GOOD ARTICLE ON LOWRY'S HERO DAVE PERRY
Gil Jesus
to be misleading." - Bob Fox
Bud
<snicker> Sort of like the Klan complaining that the NAACP has a hate-
driven agenda.
Gil Jesus
>
> �<snicker> Sort of like the Klan complaining that the NAACP has a hate-
> driven agenda.
Got those photographs of the bullet fragments inside the Presidential
limo
as they were found, yet ?
You have your assignment........concentrate !!!
lazu...@webtv.net
Holland...who can be the biggest jackass that will say an do anything to
support the official story...Laz
Bud
> On Apr 9, 5:19 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <snicker> Sort of like the Klan complaining that the NAACP has a hate-
> > driven agenda.
>
> Got those photographs of the bullet fragments inside the Presidential
> limo
> as they were found, yet ?
What the fuck do I need them for, retard?
> You have your assignment........concentrate !!!
It`s a very simple case, it doesn`t take a lot of concentration.
Bud
You missed the irony of a conspiracy retard complaining that someone
elses writing was incomplete, one-sided and agenda-driven (but then
again you would, being a conspiracy retard yourself).
aeffects
only problem with you're IRONy Dudster is: nutter IRONy is made of
silly-putty. And from what I understand, a precious metal in lone nut
troll terms.... carry on!
Robert Harris
wrote:
>"Perry's writing is so incomplete, so one-sided, so agenda-driven as
>to be misleading." - Bob Fox
>
>http://www.ctka.net/2010/perry.html
Gotta agree with you on this one. Perry is a propagandist and one of
the biggest phonies around.
I remember a video from back when he was still pretending to be a
conspiracy buff and they were timing the walk from Oswald's room, to
the Tippit site.
He said three different times, that he was totally shocked to learn
that Oswald could have made it, as if he didn't already know that,
like every other researcher on the planet did.
You have to look closely, but there was a guy standing behind him,
rolling his eyes on the third time:-)
Robert Harris
Steve
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:30:36 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus <gjjm...@aol.com>
The real story with Dave Perry is the fact that he is simply one more
former conspiracy nut to admit the weakness of the conspiracy
mindset. Every few years one more noted conspiracy believer fesses up
and admits that there is nothing behind all the silly and child-like
conspiracy theories out there. Gus Russo did, Steve Barber did, Gary
Mack did, Dave Perry did, Vince Palamara did for a while (but he can't
seem to make up his mind about WHAT in the hell he believes and
frankly he doesn't care who did it so long as they his name gets
included in their book's index) and on and on and on.
By the way you bunch of nuts. Can you name even one noted lone nut
supporter that has defected and embraced the conspiracy nonsense?
Clearly the nuts are losing team members one by one. And if pride
wasn't an issue, more would jump ship, but it is hard to admit that
you've pissed away a good part of your adult life chasing rainbows and
unicorns. So rather than honestly stating the obvious (Oswald did it
alone) they keep up the charade of some complicated imagined
conspiracy hoping beyond hope that those with whom they talk don't ask
for nitpicky things like bullet's, rifles, or fingerprints to support
their stupid theories.
David Von Pein
>>> "...he [Dave Perry] was totally shocked to learn that Oswald could have made it, as if he didn't already know that, like every other researcher on the planet did." <<<
Are you kidding, Bob?! There are still many, many CTers
("researchers"??) who want to pretend that Oswald couldn't possibly
have made it from 1026 N. Beckley Avenue to Tenth & Patton in time to
kill Tippit.
On this forum alone, I can think of several kooks who have argued that
very thing. Rossley for one. (Although, of course, Rossley hardly
could be classified as a "researcher"; he's more like a caricature in
the funny papers; but that's another argument.)
Anyway, if you were to poll the batch of conspiracy kooks here at acj,
my guess would be that the vast majority of them would claim that
Oswald didn't have enough time to get to Tenth Street to murder
Tippit. It's just one of dozens of silly myths that the CT nuts
continue to embrace.
Gil Jesus
> By the way you bunch of nuts. �Can you name even one noted lone nut
> supporter that has defected and embraced the conspiracy nonsense?
> Clearly the nuts are losing team members one by one. �And if pride
> wasn't an issue, more would jump ship, but it is hard to admit that
> you've pissed away a good part of your adult life chasing rainbows and
> unicorns. �So rather than honestly stating the obvious (Oswald did it
> alone) they keep up the charade of some complicated imagined
> conspiracy hoping beyond hope that those with whom they talk don't ask
> for nitpicky things like bullet's, rifles, or fingerprints to support
> their stupid theories.-
Find the photograph of the paper "gunsack" on the 6th floor as found,
yet ?
We're still waiting.
Steve
No. There wasn't one. But your logic is flawed isn't it dummy. YOUR
claim is that you will only believe that which has photographic proof,
yet the vast majority of YOUR beliefs have no photographic basis
either. It is silly to limit what we believe to what has a
photographic record. Do YOU have a photograph of youyr parents having
sex the time you were allegedly conceived? Then using YOUR logic YOU
would have to believe that you were adopted. If real historians only
believed what they had photographic proof then they would have to
conclude that Lincoln was never assassinated and that Washington never
lived.
You truely are an idiot.