Re: Breaking! Federal Court Finds California Magazine Ban Violates the Second Amendment

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 3/31/19 10:18 AM, OrigInfoJunkie wrote:
>>>>>> Being as Obama was corrupt and he appointed Sotomayor and Kegan, can
>>>>>> they be removed or impeached now that the ObamaRegime is the source of
>>>>>> corruption and a Coup D`etat....
>>>>>
>>>>> No. Supreme Ct judges are appointed for life during good behavior.
>>>>> They can only be impeached by Congress.The House now has a Democrat
>>>>> majority.
>>>>
>>>> This is Republican dedication to democracy and respect for the rule of law.
>>>> #SAD.
>>>
>>> So if the impeachment of SC Juctices for bad behavior is "dedication to
>>> democracy and respect for the rule of law" is "#SAD" IYO then, you preferred
>>> and approved of the corruption found in those running the previous administration.
>>> Thanks for clarifying your position.
>>
>> No person in a position of responsibility in the US has ever suggested removing
>> justices because they were appointed by a president of a different party.
>
> I only see the assertion that since Obama was corrupt, those two Justices may
> be corrupt as well. This is similar to the assertions made of those justices
> appointed by Trump....the last one being Kavannaugh. Others refers to Justices
> with bad behavior.
>
> You were presented TWO Justices, and were caught trying to apply it to
> ALL Supreme Court Justices appointed by a Democrat POTUS. That includes
> more than just Sotomoyer and Kegan, eh?
>
>> No congress has considerred impeaching a justice over such a trivial and
>> partisan reason.
>
> Samuel Chase.
> https://www.history.com/news/has-a-u-s-supreme-court-justice-ever-been-impeached
>
>> But you're special.
>
> No more "special" than any other rational, mature US citizen.
>
>> It may turn out Democrats win the presidency, house, and senate in 2020.
>
> Highly improbable, but ok, I'll read your fantasy....
>
>> How would you feel about removing all justices appointed by Republicans
>> presidents?
>
> Who's said anything about "removing all justices appointed by (Democratic)
> presidents"? No one stated or implied it in this thread...except you.
>
> OTOH, you mean like FDR wanted to do? (US Attorney General Homer Cummings)
> “Mr. President, they mean to destroy us. . . . We will have to find a way
> to get rid of the present membership of the Supreme Court.”
> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/when-franklin-roosevelt-clashed-with-the-supreme-court-and-lost-78497994/
>
> Like the current Democratic plan, FDR decided instead pack the Court,
> changing the number from 9 to 15 Justices.
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-justices-why-democrats-are-looking-to-completely-overhaul-the-supreme-court/
>
> Similar to their scheme in the Midnight Judges Act of 1800.
>

You supported the premise I put forth rather well... I called it
REPARATIONS for the ObamaRegime's criminal actions.... as those
appointees are part of the corruption that Obama Created. It is limited
and it cleanses the court of corruption by the one corrupt President who
is guilty of Sedition Treason and Sabotage against the U.S. Constitution.

We need to unwind the Obama Corruption and part of it will be the
corruption of the Supreme Court. Along with the thousands of lower
court seats where Obama planted the seeds of his corruption.

And then we need to look at the Hundreds of Obama changes to the top
Military officers where it was also controversial and the seeds of
corruption were spread. All specifically targeted and focused on the
Obama corruption as the problem. NOT at the Democrat party.



--

That's Karma