info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
ROKC's Mick Purdy On Prayer Man
31 views
Skip to first unread message
Scrum Drum
Nov 29, 2021, 9:34:44 PM11/29/21
to
Here is what ROKC's MIck Purdy calls research:
"I know this much if we were to obtain the original Darnell footage and have that scanned at the highest resolution possible then we'd all pack up and go home - Job's done. I'm that confident. My background is in film and TV. I've viewed Stan Danes copy of the PM frame on a high res retina monitor and I can assure you that the unidentified figure standing to BWF's right hand side atop of the stairs in the far left hand side corner of the landing looks remarkably like Lee Oswald, and I can assure you the figure is not a woman - The figure is not wearing a wig, and is most certainly not over weight, at least not by a whopping 300lb's...(You reading this Brian?)"
Purdy is too dumb to realize that the reason Oliver Stone and DiEugenio stayed miles away from Prayer Man is because both of them realize it is bullshit but they don't want to offend researcher community feelings...
These ROKC goofs ignore the fact that they haven't found Stanton to Frazier's left in Altgens...If Stanton is not to Frazier's left then she has to be to his right - which just so happens to be where Lovelady said she was at that exact time...
Prayer Man is wearing a uniform-colored dress from shoulder to knee and Davidson brought out Sarah Stanton's chubby face on "him"...But we are asked by ROKC and its idiot members to ignore all this like they do and go with "Prayer Man really looks like Oswald"...
Anyone with photo analysis skill can see Stanton's obese hips, forearm, and hand on Prayer Man...They can also see Stanton's 5 foot 4 height...
Yes I'm reading it Mick...Are YOU reading this???
"I know this much if we were to obtain the original Darnell footage and have that scanned at the highest resolution possible then we'd all pack up and go home - Job's done. I'm that confident. My background is in film and TV. I've viewed Stan Danes copy of the PM frame on a high res retina monitor and I can assure you that the unidentified figure standing to BWF's right hand side atop of the stairs in the far left hand side corner of the landing looks remarkably like Lee Oswald, and I can assure you the figure is not a woman - The figure is not wearing a wig, and is most certainly not over weight, at least not by a whopping 300lb's...(You reading this Brian?)"
Purdy is too dumb to realize that the reason Oliver Stone and DiEugenio stayed miles away from Prayer Man is because both of them realize it is bullshit but they don't want to offend researcher community feelings...
These ROKC goofs ignore the fact that they haven't found Stanton to Frazier's left in Altgens...If Stanton is not to Frazier's left then she has to be to his right - which just so happens to be where Lovelady said she was at that exact time...
Prayer Man is wearing a uniform-colored dress from shoulder to knee and Davidson brought out Sarah Stanton's chubby face on "him"...But we are asked by ROKC and its idiot members to ignore all this like they do and go with "Prayer Man really looks like Oswald"...
Anyone with photo analysis skill can see Stanton's obese hips, forearm, and hand on Prayer Man...They can also see Stanton's 5 foot 4 height...
Yes I'm reading it Mick...Are YOU reading this???
Sky Throne 19efppp
Nov 30, 2021, 5:46:18 AM11/30/21
to
Scrum Drum
Nov 30, 2021, 12:33:26 PM11/30/21
to
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 5:46:18 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:34:44 AM UTC, Scrum Drum wrote:
ROKC don't need no stinkin Stanton to Frazier's left...
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:34:44 AM UTC, Scrum Drum wrote:
Their idea of research rigor is you can still continuing marching strong and naked in public while not being able to show Stanton to Frazier's left...
Scrum Drum
Nov 30, 2021, 7:33:17 PM11/30/21
to
On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 12:33:26 PM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 5:46:18 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:34:44 AM UTC, Scrum Drum wrote:
Purdy is still posting on ROKC that the obtaining and scanning of the Darnell original film will produce the final evidence to prove Oswald's innocence...What he is forgetting is the Wiegman Film would be a shorter route to proving Prayer Man's identity because it possesses Davidson's woman's face...
> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 5:46:18 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:34:44 AM UTC, Scrum Drum wrote:
Darnell is not the best NBC film to prove Prayer Man's identity, Wiegman is...If we could get a high quality scan of Davidson's frames from the original Wiegman celluloid we could scientifically replicate Davidson's photo enhancement settings on those scans...Once we repeated Davidson's enhancement settings and got the exact same woman's face from that scan that is proof because it would prove that the woman's face is an existing part of the original...The current internet research community is a bunch of assholes because they forget Kamp made the flimsy excuse that the woman's face was a photo artifact mirage caused by film to video transfer...Bullshit...Once we scanned the original and reproduced Davidson's woman's face from it that would be firm proof that the woman's face was not any film to video artifact and was a solid feature existing on the original film...That woman's face, of course, is the chubby-cheeked visage of Sarah Stanton...
The reason the hacks and morons who have excluded me from this conversation on their websites avoid this is because they know it is deadly to their bullshit and conclusively proves Prayer Man is Stanton FROM THE WIEGMAN FILM...But the reason they have hijacked the conversation in to only discussing their being denied the films is because they are dishonestly avoiding discussing how Prayer Man's identity can be proven from the already-existing images...They avoid discussing the Wiegman film because they know it disproves them...
0 new messages