PING;;;; GREMLIN OR DIESEL INTERESTING STUFF

[Nobody Home]

You might wish to take a look at this website.
Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
VERY INTERESTING.

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

[Charlie Glock]

How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

[%]

Bill wrote:
> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:

>
>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>
>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>>> DetectCookieSupport=1
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>
>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>

> Search on Michael Glasser.
> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>
so do you

[Nothing]

In article <XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170>,
bti...@wacko.org says...

>
> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:
>

> > On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
> >> You might wish to take a look at this website.
> >> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
> >> VERY INTERESTING.
> >>
> >> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
> >> DetectCookieSupport=1
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
> >>
> > How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
> >

> Search on Michael Glasser.
> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
> aka snit. He has quite the record.

Just tried it. Here is what showed up. Snit seems to have
a lot of issues. Everything from custody of his kids to
disorderly conduct fighting in public.
Not good.

Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...

Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: NONE
Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL

Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL

Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
Case Number: 22616154
Case Filing Date: 01/07/2008
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY OFFICER
Case Number: 27946890
Case Filing Date: 09/16/2010
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
Case Number: 29544340
Case Filing Date: 10/27/2011
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

Offense: NOT SPECIFIED
Case Number: P-1300-DO-201000273
Case Filing Date: 03/25/2010
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: DOM REL
Description: 12 - YAVAPAI COUNTY SUPERIOR
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: PIMA

Offense: FAIL TO CARRY VEHICLE REGISTRATION CARD
Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED

Offense: FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL RESP
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY COURT

Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
Case Number: 11237946
Case Filing Date: 03/29/1999
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT

Level: TRAFFIC
Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT

[%]

none of this says it was snit or where you got it from so it's likely lies

[Snit]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:19:53 PM MST, "%" wrote
<HoqcnRoG5KaleRn4...@giganews.com>:

The list has no relation to reality.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Charlie Glock]

Maybe, but how do you explain the list?
It looks legit to me.
What say you?

[Snit]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:47:11 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<zU5hN.83938$xHn7...@fx14.iad>:

It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.

[Charlie Glock]

You have not answered the question.
So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
Is it all faked?
While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit, why would the government
fake data about you?
Please explain.

[%]

Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records displayed:
• The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record of
the case.
• The information is subject to change at any time.
• The information is not the official record of the court.
• Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
• The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
background search of official public records.

[Joel]

The alleged information is clearly not credible.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[%]

Joel wrote:
> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>> Is it all faked?
>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit, why would the government
>> fake data about you?
>> Please explain.
>
>
> The alleged information is clearly not credible.
>

[Snit]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 9:09:05 PM MST, "%" wrote
<v7adneHnDZ98lhj4...@giganews.com>:

The information is complete hogwash.

[Snit]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 7:34:43 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<t6t9oih06kfcj7tim...@4ax.com>:

> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>> regarding you?
>> Is it all faked?
>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit, why
>> would the government
>> fake data about you?
>> Please explain.
>
>
> The alleged information is clearly not credible.

It is utter rubbish.

[Snit]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:59:23 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<%36hN.9196$STLe...@fx34.iad>:

What part of it being utter fiction are you not getting you sick little sock?

> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?

What is your proof you are not raping babies?

> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
> regarding you?
> Is it all faked?

Usenet is NOT a government site.

> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit, why
> would the government
> fake data about you?
> Please explain.

Why do you rape babies?

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>
>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>
> You have not answered the question.
> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?

Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.

To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!

Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
clue already!

[Al Sakran]

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 04:46:32 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:59:23?PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote

><%36hN.9196$STLe...@fx34.iad>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:47:11?PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote

>>> <zU5hN.83938$xHn7...@fx14.iad>:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:19:53?PM MST, "%" wrote

You have a sick mind.

>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>> regarding you?
>> Is it all faked?
>
>Usenet is NOT a government site.

Unless I've overlooked something, the site is a valid url. It has
nothing to do with Usenet.
This is the site I just looked at http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
Is there something related to Usenet?

>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit, why
>> would the government
>> fake data about you?
>> Please explain.
>
>Why do you rape babies?

You seem obsessed with sick thoughts.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>> regarding you?
>
> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.

Usenet is NOT a government site.

> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>
> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
> clue already!

You care more about MY life than your own... and you lie about my life. It is
what you do.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>
> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.

Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in various other data like
snit's name, his address and so forth.
A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth date also come up.

So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at snit's address, is the
same age as snit or it's snit.

I think the conclusion is obvious.

> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>
> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
> clue already!

I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP was factual or a cut
and paste made up post.

It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him attempting to cover
his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.


--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>> regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>
> Usenet is NOT a government site.

Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.

>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>
>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>> clue already!
>
> You care more about MY life than your own... and you lie about my life.

Stop projecting, you're the one lying about your "life" here. That's
clearly a gov't site and it's clearly showing what it does, goofy BS
from you or your puppets/shills can't change that.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>><um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>> regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>
> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.

Snit is really going off the rails again.
Why he continues to deny the obvious is a mystery.

>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>
>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>>
>> You care more about MY life than your own... and you lie about my life.
>
> Stop projecting, you're the one lying about your "life" here. That's
> clearly a gov't site and it's clearly showing what it does, goofy BS
> from you or your puppets/shills can't change that.

True.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>
> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.

Not that this should surprise anyone who's read a half dozen of his
posts... he's a pathetic and shameless liar and has been the entire time
I've 'watched him in action'.

> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in various other data like
> snit's name, his address and so forth.
> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth date also come up.

I usually don't bother with this kind of thing but I did this time. I'm
wondering if he actually fought for custody of the kids (were they even
his? I thought Gremlin said they weren't). I'd tend to doubt it but he's
the vindictive type so even knowing they'd be better off with mom (or is
he *that* far gone to believe otherwise?) I can see him trying. I don't
see him being successful at it unless she wanted it that way (even then
it might be impossible, given his issues).

> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at snit's address, is the
> same age as snit or it's snit.

It's him.

> I think the conclusion is obvious.

As obvious as the expected lying and red herring toss he's done in this
thread.

>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>
>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>> clue already!
> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP was factual or a cut
> and paste made up post.
>
> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him attempting to cover
> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.

Whatever any of us might "feel" for him, he's old enough to know lying
to the extent he does is absurd and I guarantee you he's been caught at
it enough IRL to have had that drilled into the block he calls his head.
He just refuses to 'look bad', no matter the cost, narcissistic posers
are like that.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:

> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>><um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>
>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>
>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>
> Snit is really going off the rails again.
> Why he continues to deny the obvious is a mystery.

He's a narcissist's narcissist... that's the "mystery".

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
>
> Not that this should surprise anyone who's read a half dozen of his
> posts... he's a pathetic and shameless liar and has been the entire time
> I've 'watched him in action'.
>
>> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in various other data like
>> snit's name, his address and so forth.
>> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
>> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth date also come up.
>
> I usually don't bother with this kind of thing but I did this time. I'm
> wondering if he actually fought for custody of the kids (were they even
> his? I thought Gremlin said they weren't). I'd tend to doubt it but he's
> the vindictive type so even knowing they'd be better off with mom (or is
> he *that* far gone to believe otherwise?) I can see him trying. I don't
> see him being successful at it unless she wanted it that way (even then
> it might be impossible, given his issues).

