The foremost claim of the white supremacists is that the white people
have led the way and are for that reason superior. This claim is then
used by them to claim that they are superior, and as such have the
right to dictate life for other white people. There is a big problem
with their claims, and it is as follows: Most of the white people who
actually contributed to the well-being and accomplishment of the white
people were nothing like white supremacists. And if it had been up to
the white supremacists, the white race would have never accomplished
anything at all.
Europe came to the forefront of the world in 18th and 19th centuries
as a result of science and industrialization. Neither of these
endeavors would have been possible had the white supremacists been in
charge. First of all, white supremacists hate science and want to kill
the scientists, whom they see as Jews or as liberal or as godless or
as New World Order. As for industry, the white supremacists'
contribution to it is less than that of Chinese sweatshop laborers and
Mexican maquiladora workers. Which means that they have no business
claiming credit for the work of scientists, industrialists or laborers
that have actually contributed to the Western Civilization, and that
the accomplishments of Western civilization do not belong to them and
are not theirs to appropriate.
And if the white supremacists had met in person most of the people who
contributed meaningfully to Western Civilization, they would have
murdered them, as they are well intent to murder anyone who has it
within themselves to contribute meaningfully to Western Civilization
now.
The white supremacists then go on and claim that they are protecting
"culture" or "civilization." I ask a question of white supremacists:
What do you know about culture? Read many great books, understand much
great art, have in-depth understanding of much poetry and philosophy?
A schoolkid in Kenya knows more about such things than does your
average white supremacist. And a schoolkid in Kenya is a much prouder
manifestation of Western civilization than all of the world's white
supremacists taken together.
These are the same people that used to beat up their classmates for
studying at school. These are the same people that strangle their
wives to death if they read books or view art or study philosophy or
metaphysics. These are the same people that burn to death someone,
white black or Asian, who produces anything that adds to the culture
now. So I ask again, What do you know about culture or civilization
and how dare you be claiming to protect the things you know nothing
about?
Freedom is choice - meaningful choice over one's life and one's
destiny. The more choice, the more freedom; the less choice, the less
freedom. Nobody chooses their ethnicity or their race. Which means
that, the more people are made to identify with race or ethnicity, the
more they are made to identify with the unchosen, the less the amount
of choice in their lives and the less their freedom.
The less their freedom, the less they tolerate freedom in others, the
worse it is for everyone.
It is the same exact down-grading dynamic as is led by the Taliban.
These, too, think that they are protecting their culture and their
civilization as they make it their first policy to destroy anyone who
has it within them to contribute meaningfully to either. In both cases
the worst elements in the group take credit for the work of their
betters and use this appropriation of credit to subject others in the
group to totalitarian control. And in both cases, the result is the
worst
possible: Totalitarianism, by the worst in each group, over the rest
of the group, when they have created none of the work to which they
lay credit, which they would not have tolerated to come about had they
been in control when it was done, and whose equivalents they keep from
being created by people in the group now.
The result: Destruction of freedom; imposition of totalitarianism;
sabotage of all meaningful contributions; and hideous abuses, by the
worst in the group, over all who have the misfortune of sharing the
race or the ethnicity with them.
It is time for the people of all ethnicities and cultures to throw off
the yoke of the swine within these ethnicities and cultures and to
emerge as free citizens working with other free citizens to create a
better future for the world. It is time that unchosen factors be
minimized and chosen factors maximized, resulting in real freedom. It
is time that credit be given where it is due and denied appropriation
by the worst in humanity who are responsible for none of the
achievements to which they lay credit, and which appropriation they
then use to bludgeon everyone else into being their slaves. And it is
time that these usurpers be seen for what they are and forever denied
ability to oppress and enslave the citizens of the free world.
White aryans ARE SUPREME, are the "aryamenche".
Whites alone created 80% of the ancient worlds noble metaphysical
philosophy.
Whites own all the exotic defense 'equipment'
You talk about "white supremacy" is like talking about "black filth",
both are common knowledge.
I assume youre of one of the racially inferior subgroups of humans.
