Cause of Humanity's trouble
seelite
share, to grasp and not to distribute....
"Humanity has never really lived up to the teaching given it. Spiritual
impression, whether conveyed by the Christ, by Krishna or by Buddha (and passed
on to the masses by Their disciples) has not yet been expressed as it was hoped.
Men do not live up to what they already know; they fail to make practical their
information; they short circuit the light; they do not discipline themselves;
greedy desire and unlawful ambition control and not the inner knowledge...
Spiritual impression has been interrupted and there has been interference with
the divine circulatory flow...
This is the major problem facing spiritual people at this time."
From the Problems of Humanity, by Alice Bailey & Djwhal Khul
<http://www.netnews.org/bk/problems/toc.html>
David White
I would reckon in the giving/taking stakes, bringing strong statistical
analysisi to bear the ratio is 50/50.
Humanity's OK.
It just depends which way you look at it.
David
seelite wrote in message <36b003dc...@news.concentric.net>...
seelite
nothing needed changing too. Of course MLK and friends had other ideas.
When you consider that 1 billion people, 1/6 of the earth's population are
living in abject poverty, and that of those an estimated 25,000 (mostly
children) die of hunger every day (not week or month)...while there is a surplus
of food on the planet, It seems pretty narrow minded to say...that
'everything's fine'.
When we evolve to the point where everyone is as concerned about their neighbors
everywhere, as a few good people are now concerned about impoverished people in
their cities...then we will be ok. Right now, it seems that most of us take our
material possessions and luxuries for granted, while we selfishly ignore the
less fortunate.
----------------------
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as
those who are." Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
seelite
>If someone's taking, someone must be giving.
>I would reckon in the giving/taking stakes, bringing strong statistical
>analysisi to bear the ratio is 50/50.
>Humanity's OK.
>It just depends which way you look at it.
>
>David
It depends on which side of the fence you're on. If you're belly and fridge is
full, then it's ok. But if you happen to be close to one of the estimated
25,000 who die each day of hunger in this world of plenty (there is an excess of
food), then there are some big problems!
50 years ago, lots of people thought blacks were inferior to whites.
Today, lots of people think those in the lesser developed parts of the
world matter much less than those of us in the developed part of the world, and
we ignore their plight, while we grab more for ourselves.
50 years from now, there will be no people dying of hunger...because the
percentage of people with good sense and compassion for the less fortunate is
growing and will continue to grow.
"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as
those who are." Benjamin Franklin
>seelite wrote in message <36b003dc...@news.concentric.net>...
>>"The key to humanity’s trouble has been to take and not give, to accept and
>>not share, to grasp and not to distribute....
Boring Equipment
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:18:34 GMT, "David White" <david...@clara.co.uk> wrote:
> >If someone's taking, someone must be giving.
> >I would reckon in the giving/taking stakes, bringing strong statistical
> >analysisi to bear the ratio is 50/50.
> >Humanity's OK.
> >It just depends which way you look at it.
> >
> >David
>
> It depends on which side of the fence you're on. If you're belly and fridge is
> full, then it's ok. But if you happen to be close to one of the estimated
> 25,000 who die each day of hunger in this world of plenty (there is an excess of
> food), then there are some big problems!
>
> 50 years ago, lots of people thought blacks were inferior to whites.
Actually, it's my opinion (and psuedo-objective view of real life situations)
that "Blacks" are in fact superior to "Whites" in so many ways, that,
when it comes to intellectual standards of comparison, the case can be
made that thru history and socialization "Blacks" have been conditioned
to feel/think that they are 'not' naturally superior. This is obviously
beginning to change (slowly & painfully for many "Blacks" & non-"Blacks"
alike - but make no mistake: it is changing).
> Today, lots of people think those in the lesser developed parts of the
> world matter much less than those of us in the developed part of the world, and
> we ignore their plight, while we grab more for ourselves.
The "well-off", although, outwardly sympathetic to the less
developed, infrastructurally speaking, are really not of a mind to risk
losing what they take for granted, by even considering the
realities of those out of their immediate geopolitical/socioeconomic loop.
> 50 years from now, there will be no people dying of hunger...because the
> percentage of people with good sense and compassion for the less fortunate is
> growing and will continue to grow.
Human nature is hardwired neurology. It will take 50 times 100 generations of
chromosomal engineering performed with care, sensitivity and wisdom.
> "Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as
> those who are." Benjamin Franklin
You can only be affected by "walking in one's shoes" or
really "'seeing' empathetically". Personally, I blame the
extraterrestrial geneticists*. Don't you? !!!!!
Ride the Chunnel...
...The Endless Chunnel...
...The Chunnel is Long.....