I'm pretty much the same. I don't bother with these kind of posts but like you this time I did take
a look because the original link was posted and not just the shortened one. Had just the shortened
link been posted I wouldn't have looked.

I believe Gremlin did say something about them not being married. It's either a custody battle or
it's some kind of grift to lower taxes or increase disability benefits or something similar. Sadly,
two people living together but not married do better tax and benefits wise than if they were
married.
If his wife needs character witnesses she can subpoena the entire group to testify to snit's
insanity.

The disorderly Conduct Fighting in public is troubling. And it's recent.

>> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at snit's address, is the
>> same age as snit or it's snit.
>
> It's him.

Indeed it is.

>> I think the conclusion is obvious.
>
> As obvious as the expected lying and red herring toss he's done in this
> thread.

Him and his socks/shills that appear like magic to defend snit.
He really does believe people are as stupid as he needs them to be.

>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>
>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP was factual or a cut
>> and paste made up post.
>>
>> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him attempting to cover
>> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.
>
> Whatever any of us might "feel" for him, he's old enough to know lying
> to the extent he does is absurd and I guarantee you he's been caught at
> it enough IRL to have had that drilled into the block he calls his head.
> He just refuses to 'look bad', no matter the cost, narcissistic posers
> are like that.

Pretty much so.
I truly believe he suffers from mental illness.

[pothead]

Yea.
Snit makes Trump appear to be an echoist.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>> regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>
> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.

I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list. But even if there is a web
source, the source is simply wrong. It is that simple.

You hate your life so much you obsess over mine. You lie about mine. It is
what you do. For 20 years. Recently you have had your sexual advances be more
direct. I am NOT interested in any type of relationship with you.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:56:33 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<um4m51$1m2re$1...@dont-email.me>:

> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>> regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>
> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in
> various other data like
> snit's name, his address and so forth.
> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth
> date also come up.
>
> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at
> snit's address, is the
> same age as snit or it's snit.
>
> I think the conclusion is obvious.

The conclusion: you are a liar.

It really is that simple.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:42:38 AM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
<utlboi9rahbrqo9v6...@4ax.com>:

Who are you?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:25:36 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4nrg$1mdhi$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

What do you think your need to attack says about you?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:23:53 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4no9$1mdhi$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>> regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
>
> Not that this should surprise anyone who's read a half dozen of his
> posts... he's a pathetic and shameless liar and has been the entire time
> I've 'watched him in action'.

Why is it these lies cannot be quoted? You never can answer that question. Why
do you have your testament to your failure to quote me lying? Off you run
again.

For TWENTY years you have been trying to catch me in a lie... but you have
found you lie more in a day than you can find me lying in a year.

>
>> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in
>> various other data like
>> snit's name, his address and so forth.
>> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
>> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth
>> date also come up.
>
> I usually don't bother with this kind of thing but I did this time. I'm
> wondering if he actually fought for custody of the kids (were they even
> his? I thought Gremlin said they weren't).

Gremlin lies a lot.

> I'd tend to doubt it but he's
> the vindictive type so even knowing they'd be better off with mom (or is
> he *that* far gone to believe otherwise?) I can see him trying. I don't
> see him being successful at it unless she wanted it that way (even then
> it might be impossible, given his issues).

You are the one whose family held an intervention.

>
>> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at
>> snit's address, is the
>> same age as snit or it's snit.
>
> It's him.

You said I was an imposter of myself.

>
>> I think the conclusion is obvious.
>
> As obvious as the expected lying and red herring toss he's done in this
> thread.

I am noting your obsession with my life is not healthy. And you lie about it a
lot.

>
>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>
>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP
>> was factual or a cut
>> and paste made up post.
>>
>> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him
>> attempting to cover
>> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.
>
> Whatever any of us might "feel" for him, he's old enough to know lying
> to the extent he does is absurd and I guarantee you he's been caught at
> it enough IRL to have had that drilled into the block he calls his head.
> He just refuses to 'look bad', no matter the cost, narcissistic posers
> are like that.

All those damned unquotable lies. LOL!

Why is it you lie more in a day than you can show me lying in a year? You
never can answer that, either.

[Al Sakran]

On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:44:50 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:42:38?AM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote

I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
group?
And who might you be?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:25 PM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
<d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com>:

I am the one people are obsessing over... and lying about.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>
>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>
>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>
> I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list.

Stop spewing your bull, the link was in the post you responded to but
that's not even relevant, you goofy red herring tosser, you know damn
well the charges in the "list" you "saw" are real.

> But even if there is a web source,

There is no "even if", you ridiculous liar, it clearly exists.

> the source is simply wrong.

Stop digging (read: lying), it's a matter of public record, fool.

> It is that simple.

So soon we'll be able to see the defamation lawsuit you'll file? Oops!

Cut the crap, you idiotic poser, *no one* buys it... and no one gives a
sh*t about your goofy record so it's *ridiculously* stupid to lie about
something we can all see, 'Arnie'.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:56:33 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
><um4m51$1m2re$1...@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>> regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
>> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in
>> various other data like
>> snit's name, his address and so forth.
>> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
>> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth
>> date also come up.
>>
>> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at
>> snit's address, is the
>> same age as snit or it's snit.
>>
>> I think the conclusion is obvious.
>
> The conclusion: you are a liar.
>
> It really is that simple.

Get some mental health help, seriously.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:25:36 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><um4nrg$1mdhi$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>>
>>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>>
>>> Snit is really going off the rails again.
>>> Why he continues to deny the obvious is a mystery.
>>
>> He's a narcissist's narcissist... that's the "mystery".
>
> What do you think your need to attack says about you?

Please. Why else would you lie *so* blatantly and ridiculously?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:55:47 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4pk3$1mlkv$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

Remember, based on my atypical anxiety / panic I have had mental health
treatment. YOU fear it. What does that say about you?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:54:59 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4pij$1mlkv$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>
>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>
>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>
>> I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list.
>
> Stop spewing your bull, the link was in the post you responded to but
> that's not even relevant, you goofy red herring tosser, you know damn
> well the charges in the "list" you "saw" are real.

Looked again. I see the link. It does not take you to a list like is shown.

In short: you focus on my life, and lying about it at that.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:57:39 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4pnj$1mlkv$3...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

You did not answer. You never will. You focus on your attacks against me but
never about your challenges. You need to lie about me non-stop to try to feel
better about yourself.

>
> Please. Why else would you lie *so* blatantly and ridiculously?

[Steve Carroll]

You clearly need more... a lot more.

> YOU fear it. What does that say about you?

Your penchant for telling absurd and ridiculous lies isn't about me, red
herring tosser.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:54:59 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><um4pij$1mlkv$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>> <um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>>
>>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>>
>>> I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list.
>>
>> Stop spewing your bull, the link was in the post you responded to but
>> that's not even relevant, you goofy red herring tosser, you know damn
>> well the charges in the "list" you "saw" are real.
>
> Looked again. I see the link. It does not take you to a list like is shown.

