Snit (a real advocate): More Malwarebytes tweaks

[Dustin the dude with the stuck floppy]

Who doesn't know that this kind of bull is Mike Easter's MO, not the MO of
Snit (a real advocate)? It is all just projection... the trolling, the forging,
the writing of drivel, the animosity... the puffy red eyes and tendency to
show how flustered he is over being banned from the sandbox for pissing in
it again... Mike Easter can not help himself.

There's a few choices to choose from in so far as in out.

Of course my timely statement stands accurate and correct.

My position: Even if he was barely learning by copying websites, the claim
that obtaining an education as being one of having "not anything" to show
for it does not work for me because you will clearly have the knowledge to
show for it and intelligence is beyond Mike Easter.

--
This broke the Internet!
https://az-gycc.org/category/gycc/
Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

[Diesel Crook]

Keep in mind your accusation is based on you not understanding context. Your
game:

* Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code .
* Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

Then you insist I lied. But you leave out the context.

1) Snit spoke of Carroll's flood bot code, and what can be known without
the code
2) Dustin Cook responded by speaking of what he can know HAVING THE CODE.
3) Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code.
4) Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

You start at step three and then insist that if one starts there it LOOKS
like you were unfairly accused.

In short: you prove yourself a functionally illiterate fraud again.

--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>

[Steven - fretwizzen]

Not long ago I did work on and showed some C for the front end (only works
on high end systems) which is the only thing you can do when trying to
avoid HWSNBN's immature crap while reading with Google Groups. That is
the problem now and younger pupils don't stand a chance, people from smarter
generations SHOULD know better than to fall for communism.

What does it take to end this?

Learning NNTP protocol... even now a newbie. Pothead can create a virtual
machine. Makes HWSNBN cry because he can not. HWSNBN is far too idiotic
to write a complex script. The only scripting he's able to do is click,
click, drool, drool.

That's what HWSNBN does when he gets mad. He of course creates a sock,
starts a stupid thread so he can claim he didn't do it. Don't blame me
it was my left hand... and then HWSNBN babbles to his own post with his
right hand.

-
Puppy Videos
https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

[Dustin who does stuff with miceless computers]

Why do you think Snit is trying to babysit Apd? Even he sees some reality.
He can not comment on *any* of the stuff I quote because he sees it's real.
By following 'media talking heads' like that you get terms like 'reverse
racism'. Carried to its (un)reasonable slippery slope, the push that it's
'bigoted' for a traditional human to not wish to have sex with a dead body
is created.

Snit's computer has more hard drives than Apd's. Snit wins. Apd loses.
Simple as that.

Is Snit envious about Apd having five web sites warning people about what
he is, vs the single one he earned? Apd suffers from waking lies so, to
him, everything, even randomized bot posts, are "libel". Who *doesn't* know
this?


--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[Dusty Cook]

Glasser Michael Snit claims:

* You have two degrees, both in CS and you did not know IT was different.
* You have two degrees, both in IT.
* You have two degrees, one in IT and one in CS.
* You blame me for you confusing IT with IS though you offer no evidence.
* Your project your confusion and dishonesty onto me.

All trivial to show:

Glasser Michael Snit <XnsAB593F...@MjEwUG.BDMbgpk>:
-----
Well, I have two Masters myself, but they are in CS I
wasn't aware CS and I.T were/are seperate entities now.
-----

Glasser Michael Snit <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
Unlike yourself snit, I hold two honorary masters in IT
-----

Glasser Michael Snit <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
We discussed at length previously his masters in IS, and
mine in IT and the differences between them. He was quite
adamant that he had a masters in IS, *not* IT as is mine.
-----

Glasser Michael Snit <XnsAC75C8...@dcFn0WjC2iFiA86fj2h.35Y>:
-----
One is in CS, the other is in IT.
-----

Glasser Michael Snit <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
I'd also like to know how Snit could be so confused
concerning which degree he has.
-----

Other than you being a functionally illiterate fraud, how do you explain
any of that?

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/108-Warrior-Dr-Kingsport-TN-37663/42459578_zpid/
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

[Dusty Crook]

Snit sock Toasty is a toxic idiot who regularly claims anyone who disagrees
with Peeler to be a sock and, still, he wants us to believe that is true.
Gotta be crack. That's our Snit sock Toasty, though, has super powers
and such. Believes if your computer/account is online, they've got the
right to use your resources, whether you like it or not.

Perhaps you use it foolishly. Do you not understand the use of private
networks? At some point, if you bother to care... you would see that Snit
sock Toasty's scheme is to 'casually' incite people and then play 'dupe'.
It was Snit sock Toasty who stated that he and his college buddies used
to break windows all the time and it was fun.


-
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[Stephen Carroll]

Snot / Snit must understand that DBD can go get Access, right, medhead?
And, of course, anyone can go get a real newsreader with proper filtering,
which renders *his* kiddie crap impotent, just like Snot / Snit. Of course
my original statement stands true and correct.

DBD will leave once those of us here before the eternal September are
outnumbered. That and there will perpetually be a butthurt insomniac or
more in an open usenet group (e.g. Snot / Snit). The impossibility of
taming a shrew aside, we've all seen who frequently pitches a fit when
he does not get nonstop attention.

You do realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started
out when Snot / Snit was quoted lying.

How would DBD understand me if you trust there is a possibility that
I use forged accounts? That really works in your brain? This is the so-
called improved 'ideal' by those calling themselves 'elite', you must
'litmus test' yourself, you are no longer given due process, you're deemed
guilty until you attack someone else... a thing that isn't possible in
this story.