England=============(({c h u n n e l}))============France
The late Thomas Edwin Castello, who worked within the
underground 'Dulce' facility, [http://eagle-net.org/dulce/]
suggested that the early experiments by Rand and Los Alamos
labs in nuclear-powered 'earth-boring' technology has been
taken to the extreme.
In a letter dated Sept. 1990, he made mention of the
nuclear BORING mechanisms which can allegedly bore a
tunnel through the earth at a rate of 5-10 mph by cracking
the surrounding rock and heating the rock and earth into a
state of liquid incandescance using super-hot cones, pulsed
lasers and other methods [see: U.S. Patent numbers 3,881,777;
3,885,832 and 3,693,731 for instance, via their Patent Search
engine which can be easily accessed by doing a "web search"
of the "United States Patent Office"] and pressing the liquid
or molten rock into the peripheral cracks where the cold earth
cools and solidifies it in a matter of minutes, leaving no
leftover materials that would otherwise have to be removed
from the tunnel, as in more traditional and expensive
tunneling or mining operations.
=====================================
US Patent Full Text Database
(a database of the full text
content of US patents issued
from January 1, 1976 to the most
recent weekly issue date): http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html
=====================================
United States Patent : 5,813,482
Barbera September 29, 1998
Earth boring system and apparatus
Abstract
An earth boring system is disclosed for guiding and steering
a string of pipe casings to form an underground cased bore.
The string of pipe casings are guided by a boring end assembly
including a front casing and a steering head connected at an
interface gap by a plurality of hinge assemblies each having
an actuator and a pair of connector parts. A protective
enclosure protects the hinge assemblies from loosened earth
from the earthen bore and from the earth being removed from
within the pipe casings. The protective enclosure can be formed
by an inner pipe and an outer pipe of both the front casing and
the steering head, plus a closure ring and a retainer belt at
the interface gap. Guidance sensors are provided to determine
the location of the string of pipe casings and a computer control
center computes steering head axial and angular displacements for
guiding the string of pipe casings and controlling the extent of
the interface gap.
Inventors: Barbera; Leo J. (1835 Youngs Rd., Southern Pines,
NC 28387) Appl. No.: 578740
Filed: December 26, 1995
U.S. Class: 175/61; 175/62; 175/73; 175/171; 405/143
Intern'l Class: E21B 007/06; E21B 007/20; E21D 009/08
Field of Search: 175/62,73,74,75,45,171,61 405/143
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
3526285 Sep., 1970 Adkins et al.
3767836 Oct., 1973 Geis et al.
3851716 Dec., 1974 Barnes
3919851 Nov., 1975 Plourde
3939926 * Feb., 1976 Barnes et al.
4013134 Mar., 1977 Richmond et al.
4436448 Mar., 1984 Magnus et al.
4438820 Mar., 1984 Gibson
4630967 Dec., 1986 Soltau
4655493 Apr., 1987 Sumi
4867255 Sep., 1989 Baker et al.
5061120 Oct., 1991 Akesaka
5099927 Mar., 1992 Gibson et al.
5125768 Jun., 1992 Ilomaki
5203418 Apr., 1993 Gibson et al.
5470132 Nov., 1995 Cartwright
Foreign Patent Documents
3505505 Aug., 1986 DE
0125090 May., 1990 JP
2186899 Aug., 1987 GB
========================================================
* United States Patent 3,939,926
Barnes , et al. February 24, 1976
Portable earth boring machine
Abstract
A portable earth boring machine for the horizontal boring of
shafts and the insertion of pipeline casing sections in
installations where excavation from the surface is undesirable.
The machine is characterized by a steering head particularly
adapted for rock drilling operations which head is positioned
at the front of the casing with such steering head being
automatically controlled so as to directionally control the
direction of extension of the pipeline as the drilling
operation progresses.
Inventors: Barnes; Thomas W. (Franklin, OH); Richmond; Albert R.
(West Salem, OH)
Assignee: The Richmond Manufacturing Company (Ashland, OH)
Appl. No.: 528460
Filed: November 29, 1974
U.S. Class: 175/24; 173/2; 175/61; 175/73; 175/45; 299/1
Intern'l Class: E21B 007/10
Field of Search: 175/24,26,61,62,73,74 299/1 173/2
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
3415329 Dec., 1968 Marlind
3526285 Sep., 1970 Adkins et al.
3767836 Oct., 1973 Geis et al.
3851716 Dec., 1974 Barnes
3857449 Dec., 1974 Kimura
Foreign Patent Documents
259,009 Jun., 1970 SU
Primary Examiner: Purser; Ernest R.
Assistant Examiner: Favreau; Richard E.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Fultz, Esquire; Palmer
Parent Case Text
REFERENCE TO CO-PENDING APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending
application Serial No. 497,245 filed Aug. 14, 1974.