No one said it did, red herring tosser.

> In short: you focus on my life, and lying about it at that.

AGAIN, you're the only one lying about your "life", poser. So what'd you
think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the point where she
felt she had to do something about it legally)?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:02:28 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4q0k$1mlkv$5...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:54:59 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <um4pij$1mlkv$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>> <um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>>>
>>>> I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list.
>>>
>>> Stop spewing your bull, the link was in the post you responded to but
>>> that's not even relevant, you goofy red herring tosser, you know damn
>>> well the charges in the "list" you "saw" are real.
>>
>> Looked again. I see the link. It does not take you to a list like is shown.
>
> No one said it did, red herring tosser.

So the list is not meant to be from the link? LOL! Learn to read.

>
>> In short: you focus on my life, and lying about it at that.
>
> AGAIN,

Again and again and again. For TWENTY years you have lied about my life.

> you're the only one lying about your "life", poser.

But only in ways you cannot quote. How does that work again? And why are you
focused on my life? That is the bigger question. You have no answer. Why not
focus on YOUR life and do something with it other than obsess over me?

> So what'd you
> think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the point where she
> felt she had to do something about it legally)?

See: you are just flat out lying.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:00:16 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4psg$1mlkv$4...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

You say that as an attack... not based on reality.

>
>> YOU fear it. What does that say about you?
>
> Your penchant for telling absurd and ridiculous lies isn't about me, red
> herring tosser.

You refuse to get the help you need.

[pothead]

I think snit is broken again.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> So what'd you think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the
>> point where she felt she had to do something about it legally)?
>
> See: you are just flat out lying.

Spare me your bull, anyone can punch case numbers in and see it's you
who's doing the lying:

M-1343-CM-2023000205 - HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

P-1300-DO-202100722 - Title: In Re the Marriage of: ANNE M
(listed as the petitioner, gee... what a shock <eyeroll>)
PETITION: DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE W/ CHILDREN

At least we now know why the 'wheels came off your cart' in the last
year or two... as I've pointed out previously, 'something' was up.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:31:43 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4rnf$1mvj6$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records displayed:
• The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record of the
case.
• The information is subject to change at any time.
• The information is not the official record of the court.
• Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
• The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough background
search of official public records.

The user is responsible for verifying information provided on this website
against official court information filed at the court of record. Use of this
website shall indicate agreement by the user that the Arizona judiciary,
including its courts, divisions, officers, and employees, shall not be liable
for any loss, consequence, or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the
use of any of the information available through this website and that the
Arizona judiciary does not provide any warranty, express or implied, that the
information provided is accurate, current, correct, or complete.


But the bigger question: why are you focused on MY life and not your own, and
why do you feel the need to lie about my life?

[David B.]

On 22 Dec 2023 at 18:56:33 GMT, "pothead" <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:

> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>> regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>
> Snit proves once more that he is a pathological liar.
> This morning I followed the link, put in the Captcha code and then put in
> various other data like
> snit's name, his address and so forth.
> A fair amount of court cases, including recent ones from August 2023.
> If you look at the details of the various cases, his wife's name and birth
> date also come up.
>
> So either this is some person who has a wife with the same name, lives at
> snit's address, is the
> same age as snit or it's snit.
>
> I think the conclusion is obvious.
>
>

>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>
>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>> clue already!
> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP
> was factual or a cut
> and paste made up post.
>
> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him
> attempting to cover
> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.

From here in the UK it's asking for his date of birth.

What is it please?

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:31:43 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
><um4rnf$1mvj6$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> So what'd you think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the
>>>> point where she felt she had to do something about it legally)?
>>>
>>> See: you are just flat out lying.
>>
>> Spare me your bull, anyone can punch case numbers in and see it's you
>> who's doing the lying:
>>
>> M-1343-CM-2023000205 - HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>>
>> P-1300-DO-202100722 - Title: In Re the Marriage of: ANNE M
>> (listed as the petitioner, gee... what a shock <eyeroll>)
>> PETITION: DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE W/ CHILDREN
>>
>> At least we now know why the 'wheels came off your cart' in the last
>> year or two... as I've pointed out previously, 'something' was up.
>
> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records displayed:
> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record of the
> case.

BZZZZT! They're *not* going to make a mistake about divorce or harassment
charges.

> But the bigger question: why are you focused on MY life

I could care less about your life, Mr. Gigantic Hypocrite who has tried
to drag in all manner of innocent and unrelated people when you were
"focused on MY life". I started responding to this thread because I saw
you 'doing what you do'... and all you're doing now is solidifying what
you are in the mind's of readers.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:48:32 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4smv$1mvj6$3...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 1:31:43 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>> <um4rnf$1mvj6$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So what'd you think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the
>>>>> point where she felt she had to do something about it legally)?
>>>>
>>>> See: you are just flat out lying.
>>>
>>> Spare me your bull, anyone can punch case numbers in and see it's you
>>> who's doing the lying:
>>>
>>> M-1343-CM-2023000205 - HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>>>
>>> P-1300-DO-202100722 - Title: In Re the Marriage of: ANNE M
>>> (listed as the petitioner, gee... what a shock <eyeroll>)
>>> PETITION: DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE W/ CHILDREN
>>>
>>> At least we now know why the 'wheels came off your cart' in the last
>>> year or two... as I've pointed out previously, 'something' was up.
>>
>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records displayed:
>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record of the
>> case.
>
> BZZZZT! They're *not* going to make a mistake about divorce or harassment
> charges.

Yet before it was claimed she still lives at the same address. Great detective
work on your part. LOL!

But the bigger question... why are you focused on MY life and not your own
mess of a life where you family held an intervention about your obsession with
me?

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, David B <b...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>
>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP
>> was factual or a cut
>> and paste made up post.
>>
>> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him
>> attempting to cover
>> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.
>
> From here in the UK it's asking for his date of birth.
>
> What is it please?

I'd post screen shots but I just can't do it, not even to him (nor will
I give you the date for the same reason). Glasser is lying his ass off
in this thread but the divorce (clearly his main issue) also underscores
what I pointed out for the last year or two. His behavior reached an
insane peak of lunacy... it cracked him and he took it out online. He
never said a word to you about it (if no, that'd seem odd)?

[Gremlin]

Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com>
news:i4s6oil3dl4506dhc...@4ax.com Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:00:36

GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> You might wish to take a look at this website.
> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
> VERY INTERESTING.

:) Thanks for the informative post. Full disclosure: I last used the site
you shared a few years ago when I released the snitfiles. Some of the
information included in the snitfiles came from that site.

>
https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDet
> ectCookieSupport=1
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

It's very interesting isn't it? I used to ride him over being an
irresponsible driver; he got busted several times without insurance. I
even suggested the theory that he goes and gets insurance to beat the
ticket, and drops it soon after. How else would you get another ticket
later for the same thing, right? He's not financially responsible in that
aspect. Drives around without insurance. If he hits you, your insurance
company would have to sue him to recover anything. And, he has nothing
worth suing him for. The land his trailer sits on, *IF* he owns the land
and it's not rented, is worth more than the dwelling. I probably should do
an updated information gathering run. My collection is missing quite a few
of those cases.

