Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: The House has postponed testimony in the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.
1 view
Skip to first unread message
BeamMeUpScotty
Oct 20, 2019, 4:28:46 PM10/20/19
to
On 10/20/19 2:10 PM, Andrew Janson wrote:
> On 10/19/2019 5:51 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who
> rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled
> and lied:
>
>> On 10/19/19 10:19 AM, jim wrote:
>>> David Hartung wrote on 10/19/2019 8:12 AM:
>>>> The sole purpose of this "impeachment inquire" is to destroy the
>>>> President's
>>>> political viability, so that he loses next November.
>>>
>>> You are saying investigations of a candidate are unethical because
>>> they destroy the candidates viability in upcoming election.
>>
>> NO but FAKE investigations are....
>
> Nothing fake about it. Enough is already known about corrupt Trump's
> corrupt solicitation of foreign interference in our election, for
> corrupt Trump's political gain, but more needs to be uncovered. That's
> being done in the fully constitutional, fully legal, fully ethical House
> impeachment inquiry.
You mean the one they suspended... and the one that has no evidence to
show the public? That rises to the level of Quid Pro Quo?
And the one that calls its self an *IMPEACHMENT* inquiry when the House
of Representatives has yet to vote to invoke any impeachment of any kind
including anything called an impeachment inquiry.
Corruption by a Democrat is NOT legal because they are running in a
Democratic primary... it's NOT a Presidential General Election. NOT
yet. And Biden has yet to become an actual candidate for the Presidency.
The FAKE IMPEACHMENT inquiry has nothing and NANCY PELOSI says there
will never be a vote impeachment. Which means the FAKE inquiry
masquerading as an impeachment inquiry, is also a moot point.
The entire fiasco is just an attempt to hide Democrats corruption.
--
That's Karma
Is it strange that Hillary has been involved in 3 of the 4 "impeachment"
attempts that have happened in the last 250 years?
> On 10/19/2019 5:51 PM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who
> rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled
> and lied:
>
>> On 10/19/19 10:19 AM, jim wrote:
>>> David Hartung wrote on 10/19/2019 8:12 AM:
>>>> The sole purpose of this "impeachment inquire" is to destroy the
>>>> President's
>>>> political viability, so that he loses next November.
>>>
>>> You are saying investigations of a candidate are unethical because
>>> they destroy the candidates viability in upcoming election.
>>
>> NO but FAKE investigations are....
>
> Nothing fake about it. Enough is already known about corrupt Trump's
> corrupt solicitation of foreign interference in our election, for
> corrupt Trump's political gain, but more needs to be uncovered. That's
> being done in the fully constitutional, fully legal, fully ethical House
> impeachment inquiry.
You mean the one they suspended... and the one that has no evidence to
show the public? That rises to the level of Quid Pro Quo?
And the one that calls its self an *IMPEACHMENT* inquiry when the House
of Representatives has yet to vote to invoke any impeachment of any kind
including anything called an impeachment inquiry.
Corruption by a Democrat is NOT legal because they are running in a
Democratic primary... it's NOT a Presidential General Election. NOT
yet. And Biden has yet to become an actual candidate for the Presidency.
The FAKE IMPEACHMENT inquiry has nothing and NANCY PELOSI says there
will never be a vote impeachment. Which means the FAKE inquiry
masquerading as an impeachment inquiry, is also a moot point.
The entire fiasco is just an attempt to hide Democrats corruption.
--
That's Karma
Is it strange that Hillary has been involved in 3 of the 4 "impeachment"
attempts that have happened in the last 250 years?
BeamMeUpScotty
Oct 21, 2019, 12:49:03 PM10/21/19
to
TRUMPS actions a crime, then shouldn't Hillary be investigated for the
way she stole the Primary from Bernie Sanders? That would be considered
the Presidential election if you consider BIDEN to be running against
TRUMP, all the election laws are in play and for Hillary who hacked the
Bernie Sanders election via the DNC it will mean Prison....
The FAKE IMPEACHMENT inquiry has nothing and NANCY PELOSI says there
*masquerading as an impeachment inquiry* , is also a moot point.
lordofal...@gmail.com
Jul 13, 2022, 10:58:07 PM7/13/22
to
> brother dano...@netzero.net wrote:
>
> >Jesus did not say the world would end in his lifetime he said the
> >generation that saw the signs of his coming would not pass away
> >untill all is fulfilled.
>
> Actually, He did say either of those things and you just
> added words to the Bible. (:
Actually, HIS Words in the Bible include Revelation.
Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
May you wisely choose to surrender to HIM by publicly confessing with
your mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
You may possibly have only until 03:03:2007 (Revelation 03:03 - 20:07)
when the whole moon will likely turn blood red as predicted by
astronomers and as foreseen by Apostle John in Revelation 6 in his
describing the imminent wrath of the Lamb.
May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
diabetes, depression, anxiety, or panic so that we can love our
neigbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a great deal more, dear
neighbor Archie whom I love unconditionally.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
0 new messages