info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: "The world's greatest memory" failed more than 30 times in responding to Mueller's>>> Perjury trap.
1 view
Skip to first unread message
BeamMeUpScotty
Apr 20, 2019, 1:15:16 PM4/20/19
to
On 4/20/19 12:13 PM, Ken wrote:
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> WASHINGTON — President Trump has boasted at various points that he has
>> “one of the great memories of all time” or even “the world’s greatest
>> memory.”
>>
>> But the world’s greatest memory failed him repeatedly when prosecutors
>> asked him those classic questions from decades of presidential
>> scandals — what did he know and when did he know it?
>>
>> Mr. Trump refused for more than a year to be interviewed by the
>> special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and in the end agreed to
>> respond to questions only in writing. Even then, with the help of his
>> lawyers, the president found it difficult to summon details from his
>> presidential campaign in 2016 that might shed light on what happened.
>>
>> More than 30 times, he told the prosecutors that he had no memory of
>> what they were asking about, employing several formulations to make
>> the same point.
>>
>> “I do not remember.”
>>
>> “I do not recall.”
>>
>> “I have no recollection.”
>>
>> “I have no independent recollection.”
>>
>> “I have no current recollection.”
>>
>> He did not remember learning about a Trump Tower meeting held in June
>> 2016 by his son, son-in-law and campaign chairman with visiting
>> Russians promising “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from the Russian
>> government. He did not remember being told in advance of Russian
>> hacking of Democratic emails before the stolen messages were posted
>> online.
>>
>> He did not remember any particular conversations with Roger J. Stone
>> Jr., a longtime adviser, during the last months of the campaign, much
>> less discussions with him about WikiLeaks. He did not remember
>> discussing a possible trip to Russia to promote a proposed tower
>> project in Moscow. He did not remember an invitation from Russia’s
>> deputy prime minister to attend an economic forum in St. Petersburg.
>>
>> A fuzzy memory is not exactly unusual for any president given how much
>> they typically juggle, much less a 72-year-old president who is the
>> oldest ever elected for the first time. But Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors
>> considered his memory lapses unsatisfying and pressed Mr. Trump’s
>> lawyer again for an in-person interview, to no avail.
>>
>> “The written responses, we informed counsel, ‘demonstrate the
>> inadequacy of the written format, as we have had no opportunity to ask
>> follow-up questions that would ensure complete answers and potentially
>> refresh your client’s recollection or clarify the extent or nature of
>> his lack of recollection,’” Mr. Mueller’s report said.
>>
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/20/us/politics/trump-mueller-memory.html
>>
>>
>> Trump was simply lying, of course.
>
> In an effort to keep you well informed, below is just one example of
> someone you are fond of doing the same thing. There are many more
> examples I could cite, but perhaps your curiosity will seek them out?
>
> https://canadafreepress.com/article/ken-starr-i-knew-hillary-lied-under-oath-in-1995-but-couldnt-prove-perjury
>
>
> "Over and over, more than 100 times, Hillary claimed not to remember
> when Starr asked her basic factual questions that anyone either would
> remember or could at least make an effort to recall. Not Hillary. Can’t
> remember, don’t recall, have no recollection . . .
>
> It became so absurd that Starr considered charging her with perjury
> simply on the basis of how absurd and implausible her deposition answers
> were. The other night on Tucker Carlson’s show, Starr explained why he
> ultimately decided against it, and don’t think for a minute it’s because
> he decided he believed her. Not a chance:"
It was a perjury trap, if you can't remember it as absolute or if it's a
trick question where they ask a date or a time and the Prosecutor has
the tape of it then if you're off with any little part of the response,
you will be charged with lying to them and told you're headed to prison.
I'm just impressed he answered any of them considering there was no
crime how would he know anything that could solve a crime that never
happened?
That tells me the questions couldn't have been about actual crimes that
Mueller had evidence of. Which means it was a perjury trap NOT about an
actual investigation of a CRIME, because there was no crime to follow
the leads for. You know investigators follow evidence trails to prove
who committed a crime. they had no collusion crime they could charge
TRUMP *or anyone else* with. So what crime were they investigating if
they knew from just a few months into that investigation that there was
no collusion with RUSSIA, they must have been spying and "investigating"
to get something other than evidence of a crime, because Peter Strzok
and Lisa Page knew from day one that the "dossier" was a crap document
and that there was no TRUMP collusion with RUSSIA so they spent teh next
2 years trying to get personal information on the President of the
United State... *BUT TO USE FOR WHAT PURPOSE* since there was no crime
all they could have been doing was attempting to get TRUMP in a perjury
trap or to dig up embarrassing information or someting the Democrats
could use to extort the President....
Remember this is how Obama won his Senate seat in the STATE LEGISLATURE,
they dug up a sealed divorce document from Obama's Opponent and rather
than "extort him" to get what they wanted they simply released (leaked)
it vial the complicit NEWS MEDIA to get the guy to quit the race so
Obama had no competition. And we don't know but what Obama's people
didn't actually extort the opponent by telling him they have something
even more disgusting he did which would end with prison time.
*THIS IS JUST WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE*
In other words *THIS WAS A WITCH HUNT* and an attempt to create a reason
to investigate TRUMP and to use the investigation to try to FORCE TRUMP
to commit a process crime.
TRUMP didn't fall for it thanks to his lawyers and staff who are there
to do what is legal and to NOT give anyone like the Democrats who would
commit a coup D`etat using that ammunition of a process violation to
attack the President and use it as part of that Coup attempt.
Looks like the Democrats are just digging their hole deeper and they
don't know when to stop digging, they're going to dig until they come up
in China....
Time to make sure this *DEMOCRAT CRIME FAMILY* is finally put in prison.
DEMOCRATS ARE the newest iteration of the Mafia....