Oh, so he's been in atleast one fight of some kind in public. Interesting.
You don't suppose he mouthed off to someone while out in public and they
opted to clean his clock for him do you? :) I confess, if the fucker was
nearby in person, I'd have already done so. But, that's primarily because
I was raised to deal with my issues. If we had a problem when I attended
school, I'd try to catch up to you at recess (if we were still in a low
enough grade to have that), or lunch, or right after school at the bus
stop. OTH, If I wasn't able to do so, but we both rode the same bus, I'd
miss my stop and get off at yours; then we'd have that talk you were
avoiding. And if I couldn't catch up to you the same day, there was always
tomorrow. Just because it's a different day doesn't mean anything was
settled.

Snit is older than myself, yet, somehow? managed to avoid all of that GenX
education. Or, maybe he didn't get to avoid it, caught more than his fair
share because of the problems he has (if any generation could be
absolutely fucking cruel in gradeschool it was mine) and the snit we
interact with is the result?

--
My entire life can be summed up in one sentence...
"Well, that didn't fucking go as planned."

[Gremlin]

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>

news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:41:01 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>

>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDe
>> tectCookieSupport=1
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>

> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?

You can use one of those case IDs I shared on him when I released the
snitfile, or search his name. The site has a small pile of additional
charges that wasn't included with the snitfiles collection. A lot of the
material is new to my eyes, and I will checkout every single result in
detail. <G>

[Gremlin]

Bill <bti...@wacko.org> news:XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170 Thu,
21 Dec 2023 22:25:06 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:

>
>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>
>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>>> DetectCookieSupport=1
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>
>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>

> Search on Michael Glasser.
> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
> aka snit. He has quite the record.

Ayep. No surprise he's a fuckup in real life too. Say it louder for those
in the back who still think he's saint snit.

[Gremlin]

On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:19:53槙u20ac烈M MST, "%" wrote
<HoqcnRoG5KaleRn4...@giganews.com>:

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

> The list has no relation to reality.

Who do you think is going to fall for that? Seriously, who? Snit, the
information provided by the state government website is your information.
It's a fullname address and birthdate match to you, stupid. You are the
same person who caught all of those charges. Evidently, you don't do much
better irl getting along with people then you do here. Not surprising,
considering. And as I said before, you're bad for being a financially
irresponsible driver. You don't keep valid insurance. How the fuck do you
not have the registration, IN THE FUCKING VEHICLE, with you? WTF snit?
Didn't bother to register it to yourself when you bought it from someone
else? Oh lemme guess, it's a second or third ride, and you aren't supposed
to have several vehicles in your name while on disability. Were you
playing fast and loose with the state of Arizona and they just happened to
have pulled you over in one of the rides that for grifting purposes,
shouldn't be in your name? I'm just theorizing, mind you, I'm not accusing
you of anything specifically. and, It wouldn't really matter if I was;
even if I was right, you'd deny it. It's what you do.

I bet i'm not the only one curious about the registration charge. So
what's the deal with it, Snit?

[Gremlin]

Nothing <nnn...@hotmail.org>
news:MPG.3feead7a6...@news.eternal-september.org Fri, 22 Dec

2023 01:16:35 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> In article <XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170>,
> bti...@wacko.org says...
>>

>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
>> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:
>>
>> > On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>> >> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>> >> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>> >> VERY INTERESTING.
>> >>
>> >>

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>> >> DetectCookieSupport=1
>> >>
>> >> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>> >>

>> > How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>> >

>> Search on Michael Glasser.
>> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael
Glasser
>> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>

> Just tried it. Here is what showed up. Snit seems to have
> a lot of issues. Everything from custody of his kids to
> disorderly conduct fighting in public.
> Not good.

ROFL!!! Good share!!!

> Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
> Offense Type: Criminal
> Unique ID: Info Pending...
> Offense: Info Pending...
> County Of Origin: Info Pending...
>
> Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
> Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED
>
> Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>
> Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
> Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
> Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
> State Of Origin: AZ
>
> Level: NONE
> Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL
>
> Level: UNKNOWN
> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
>
> Level: UNKNOWN
> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
> Offense Type: Criminal
> Unique ID: Info Pending...
> Offense: Info Pending...
> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

The idiot can't seem to stay out of trouble irl or online.
Speeding violations, no insurance (he's not financially responsible; duh),
etc. The fighting is news to me, though. I wonder if he got smart with
someone while out in public and they decked him? I can understand why, if,
that took place.

I had some of this information. It was released awhile ago in the
snitfiles. Looks like it's time for a long overdue update on my snitnotes.

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:gZ5hN.93426$Wp_8....@fx17.iad Fri,
22 Dec 2023 01:52:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:47:11 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
> <zU5hN.83938$xHn7...@fx14.iad>:

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...

Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ

Level: NONE
Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL

Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL

Level: UNKNOWN
Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: YAVAPAI

> It is fiction.

No, it's not. The link is a state of Arizona, government website.
when a person enters your name into it, as advised above; they get those
results. It has the same old charges for being an irresponsible driver that
have already been published by me in your snitfile. It wasn't fiction, then,
either. More of your charges have become available for review since the list
time I visited that site though. Not to worry, I'll be collecting as much
detail as I can. You know, to keep your file uptodate.

In august of this year you got into a fight of some kind. Did you mouth off
to someone while out and about and find yourself in a bit of an altercation?

> That was easy.

Lying does come easy for you, sure. The problem is, you continue to get
caught doing it. You are literally trying to claim that your own states
government website is posting fiction about you.

> But you are a sock

You've made that claim several times before. I've never seen you support it
though. And you have been asked to do so, several times.

[Gremlin]

Joel <joel...@gmail.com> news:t6t9oih06kfcj7tim...@4ax.com
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 02:34:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>

>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction,
>>> too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much

>> information regarding you? Is it all faked?
>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit,
>> why would the government
>>fake data about you?
>>Please explain.
>
>
> The alleged information is clearly not credible.

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...

Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ

It's credible. It's being provided by an official state of Arizona
government website. You can confirm for yourself Joel by visiting the site
and putting in a case ID or snits first and last name. It's him. Those are
legitimate charges. The information is legitimate.

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:2NlhN.5156$SyNd...@fx33.iad Fri,
22 Dec 2023 19:51:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:25槙u20ac烈M MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
> <d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com>:

\>> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in

>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
>> group?
>> And who might you be?
>
> I am the one people are obsessing over

What spin. Nobody obsesses over you, snit.

> and lying about.

Nobody did that either.

<https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1>

<http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw>

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...

Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ

It's credible. It's being provided by an official state of Arizona

government website. You can confirm for yourself by visiting the site

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:yv8hN.4304$U1cc...@fx04.iad Fri, 22
Dec 2023 04:45:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Dec 21, 2023 at 7:34:43 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <t6t9oih06kfcj7tim...@4ax.com>:

>
>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction,
>>>> too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>> information regarding you?
>>> Is it all faked?
>>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life
>>> snit, why would the government
>>> fake data about you?
>>> Please explain.
>>
>>
>> The alleged information is clearly not credible.
>

> It is utter rubbish.

