In article <
d39a04ce-c22a-4e0d...@o9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Walt says...
>
>On Dec 17, 10:32=A0pm, Ben Holmes <
ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <218d42e7-00a4-498e-a4e7-0d1f36ecd...@y18g2000yqy.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> Walt says...
>>
>> >On Dec 17, 8:34=3DA0pm, Ben Holmes <
ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <8d834f92-968e-4168-b942-cc1e06fc4...@v29g2000yqv.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> Walt says...
>>
>> >> >On Dec 17, 6:02=3D3DA0pm, bigdog <
jecorbett1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Dec 17, 6:48=3D3DA0pm, Walt <
papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > Actually.....I have at least four copies of the WR...... =3D3DA0O=
>ne is=3D
>> > the
>> >> >> > official WR as ptinted by The US Government printing office in 19=
>64.
>> >> >> > Another is a copy printed by Double day, another is a copy printe=
>d b=3D
>> >y
>> >> >> > Mc Graw Hill and a couple of others..... =3D3DA0So I don't need t=
>o go =3D
>> >onlin=3D3D
>> >> >e
>> >> >> > to know what's in the Warren Commission Fables.
>>
>> >> >> You would think that with four copies, you would be able to find th=
>e
>> >> >> information about the bullets in one of them. You seem to be unawar=
>e
>> >> >> that Oswald's gun held 3 of each type of bullet,
>>
>> >> >Were you there??..... You're taking the word of the authorities. I
>> >> >don't accept the word of the authorities because I know beyond a
>> >> >shadow of doubt that they lied and framed Oswald. =3DA0You could know=
> this
>> >> >is true if you'd get your head out of your ass and open your eyes.
>>
>> >> > the same two types
>> >> >> recovered from Tippit's body. You seem to not understand why the
>> >> >> bullets couldn't be ballistically matched even though the WCR
>> >> >> explained it quite simply. And you seem to not be able to grasp the
>> >> >> very logical explaination the WC gave for the discrepancy between t=
>he
>> >> >> recovered bullets and the recovered shells. It's not like any of th=
>is
>> >> >> is rocket science but it all seems to have sailed right over your
>> >> >> head.
>>
>> >> >> PS. Why the hell did you need four copies. You don't seem to know w=
>hat
>> >> >> is in any of them.
>>
>> >> >The Warren Commissioners understood very early in their trek that the=
>y
>> >> >had to be puppets for Lyndon Johnson and rubber stamp Hoover's
>> >> >decree. =3DA0 In one of their first meeting they expressed the realiz=
>ation
>> >> >that they were up against J.Edgar Hoover and they had no chance of
>> >> >exposing him because to do so would jeopardize "national security".
>> >> >Even if they succeeded in exposing Hoover they would run the risk of
>> >> >causing the American people to lose faith in the government and
>> >> >perhaps cause rioting throughout the country. =3DA0They decided the s=
>afest
>> >> >course of action was to allow LBJ and Hoover to get away with murder.
>>
>> >> Amusingly, not even all the Warren Commissioners believed the fable
>> >> that they foisted on us.
>>
>> >Not so amusing......At least I'm not laughing. =A0 The gutless bastards
>> >betrayed us and used millions of our tax dollars to create a lie to be
>> >dumped on us.....When some of us protest they just laugh and give us
>> >the finger.
>>
>> I think it's funny... some of the very Commissioners whom the kooks belie=
>ve...
>> didn't believe it themselves.
>
>Actually Ben, I don't believe any of the members of LBJ's Warren
>Commission believed Oswald was the lone assassin.
Perhaps... but that assertion is a belief on your part, and the kooks could
legitimately argue a different point.
What they *CANNOT* argue is the *FACT* that a number of them publicly stated
that they didn't believe the SBT - and without the SBT, conspiracy is proven.