Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Words of wisdom
0 views
Skip to first unread message
BeamMeUpScotty
Jan 24, 2020, 7:25:52 PM1/24/20
to
On 1/24/20 5:29 PM, Steve ignores most fools and losers wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most fools and losers wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 07:26:10 -0800 (PST), milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 9:46:06 PM UTC-7, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 1/23/20 10:05 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/23/2020 4:00 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/23/20 5:56 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/23/2020 2:09 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/20 2:49 PM, milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
>>>>>>>>>>> seminary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>> IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
>>>>>>>>>>> Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
>>>>>>>>>>> sides.
>>>>>>>>>>> The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
>>>>>>>>>>> ordinary
>>>>>>>>>>> and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
>>>>>>>>>>> fathers
>>>>>>>>>>> established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
>>>>>>>>>>> tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
>>>>>>>>>>> job, they
>>>>>>>>>>> push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
>>>>>>>>>>> disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
>>>>>>>>>>> create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
>>>>>>>>>>> the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
>>>>>>>>>>> and to
>>>>>>>>>>> try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
>>>>>>>>>>> president in
>>>>>>>>>>> an upcoming election.
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fact.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
>>>>>>>>>> personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
>>>>>>>>> political assistance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a lie and you know it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
>>>>>> the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
>>>>>> NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
>>>>>> attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
>>>>>> would go beyond that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
>>>>>> Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
>>>>>> election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
>>>>> and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
>>>>> supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
>>>
>>>
>>> How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
>>
>> How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or clearing it with Congress?
>>
>> Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans would never let him get away with it.
>
>
> Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
> military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
>
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
--
That's Karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo
Biden is guilty!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 10:11:12 AM UTC-7, Steve ignores most fools and losers wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 07:26:10 -0800 (PST), milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 9:46:06 PM UTC-7, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 1/23/20 10:05 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/23/2020 4:00 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/23/20 5:56 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/23/2020 2:09 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/20 2:49 PM, milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 7:27:43 AM UTC-7, David Hartung
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> From a social media friend whi was a year ahead of me at the
>>>>>>>>>>> seminary.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>> IMPEACHMENT SHAM - Actually, we all know the pertinent details. As
>>>>>>>>>>> Nadler said, the facts of "what took place" are agreed on by both
>>>>>>>>>>> sides.
>>>>>>>>>>> The issue is that these facts are not criminal nor out of the
>>>>>>>>>>> ordinary
>>>>>>>>>>> and stretch what should be impeachable beyond what the founding
>>>>>>>>>>> fathers
>>>>>>>>>>> established. The Democrats have endeavored to gut the Constitution by
>>>>>>>>>>> tearing down the separation of powers. When they cant do their
>>>>>>>>>>> job, they
>>>>>>>>>>> push for activist judges that legislate from the bench. When they
>>>>>>>>>>> disagree with policies they try to rob the Executive Branch of its
>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate authority by assuming they (the Dems) can read minds, then
>>>>>>>>>>> create a spy novel drawing lines to this person and that, and stretch
>>>>>>>>>>> the usage of impeachment to include things every president does,
>>>>>>>>>>> and to
>>>>>>>>>>> try to sway public opinion against voting for the sitting
>>>>>>>>>>> president in
>>>>>>>>>>> an upcoming election.
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fact.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No it isn't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Before Trump, no president has ever asked a foreign leader for
>>>>>>>>>> personal political assistance, which is patently illegal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There has still been no US President ask a foreign leader for
>>>>>>>>> political assistance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a lie and you know it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you assert, but you have never produced actual evidence
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! Here we go with "actual" evidence again. So, there's evidence -
>>>>>> the mutually corroborating testimony of some dozen foreign service and
>>>>>> NSC personnel that they were all "in the loop" as to what Trump was
>>>>>> attempting to do - and then there's some mythical "actual" evidence that
>>>>>> would go beyond that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is compelling, unequivocal evidence that Trump was pressuring
>>>>>> Ukraine to fabricate dirt on Biden for Trump to use as a weapon in the
>>>>>> election. That compelling evidence is now seen as proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unequivocal? All this evidence shows is that Trump made the phone call,
>>>>> and that a short hold was placed on the funds. There is nothing which
>>>>> supports a claim that it was for Trump's personal gain. You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but six months is not a "short hold" when your country is at war with Russia. And I suppose it was just coincidence that Donny released the funds 90 minutes after he got caught.
>>>
>>>
>>> How long did Obama hold up giving military aid? Oh wait.....
>>
>> How long did Obama holdup military aid without discussing it or clearing it with Congress?
>>
>> Never. And we know this because doing so is illegal and Republicans would never let him get away with it.
>
>
> Gotcha again... <CHICKLE> Actually, Dummy, Obama never sent any
> military aid to the Ukraine.. even while Russia was attacking them.
>
According to Democrats the very act of NOT sending military aid to
Ukraine was a threat to United States National security.... so why
does Obama, and why do the Democrats hate America so much? So much that
they would ignore OUR NATIONAL SECURITY by not sending MILITARY aid to
the Ukrainians?
--
That's Karma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=36&v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature=emb_logo
Biden is guilty!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BeamMeUpScotty
Jan 25, 2020, 3:34:30 AM1/25/20
to
On 1/24/20 10:31 PM, milt....@gmail.com wrote:
> So, yoiu believed Trump's bullshit, too, huh? How sad...
>
> Read and learn.
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
>
> Facts First: Trump is being hyperbolic here. While the Obama administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal assistance to Ukraine, it did provide more than $100 million in security assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more
flexible after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeT67BvYzo4
Obama to Latinos "Punish Our Enemies" (American citizens)
Which begs the question of what does Obama say to other Marxist and
Jihadist friends when he rewards them? What did Obama say when he gave
Iran $150 BILLION DOLLARS? Was Obama again... punishing Americans?
WHY does Obama and why do Democrats hate America so much that they would
ignore National security?
>
> By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
> That assistance also included some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
And how does Armor kill the enemy? Hunter Biden was collecting $3
Million for NOT having any experience, with help like that from the
ObamaRegime 120 million won't go very far to helping the Ukrainians.
Perhaps MOST of the money ended up in the hands of Putin.... Obama did
say he would have more flexibility.... And a few Humvee's won't turn the
tide of war. If the EU is behind this help for the Ukrainians, why
didn't NATO fly in to save the Ukrainians from Putin?
>
> Read and learn.
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/donald-trump-barack-obama-ukraine-military-aid-sheets-pillows-fact-check/index.html
>
> Facts First: Trump is being hyperbolic here. While the Obama administration was criticized for its refusal to provide lethal assistance to Ukraine, it did provide more than $100 million in security assistance, as well as a significant amount of defense and military equipment.
Obama on an open mic telling Medvedev to tell Putin he can be more
flexible after the election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeT67BvYzo4
Obama to Latinos "Punish Our Enemies" (American citizens)
Which begs the question of what does Obama say to other Marxist and
Jihadist friends when he rewards them? What did Obama say when he gave
Iran $150 BILLION DOLLARS? Was Obama again... punishing Americans?
WHY does Obama and why do Democrats hate America so much that they would
ignore National security?
>
> By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
> That assistance also included some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
And how does Armor kill the enemy? Hunter Biden was collecting $3
Million for NOT having any experience, with help like that from the
ObamaRegime 120 million won't go very far to helping the Ukrainians.
Perhaps MOST of the money ended up in the hands of Putin.... Obama did
say he would have more flexibility.... And a few Humvee's won't turn the
tide of war. If the EU is behind this help for the Ukrainians, why
didn't NATO fly in to save the Ukrainians from Putin?
0 new messages