Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 15

[Gil Jesus]

There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.

QUESTION # 15: Why did the the Dallas Police dust "4 pcs" of white "curtain rods" FOUR MONTHS AFTER the assassination for Oswald's fingerprints ( CE 1952 ) ?

Please reply with evidence and not just opinion.

[John Corbett]

Just what kind of evidence would you expect there to be which would tell us why?

Do these questions have a point or are you just trying to be a whiny bitch? You are succeeding
at one of those.

[NoTrueFlags Here]

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:29:35 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

This is a good question. If they were found in Paine's garage, then what would be the point in looking for Oswald's prints? It wouldn't mean anything. They wouldn't bother. If they were found somewhere else, then where else where they found? The dates on the documents indicate that the dusted rods were found before the WC's Paine garage episode. In fact, the Paine Garage Episode reads like Kabuki Theater acted out to explain where the rods were found. But the documents say these were either different rods, or the same ones found somewhere else. The fact that such an elaborate ruse was employed implies that the curtain rods were found in the TSBD. Where else? It wouldn't prove anything about the assassination, but it would prove that the WC and the Secret Service were going to great lengths to coverup the truth, whatever it is.

[Ben Holmes]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

Notice folks, that Corbutt couldn't answer the question. Proving
himself a moron & coward is evidently his life goal.

He's succeeding...

[Bud]

On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 5:29:35 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:

To see if there were prints on them. These are getting easier.

NEXT!

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:09:37 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.