DBD shared a specific series of urls several times now, and invited Snot
/ Snit to show which ones aren't true and provide the evidence to back
his claim. Never has Snot / Snit done so.


--
<https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI>

[STALKING_TARGET_56]

Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him
is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked".
Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they
use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone
or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts
you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone
in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very
hard to hack these days.

So already Carroll's story is unlikely.

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing
the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password
and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless
he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out.
The "hacker" got one post in.

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my frelwizzen gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too
stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll
*surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker"
might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification
process *again*.

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was
hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts!
LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and
felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next
quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was
hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify
which one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only
one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'frelwizzen' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just
changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already
done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your
account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack
mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And
he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more
than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account
is a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions
other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And
how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems
you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too
much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all
security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/5QXJHXq8d1k/ujK_-
8ZYUnwJ
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already
alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step
authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone
is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things
- and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be
using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in
any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation,
which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make
it public information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims
it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account -
the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to
have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working
to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report
like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the
part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers
change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with
"hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver
area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from
an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace
back).

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and
figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even
more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I
had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just
copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am
to see how absurd his lies are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from
*before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can
*post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then
Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this
is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public
and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes
it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories
that make *no* sense at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories?
Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence
to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll
says they did.

Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and
he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated
remotely? Why has he not said anything about this?

My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords
and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and
it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.

This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting
like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which
contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved
password on a device he had.

His story changes with the telling.

But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways
to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods
recently tried it with me.

Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses
the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the
gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think
you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English.
But the basic look stays the same.

He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he
pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts
but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they
would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not
use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system
for certain?

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.

Do not think this is over.
-----

No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies).
Carroll is making public threats based on lies.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.

Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.

See if those can not be quoted.
-----

Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----

A complete and utter lie from Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my frelwizzen account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified
to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----

No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older
posts being edited.

--
Dustin Cook's number, tied to Johnson City
<https://www.whitepages.com/phone/1-423-491-1448>

[STALKING_TARGET_56]

Only Steve Carroll repeatedly shows videos scripting Google Groups.

Only Steve Carroll repeatedly lied about what I say can be done with
AppleScript.

Only Steve Carroll spoke of the bot changing names shortly before
it started to rapidly do so.

Only Steve Carroll spoke of the bot changing how it wraps shortly
before it started doing so.

Only Steve Carroll spoke of a GG plugin to block it even after the
name changes, something you later denied you could do, and as far as has
been speculated can only be done by the person running the bot.

Only Steve Carroll said ALL of your "code demoes" were tied to one
or more bots.

Only Steve Carroll admitted telling lies about scripting of Google
Groups.

Only Steve Carroll (of those of us in this group) posted about x10
suspending your 'net access for inappropriate bot usage.

Only Steve Carroll (of those of us in this group) complained about
Comcast and their "Bot" harassment and their comments of the bot on your
Mac.

Only Steve Carroll spoke of not just of how little programming the
bot *might* need, but how little it actually has. How would you know?

Only Steve Carroll spoke of *posting* in response to emulating a mouse
click (do shell script "usr/local/bin/cliclick c:250,300").

Add to that you repeatedly insist the content of the bot posts serves
your stated goal perfectly of pointing away from you and toward the one
you have admitted you want to blame. How odd is that!

--
Steven Petruzzellis: Narcissistic Bigot

[HHI the imaginary friend]

I have not substantiated that the number: 423.491.1448 will be answered
by Onion Knight.

Everyone is Onion Knight -- the oldest gag in the book. He's only doing
what he does. Usenet is an uncontrollable non-organization based on an honor
system.


--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>

[STALKING_TARGET_56]

Snit must have read Satan doxing files and became ferociously resentful.
I suspect this is our first manifestation of the improved Snit. Satan doesn't
have any concept of what he is blubbering about. Satan was once again a
fraud by claiming he would not engage Snit by means of shouting 'goodbye
forever!' and then assailing him via another poster. I have a JavaScript
system I use as well, but it's better than yours.

Just look at the effort Snit once again had to spend to get Satan able
to pull messages from a website server via scripting. Snit once again, took
mistreatment from Satan, instead of a great thanks, much appreciated, response
- that I feel Snit was owed for the trouble and time he spent on the issue.

--
Steven Petruzzellis the narcissistic bigot

[Steve Carroll]

These losers get their jollies out of drawing out replies to their nonsense,
which is the very definition of a troll.

Carroll claimed the evidence were entirely consistent with many of the
nyms. Well, why is he having such difficulty backing his claim up when
asked to do so? In other words, if his statement was even mostly correct,
and not just a weak attempt to come to Troll Killer Snits rescue? The clam
engine had a false positive hit, and the command line clamXAV reported
what the engine which can't created by the same person or company reported
it.

Carroll would have to have Alzheimers to be unsure of if he "rarely had"
designed a website. Remind you of anyone? When someone can't be consistent
with his story and utilizes bogus, self-image saving rot later, it's acutely
clear what his trolling is. Who *doesn't* know that this kind of crap is
Carroll's MO, not the approach of Troll Killer Snit? It's all just projection...
the flooding, the sock puppets, the writing of word-twisted nonsense, the
outbursts... the puffy red eyes and willingness to show how flustered he
is over being booted from the schoolyard for pooping in it again... Carroll
can not help himself ;)

--
Dustin Cook wants to access your computer
<https://findwhocallsyou.com/4234911448?CallerInfo>