Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
43 views
Skip to first unread message
David in Devon
Feb 17, 2019, 7:00:23 PM2/17/19
to
On 17/02/2019 23:03, Joelle wrote:>
> As if you hadn't guessed..
> Winston is not that easily fooled, thank goodness.
>
> Joëlle
A simple question for you, Joëlle
Can you explain why *Winston has actually been downright rude*?
He has simply ignored Pierre's 'Ping'; you responded instead.
Those two fellows are, supposedly, pretty good friends here.
Have you any idea what happened to Omaha® (Mr James Shepherd)?
He used to be the moderator of this group until forced out by Winston.
https://www.shepherd.org/about/history-and-mission
=
Is there any way to check the company accounts of an organisation like
The Shepherd Centre?
--
David B.
Devon, UK
> As if you hadn't guessed..
> Winston is not that easily fooled, thank goodness.
>
> Joëlle
A simple question for you, Joëlle
Can you explain why *Winston has actually been downright rude*?
He has simply ignored Pierre's 'Ping'; you responded instead.
Those two fellows are, supposedly, pretty good friends here.
Have you any idea what happened to Omaha® (Mr James Shepherd)?
He used to be the moderator of this group until forced out by Winston.
https://www.shepherd.org/about/history-and-mission
=
Is there any way to check the company accounts of an organisation like
The Shepherd Centre?
--
David B.
Devon, UK
David in Devon
Feb 17, 2019, 7:14:09 PM2/17/19
to
Posted here in case THIS post is deleted too!
=
On 25/01/2019 10:42, Pierre Szwarc wrote:
> I hadn't heard from him in such a long time that I didn't recognize
>his name until it was brought to my attention here… I don't understand
>why he latched on to me the way he did, it's almost as though he were
>looking for a father figure – which is a very bad idea, as I don't
have >children nor patience with the children of others <LOL>
*David is the father figure*! He has one surviving son, a daughter and
five grandchildren. He's told you that in your current mutual Facebook
group.
Why have you not yet joined the *Annexcafe* group, Pierre?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/AnnexcafePhotoshowcaseMembers/
> -- Pierre
> Le 25/01/2019 à 02:04, Andrew Taylor a écrit :
>> Beware. The last time I contacted Ann about 10 years ago, she wanted
nothing to do with Boater Dave. I doubt she has changed her mind. Funny,
in real life, (I have met him in person), he is a clever, very
intelligent man, but his online persona is the Jeckle and Hyde
character, a manipulative son of a bitch full of conspiracy theories
about everyone including, me, Pierre and Winston.
>> Andrew Taylor
>> Mississauga - Ontario
>> Canada
>> ~
>> "Pierre Szwarc" <nob...@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:q1hs99$111$1...@myplugbox.com...
>>
>> I have a request from a British FB friend, named David Brooks, whom
I got acquainted with online a long time ago. He's looking for a British
woman with whom he used to have frequent telephone calls but who seems
to have fallen off the grid. Her screen name was Ann, she lived (lives?)
near Reading, Buckinghamshire, UK. Like David and me (and a flock of
others) she was a member of the Annex Café forum while that lasted, but
she didn't follow us into the dark side (aka FB). He's trying to locate
her and asked me to inquire here, just in case…
>>
>> Here's a link to possibly jog your memory:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070228040421/http://www.annexcafe.com/registry/viewregistry.cfm?regid=27&gohistory=1
>>
>> Thanks for your help
>> -- Pierre
=
Just for a permanent record!
=
On 25/01/2019 10:42, Pierre Szwarc wrote:
> I hadn't heard from him in such a long time that I didn't recognize
>his name until it was brought to my attention here… I don't understand
>why he latched on to me the way he did, it's almost as though he were
>looking for a father figure – which is a very bad idea, as I don't
have >children nor patience with the children of others <LOL>
*David is the father figure*! He has one surviving son, a daughter and
five grandchildren. He's told you that in your current mutual Facebook
group.
Why have you not yet joined the *Annexcafe* group, Pierre?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/AnnexcafePhotoshowcaseMembers/
> -- Pierre
> Le 25/01/2019 à 02:04, Andrew Taylor a écrit :
>> Beware. The last time I contacted Ann about 10 years ago, she wanted
nothing to do with Boater Dave. I doubt she has changed her mind. Funny,
in real life, (I have met him in person), he is a clever, very
intelligent man, but his online persona is the Jeckle and Hyde
character, a manipulative son of a bitch full of conspiracy theories
about everyone including, me, Pierre and Winston.
