Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What's got YoHarvey Oswald's panties all twisted up ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

hotrod3...@aol.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2008, 5:44:19 PM3/21/08
to
The TRUTH.

Gil Jesus demonstrates the impossibility of the "factoid" that
Oswald carried the rifle into the TSBD under his armpit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1l9Wom0PLk

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2008, 5:47:21 PM3/21/08
to

All you did was put your ugly self on video holding a tape
measure...you didn't demonstrate anything except the fact that your
one ugly looking piece of white trash. Like that little demonstration
would hold up in a court of law LOL. And you still have no proof that
Frazier SAW the bag under Oswalds armpit. You're assuming and
speculating to mislead people again with another of your pathetic
videos. Because he "Said So" isn't going to cut it, idiot.

hotrod3...@aol.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2008, 6:00:55 PM3/21/08
to
On Mar 21, 4:47�pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mar 21, 5:44�pm, hotrod34117...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > The TRUTH.
>
> > Gil Jesus demonstrates the impossibility of the "factoid" that
> > Oswald carried the rifle into the TSBD under his armpit.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1l9Wom0PLk
>
> All you did was put your ugly self on video holding a tape
> measure...you didn't demonstrate anything except the fact that your
> one ugly looking piece of white trash. Like that little demonstration
> would �hold up in a court of law LOL.

Gee, it was obvious to everyone else who saw the "demonstration" what
it was all about.
Although it IS tough to penetrate cement.

Did you read the comments ?

>And you still have no proof that Frazier SAW the bag under Oswalds armpit. You're assuming >and speculating to mislead people again with another of your pathetic videos. Because >he "Said So" isn't going to cut it, idiot.

The fact that Frazier testified to the WC or "said so" IS the evidence
that he SAW the bag under Oswald's armpit. Gee, how friggin' thick is
that skull of yours ? Can you possibly be that stupid or are you just
in denial ?

You keep running from the question :

Then why did Frazier make this statement in testimony before the WC if
he couldn't see the package ?

" ... but when I did look at it he did have his hands on the package
like that," and at this point Frazier placed the upper part of the
package under his armpit and attempted to cup his right hand beneath
the bottom of the bag. (WCR Ch 4, pg. 134 )

Stick to insults. You don't know your ass from your elbow on evidence.

justm...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2008, 6:26:47 PM3/21/08
to

because he assumed just like you are....there was one comment there
don't flatter yourself.
I know you're an ass that's all that matters along with being a liar
and a bigot.

Why is it you only use witness testimony no matter how far fetched it
is when it agrees with your retarded way of thinking Chico?? How many
witnesses saw Connally pull a gun out of his sock and shoot JFK?
NONE...yet you implied and then asked the question which one did it
Nellie or John. And you call other people thick?
Go back to your fantasies....that's all you ever supply any JFK forum.

aeffects

unread,
Mar 22, 2008, 3:27:35 AM3/22/08
to
On Mar 21, 3:26 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>

focus crone, FOCUS.....

Gil Jesus

unread,
Mar 22, 2008, 5:38:49 AM3/22/08
to
> On Mar 21, 3:26 pm, "justme1...@gmail.com" <justme1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

>
> > because he assumed just like you are....


"when I did look at it" sounds like an ASSUMPTION to you ?

Wow, you really DO have no clue, do you ?

0 new messages