Marsh on OJ
eca...@tx.rr.com
I pointed out that you claim OJ's alibi for
where he was at the time of the murders was:
Marsh answer:
"He was on a Plane."
I then asked how you came by that knowledge
that OJ was on a plane at the time of the
murders..
Ed:
"OJ had no alibi. None. Zip. 0."
Marsh:
"Sure he did. He was on a plane."<===Marsh claim
Then when you are CAUGHT on your bogus claim,
you shift gears 180 degrees and answer:
"It is not knowledge. It is not a fact. It is
the type of claim that he could
make up."<==REVISED new Marsh claim
You really have no business on this OJ subject
Tony.. The bluff & duck & constant sail trimming
doesn't work with someone who knows the OJ case.
Same goes for JFK btw..
MR ;~D
Ed Cage
0245Jul307
(Ever have any luck finding even one of those
"50 aliases" you claimed I have used? .. Not
even *one* example yet huh Tony?)
On Jul 2, 10:58 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> ecag...@tx.rr.com wrote:
> > Marsh OJ was unable to explain his deep cut on the
> > left hand which was btw the same side that his DNA
> > matched droplets were on as he (or the real killer)
> > walked away from the Bundy murder scene.
>
> Of course OJ could not explain his deep cut. Again, your logic is faulty
> about it dipping on the left side. You'd need to prove it was HIS blood
> dripping at the crime scene. If it's just the victim's blood that could be
> dripping from a knife held in the left hand.
>
> > 1) Deep cut on left hand for OJ same as the killer?
> > No problem for Marsh.
>
> My problem is not with the evidence. My problem is with your logic. Your
> illogical leaps are what get guilty men off the hook. Stick to the facts
> of what you can prove.
>
> > 2) DNA match of blood droplets on the same side,
> > (left) as killer walked away?
> > No problem for Marsh.
>
> No problem if it was planted, as the defense suggested. Setting the stage
> for reasonable doubt. If there were no prosecutorial misconduct in this
> case then no one would take any of the suggestions seriously.
>
> > ` ~ ~ ~
>
> > (A)
> > OJ first claimed he cut his hand on a glass in
> > Chicago upon hearing of Nicole's murder/death.
>
> > (B)
> > OJ next claimed he cut his hand in his Bronco
> > on the metal cell phone receptacle
> > after being informed of the blood in his car.
>
> Inconsistencies like that are pointed out to the jury.
>
> > After the DNA tests and all his inconsistencies
> > on the very deep cut on his left hand came
> > quickly unraveled.. OJ then resorted to this
> > explanation "C" on how he got a damn deep cut
> > on his left hand finger..
>
> > (C)
> > OJ finally closed with this explanation: "I
> > don't know how I cut myself.. I cut myself all
> > the time."
>
> Some people do. And some juries buy such ridiculous explanations.
>
> > NONE OF THESE explanations seem to phase Tony
> > Marsh however. "Does anybody believe his excuse?"
> > asks Marsh demonstrating beyond all doubt that
> > he has sparse information on the OJ case and
> > lacks *objectivity* to boot..
>
> Again you show the weakness of your position when you make up false
> positions for me.
>
>
>
>
>
> > ` ~ ~ ~
>
> > 3) Finally upon learning OJ had no alibi that
> > worked for where he was at the time of the
> > murder, Marsh rebuts (Har-har) with this gem
> > of CS&L and steadfast research:
> > "Sure he did. He was on a plane."
>
> > Marsh if you can produce clear and convincing
> > evidence of that last rebuttal you made for OJ
> > having no alibi at the time Nicole & Ron were
> > killed OJ would be mighty pleased.. So would the
> > "National Inquirer" and the "Star" who might
> > throw you a jelly roll for that kind of mega-
> > block-buster research.. I'm sure OJ would give
> > you a big high five for clearing his name and
> > releasing liens on him from that pesky $33
> > million dollar civil judgement.
>
> If OJ can manufacture an alibi for his cut hand that some people fall for,
> then certainly he can claim that he was on the plane at the time. And
> given the sloppiness of the investigation he might have gotten away with
> such a ridiculous alibi.
>
> > You claim OJ's alibi for where he was at the
> > time of the murders was: "He was on a Plane."
> > ' ____________
>
> > Mind if I ask how you came by that knowledge?
>
> It is not knowledge. It is not a fact. It is the type of claim that he
> could make up.
>
>
>
> > ' ____________
>
> > MR ;~D
> > Ed Cage
> > 1538Jul207
> > Tony I'm not trying to be cute here.. I honestly
> > now believe you just enjoy the verbal sparring
> > in spite of the fact you do poorly so often..
