Mark Lane - (#394) - Both Chickenshit & Chuckles Agree!

[Ben Holmes]

In the last few paragraphs - Mark Lane showed that Willis slide #8
apparently shows Jack Ruby... now let's see how the Warren Commission
dealt with this evidence:

"Willis said that FBI agents who had questioned him seemed to think
that Ruby was the man in the picture. 'They mentioned it themselves
before I did,' he said. 'They're the ones that spotted it, I guess,
first.' Subsequently Willis was questioned by Secret Service agents
and a Commission lawyer. Although he pointed out the man who appeared
to be Ruby, neither the Commission representative nor the Secret
Service agents showed any interest, he said. 'There was so much they
already knew about Ruby,' Willis added, 'they weren't concerned.'

The Commission did publish all 12 photographs, but it offered an
incomplete print of slide eight. Its version differs from the
original, a copy of which was secured from Willis by the independent
investigator. As published by the Commission, the picture was trimmed
in such a manner that a substantial portion of the face of the man
thought to be Ruby was removed."

Mark Lane is showing the sheer dishonesty that the Warren Commission
employed when dealing with evidence that they didn't like.

Both Chickenshit and Chuckles agree that the Warren Commission was
dishonest in the way they treated the evidence.