Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY: LESS THAN ZERO

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Gil Jesus

unread,
Aug 11, 2008, 10:45:37 AM8/11/08
to
New research shows Sen. Arlen Specter's single bullet theory -- the
lynchpin in the Warren Commission's case against Lee Oswald -- has
even less credibility than has been thought.

A team of Italian experts just completed new tests on the alleged
murder weapon.

http://www.ctka.net/lho_mc.html

This comes on the heels of a new study by a Texas A&M statistician,
which was written about in the Washington Post.

http://www.science.tamu.edu/articles/550/

Jim DiEugenio places the issues in context in Death of the NAA
verdict.

http://www.ctka.net/death_of_naa.html

Message has been deleted

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 11, 2008, 9:51:53 PM8/11/08
to


www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/6fbbfcd58a3d9ec1

More kook hash.

Tasty to a kook....tripe to a reasonable person.

But dredging up the "They were unable to load and fire three shots in
less than 19 seconds" hunk of hilarity was nice of you, Gilbert.

I always like seeing just how desperate the kooks can get. And
latching onto the "19 Seconds" theory puts a kook's desperation on a
new, heretofore never reached level of absurdity.

But, as long as Gil can keep that CT flame a-burning, he's happy....no
matter how stupid he looks while trying to fan that flame.

LOL.

David Von Pein

unread,
Aug 11, 2008, 10:02:31 PM8/11/08
to


www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/6fbbfcd58a3d9ec1

ADDENDUM:


>>> "A team of Italian experts just completed new tests on the alleged murder weapon." <<<

BTW, the above quote is a lie (in two different respects):

1.) "Just completed" is wrong. That silly Italian rifle test was done
in June 2007:

www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/06/29/Italian_experts_test_JFK_assassination_gun/UPI-11131183172218/

2.) The tests in Terni, Italy, did not involve Oswald's C2766 MC
rifle. They used a 91/38 model Carcano for the tests, but it certainly
wasn't the "alleged murder weapon", as Gil states above.

muc...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 12, 2008, 4:40:52 AM8/12/08
to
On 12 Aug., 04:02, David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
> www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/6fbbfcd58a3d9ec1
>
> ADDENDUM:
>
> >>> "A team of Italian experts just completed new tests on the alleged murder weapon." <<<
>
> BTW, the above quote is a lie (in two different respects):
>
> 1.) "Just completed" is wrong. That silly Italian rifle test was done
> in June 2007:
>
> www.upi.com/Top_News/2007/06/29/Italian_experts_test_JFK_assassinatio...

>
> 2.) The tests in Terni, Italy, did not involve Oswald's C2766 MC
> rifle. They used a 91/38 model Carcano for the tests, but it certainly
> wasn't the "alleged murder weapon", as Gil states above.

Chin up, Gil, even clueless assholes like you have fans in the CT
world:

"[Gil is among the] 3 Finest Minds To Ever Investigate JFK
Murder." [Phil Ossofee]

"[He is] the crackerjack researcher who puts it all together." [Phil
Ossofee]

"I have learned a bunch from [his] posts." [Phil Ossofee]

"I am one big fan." [Curt Jester]

"Gil seems quite competent and intelligent to me." [Ben Holmes]

"KUTGW Gil." [David Healy]

Harry

unread,
Aug 12, 2008, 10:02:36 AM8/12/08
to
> "KUTGW Gil." [David Healy]- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You don't.

Gil Jesus

unread,
Aug 12, 2008, 3:13:53 PM8/12/08
to
On Aug 12, 4:40�am, much...@gmail.com wrote:

> Chin up, Gil, even clueless assholes like you have fans in the CT
> world:


Green is not your color.

Where are YOUR fans, YOYO ?

Doesn't say much for your genius now, does it ?

lazu...@webtv.net

unread,
Aug 12, 2008, 3:05:25 PM8/12/08
to
The big problem with the JFK Assassination is: If you can't trust the
people who were there who can you trust? can't trust the nurses, can't
trust the doctors, can't trust the mortician, can't trust the X-Ray tech
etc. if you are a lone nutter..which is needless to say ridiculous.

Gil Jesus

unread,
Aug 12, 2008, 3:23:54 PM8/12/08
to


Agreed. You can trust the witnesses who had no reason to lie, or you
can trust the suspects.

When you phrase it like that, you're right. It's ridiculous.

0 new messages