>> Andrew Taylor
>> Mississauga - Ontario
>> Canada
>> ~
>> "Pierre Szwarc" <nob...@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:q1hs99$111$1...@myplugbox.com...
>>
>> I have a request from a British FB friend, named David Brooks, whom
I got acquainted with online a long time ago. He's looking for a British
woman with whom he used to have frequent telephone calls but who seems
to have fallen off the grid. Her screen name was Ann, she lived (lives?)
near Reading, Buckinghamshire, UK. Like David and me (and a flock of
others) she was a member of the Annex Café forum while that lasted, but
she didn't follow us into the dark side (aka FB). He's trying to locate
her and asked me to inquire here, just in case…
>>
>> Here's a link to possibly jog your memory:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070228040421/http://www.annexcafe.com/registry/viewregistry.cfm?regid=27&gohistory=1
>>
>> Thanks for your help
>> -- Pierre
=
Just for a permanent record!
Shadow
Feb 19, 2019, 6:52:50 AM2/19/19
to
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:14:05 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> Beware. The last time I contacted Ann about 10 years ago, she wanted
>nothing to do with Boater Dave.
..............
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> Beware. The last time I contacted Ann about 10 years ago, she wanted
>nothing to do with Boater Dave.
>Just for a permanent record!
OK, recorded. The STALKING and other people's personal
information was removed, after all, this is Usenet.
Why ? Read here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190205091456/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
How is this on topic on any of the cross-groups you posted to
? OT up.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 7:00:49 AM2/19/19
to
On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
> ? OT up.
> []'s
The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
news.myplugbox.com server reads and posts in the Windows10 group. He
goes by the name of 'Winston' - supposedly a Microsoft MVP using a
handle which looks like this:-
...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
msft mvp 2007-2019
HTH
HAND
> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
> ? OT up.
> []'s
The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
news.myplugbox.com server reads and posts in the Windows10 group. He
goes by the name of 'Winston' - supposedly a Microsoft MVP using a
handle which looks like this:-
...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
msft mvp 2007-2019
HTH
HAND
Shadow
Feb 19, 2019, 4:12:54 PM2/19/19
to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>
>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>> ? OT up.
>> []'s
>
>The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
><private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>
>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>> ? OT up.
>> []'s
>
>The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
So respect his moderation.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190205091456/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 4:45:38 PM2/19/19
to
On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>
>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>> ? OT up.
>>> []'s
>>
>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>
> So respect his moderation.
Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>
>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>> ? OT up.
>>> []'s
>>
>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>
> So respect his moderation.
will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
too.
nospam
Feb 19, 2019, 4:59:50 PM2/19/19
to
In article <3O_aE.105780$fn2....@fx12.fr7>, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >
> > So respect his moderation.
>
> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> too.
so that's why you were booted out of the navy.
> >>
> >> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >
> > So respect his moderation.
>
> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> too.
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 5:19:10 PM2/19/19
to
ignorant.
You comment is incorrect, as I'm confident you know only too well.
nospam
Feb 19, 2019, 5:24:52 PM2/19/19
to
In article <vh%aE.65609$yK.4...@fx06.fr7>, David in Devon
commanding officers, you would have been booted out.
your words, not mine.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >>>
> >>> So respect his moderation.
> >>
> >> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> >> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> >> too.
> >
> > so that's why you were booted out of the navy.
>
> I know you are many things, 'nospam', but hadn't pegged you as being
> ignorant.
>
> You comment is incorrect, as I'm confident you know only too well.
given that you don't respect those in a position of power, namely your
> >>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >>>
> >>> So respect his moderation.
> >>
> >> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> >> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> >> too.
> >
> > so that's why you were booted out of the navy.
>
> I know you are many things, 'nospam', but hadn't pegged you as being
> ignorant.
>
> You comment is incorrect, as I'm confident you know only too well.
commanding officers, you would have been booted out.
your words, not mine.
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 5:45:54 PM2/19/19
to
Commanding Officers do not appoint *themselves* to such a position.
That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
> your words, not mine.
I doubt it. I suspect a misunderstanding on your part.
nospam
Feb 19, 2019, 5:56:00 PM2/19/19
to
In article <AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7>, David in Devon
> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
the only bad news is you, who has yet again changed his nym.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >>>>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So respect his moderation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> >>>> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> >>>> too.
