Burish (Area 51 alleged "scientist" responds to George Knapp (KLAS-TV) via Jeff Rense
Area51watch
to George Knapp (KLAS-TV) via Jeff Rense
Dear Jeff:
I have had a chance to review the poorly done article by KLAS TV8 and
Mr. Knapp ( "Dr. Dan Burisch", Area 51 "scientist", a total fraud? -
http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=4190378 ,
and have observed the question "...total fraud?"
The answer to that question is "No." I am as real as ever. George had
an interview with both my wife and Marcia McDowell scheduled, but began
talking behind their backs to other folks in email, to such an extent
that they cancelled their interview. (If this is ever in contention, I
have the emails.)
To give you an idea what is going on, I am currently engaged in a
videotaped debriefing covering the 18 years of service to Majestic.
This debriefing, which may be issued to the public in segments, will
cover everything from the true Majestic 12 and Committee of the
Majority, the J-Rod, to my private life and education...it will run the
whole gambit.
Further, Ron Garner, who is handling the process of my debriefing
coming to the public, had indicated to George that he would have an
exclusive if he would be patient for the work to get done. He wasn't.
Here is a primary list of factual items that George got wrong in the
short few minutes his article took.
1. George Knapp said my name was first: Danny Crain, then Danny
Catselas, then Burisch.
Wrong. My name was first Danny B Crain, then Danny B Catselas Burisch.
It was legally changed in 1995 and the court docs are KNOWN.
2. George Knapp showed a sticker on a vehicle claiming it was mine and
or Deb's, and said that we could have got it as Deb has a family member
in the U.S. Military.
Wrong. We have NEVER had a Nellis sticker on our vehicle for Access to
NAFB...never. HE GOT THE WRONG CAR! ...God Bless him! Further, Deb
has no family member in the military. The last one she had was her
father. He died in 2000, and the last time he was in the military was
the Korean War!
3. George said he had a tape of Marcia uprooting a "SPACE PROBE" at
Frenchman's Mountain.
Wrong. Oh, my God! It was the Aug 14, 2001 probe I placed at
Frenchman's Mountain as a first attempt lure for GP's. ...and I am
still very upset at Marcia for stealing it.
4. George said even my Mom had doubts.
Wrong. Look at the film. She was so pissed off when she said, "well
if my son is the biggest bullshitter in the world, then show me..."
She said it defensively and with extreme anger, as she was pissed off
at George at the time, and even George had to admit that she backs the
account as truth. I had Ron here, who was at that meeting and he
verified what was going on at the time. Perhaps he missed her
affidavit...as well as Byrd's, "Spangler's", and mine? I am sure he
missed Tom Mack's letter.
5. George said that I graduated with my PhD at SUNY in 1990, then
showed my work evals from P/P from 1990. I know they were mine, as the
copies of them originally came from me!
Wrong. 1989.
6. George said that the SUNY said "no way."
Correct tack from them...you better believe it...as if they ever say
"yes way" they are so sued!
7. George got Bob Lazar's position, who said it was crap.
Wrong. In Bob's response he said (a) he never met me "aka
knuckle-head", and (b) he never worked at Tonopah. That's correct, I
believe! (but I liked the knuckle-head line!) ...and I wonder where
George got the bad info? I saw someone who looked like Bob Lazar one
time out there, but I never identified him, have never met him, and
have never said he worked at Tonopah...the DIA guys who now say they
can fly you to Planet Serpo claimed that, I believe. You will find no
such quotes from me, anywhere. Bob was prejudiced with the double lie
first, that I allegedly said I knew him and that he worked at Tonopah,
then what else is he going to say? ...that the rest must be too! An
honest reaction by someone fed an initial set of inaccurate
information.
8. George said I have DVD's for sale.
Wrong. The particular DVD issue that he showed was Bill Hamilton's. I
have never received one thing from them, when they were for sale.
9. George got retired John Alexander to say "highly improbable" about
me.
Cool! I'll have another Bigelow (brand of coffee), I hear John's
employer will like that. To this, George then replied that Alexander
was not now involved with Bigelow. Go to www.nidsci.org and click on
personnel. NIDS has been critical of me from the first time they
learned of me, so it is no surprise they still are.
10. George mentioned that the UNLV Alumni journal doesn't check post
grad status. News to me...but...better check with Deb as she is the
one who put me in it.
I have indicated that my door is still cracked open, a bit for next
year, after the debriefing is complete, for a possible interview. I
think George is suffering from lack of information, which is brought on
when no one will set down with a person. We will see how his conduct
goes, for next year. I have also been recently courted by a number of
radio talk show hosts for interviews and most of them have understood
that the debriefing must first be completed before I begin giving
interviews. My life has been so complicated, it is requiring a
carefully produced chronology of events, so that a target audience may
understand the facts.