Claims
1. In an earth boring apparatus of the type that
forms horizontal holes and pushes sections of casing
into said holes, the combination of casing means
comprising a lead casing section provided with a
plurality of side openings; bearing means mounted in
said lead casing section; a rock head mounting shaft
journaled in said bearing means; a rock drilling head
mounted on the forward end of said mounting shaft; a
wedging means radially moveably mounted at each of
said side openings and extendable outwardly therefrom;
wedge driving means for said wedging means for
extending and retracting said wedging means against
and away from the rock surrounding said lead casing
section; sensing means for progressive extension into
the earth fill; gauge means for location adjacent the
earth fill and connected to the sensing means, said
gauge means including read-out indicia for informing
the operator of grade deviations of the sensing means;
and automatic control means for energizing said wedge
driving means responsive to sensing of a deviation in
grade by said sensing means. [...]
http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html
cl...@xld.com
Clark, Still Free in Round Rock Texas USA
http://xld.com/ -- Freedom's Home Page
Your theory of taking from the producers and giving to the non-producers
simply will not work due to the fact that when a person learns that he can
eat without working, he simply will not work. Look around you. There's
proof everywhere.
Regards,
Clark Simmons
In article <36bd9e82...@news.concentric.net>,
seelite @ concentric.net wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:18:34 GMT, "David White" <david...@clara.co.uk>
wrote:
> >If someone's taking, someone must be giving.
> >I would reckon in the giving/taking stakes, bringing strong statistical
> >analysisi to bear the ratio is 50/50.
> >Humanity's OK.
> >It just depends which way you look at it.
> >
> >David
>
> It depends on which side of the fence you're on. If you're belly and fridge
is
> full, then it's ok. But if you happen to be close to one of the estimated
> 25,000 who die each day of hunger in this world of plenty (there is an excess
of
> food), then there are some big problems!
>
> 50 years ago, lots of people thought blacks were inferior to whites.
>
> Today, lots of people think those in the lesser developed parts of the
> world matter much less than those of us in the developed part of the world,
and
> we ignore their plight, while we grab more for ourselves.
>
> 50 years from now, there will be no people dying of hunger...because the
> percentage of people with good sense and compassion for the less fortunate is
> growing and will continue to grow.
>
> "Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as
> those who are." Benjamin Franklin
>
> >seelite wrote in message <36b003dc...@news.concentric.net>...
> >>"The key to humanity’s trouble has been to take and not give, to accept and
> >>not share, to grasp and not to distribute....
> >From the Problems of Humanity, by Alice Bailey & Djwhal Khul
> ><http://www.netnews.org/bk/problems/toc.html>
>
Regards,
Clark, Still Free in Round Rock Texas USA
http://xld.com -- Freedom's Home Page
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
whoisdavid
inability or unwillingness to accept what "is" for what it "is" without
attempting to alter, change,or deny it.
David
In article <36BBE7...@equipment.com>,
Boring.Equipment.Ambiguous.Marital.Aids wrote:
--
David
pri...@nospam.com
has been. More people have more food and midicine than ever have. More people
have justicethan ever have. The trend over the past 10,000 years is for
increasing civility.
On Sat, 06 Feb 1999 11:14:33 GMT, whois...@tcinternet.net (whoisdavid) wrote:
>There also is the possibility that the cause of all man's problems is his
>inability or unwillingness to accept what "is" for what it "is" without
>attempting to alter, change,or deny it.
WARNING: READ NO FURTHER IF YOU ARE EASILY OFFENDED!
LONG SIGNATURE BEGINS HERE:
VOTE DOLE in 2000 - She's smart. She's qualified. And She doesn't diddle interns.
Extra Extra Read all about it:
Democrats are Hustlers - The emerging Larry Flynt-Bill Clinton
relationship pretty much described the Democratic Party's philosophy - When
you can't win on moral grounds, get in bed with a pornographer.
A vote for the Democrats is a vote for Larry Flynt and "Hustler",
And apparently the dyke brigade of the Democrat Party approves (
maybe they just like to look at the pictures).
Make the Internet Safe for Kids: Support the Child Online Protection Act
Join the BOYCOTT:
Adulterers - Republican or Democrat
Democratic Party National Organization of Women
72% of reprobate Americans who worship Larry Flynt by
claiming Clinton shouldn't be removed from office!
Barbara Streisand The BLOODworth-Thomases,
Alec Baldwin, and all other Hollywood liberals
who stick up for BJ Clinton.
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting ("FAIR")
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL MSNBC,NBC, Tom Brockaw,
Dope Addicts, Homosexuals, Fornicators, Adulterers,
Liars, Theives, Murderers, Rapists
LARRY FLYNT AND HIS SMUT MACHINE
New feminist reality: It is OK for powerful white male to
use women who work for them as sex kittens.
