Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one Hank Sienzant: Question # 4

68 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 7:10:45 AM10/23/23
to

Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.

Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 7:53:08 AM10/23/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.
>
> Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?

That's because there was another large group of witnesses who said the shots came from the
direction of the TSBD and those witnesses were corroborated by the physical evidence, shells
and a rifle found on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There were also several EYEwitnesses who saw
a rifleman in the 6th floor window, one of whom saw the last shot being fired. We also have
Williams, Jarman, and Norman who were right below Oswald when he was firing the shots
from the 6th floor and even heard the shells hitting the floor.

It's pretty obvious which group of earwitnesses got the location wrong, but since Gil looks at
all the evidence in isolation from the rest, he thinks equal weight should be given to both
groups of witnesses.

NoTrueFlags Here

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 8:09:33 AM10/23/23
to
False dichotomy. The fact that somebody fired shots from one place doesn't mean that shots did not come from the other. Only to Nutter Retards.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 9:14:24 AM10/23/23
to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:53:07 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.
>>
>> Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?
>
>That's because there was another large group of witnesses who said the shots came from the
>direction of the TSBD and those witnesses were corroborated by the physical evidence, shells
>and a rifle found on the 6th floor of the TSBD.


Sorry stupid, that doesn't contradict the witnesses pointing to the
Grassy Knoll.

So you're lying again.


>It's pretty obvious which group of earwitnesses got the location wrong...


This is a logical fallacy... can you name it? (Hint: it's the one most
used by believers...)

Bud

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 7:09:52 PM10/23/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.
>
> Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?

You are misrepresenting what those witnesses actually said. They didn`t state that is where the shots came from, only that that is where they *thought* they had.

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 6:16:44 AM10/24/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:53:08 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
It's even more obvious that Gil never sticks around to address the fallacies of his positions when
those fallacies are pointed out. He just moves on to his next fallacy.

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 6:20:32 AM10/24/23
to
There wasn't a single eyewitness who saw a shooter on the GK. There was no forensic evidence
of a shooter on the GK. No weapon or spent shells. We have both of those in the TSBD. Lee
Bowers who had a perfect view of the area behind the picket fence saw nobody there when the
shots were fired.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 8:47:53 AM10/24/23
to
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:16:42 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:53:08?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
It's equally obivous that I do. So Corbutt has to run away...

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 8:53:46 AM10/24/23
to
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 03:20:30 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:09:52?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> > Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.
>> >
>> > Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?
>> You are misrepresenting what those witnesses actually said. They didn`t state that is where the shots came from, only that that is where they *thought* they had.
>
>There wasn't a single eyewitness who saw a shooter on the GK.


Congratulations!!! Nicole Simpson is still alive!

Your fallacies are quite stupid. ROTFLMAO!!!


>There was no forensic evidence
>of a shooter on the GK.


What would you expect?


> No weapon or spent shells.


Ah! So the killers didn't want to leave a valuable weapon... Shame on
them!


>We have both of those in the TSBD.


Not a relevant point. One has NOTHING to do with the other.


>Lee Bowers who had a perfect view of the area behind the picket fence saw nobody there when the
>shots were fired.


There you go, lying again.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 24, 2023, 8:54:14 AM10/24/23
to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:09:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Bud

unread,
Oct 26, 2023, 6:14:22 PM10/26/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> Fifty-one witnesses held the shots sounded as if they came from west of the Depository, the area of the grassy knoll on Elm Street, the area directly on the right of the President's car when the bullets struck. Yet the Warren Commission concluded that "no credible evidence" existed that any shots were fired from anywhere but the Texas School Book Depository.
>
> Can you name another murder case where the testimony of 51 witnesses was dismissed as "no credible evidence"?

Sound is invisible, and reflects off surfaces, therefore it cannot credibly be used to pinpoint the location of a shooter.

NEXT!

Brian Doyle

unread,
Oct 26, 2023, 6:18:59 PM10/26/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:10:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>


Gil is thread spamming...

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 27, 2023, 9:18:27 AM10/27/23
to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:14:21 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
0 new messages