>

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:gv8hN.4303$U1cc...@fx04.iad Fri,
22 Dec 2023 04:45:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Dec 21, 2023 at 9:09:05 PM MST, "%" wrote
> <v7adneHnDZ98lhj4...@giganews.com>:

>
>> Joel wrote:
>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are
>>>>> fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>>> information regarding you?
>>>> Is it all faked?
>>>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life
>>>> snit, why would the government
>>>> fake data about you?
>>>> Please explain.
>>>
>>>
>>> The alleged information is clearly not credible.
>>>

>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>> displayed: • The information may not be a current, accurate, or
>> complete record of the case.

>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>> background search of official public records.
>

> The information is complete hogwash.

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:Iw8hN.87850$7sbb....@fx16.iad Fri,
22 Dec 2023 04:46:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:59:23槙u20ac烈M MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
> <%36hN.9196$STLe...@fx34.iad>:

> What part of it being utter fiction are you not getting you sick little
> sock?

How could it be utter fiction when it's coming from the state of Arizona,
Snit?

>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>

> What is your proof you are not raping babies?

So you admit you lied. The site isn't fiction.

>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>> information regarding you?
>> Is it all faked?
>

> Usenet is NOT a government site.

Nobody said usenet was. However....

the url below is a government website. Specifically, the state of Arizona
government. Where you live, Snit.

https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
DetectCookieSupport=1

http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

Search on Michael Glasser.
It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
aka snit. He has quite the record.

Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
Offense Type: Criminal
Unique ID: Info Pending...
Offense: Info Pending...
County Of Origin: Info Pending...

Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
State Of Origin: AZ

It's credible. It's being provided by an official state of Arizona
government website. You can confirm for yourself by visiting the site
and putting in a case ID or snits first and last name. It's him. Those are
legitimate charges. The information is legitimate.

>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit,
>> why would the government
>> fake data about you?
>> Please explain.
>

> Why do you rape babies?

Why did you follow that girl? You are a real life stalker then, yea? It's
not restricted to online only.
Who did you get into a fight with, Snit? Mouth off to someone in public did
you?

[Gremlin]

Al Sakran <japp...@pmail.com>
news:d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:50:25
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:44:50 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

[snip]

>>> It looks legit to me.
>>
>>Who are you?

>
> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
> group?
> And who might you be?

Allow me to introduce you to Snit. He's a one of a kind. The following urls
should more than explain what and who he is. And why you shouldn't interact
with him, unless, as you've shown, it's to show what a liar he is.

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Yes, the charges are his, obviously; He lives in the very state they are in
and his name is Michael Glasser. The birthdate and address is a match too,
in case you were curious. He lives in a single wide trailer that has some
years on it. His yard looks like shit because he doesn't take care of his
property; doesn't take pride in how it looks.

[Gremlin]

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>

news:um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Fri, 22 Dec 2023
18:17:13 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction,
>>> too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.

>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?

>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>> information regarding you?
>

> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.

Lying his ass off? Leaving no doubt whatsover that what's written about him
here:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

is all true. Or did you mean something else?

> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!

He's lucky he wasn't unalived over that incident.

> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
> clue already!

Let him continue digging that hole. :)

[Charlie Glock]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>
>> You have not answered the question.
>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>
> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>

> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>

> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
> clue already!
>

I do not see any way for snit to weasel out of this one.
All of his usual tricks are not working but are actually harming snit's reputation even further.
I haven't been following the thread closely but I did ask him some questions and he dodged them.


--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

[Charlie Glock]

On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

>> On 2023-12-22, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>>><um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>

>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>>

>>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>>

>>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>>

>>> Snit is really going off the rails again.
>>> Why he continues to deny the obvious is a mystery.
>>
>> He's a narcissist's narcissist... that's the "mystery".
> Yea.
> Snit makes Trump appear to be an echoist.
>
I confess I did have to look up the word echoist.
I can still be taught.

[%]

Snit wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:25 PM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
> <d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com>:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:44:50 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:42:38?AM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
>>> <utlboi9rahbrqo9v6...@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 04:46:32 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:59:23?PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
>>>>> <%36hN.9196$STLe...@fx34.iad>:
>>>>>

>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:47:11?PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
>>>>>>> <zU5hN.83938$xHn7...@fx14.iad>:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:19:53?PM MST, "%" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <HoqcnRoG5KaleRn4...@giganews.com>:

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170>,
>>>>>>>>>>> bti...@wacko.org says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DetectCookieSupport=1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> Search on Michael Glasser.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
>>>>>>>>>>>> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Just tried it. Here is what showed up. Snit seems to have
>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of issues. Everything from custody of his kids to
>>>>>>>>>>> disorderly conduct fighting in public.
>>>>>>>>>>> Not good.
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Level: NONE
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: UNKNOWN
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: UNKNOWN
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL

>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...

>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: 22616154
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 01/07/2008
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...

>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY OFFICER
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: 27946890
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 09/16/2010
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...

>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: 29544340
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 10/27/2011
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...

>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: NOT SPECIFIED
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: P-1300-DO-201000273
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 03/25/2010
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: DOM REL
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: 12 - YAVAPAI COUNTY SUPERIOR

>>>>>>>>>>> Offense Type: Criminal
>>>>>>>>>>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: Info Pending...

>>>>>>>>>>> County Of Origin: PIMA
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: FAIL TO CARRY VEHICLE REGISTRATION CARD
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL RESP
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY COURT
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>>>>>>>>>>> Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Number: 11237946
>>>>>>>>>>> Case Filing Date: 03/29/1999
>>>>>>>>>>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Level: TRAFFIC
>>>>>>>>>>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> none of this says it was snit or where you got it from so it's likely lies

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The list has no relation to reality.
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Maybe, but how do you explain the list?

>>>>>>>> It looks legit to me.

>>>>>>>> What say you?

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>

>>>>> What part of it being utter fiction are you not getting you sick little sock?
>>>>

>>>> It looks legit to me.
>>>
>>> Who are you?
>>
>> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in
>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
>> group?
>> And who might you be?
>

> I am the one people are obsessing over... and lying about.
>
you're not even part snit

[%]

Snit wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:42:38 AM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote

he's the sniterator

[Charlie Glock]

ATM he is currently about 1/4 the way to China.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
> news:um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Fri, 22 Dec 2023
> 18:17:13 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction,
>>>> too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>> information regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>
> Lying his ass off? Leaving no doubt whatsover that what's written about him
> here:
>
><https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
><https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
><https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>
> is all true. Or did you mean something else?

With him, *is* there anything else?

>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>
> He's lucky he wasn't unalived over that incident.

No sh*t... I'd bet she can beat the hell outta him ;)

>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>> clue already!
>
> Let him continue digging that hole. :)

I know! Just look at all the 'weaseling' he's done in an attempt to
'erase' reality; how much he's 'investing' in his absurd idea that
people are as stupid as he needs them to be. He's beyond pathetic.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>
>>> You have not answered the question.
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>>
>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>
>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>> clue already!
>>
> I do not see any way for snit to weasel out of this one.