--
That's Karma
> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> WASHINGTON — President Trump has boasted at various points that he has
>> “one of the great memories of all time” or even “the world’s greatest
>> memory.”
>>
>> But the world’s greatest memory failed him repeatedly when prosecutors
>> asked him those classic questions from decades of presidential
>> scandals — what did he know and when did he know it?
>>
>> Mr. Trump refused for more than a year to be interviewed by the
>> special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, and in the end agreed to
>> respond to questions only in writing. Even then, with the help of his
>> lawyers, the president found it difficult to summon details from his
>> presidential campaign in 2016 that might shed light on what happened.
>>
>> More than 30 times, he told the prosecutors that he had no memory of
>> what they were asking about, employing several formulations to make
>> the same point.
>>
>> “I do not remember.”
>>
>> “I do not recall.”
>>
>> “I have no recollection.”
>>
>> “I have no independent recollection.”
>>
>> “I have no current recollection.”
>>
>> He did not remember learning about a Trump Tower meeting held in June
>> 2016 by his son, son-in-law and campaign chairman with visiting
>> Russians promising “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from the Russian
>> government. He did not remember being told in advance of Russian
>> hacking of Democratic emails before the stolen messages were posted
>> online.
>>
>> He did not remember any particular conversations with Roger J. Stone
>> Jr., a longtime adviser, during the last months of the campaign, much
>> less discussions with him about WikiLeaks. He did not remember
>> discussing a possible trip to Russia to promote a proposed tower
>> project in Moscow. He did not remember an invitation from Russia’s
>> deputy prime minister to attend an economic forum in St. Petersburg.
>>
>> A fuzzy memory is not exactly unusual for any president given how much
>> they typically juggle, much less a 72-year-old president who is the
>> oldest ever elected for the first time. But Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors
>> considered his memory lapses unsatisfying and pressed Mr. Trump’s
>> lawyer again for an in-person interview, to no avail.
>>
>> “The written responses, we informed counsel, ‘demonstrate the
>> inadequacy of the written format, as we have had no opportunity to ask
>> follow-up questions that would ensure complete answers and potentially
>> refresh your client’s recollection or clarify the extent or nature of
>> his lack of recollection,’” Mr. Mueller’s report said.
>>
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/20/us/politics/trump-mueller-memory.html
>>
>>
>> Trump was simply lying, of course.
>
> In an effort to keep you well informed, below is just one example of
> someone you are fond of doing the same thing. There are many more
> examples I could cite, but perhaps your curiosity will seek them out?
>
> https://canadafreepress.com/article/ken-starr-i-knew-hillary-lied-under-oath-in-1995-but-couldnt-prove-perjury
>
>
> "Over and over, more than 100 times, Hillary claimed not to remember
> when Starr asked her basic factual questions that anyone either would
> remember or could at least make an effort to recall. Not Hillary. Can’t
> remember, don’t recall, have no recollection . . .
>
> It became so absurd that Starr considered charging her with perjury
> simply on the basis of how absurd and implausible her deposition answers
> were. The other night on Tucker Carlson’s show, Starr explained why he
> ultimately decided against it, and don’t think for a minute it’s because
> he decided he believed her. Not a chance:"
It was a perjury trap, if you can't remember it as absolute or if it's a
trick question where they ask a date or a time and the Prosecutor has
the tape of it then if you're off with any little part of the response,
you will be charged with lying to them and told you're headed to prison.
I'm just impressed he answered any of them considering there was no
crime how would he know anything that could solve a crime that never
happened?
That tells me the questions couldn't have been about actual crimes that
Mueller had evidence of. Which means it was a perjury trap NOT about an
actual investigation of a CRIME, because there was no crime to follow
the leads for. You know investigators follow evidence trails to prove
who committed a crime. they had no collusion crime they could charge
TRUMP *or anyone else* with. So what crime were they investigating if
they knew from just a few months into that investigation that there was
no collusion with RUSSIA, they must have been spying and "investigating"
to get something other than evidence of a crime, because Peter Strzok
and Lisa Page knew from day one that the "dossier" was a crap document
and that there was no TRUMP collusion with RUSSIA so they spent teh next
2 years trying to get personal information on the President of the
United State... *BUT TO USE FOR WHAT PURPOSE* since there was no crime
all they could have been doing was attempting to get TRUMP in a perjury
trap or to dig up embarrassing information or someting the Democrats
could use to extort the President....
Remember this is how Obama won his Senate seat in the STATE LEGISLATURE,
they dug up a sealed divorce document from Obama's Opponent and rather
than "extort him" to get what they wanted they simply released (leaked)
it vial the complicit NEWS MEDIA to get the guy to quit the race so
Obama had no competition. And we don't know but what Obama's people
didn't actually extort the opponent by telling him they have something
even more disgusting he did which would end with prison time.
*THIS IS JUST WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE*
In other words *THIS WAS A WITCH HUNT* and an attempt to create a reason
to investigate TRUMP and to use the investigation to try to FORCE TRUMP
to commit a process crime.
TRUMP didn't fall for it thanks to his lawyers and staff who are there
to do what is legal and to NOT give anyone like the Democrats who would
commit a coup D`etat using that ammunition of a process violation to
attack the President and use it as part of that Coup attempt.
Looks like the Democrats are just digging their hole deeper and they
don't know when to stop digging, they're going to dig until they come up
in China....
Time to make sure this *DEMOCRAT CRIME FAMILY* is finally put in prison.
DEMOCRATS ARE the newest iteration of the Mafia....
--
That's Karma
BeamMeUpScotty
Apr 20, 2019, 5:13:24 PM4/20/19
to
Clinton's and Al Gore link back to China with money laundering in a
campaign wher they took campaign money from Chinese monks who take a vow
of poverty...
0 new messages