If you don't like censorship, you have no business complaining
about the length of this signature.
Have a nice day!
David White
is taking, and that is the problem with Humanity.
I was pointing out that this is not possible.
I repeat: if someone is taking, then someone must be giving, so on average
it's 50/50, which is what I mean by "OK".
seelite wrote in message <36bd9e82...@news.concentric.net>...
>On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:18:34 GMT, "David White" <david...@clara.co.uk>
wrote:
>>If someone's taking, someone must be giving.
>>I would reckon in the giving/taking stakes, bringing strong statistical
>>analysisi to bear the ratio is 50/50.
>>Humanity's OK.
>>It just depends which way you look at it.
>>
>>David
>
>It depends on which side of the fence you're on. If you're belly and
fridge is
>full, then it's ok. But if you happen to be close to one of the estimated
>25,000 who die each day of hunger in this world of plenty (there is an
excess of
>food), then there are some big problems!
>
>50 years ago, lots of people thought blacks were inferior to whites.
>
>world matter much less than those of us in the developed part of the world,
and
>we ignore their plight, while we grab more for ourselves.
>
>percentage of people with good sense and compassion for the less fortunate
is
>growing and will continue to grow.
>
as
>those who are." Benjamin Franklin
>
cl...@xld.com
People in undeveloped countries have the same right to earn their sustenance
that I do. They do not have the right to have taken what I've earned and
given to them.
Therein lies the major appeal of socialism. People sign on to it when they
realize that they can live off the sweat of others without effort on their
part. That system, like true democracy, eventually implodes into itself.
Regards,
Clark Simmons
In article <39wv2.3084$cQ5...@nnrp2.clara.net>,
Regards,
Nonlinear Eigenvalue
Ride the Chunnel...
...The Endless Chunnel...
...The Chunnel is Long.....
England=============(({c h u n n e l}))============France
http://patent.womplex.ibm.com/
US3881777: Apparatus and method for large tunnel
excavation in soft and incompetent rock or ground
Inventor(s): Altseimer; John H. , Los Alamos, NM
Hanold; Robert J. , Los Alamos, NM
Applicant(s): The United States of America as represented
by the United States Energy Research and
Development Administration, Washington, DC
Issued/Filed Dates: May. 6, 1975 / Jan. 25, 1974
Application Number: US1974000436402
IPC Class: E21C 009/04;
Class: 299/033; 175/011; 176/DIG.3; 299/014;
Abstract:
A tunneling machine for producing large tunnels in soft rock or wet,
clayey, unconsolidated or bouldery earth by simultaneously
detaching the tunnel core by thermal melting a boundary kerf into the
tunnel face and forming a supporting excavation wall liner by
deflecting the molten materials against the excavation walls to
provide, when solidified, a continuous wall supporting liner, and
detaching the tunnel face circumscribed by the kerf with powered
mechanical earth detachment means and in which the heat required
for melting the kerf and liner material is provided by a compact
nuclear reactor. The invention described herein was made in the
course of, or under a contract with the U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY
COMMISSION.
Attorney, Agent, or Firm: Horan; John A.; Heyman; Henry;
Primary/Assistant Examiners: Abbott; Frank C.; Pate, III;
William F.
Schematic: http://patent.womplex.ibm.com/cgi-bin/viewpat.cmd/US03881777__
roberte
> Therein lies the major appeal of socialism. People sign on to it when
they
> realize that they can live off the sweat of others without effort on
their
> part. That system, like true democracy, eventually implodes into itself.
>
> Regards,
> Clark Simmons
>
I think that socializm failed because of the lack of freedom.. It had
more to do with the basic corruptability of mankind. The desire to control
and dominate others.. No matter what the government is or idealistic
dreams may be,, some one is going to look to take advantage.. The Soviet
System fell from corruption... A simple case of too much power held by too
few people.
If you actually looked at many of the so-called Self Made Millionairs you
find that they had advantages over the common man. They were from rich
familys, and had many connections that helped them suceed... If they are
willing to tell the truth they would say that they were lucky in life..
This is one ot the problems people have we tend to live in a fantasy world
of our own creation. To fullfill our fantasys we will lie cheat and steel,
and even kill to get what we want.. We turn the channel when we see
starving children in Africa and complain that our BMW's aren't brand new.
The BMW was bought from profit from a factory in which that raw materials
came from that same African country, and to get the materials cheaper we
had the government overthrown and made deals with the new dictator. We
installed the Shaw of Iran when the democratic government was going to
nationalize the oil fields... We sent the CIA to overthrow the government
so we could have cheep oil.
We have to acknowlege that we are lucky in life and that others aren't so
lucky.. Then if we do that fairness dictates that we help those who aren't
so lucky. This simple thing is not Socialism, it's just consideration for
others and a healthy dose of humility..