websites-15 JFK related blogs, 100,000 USENET posting sorry ass!

DVP can't be honest if his life depended on it.

Embarrassing what McAdams has to work with.

[David Von Pein]

http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0393045250&cdForum=FxVMQ58Y9WOJZ4&cdMsgID=Mx36XI5E8DFOV3S&cdMsgNo=49&cdPage=5&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx3L36ZL9W89MBT&store=books#Mx36XI5E8DFOV3S


BEN HOLMES SAID:

>>> "By setting up the killfilter, I can bypass 90% of the nonsense." <<<


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

And yet you (Ben Holmes) come here (to Amazon.com) to argue
incessantly with a person who you've got killfiled at another forum,
i.e., you're arguing with a person (me) who isn't worthy of your time--
at ANY forum.

Tell us please, oh great Benjamin--why am I worthy of your precious
time and retorts at Amazon.com, but unworthy of your valuable
arguments at the other forum?

What a hypocrite.

>>> "If, of course, this were true, then DVP would be willing to debate the evidence without lying or running away." <<<

But what good would it do YOU -- you've got me "killfiled". So you'll
never see my arguments anyway.

What a hypocrite.

And, of course, Holmes is dead wrong about this anyhow, because I am
constantly citing evidence and testimony, etc. But he'll continue to
pretend that I never once have cited anything.

What a hypocrite.

>>> "As one simple example: Bugliosi stated that Perry & Carrico described the original bullet wound in JFK's throat as "ragged". Yet DVP can't produce a citation that supports that. Nor will he admit that Bugliosi simply lied." <<<

And that's because Bugliosi did not lie. Vince was WRONG regarding the
"ragged" thing. I don't deny that fact (and never have denied it). But
IMO he did not lie. And I fully explained why this is the case in a
lengthy post concerning this matter on July 14, 2011 (below), which
Holmes has seen. But he'll still pretend I have ignored this topic
entirely and/or he'll continue to assert that I have not explained the
matter in anything close to a reasonable or sensible manner. But he'll
continue to be wrong when he makes that assertion.

What a hypocrite.

http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/07/reclaiming-history-errors.html

[David Von Pein]

http://www.amazon.com/review/RZD82270D69E8/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0393045250&cdForum=FxVMQ58Y9WOJZ4&cdMsgID=Mx2F3N1VWFBT3GR&cdMsgNo=52&cdPage=6&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx3L36ZL9W89MBT&store=books#Mx2F3N1VWFBT3GR


BEN HOLMES SAID:

>>> "If he [Vince Bugliosi] understood the evidence, he lied about the most critical evidence in the case demonstrating a conspiracy." <<<


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Holmes apparently thinks the small nature of JFK's throat wound is
"the most critical evidence in the case demonstrating a conspiracy" --
which, of course, is an utterly foolhardy statement, in light of Dr.
Perry's WC testimony, wherein Perry told the world that the wound he
observed in JFK's throat at Parkland could have been "either" an entry
or an exit wound [at 3 H 373]:

ARLEN SPECTER -- "Based on the appearance of the neck wound alone,
could it have been either an entrance or an exit wound?"

DR. MALCOLM PERRY -- "It could have been either."

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh3/html/WC_Vol3_0191a.htm

But retards like Ben Holmes just do not want to believe that Dr. Perry
was telling the truth in the above testimony. Do you, Ben? You prefer
to cling to your fantasies about the throat wound being an entrance
wound for a bullet which came from an invisible Grassy Knoll sniper,
whose bullet was one of TWO such missiles that just STOPPED dead in
its tracks after it went into JFK's body only a short distance (while
striking no bones at all). And then on top of that ridiculous and
preposterous notion, BOTH bullets then just disappeared off the face
of the planet! Right, Benji?

Related link:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f62516784744963f

[timstter]

> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

BUMP! YOO HOO! BENNY!

TB