Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
If the penalty for a crime is a fine.
11 views
Skip to first unread message
Aardvark
Feb 16, 2024, 4:36:49 PM2/16/24
to
Then, for a price, it's *not* a crime.
Just thinkin'.
--
#FreePalestine #CeasefireNow #GazaUnderAttack #WarCrimes
"We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom
of Palestine" - Nelson Mandela
Just thinkin'.
--
#FreePalestine #CeasefireNow #GazaUnderAttack #WarCrimes
"We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom
of Palestine" - Nelson Mandela
Dave Wilkinson
Feb 19, 2024, 11:30:34 AM2/19/24
to
On Friday 16 February 2024 at 21:36:49 UTC, Aardvark wrote:
> Then, for a price, it's *not* a crime.
>
> Just thinkin'.
>
True but if an expensive lawyer can get yuo a not guilty charge because you paid more it means yuor not guilty
> Then, for a price, it's *not* a crime.
>
> Just thinkin'.
>
because you can afford to pay more.
Chris
Feb 20, 2024, 3:20:19 AM2/20/24
to
Dave Wilkinson <whisk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2024 at 21:36:49 UTC, Aardvark wrote:
>> Then, for a price, it's *not* a crime.
>>
>> Just thinkin'.
>>
> True but if an expensive lawyer can get yuo a not guilty charge because
> you paid more it means yuor not guilty
> because you can afford to pay more.
Sad, but true.
> On Friday 16 February 2024 at 21:36:49 UTC, Aardvark wrote:
>> Then, for a price, it's *not* a crime.
>>
>> Just thinkin'.
>>
> True but if an expensive lawyer can get yuo a not guilty charge because
> you paid more it means yuor not guilty
> because you can afford to pay more.
If, however, the expensive lawyer(s) still can't get you off then you're
definitely guilty.
Dave Wilkinson
Feb 20, 2024, 6:02:25 AM2/20/24
to
Is it then election interference :-D
Snit
Feb 20, 2024, 9:41:49 AM2/20/24
to
On Feb 20, 2024 at 4:02:23 AM MST, "Dave Wilkinson" wrote
<44ae813f-8297-48da...@googlegroups.com>:
Think the main idea is he is clearly actually guilty. He still should have his
day in court -- though as open as he was about his illegal behavior, and as
well known as he is, there may be challenges finding juries which are not well
aware he is guilty. Still, be as fair as you can be and let him have his
defense. But even with expensive lawyers he is unlikely to prevail -- not if
the system works as it should. Then again, the system is very biased toward
the rich, so we shall see, and the SCOTUS is extremely biased and right wing
at this point. They might jump in to "save the day".
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<44ae813f-8297-48da...@googlegroups.com>:
day in court -- though as open as he was about his illegal behavior, and as
well known as he is, there may be challenges finding juries which are not well
aware he is guilty. Still, be as fair as you can be and let him have his
defense. But even with expensive lawyers he is unlikely to prevail -- not if
the system works as it should. Then again, the system is very biased toward
the rich, so we shall see, and the SCOTUS is extremely biased and right wing
at this point. They might jump in to "save the day".
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
0 new messages