On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:51:25 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<
hsie...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 5:05:43?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
You do it every day.
Instead of addressing the fact that *BOTH* versions were sent out -
you constantly keep telling me that the ball is in my court - despite
the fact that I keep pointing out your cowardice.
>Try attacking the message for a change.
Both versions were sent out.
ATTACK *THAT* MESSAGE.
And explain how *your* wacky theory explains that fact.
> What did Bugliosi say that you disagree with?
Do *you* believe, as Chickenshit does, that Bugliosi asserted that the
"oval" shape of Connally's back wound that was "virtually conclusive
evidence" of an SBT?
Or will you run like the coward you are... again?