Seriously, do you care about his record? To me it's the insane lying.

> All of his usual tricks are not working but are actually harming snit's reputation even further.

Is that even possible?

> I haven't been following the thread closely but I did ask him some questions and he dodged them.

I saw... his responses are what prompted me to look at that site. IME,
whenever he denies something to *this* extent, he's lying.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:

> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:54:59 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>><um4pij$1mlkv$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:03:41 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>> <um4mid$1m5e3$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

>>>>
>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 11:17:13 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
>>>>>> <um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information
>>>>>>>> regarding you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>>>>

>>>>>> Usenet is NOT a government site.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop acting like a ridiculous idiot, it fools *no one*.
>>>>

>>>> I did not even see a site referenced. I saw a list.
>>>
>>> Stop spewing your bull, the link was in the post you responded to but
>>> that's not even relevant, you goofy red herring tosser, you know damn
>>> well the charges in the "list" you "saw" are real.
>>
>> Looked again. I see the link. It does not take you to a list like is shown.
>
> No one said it did, red herring tosser.
>
>> In short: you focus on my life, and lying about it at that.
>
> AGAIN, you're the only one lying about your "life", poser. So what'd you

> think was going to happen when you stalked her (to the point where she
> felt she had to do something about it legally)?

Another example of snit changing his story when version 1 isn't gaining traction.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

[%]

the subject line says
PING;;;; GREMLIN OR DIESEL INTERESTING STUFF
so you open it expecting it to be about what it says ,
and lo and behold its about snit ,
carroll , you're an idgit and don't play you don't see this

[%]

that's a lie turkey head

[%]

like you just did

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com>
> news:i4s6oil3dl4506dhc...@4ax.com Wed, 20 Dec 2023 23:00:36
> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>> VERY INTERESTING.
>
>:) Thanks for the informative post. Full disclosure: I last used the site
> you shared a few years ago when I released the snitfiles. Some of the
> information included in the snitfiles came from that site.
>
>>
> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDet
>> ectCookieSupport=1
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>
> It's very interesting isn't it? I used to ride him over being an
> irresponsible driver; he got busted several times without insurance. I
> even suggested the theory that he goes and gets insurance to beat the
> ticket, and drops it soon after. How else would you get another ticket
> later for the same thing, right? He's not financially responsible in that
> aspect. Drives around without insurance. If he hits you, your insurance
> company would have to sue him to recover anything. And, he has nothing
> worth suing him for. The land his trailer sits on, *IF* he owns the land
> and it's not rented, is worth more than the dwelling. I probably should do
> an updated information gathering run. My collection is missing quite a few
> of those cases.

Where I live NYS, driving without insurance is a major offense which could result in over $2k in
fines, car impounded, revoked driver's license and possible prison time.
And the cops don't even have to pull you over to determine you have no insurance, registration,
expired inspection etc.
The patrol cars are equipped with license plate scanners that do it automatically.
Trust me, you do NOT want to end up like that.



> Oh, so he's been in at least one fight of some kind in public. Interesting.

> You don't suppose he mouthed off to someone while out in public and they
> opted to clean his clock for him do you? :) I confess, if the fucker was
> nearby in person, I'd have already done so. But, that's primarily because
> I was raised to deal with my issues. If we had a problem when I attended
> school, I'd try to catch up to you at recess (if we were still in a low
> enough grade to have that), or lunch, or right after school at the bus
> stop. OTH, If I wasn't able to do so, but we both rode the same bus, I'd
> miss my stop and get off at yours; then we'd have that talk you were
> avoiding. And if I couldn't catch up to you the same day, there was always
> tomorrow. Just because it's a different day doesn't mean anything was
> settled.

Knowing what I know about snit online, that fight probably lasted all of 2 minutes unless he was
fighting a female and then it would have lasted 30 seconds.

> Snit is older than myself, yet, somehow? managed to avoid all of that GenX
> education. Or, maybe he didn't get to avoid it, caught more than his fair
> share because of the problems he has (if any generation could be

> absolutely fucking cruel in grade school it was mine) and the snit we

> interact with is the result?

With his effeminate characteristics I suspect that snit was made fun of by the other students and
that probably still bothers him to this day.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:41:01 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>
>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDe
>>> tectCookieSupport=1
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>
>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>
> You can use one of those case IDs I shared on him when I released the
> snitfile, or search his name. The site has a small pile of additional
> charges that wasn't included with the snitfiles collection. A lot of the
> material is new to my eyes, and I will checkout every single result in
> detail. <G>

That's what I did. I have local copies of the information you provided in the past.

[%]

you're becoming a carroll

[%]

pothead wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
>> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:41:01 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>>
>>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAutoDe
>>>> tectCookieSupport=1
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>>
>>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>
>> You can use one of those case IDs I shared on him when I released the
>> snitfile, or search his name. The site has a small pile of additional
>> charges that wasn't included with the snitfiles collection. A lot of the
>> material is new to my eyes, and I will checkout every single result in
>> detail. <G>
>
> That's what I did. I have local copies of the information you provided in the past.
>

so now you know when snit has a shit and ,
i can see why that would be important to you ,
you have to eat somehow

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 3:11:32 PM MST, "%" wrote
<94OdnWU7YdMOlBv4...@giganews.com>:

He is much the same but not as bad.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 3:02:51 PM MST, "%" wrote
<_6acnXZw45wXmhv4...@giganews.com>:

I *made* Carroll obsess over my life. Not his fault at all. LOL!

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:38:32 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4vko$1nert$3...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

I made you obsess over my life and lie about it. Not your fault at all, eh?
LOL!

Focus on your own life.n

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:33:13 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4vap$1nert$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

I have said I do not want you of focusing on my life and lying about it... and
to you that is offensive.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Bill <bti...@wacko.org> news:XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170 Thu,
> 21 Dec 2023 22:25:06 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
>> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:

>>
>>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>>

>>>> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>>>> DetectCookieSupport=1
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>>

>>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>>

>> Search on Michael Glasser.
>> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
>> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>

> Ayep. No surprise he's a fuckup in real life too. Say it louder for those
> in the back who still think he's saint snit.

Well that definitively answers the question as to whether snit is playing an acting game or if he
is truly as fucked up as he appears.

Looking at the replies it didn't take long for snit's socks and shills to come to his defense
claiming it's all faked.
How can anyone claim a government website is faked?
Hacked yea, but faked? I don't think so.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:04:15 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um4tkf$1n8io$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

> On 2023-12-22, David B <b...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>>

>>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>>> clue already!

>>> I don't care about snit's record either. I just took a look to see if the OP
>>> was factual or a cut
>>> and paste made up post.
>>>
>>> It *is* factual. Trouble seems to follow snit around for some reason and him
>>> attempting to cover
>>> his tracks by lying just makes things worse. I do feel sorry for him though.
>>
>> From here in the UK it's asking for his date of birth.
>>
>> What is it please?
>
> I'd post screen shots but I just can't do it, not even to him (nor will
> I give you the date for the same reason). Glasser is lying his ass off
> in this thread but the divorce (clearly his main issue) also underscores
> what I pointed out for the last year or two. His behavior reached an
> insane peak of lunacy... it cracked him and he took it out online. He
> never said a word to you about it (if no, that'd seem odd)?

