Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DiEugenio On Bugliosi Pt. 4-ZFilm & Autopsy CTKA Site

7 views
Skip to first unread message

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 13, 2008, 5:17:41 PM12/13/08
to
Check it out at the CTKA Site. This is the best segment so far in my
view.

curtjester1

unread,
Dec 14, 2008, 10:34:38 AM12/14/08
to
On Dec 13, 5:17 pm, lazuli...@webtv.net wrote:
> Check it out at the CTKA Site. This is the best segment so far in my
> view.

Here's the article, Jeff. Great site.

http://www.ctka.net/2008/bugliosi_4_review.html

I think if I remember right, Zapruder alluded to that he saw JFK hit,
then the sign obscured his sight. Another WC Shill exposed, Vinne
Buglosi.

CJ

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 14, 2008, 11:03:28 AM12/14/08
to

DiEugenio gets so many things wrong, it's pathetic. He actually thinks
the large exit wound at the right-front of JFK's head (as seen via the
Z-Film) is the "impact" point for a bullet that entered JFK's head
from the front.

I.E., Jim D. actually had the guts to blurt out the following hunk of
nonsense on Black Op Radio on November 27th:

"The only part of the head that looks like it's being impacted
is the front."

No kidding. Jim actually said the above words on the Thanksgiving
BlackOp program.

Jim apparently thinks that bullet entry wounds are normally huge and
blown out....instead of exit wounds producing the bigger holes.

Can ANYTHING be more inane than the above DiEugenio remark regarding
JFK's large head wound? If so (other than shouting "Greer did it!"),
please inform me what could be a more-retarded comment?

===================================================

MAKING JIM DiEUGENIO LOOK SILLY (A MULTI-PART DVP SERIES):

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/089724b74596fdd1

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f40f7c3d2563783f

===================================================

aeffects

unread,
Dec 14, 2008, 11:58:33 AM12/14/08
to
On Dec 14, 8:03 am, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> DiEugenio gets so many things wrong, it's pathetic.

its ALWAYS pathetic when you're made a fool of, isn't it troll.....?
Suck it up Reitzes-Pieces / D. VonPein, you'll live forever in byte-
land not knowing who you really are, but we do (hence so does the rest
of the USENET/Internet world) You should be grateful.

Such is the fate of WCR Lone Nut supporters everywhere....

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 14, 2008, 9:42:36 PM12/14/08
to

I love the fact that kooks like David G. Healy think they "know" who I
"really" am, and then they/he write e-mails to Len Osanic about it.

LOL.

I love it!

Nothing can possibly top the joy I get out of witnessing kookism like
that.

Never, EVER stop thinking I'm David Reitzes, Mr. Crackpipe.

You promise?

(Or maybe I'm back to being Mr. Keating today, huh?)

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 15, 2008, 1:27:20 AM12/15/08
to
Bugliosi finesses, or avoids discussing so much evidence for conspiracy,
it's really pathetic., revolting, and disgusting.

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Dec 15, 2008, 1:51:11 AM12/15/08
to


www.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/browse_thread/thread/524a50e8b2a2d11a


>>> "And Pam responds by claiming that I must be David Von Pein!" <<<


LOL.

Yeah, Dave R., it looks like the "DR/DVP" melding is spreading.

It's absolutely hilarious, as I told the biggest fan of this stupid
rumor (Mr. Healy) just today:

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9a7afbc541a6675e

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Dec 16, 2008, 4:02:29 PM12/16/08
to
If you have a pathological need to believe the Government Bugliosi is
your man!-The people around the events of the Autopsy knew the official
story is110% bullshit-O'Conner, Custer, Jenkins, David,
Rydburg,Lipsey...now, why would that be if Oswald Acted alone?

0 new messages