>
> > On Jul 2, 12:35 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> ecag...@tx.rr.com wrote:
>
> >> Is this addressed to me? Hard to tell if you don't quote properly.
> >> Anyway, assuming you have some erroneous presumptions about what I
> >> believe, read my previous messages in Google Groups. I have always
> >> thought that OJ Simpson committed the murders. It should have been a
> >> simple case, but the prosecution made too many mistakes and suborned
> >> perjury.
>
> >>> 1) Tony the bloody footprints leading away
> >>> from the Bundy murder scene matched OJ's
> >>> shoe size.
> >> So what? He's the only human with that shoe size? Weak evidence.
>
> >>> 2) The bloody shoe prints leading away had
> >>> blood droplets on the LEFT hand side..
> >> So what? It also depends on whose blood it was.
>
> >>> 3) Guess which hand OJ severely cut. (LEFT)
> >> Does anyone believe his excuse?
>
> >>> 4) Guess whose DNA the blood drops on the
> >>> left matched. (OJ)
> >> Maybe because the police collected his blood and did not turn it in to
> >> the evidence room properly on time.
>
> >>> 5) OJ had no alibi. None. Zip. 0.
> >> Sure he did. He was on a plane.
>
> >>> 6) He presented **MULTIPLE** versions of how
> >>> he got the deep cut on his left hand finger.
> >> Multiple lies do not convict.
>
> >>> These 6 items alone are enough for objective
> >>> observers.
> >> Plenty for circumstantial evidence. I had hoped that it would be a
> >> showcase for DNA evidence proving guilt. But then the prosecution
> >> screwed it up.
>
> >>> Keep the day job Marsh.. Your posts indicate
> >>> you're a guy that seems to enjoy verbal
> >>> sparring on hopeless causes. Problem is, you
> >>> are no good at it.
> >> Keep it up Ed. America's heartland depends on you and Bugliosi to buy
> >> all the straw they can produce.
>
> >>> MR ;~D
> >>> Ed Cage
> >>> 1303Jul107
> >>> On Jun 30, 10:44 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>> ecag...@tx.rr.com wrote:
> >>>>> Assorted gems of legal wisdom from JB on OJ:
> >>>>> ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> >>>>> "I am SURE in my mind that the gloves and
> >>>>> socks were planted. There would have been
> >>>>> blood around the socks on the floor if they
> >>>> Wrong. The blood was very light and ONLY on the inside between the pair
> >>>> of socks. How does he explain the blood preservative found on supposedly
> >>>> fresh blood? Did OJ drink a gallon of laundry detergent?
> >>>>> had. I don't think you understand reasonable
> >>>>> doubt and I suspect you have never had
> >>>>> reasonable doubt about anything. Your ego
> >>>>> runs away with you, sir."
> >>>>> ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> >>>>> "Why did Furman just happen to be the person
> >>>>> who discovered the bloody glove by the fence
> >>>>> but, of course there was no blood on the
> >>>>> fence to show that OJ climbed it. There
> >>>>> should have been a river of blood. There
> >>>>> wasn't. No blood in the drains so how did OJ
> >>>>> get cleaned up? Also the time line is very
> >>>>> narrow and OJ makes it on the plane with no
> >>>>> signs of nervousness and the people on that
> >>>>> plane and the limo driver did not see a cut
> >>>>> or a bandage on his hand. Some people talked
> >>>>> with him on the plane and not one saw a cut
> >>>>> or a bandage."
> >>>>> ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> >>>>> "I followed every minute of it and I believe
> >>>>> the jury had no choice but to find him not
> >>>>> guilty based on how the case was handled."
> >>>>> ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> >>>>> I disagree completely JB.. And as a matter of
> >>>>> fact my sister who was a former AA flight
> >>>>> attendant told me the following story.. To the
> >>>>> best of my knowledge if it was relayed to the
> >>>>> prosecutors Marcia Clark et. al., it was never
> >>>>> pursued:
> >>>>> A friend of my sister's was the AA flight
> >>>>> attendant on OJ's subsequent flight up to
> >>>>> Chicago immediately after the Ron Goldman and
> >>>>> Nicole Simpson murder.. She did in fact see OJ
> >>>>> on the plane as he curiously and steadfastly
> >>>>> kept his left hand in some sort of tote-bag
> >>>>> during the entire trip to Chicago.
> >>>>> MR ;~D
> >>>>> Ed Cage
> >>>>> 0810Jun3007a- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -