Why Did Jackie Change Her Story?
Robert Harris
Mrs. Kennedy made a very strange statement during her testimony. As we
all know, she said that she heard two shots that day. But she also
said she "used to believe" that she heard three.
Let’s stop and think about that for a moment.
How in holy hell, did she change her mind, going from three shots to
two? Certainly, any newspaper or magazine articles she read, would
have reported three shots. And she would have heard the same thing
from any FBI or Secret Service people she talked to as well, don’t you
think?
I could understand her going from two to three shots, but it makes no
sense at all, for her to go the other way.
So, how did she become convinced to change her story from three shots
to two?
Remember - she told both the WC and Theodore White, that she
absolutely didn’t think that first "noise" was really a gunshot,
right?
In fact, she said she also "used to believe" that she was looking away
from her husband when what she described as the "first shot" was
fired, because Governor Connally’s shouting had drawn her attention.
Therefore, she wasn’t able to pull him down before the "second shot"
was fired and blew up JFK’s head.
Remember that?
So, the next question is, when did she hear that third shot?
And the obvious answer to that is, that she could only have heard it
AFTER the fatal head wound!
So, what really happened was, that SOMETHING convinced Mrs. Kennedy
that she never heard that post-313 gunshot. That is why she had to
lose shot number three.
And that same SOMETHING appears to have made Mrs. Kennedy a bit
sarcastic in separating the obviously altered story she was telling,
from what she "used to believe" (and obviously, still did).
There is simply, no other explanation, than that she was asked and
perhaps pressured a bit, to change her story, leaving out that final
shot as well as the brain tissue she retrieved from the trunk.
If Mrs. Kennedy had told the WC about that last shot, it would have
completely blown the LN theory and put an end to any hope of
"convincing the public" that Oswald acted alone. The same thing would
have happened, if she had described the result of that final shot,
which was to blow brain tissue all the way to the rear of the trunk.
That’s why she never again publicly used the term "brain tissue", or
"brains" as she did on 11/22, substituting instead, the term "flesh
colored bone", as in her interview with Theodore White, in which she
described both "white" and "flesh colored" skull bone.
It must have been incredibly frustrating for Jackie to have had to
withhold this information. But fortunately, she left us with some
rather broad hints.
Think about it - even the most skeptical of you, must agree, that she
was telling us that her story was altered. wasn't she?
The question then becomes, what caused her to alter her story?
Try this - list the top three alternatives to the obvious.
Yeah, that’s right. There ARE NO alternatives.
Robert Harris
There is no question that an honest man will evade.
The JFK History Page
http://jfkhistory.com/