LETS QUOTE GOTAMA BUDDHA ON THE INFERIOR NEGROID RACES:::::::::::::::
The most famous Sakya was the Buddha, a member of the ruling
Gotama (Pali: Gotama) clan of Sakya (Scythians), who is also known as
"Sakyamuni" (Pali: Sakyamuni, "sage of the Sakya/Scythian [peoples]").
[DN 1.90-95] The Scythians are described by Ambattha as “fierce, rough
spoken, violent, wanderers (incorrectly translated as menials in some
translations). They do not respect Brahmins, nor pay homage to them.”
Upon visiting Kapilavatthu, hometown of the Scythians, (Shakya),
Ambattha explains them as those who “sat upon high seats in meeting
halls, engaging in laughing, rough playing, poking each other with
fists and fingers and paid no regard to (Ambattha).” In referring to
Gotama the “Scythian-sage” (Sakyamuni), he: [DN 3.144] “has blue
eyes”. In further at [DN 3.81] the true Brahmins are “fair skinned,
whereas the others (inferiors) are dark-skinned”.
Ambattha is asked by Gotama “What is your clan (peoples)?”, upon
which Ambattha responds that he is a Kanhayan, which translates as a
“Black-person” [DN 1.90-95], but is meant a Dravidian, or a dark-
skinned Tamil. Dravidian people, Dravidian race or Dravidians are
terms that are some times given to those dark races, the Tamils, in
being dark and inferior, as contrasted with the fair Scythians, or
Indo-Europeans of the North and especially along the base of the
Himalayan mountains, such as the home of Gotamas peoples, the Shakya
(Scythians). The average North Indian (esp. Punjab, etc.) is fairer
than the average Tamil Brahmin as well as the non-Brahmin. If there is
such a thing as an Aryan race that is lighter-skinned within the
Indian population, it is far more concentrated in the North.
Gotama, in continuing his talk with Ambattha, explains that King
Okkaka of the Aryans, the Scythians, made their home at the base of
the Himalayas beside a lotus-pond where there was a large grove of
teak trees, and for fear of “contaminating their race (by breeding
with the dark-skinned inferiors), would breed with their own
sisters.”[DN 2.92].
In further, in downgrading the nature of Ambattha, he goes on to
say that “King Okkaka had a slave-girl named Disa (whom he had sex
with), which had given birth to a black (mixed) child, (a tanha baby,
black child). The black baby when born cried out: ‘wash me mother!!
Wash me mother!! Get this dirt (dark-skin) off of me!!” [DN 2.93].
Gotama continues: “Because, Ambattha, just as people in these
days use the term Demon (pisaca) as a term of insult and abuse, so too
in those old days they said ‘Black (tanha). And they said of that baby
when he was born ‘behold, a Black, a Demon!!’ And this is how,
Ambattha, in former days the Scythians (Sakya) were the masters, and
your peoples are descendents of (half-breeds) the children of slave
girls (who were impregnated by superior Aryans/Scythians)” [DN
2.93].
Youre refuted, the aryans are the master race in wisdom, invention,
and noble pursuits...........
................there are niggers in africa STILL throwing wood
spears. Case is rested.
I DARE you to watch it!!!!!!!!!!!
I watched it. His race is not inferior.
What are you going to do now, ubermunchkin, burst a blue blood vessel
in my general direction? :D
The Aryans are from Persia and northern India. They are not white
skinned. You are a twit.
> The Aryans are from Persia and northern India. They are not white
> skinned.
Actually they are:
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r4/Heimdall00/Kalasha_girl.jpg
http://www.sak.se/sak/utstallning/nuristan/Nuristanflicka-m-barn-s.jpg
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o0TQ1gj8GQo/0.jpg
http://www.iran-resist.org/local/cache-vignettes/L333xH500/Mohammad-Ali-
Ramin-38053.jpg
--
tois egregorosin hena kai koinon kosmon einai
ton de koimomenon hekaston eis idion apostrephesthai
No, actually they're not.
Iran is named for this tribe. A photo of any Iranian will do.
wrong, Gotamas people were SCYTHIANS, Pali for same is sakya
Persians, son, are half-breed europeans who came down during the last
ice age.
So when you say persian, youre only saying "half/mostly europeans".