I am saying I do not want you focusing on my life, nor lying about it.

And to you that means I am in the wrong. LOL!

You need to seek help.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 3:02:05 PM MST, "%" wrote
<_6acnXdw45zBmhv4...@giganews.com>:

He is obsessed with me. With lying about me.

Then he denies his war is one sided.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:22:09 PM MST, "%" wrote
<Teqdnej2ZsWcYxj4...@giganews.com>:

Strap on backwards is no parts.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:50 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Al Sakran <japp...@pmail.com>
> news:d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:50:25
> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:44:50 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> It looks legit to me.
>>>
>>> Who are you?
>>
>> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in
>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
>> group?
>> And who might you be?
>
> Allow me to introduce you to Snit. He's a one of a kind. The following urls
> should more than explain what and who he is. And why you shouldn't interact
> with him, unless, as you've shown, it's to show what a liar he is.
>
> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>
> Yes, the charges are his, obviously; He lives in the very state they are in
> and his name is Michael Glasser.

Good you are calling Carroll out on his lies that I am an imposter using that
name. Thanks.

> The birthdate and address is a match too,
> in case you were curious. He lives in a single wide trailer that has some
> years on it. His yard looks like shit because he doesn't take care of his
> property; doesn't take pride in how it looks.

This is you lying.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:49 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:gv8hN.4303$U1cc...@fx04.iad Fri,
> 22 Dec 2023 04:45:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 9:09:05 PM MST, "%" wrote
>> <v7adneHnDZ98lhj4...@giganews.com>:
>>
>>> Joel wrote:

>>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-12-22, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are
>>>>>> fiction, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have not answered the question.

>>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>>>> information regarding you?

>>>>> Is it all faked?
>>>>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life
>>>>> snit, why would the government
>>>>> fake data about you?
>>>>> Please explain.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The alleged information is clearly not credible.
>>>>
>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>> displayed: • The information may not be a current, accurate, or
>>> complete record of the case.
>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>> background search of official public records.
>>
>> The information is complete hogwash.

>>
>
> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
> DetectCookieSupport=1
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>

> Search on Michael Glasser.
> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>

> Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
> Offense Type: Criminal
> Unique ID: Info Pending...
> Offense: Info Pending...
> County Of Origin: Info Pending...
>
> Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
> Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED
>
> Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>
> Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
> Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
> Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
> State Of Origin: AZ
>

> It's credible. It's being provided by an official state of Arizona
> government website. You can confirm for yourself by visiting the site
> and putting in a case ID or snits first and last name. It's him. Those are
> legitimate charges. The information is legitimate.

But then why does my wife still have the same address?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:49 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:Iw8hN.87850$7sbb....@fx16.iad Fri,
> 22 Dec 2023 04:46:32 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Dec 21, 2023 at 6:59:23â\u20acŻPM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
>> <%36hN.9196$STLe...@fx34.iad>:
>

>> What part of it being utter fiction are you not getting you sick little
>> sock?
>

> How could it be utter fiction when it's coming from the state of Arizona,
> Snit?

I noted the lies are utter fiction. I am not going to go into which is truth
and which is lie.

>
>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>

>> What is your proof you are not raping babies?
>
> So you admit you lied. The site isn't fiction.

What is your proof you are not raping babies?

>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>> information regarding you?
>>> Is it all faked?

>> Usenet is NOT a government site.

> Nobody said usenet was. However....

> the url below is a government website. Specifically, the state of Arizona
> government. Where you live, Snit.

> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
> DetectCookieSupport=1

> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw

> Search on Michael Glasser.
> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael Glasser
> aka snit. He has quite the record.

> Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
> Offense Type: Criminal
> Unique ID: Info Pending...
> Offense: Info Pending...
> County Of Origin: Info Pending...

> Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
> Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED

> Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC

> Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
> Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
> Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
> State Of Origin: AZ

> It's credible. It's being provided by an official state of Arizona
> government website. You can confirm for yourself by visiting the site
> and putting in a case ID or snits first and last name. It's him. Those are
> legitimate charges. The information is legitimate.

>>> While I do not trust the government,looking at your pathetic life snit,
>>> why would the government
>>> fake data about you?
>>> Please explain.

>> Why do you rape babies?

> Why did you follow that girl?

Here you are making a trolling assumption.

> You are a real life stalker then, yea? It's
> not restricted to online only.
> Who did you get into a fight with, Snit? Mouth off to someone in public did
> you?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:2NlhN.5156$SyNd...@fx33.iad Fri,
> 22 Dec 2023 19:51:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:25â\u20acŻPM MST, "Al Sakran" wrote
>> <d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com>:
>
> \>> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in

>>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
>>> group?
>>> And who might you be?
>>

>> I am the one people are obsessing over
>

> What spin. Nobody obsesses over you, snit.

Of your last 100 posts, how many was I not mentioned?

Maybe 5?

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:44 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

>> It is fiction.
>
> No, it's not. The link is a state of Arizona, government website.
> when a person enters your name into it, as advised above; they get those
> results

Thank you for calling Carroll out on his lie I am imposter using that name.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:43 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Snit, the
> information provided by the state government website is your information.
> It's a fullname address and birthdate match to you, stupid. You are the
> same person who caught all of those charges.

Thank you for calling Carroll out on his lie that I am an imposter.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:42 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> Nothing <nnn...@hotmail.org>
> news:MPG.3feead7a6...@news.eternal-september.org Fri, 22 Dec

> 2023 01:16:35 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> In article <XnsB0E1B1313...@135.181.20.170>,
>> bti...@wacko.org says...
>>>
>>> Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote in
>>> news:NfXgN.9525$9cLc...@fx02.iad:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-12-20, Nobody Home <nobod...@liamg.com> wrote:
>>>>> You might wish to take a look at this website.
>>>>> Plug in the correct data and it becomes interesting.
>>>>> VERY INTERESTING.
>>>>>
>>>>>

> https://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx?AspxAuto
>>>>> DetectCookieSupport=1
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/6p2wwecw
>>>>>

>>>> How about a hint as to what the 'correct data' is?
>>>>

>>> Search on Michael Glasser.
>>> It pops up a list of criminal and civil cases against Mr. Michael
> Glasser
>>> aka snit. He has quite the record.
>>

>> Just tried it. Here is what showed up. Snit seems to have
>> a lot of issues. Everything from custody of his kids to
>> disorderly conduct fighting in public.
>> Not good.
>

> ROFL!!! Good share!!!

>
>> Court, Arrest or Criminal Records
>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...
>> County Of Origin: Info Pending...
>>
>> Offense: SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
>> Disposition: BAIL/DEPOSIT GIVEN/FORFEITED
>>
>> Offense: HARASS-FOLLOW IN PUBLIC
>>
>> Offense: DISORDERLY CONDUCT-FIGHTING
>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY CTY ATTY
>> Case Number: M-1343-CM-2022000047
>> Case Filing Date: 08/05/2023
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>

>> Level: NONE
>> Description: 14 - CHINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL
>>
>> Level: UNKNOWN
>> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL
>>
>> Level: UNKNOWN
>> Description: 183 - PRESCOTT MUNICIPAL

>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...