I have always been appreciative of your radio show, and once the
debriefing is complete, next year, I would be honored to accept your
offer for interview, provided some time ago. We will need to go
through Ron Garner at the time, to get it set up. In the mean time, I
will supply you with my private email address, should you wish to
converse.
Further, Deborah, Marcia, and myself recently hosted two out of town
visitors, and showed them a bit about our lives, and propagated portals
and Ganesh Particles, live, before their eyes. Perhaps they would like
to speak with you, as well? I will see if they will write you.
Respectfully,
Dan Burisch, Ph.D.
"So He drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the
garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard
the way to the tree of life." Gen. 3:24 (NKJV)
Danny B Catselas Burisch, Ph.D.
H-6196-Maj-E ret.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________
"And so he drove the man out and posted at the east of the garden of
Eden the cherubs and the flaming blade of a sword that was turning
itself continually to guard the way to the tree of life." (Gen. 3:24
NWT)
-------
CIVILIAN INTELLIGENC OPERATIONS
http://www.hometown.aol.com/groom51s4
mi...@sushi.com
like most of the complaints are nitpicking.
jillh10
truth somehow! And we dont need people like him, its not helping the
ufo community is it!
mi...@sushi.com
and video as physical evidence if it can be proved not to be doctored,
though a real piece of alien debris would do the trick. I also require
the UFO community not to take the photographic evidence and then go off
the deep end.
That Mexican Air Force video was good stuff. The claim was they were
seeing gas buring off wells in the Gulf. The Phoenix Lights seemed
promising, until all the BS started regarding the video (aka going off
the deep end).
Re...@grouponly.com
Pretty much that's so, but,... If these were the same standards applied
to the Mob a lot of Dons would still be on the street. Relevance here ?
In the absence of hard evidence ( flying saucers, dismembered mob-hits,
whatever), proof of conspiracy can be considered de facto evidence or
else why cover up, conspire, or otherwise conceal ?
That is what makes Roswell so powerful. Since we know ( by their own
admissions) that the government has already changed their story 2(+ 1/2)
times - weather balloon, project mogul, project mogul with time compression
by witnesses that allows for test dummies 'chute drops - we need only prove
conspiracy to have de facto proof.
Even if it turned out to be say, time travellers or interdimensional warps
or just some incredible display of the most bizarre and anomalous plasma
physics, it could still be taken as proof of UFO reality until the Conspirators
( i.e., the Feds ) came out with the "real" explanation. IMHO, a key factor
to note here is that the USAF Roswell Report was only really required to
answer the basic Roswell facts and explain them as classified but mundane
events. They never really needed to explain the bodies/dummies at all as
that is usually associated with a 2nd crash site. The fact that the USAF
volunteered it is highly suggestive of the pre-emptive release of disinfo.
Just like some guilty criminal who trips themselves up by their own changing
alibis : The Feds reveal *their* conspiracy and hence the core of truth
that is in there.
Andrew
mi...@sushi.com
infamous story of Bill Clinton getting a haircut on the tarmac of LAX,
holding up air traffic. First the White House denies the story. Then
they admit it is true and apologize. Then some reporter talks to ATC,
files a FOIA for tapes and records, and determines the haircut story is
not true. It turns out the White House said it was true to get the
story out of the news cycle, even though they knew the event never took
place.
Now if you ever examined a crash site, there is always something left
behind. You just can't get every little piece of a plane. I've found
metail debris stuck in trees hundreds of feet from the point of
impact..
Re...@grouponly.com
>The fact the feds change this story doesn't mean much. Take the
>infamous story of Bill Clinton getting a haircut on the tarmac of LAX,
>holding up air traffic. First the White House denies the story. Then
>they admit it is true and apologize. Then some reporter talks to ATC,
>files a FOIA for tapes and records, and determines the haircut story is
>not true. It turns out the White House said it was true to get the
>story out of the news cycle, even though they knew the event never took
>place.
But what if the White House *was* the original source of the story?
Why would they issue a bogus story, then deny it, then admit it but with
some qualification that renders it a non-issue? If we rule out psychosis
then there must be more to the story or else why issue it in the first place?
It is a classic C.I. move to prempt your enemies by releasing something
that does contain a core of truthfulness, but is worded in such a way
as to mislead or misinform. Hence, disinformation.
