Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 1

43 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 5:21:28 AM10/23/23
to
It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that there was no problem with the chain of custody with ANY of the evidence in the case against Oswald.

Question #1: Who found Oswald's jacket ?

Bud

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 6:32:12 AM10/23/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:21:28 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that there was no problem with the chain of custody with ANY of the evidence in the case against Oswald.
>
> Question #1: Who found Oswald's jacket ?

What do you mean by "found"?

And how is this information necessary to establish a chain of possession?

John Corbett

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 6:44:32 AM10/23/23
to
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:21:28 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
> It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that there was no problem with the chain of custody with ANY of the evidence in the case against Oswald.
>
> Question #1: Who found Oswald's jacket ?

You're pathetic Gil. Just yesterday you deleted an entire post by me in which I pointed out the
fallacies of your arguments about chain of custody and now you want me to answer your question
on the same subject. But since I'm not a gutless coward like you, I'll answer your question.
It is unknown who first spotted the jacket but it was Captain Westbrook that first took
possession of it. He testified to that fact before the Warren Commission. The jacket was tied
to Oswald by fibers matching his shirt.

Now would you like to take a crack at the questions I raised regarding your whining about
chain of custody? Of course it's a rhetorical question because we both know you lack both
the courage and the intellect to take those on.
Message has been deleted

NoTrueFlags Here

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 6:55:55 AM10/23/23
to
That's not Pinky Westbrook! https://postimg.cc/hJMcsFs8

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 9:14:23 AM10/23/23
to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:32:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:


So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 9:14:24 AM10/23/23
to
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:44:31 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 5:21:28?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
>> It has been said ( by John Corbett ) that there was no problem with the chain of custody with ANY of the evidence in the case against Oswald.
>>
>> Question #1: Who found Oswald's jacket ?


Logical fallacy deleted.


>It is unknown who first spotted the jacket...


It is also unknown who found the jacket.

Why was that so difficult for you to publicly state?

Ben Holmes

unread,
Oct 23, 2023, 9:14:24 AM10/23/23
to
No-one will give the correct answer. CERTAINLY not Huckster.
0 new messages