>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>
> The idiot can't seem to stay out of trouble irl or online.
> Speeding violations, no insurance (he's not financially responsible; duh),
> etc. The fighting is news to me, though. I wonder if he got smart with
> someone while out in public and they decked him? I can understand why, if,
> that took place.

>
>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>> Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
>> Case Number: 22616154
>> Case Filing Date: 01/07/2008
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...

>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>
>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY OFFICER
>> Case Number: 27946890
>> Case Filing Date: 09/16/2010
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...

>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>
>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>> Disposition: DEFENSIVE DRIVING/DISM NO MVD
>> Case Number: 29544340
>> Case Filing Date: 10/27/2011
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: PRESCOTT VALLEY MUNICIPAL

>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...

>> County Of Origin: YAVAPAI
>>
>> Offense: NOT SPECIFIED
>> Case Number: P-1300-DO-201000273
>> Case Filing Date: 03/25/2010
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>
>> Level: DOM REL
>> Description: 12 - YAVAPAI COUNTY SUPERIOR

>> Offense Type: Criminal
>> Unique ID: Info Pending...
>> Offense: Info Pending...

>> County Of Origin: PIMA
>>
>> Offense: FAIL TO CARRY VEHICLE REGISTRATION CARD
>> Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
>>
>> Offense: FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL RESP
>> Disposition: COMPL DISMISSED BY COURT
>>
>> Offense: LOCAL CHARGE
>> Disposition: PLEA GUILTY/RESP SENT IMPOSED
>> Case Number: 11237946
>> Case Filing Date: 03/29/1999
>> State Of Origin: AZ
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>>
>> Level: TRAFFIC
>> Description: TUCSON MUNICIPAL COURT
>

> I had some of this information. It was released awhile ago in the
> snitfiles. Looks like it's time for a long overdue update on my snitnotes.

This contradicts much of what you said in your doxxing.

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05:39 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
>

> It's very interesting isn't it? I used to ride him over being an
> irresponsible driver; he got busted several times without insurance.

This is a direct lie on your part.

[WolfFan]

On Dec 22, 2023, Gremlin wrote
(in article<XnsB0E2A3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>):

i thoughtnthat he was a bad un. after all, he supports Our Dave.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Al Sakran <japp...@pmail.com>
> news:d0qboippfmdc1qsn2...@4ax.com Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:50:25

> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:44:50 GMT, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>> It looks legit to me.
>>>
>>>Who are you?
>>

>> I am Al Sakran, my real name. I am reading this thread in

>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and puzzled as to what is has to do with that
>> group?
>> And who might you be?
>

> Allow me to introduce you to Snit. He's a one of a kind. The following urls
> should more than explain what and who he is. And why you shouldn't interact
> with him, unless, as you've shown, it's to show what a liar he is.
>
><https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
><https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
><https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>
> Yes, the charges are his, obviously; He lives in the very state they are in

> and his name is Michael Glasser. The birthdate and address is a match too,

> in case you were curious. He lives in a single wide trailer that has some
> years on it. His yard looks like shit because he doesn't take care of his
> property; doesn't take pride in how it looks.
>

At least from the google photo of snit's hovel, his car doesn't look like it could go over 30MPH.
The house is the worst looking trailer on the block, by far.

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

>> Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
>> news:um4jr9$1loir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Fri, 22 Dec 2023

>> 18:17:13 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

>>
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction,
>>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.

>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?

>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much
>>>> information regarding you?
>>>

>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>
>> Lying his ass off? Leaving no doubt whatsover that what's written about him
>> here:
>>

>><https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
>><https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
>><https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>>

>> is all true. Or did you mean something else?
>>

>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>
>> He's lucky he wasn't unalived over that incident.
>>

>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>>
>> Let him continue digging that hole. :)
>

> ATM he is currently about 1/4 the way to China.
>

Xi Jinping can have him.
Snit will fit in well in China where the government dictates everything.

[%]

lets see where you live

[pothead]

On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:

>> On 2023-12-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>>> On 2023-12-22, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is fiction. That was easy. But you are a sock, so you are fiction, too.
>>>>
>>>> You have not answered the question.
>>>> So what is your proof that this site is fiction?
>>>> Apparently it is a government site so why do they have so much information regarding you?
>>>
>>> Of course it's a government site, he's 'doing what he does' AGAIN.
>>>

>>> To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
>>>

>>> Hint: Nobody gives a sh*t about your record, fool... they'd care far
>>> more about the fact that you're lying about something that anyone can
>>> easily view. You don't get the "obvious" stuff like this because you're
>>> so used to being a poser. Just STOP that sh*t... and stop all the goofy,
>>> pointless lying, it's absurd and it doesn't work anyway. Grow a f*cking
>>> clue already!
>>>

>> I do not see any way for snit to weasel out of this one.
>
> Seriously, do you care about his record? To me it's the insane lying.
>
>> All of his usual tricks are not working but are actually harming snit's reputation even further.
>
> Is that even possible?
>
>> I haven't been following the thread closely but I did ask him some questions and he dodged them.
>
> I saw... his responses are what prompted me to look at that site. IME,
> whenever he denies something to *this* extent, he's lying.
>

I'm with you SC in that I don't care about snit's legal problems but find it interesting how he
lies, lies and lies some more to try and save himself.
That is a sign of one sick puppy.

[Steve Carroll]

It's neither faked or hacked... and it's fairly easy to tell it's
genuine by the way Glasser has been responding. The only question in my
mind is based on something Gremlin alluded to: Are Glasser and wife
playacting for the courts for financial gain of some kind? I can't
imagine how that would work but I can easily see Glasser doing so if it
were possible. For now (in ME's 'voice') I'll let William of Ockham's
philosophy prevail (it's a very 'Wiki' thing to say ;)

[Snit]

On Dec 22, 2023 at 4:17:55 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<um55f3$1o50g$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:

Not going into detail about it or what you are lying about. Just noting you
are doing as you do and obsessing over my life. You ignore your own life where
you have had at least three failed marriages, your family had an intervention
to try to get you to deal with your obsession over me, and you cheated on at
least one of your wives.

Why won't you talk about those things?

> The only question in my
> mind is based on something Gremlin alluded to: Are Glasser and wife
> playacting for the courts for financial gain of some kind?

LOL! That would explain the shared address. Or maybe not? Hmmm... LOL! Will be
interesting to see how creative your stories get as you try to fish for info.

> I can't
> imagine how that would work but I can easily see Glasser doing so if it
> were possible.

You trust me to do things you could not... assuming they are possible. You see
me as having the CAPACITY to do what you could not. But my morals are higher
than yours and I would not even consider such.

> For now (in ME's 'voice') I'll let William of Ockham's
> philosophy prevail (it's a very 'Wiki' thing to say ;)