Again, to relate this to Roswell, I said there were 2/12 versions of the
story. Was that really accurate ? Not really. Because there were really 3 1/2 .
Remember the first version was a press release from the base as ordered
by Col. Blanchard the 509th Commander to Lt. Haut the base Information
Officer. So the whole sequence should be: It's a Flying Saucer, It's only
a weather Balloon, It's a Top Secret Project on a Balloon, Its a Top Secret
Project on a Balloon but if you saw any bodies they were just dummies
from years later which your failing memories have compressed in time.
So pay no attention to that man behind the curtain !
>
>Now if you ever examined a crash site, there is always something left
>behind. You just can't get every little piece of a plane. I've found
>metail debris stuck in trees hundreds of feet from the point of
>impact..
>
I think that's a great point and I don't think it gets emphasized enough.
How do you recitify the Roswell Crash with many other known crashes?
I am guessing that the USAF would say that since it was only balsa, rubber,
plastic and foil that it all stayed "sort-of" together and not one, not ONE
single piece escaped the recovery efforts. Do you have a gut reaction to that ?
Another point to consider is to ask why those pieces were still there years later
for you to find ? Because they are not capapble of finding them all ? Or because
they stopped looking when they had gathered "enough" ? If the answer is
that they stopped when they didn't think it was worthwhile anymore than clearly
we can attach a value-estimate to the Roswell Debris vs. a F-111, say.
I think you see where I'm heading .
mi...@sushi.com
to get it all. Here are two examples. One, is the encryption chip from
the space shuttle crash. It's out there, they looked, and came up
empty. We are talking ATVs patrols and on foot. Second would be the
cameras from Tom Mahood's A12 crash. The area was searched on foot and
by horse.
The USAF has gone to plowing over the spots and planting seed. But I
bet if you got a shovel you would still find debris. That F15 crash
site near Rachel is quite clean, but you can still see disturbed earth
and tire tracks.
http://www.lazygranch.com/f15_1_crash.htm
http://www.dreamlandresort.com/info/f-15_crash.html
Re...@grouponly.com
>I don't think you can throw enough people at the debris gathering job
>to get it all. Here are two examples. One, is the encryption chip from
>the space shuttle crash. It's out there, they looked, and came up
>empty. We are talking ATVs patrols and on foot. Second would be the
>cameras from Tom Mahood's A12 crash. The area was searched on foot and
>by horse.
What would this encryption chip have on it ? Access to secure channels ?
Those camera's - are we talking basic gun cameras or the "real" ones used
for intel ? What is the oldest crash site you've sifted through ?
mi...@sushi.com
the cameras:
http://www.serve.com/mahood/a-12/
http://www.lazygranch.com//h4h4928_1.htm
http://www.dreamlandresort.com/pete/oxcart_down_2.html
This crash is from 1944.
http://www.sonic.net/azfuller/pbm5bu.htm
http://www.lazygranch.com/mtcrash1.htm
This is one of the crashes where I found debris stuck in a mile some
distance away from the crash site. It had the same color as the debris
at the crash site.
When the encryption box (sorry, I said chip) was never found, the story
more or less left the news. [Conspiracy!! ;-) ] However, I found it
archived as follows. Not mentioned in this article, but the box said
"top secret" on it. Perhaps they should have written "steal me" on top.
-----------------
Debris crews search for encryption box
Associated Press
Last Updated: Feb. 7, 2003
http://www.jsonline.com/news/gen/feb03/116642.asp
Bronson, Texas - Debris crews combed an area along the Texas-Louisiana
border for the wreckage of a secret device that allowed the encryption
of communications between NASA and the shuttle Columbia.
21963Shuttle Disaster
Complete Coverage: Space Shuttle Columbia
NASA spokesman John Ira Petty said Friday that finding the box was a
high priority because officials feared its technology could be used "to
send bogus signals" to the other shuttles during future flights.
"We are searching for all debris. Certainly we would like to recover
this one," he said.
Officials did not explain why they focused their search for the device
on an area around Bronson, which is on the southern edge of the main
debris field in east Texas.
David Williams, an on-scene search coordinator with the Environmental
Protection Agency, said searchers spent Thursday in an area near
Bronson. "They said they came out of there with very little," he said.
Williams' search party found a black box with a serial number about
five miles east of Bronson, "but it didn't appear to be the black box
NASA was looking for," he said.
Bronson residents said about 80 National Guard members arrived in
trucks and were accompanied by state troopers as they searched the
woods Thursday.
"They were everywhere," said Beth Walker. They didn't say what they
were looking for but told her to report downed tree limbs or uprooted
ground, she said.