> >>>
> >>> so that's why you were booted out of the navy.
> >>
> >> I know you are many things, 'nospam', but hadn't pegged you as being
> >> ignorant.
> >>
> >> You comment is incorrect, as I'm confident you know only too well.
> >
> > given that you don't respect those in a position of power, namely your
> > commanding officers, you would have been booted out.
>
> Oh dear. It seems you ARE ignorant after all. :-(
>
> Commanding Officers do not appoint *themselves* to such a position.
it doesn't matter who appointed them.
> >>>>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
> >>>>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So respect his moderation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
> >>>> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
> >>>> too.
> >>>
> >>> so that's why you were booted out of the navy.
> >>
> >> I know you are many things, 'nospam', but hadn't pegged you as being
> >> ignorant.
> >>
> >> You comment is incorrect, as I'm confident you know only too well.
> >
> > given that you don't respect those in a position of power, namely your
> > commanding officers, you would have been booted out.
>
> Oh dear. It seems you ARE ignorant after all. :-(
>
> Commanding Officers do not appoint *themselves* to such a position.
> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 6:05:31 PM2/19/19
to
>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>
> the only bad news is you, who has yet again changed his nym.
Char Jackson
Feb 19, 2019, 6:23:22 PM2/19/19
to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 +0000, David in Devon
how you pretend that this is 'your' group? Yeah, you'll never command my
respect. There's definitely 'something of the dark' about you, that's
for sure.
Funny how you see that in others, but can't see it in yourself.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>
>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>> ? OT up.
>>>> []'s
>>>
>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>
>> So respect his moderation.
>
>Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
>will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
>too.
Hmm, sort of like how you pretend to be a moderator of this group, or
>On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>
>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>> ? OT up.
>>>> []'s
>>>
>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>
>> So respect his moderation.
>
>Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
>will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
>too.
how you pretend that this is 'your' group? Yeah, you'll never command my
respect. There's definitely 'something of the dark' about you, that's
for sure.
Funny how you see that in others, but can't see it in yourself.
David in Devon
Feb 19, 2019, 6:34:10 PM2/19/19
to
*Never*! In fact, I welcome all and sundry here, both good AND bad.
And I have NEVER deleted anybody's posts. *Not once*! :-P
> Funny how you see that in others, but can't see it in yourself.
Diesel
Feb 20, 2019, 3:34:02 AM2/20/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:OdSaE.167162$fJ4....@fx09.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 GMT
server, than he's in charge. More importantly, why are you stalking
him?
--
Never share your foxhole with someone braver than you are.
news:OdSaE.167162$fJ4....@fx09.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>
>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>> ? OT up.
>> []'s
>
> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on
> the news.myplugbox.com server reads and posts in the Windows10
> group. He goes by the name of 'Winston' - supposedly a Microsoft
> MVP using a handle which looks like this:-
Whoever owns the server gave him moderator rights. So, if it's his
> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>
>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>> ? OT up.
>> []'s
>
> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on
> the news.myplugbox.com server reads and posts in the Windows10
> group. He goes by the name of 'Winston' - supposedly a Microsoft
> MVP using a handle which looks like this:-
server, than he's in charge. More importantly, why are you stalking
him?
--
Never share your foxhole with someone braver than you are.
Diesel
Feb 20, 2019, 3:34:02 AM2/20/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
or the server admin appointed him those duties.
As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
part. As is most things you write.
--
insert funny tagline here
news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
or the server admin appointed him those duties.
As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
part. As is most things you write.
--
insert funny tagline here
Diesel
Feb 20, 2019, 3:34:03 AM2/20/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:Pn0bE.105781$fn2....@fx12.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:34:06 GMT
You've self appointed the position which doesn't exist on alt
newsgroups. You don't run a server yourself, and, nobody I can think
of would bestow any rank on you otherwise.
> The thing is, Miss Jackson, I'm a *GOOD* guy! :-)
You blackmail, you stalk, you try to name and dox drop, many many
times, and you knowingly copyright infringe my things as well as that
of others. In what possible way are these actions that of a good guy?
Here's more:
Message-ID: <_KA9E.86455$Xl2....@fx20.fr7>
> I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same
> email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no
> accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on
> usenet.
That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd
scored a bullseye.
> Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you
> aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to
> that paste?
I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?
*** end paste
Any particular reason you've been sharing only a paragraph from the
post from 1999, David? Is it because the rest of the post directly
contradicts your claims of my being a bad guy? You know, the section
where I've apologized and wrote I was sorry if any of my viruses
affected them?
To which I responded:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200
> I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
> tell any newbies about you?
You're about as honest as you are sober, David.
Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I
accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view
of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with
Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to
his face?
Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me,
to be my friend, etc via email were all lies?
Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a
cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would
void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have
any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard.
Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace
arrangements in play?
Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write
as being in any way truthful?
So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both,
then David?
*** end questions paste
I don't actually expect a response to any of them, because, let's
face it, no reply he could think of is going to give other readers
the impression that he isn't exactly what several of us have said he
was, from day one.
At the end of the day, you are a sorry piece of shit, lying,
stalking, copyright infringing, scumbag. And despite your claims to
the contrary, one need only read a few replies to you from various
newsgroups to see how well known you are for being a stalker and
asshole.
What's worse, you've never issued an honest apology for any of it.
Unlike myself.
--
Digression is education.
news:Pn0bE.105781$fn2....@fx12.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:34:06 GMT
newsgroups. You don't run a server yourself, and, nobody I can think
of would bestow any rank on you otherwise.
> The thing is, Miss Jackson, I'm a *GOOD* guy! :-)
times, and you knowingly copyright infringe my things as well as that
of others. In what possible way are these actions that of a good guy?
Here's more:
Message-ID: <_KA9E.86455$Xl2....@fx20.fr7>
> I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same
> email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no
> accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on
> usenet.
That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd
scored a bullseye.
> Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you
> aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to
> that paste?
I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?
*** end paste
Any particular reason you've been sharing only a paragraph from the
post from 1999, David? Is it because the rest of the post directly
contradicts your claims of my being a bad guy? You know, the section
where I've apologized and wrote I was sorry if any of my viruses
affected them?
To which I responded:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200
> I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
> tell any newbies about you?
You're about as honest as you are sober, David.
Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I
accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view
of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with
Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to
his face?
Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me,
to be my friend, etc via email were all lies?
Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a
cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would
void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have
any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard.
Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace
arrangements in play?
Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write
as being in any way truthful?
So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both,
then David?
*** end questions paste
I don't actually expect a response to any of them, because, let's
face it, no reply he could think of is going to give other readers
the impression that he isn't exactly what several of us have said he
was, from day one.
At the end of the day, you are a sorry piece of shit, lying,
stalking, copyright infringing, scumbag. And despite your claims to
the contrary, one need only read a few replies to you from various
newsgroups to see how well known you are for being a stalker and
asshole.
What's worse, you've never issued an honest apology for any of it.
Unlike myself.
--
Digression is education.
Diesel
Feb 20, 2019, 3:34:10 AM2/20/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:3O_aE.105780$fn2....@fx12.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 GMT
like or agree with that or not. If you cannot respect that, feel free
to discontinue abusing the server.
> People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never
command my respect.
Isn't that what you demand of others? To respect and do as you want
them to do, or you'll blackmail and slime them on usenet and
elsewhere. Going so far as to create a totally bogus blog, and/or
facebook page. Really David, you're beyond what qualifies for a
normal pathetic sorry piece of shit.
It's just as well that your kid died so long ago, if you were my
parent, I'd be more than slightly ashamed of you. There's nothing
okay about what you do and have been doing for years to people you
don't know, David. Stalking isn't okay. Sliming people isn't okay.
Posting their copyrighted material to usenet, isn't okay.
Threatening to file fake dmca notices and counter notices, isn't
okay.
> There's 'something of the dark' about him too.
I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well
established track record of stalking, sliming, and copyright
infringing those you elect to have a problem with.
I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the TBI
concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your
bullshit didn't I?
From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
infact.
That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite similiar,
except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine
typically does not.
--
The female gangbang world record is owned by a woman named Houston
who had intercourse with 620 men in one day! A video was made of this
historic event. As it took about 10 hours (with a few very brief
breaks) to do it, the average time of intercourse was less than 58
seconds.
news:3O_aE.105780$fn2....@fx12.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>
>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>> ? OT up.
>>>> []'s
>>>
>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups
>>> on the <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>
>> So respect his moderation.
>
> Most certainly not.
It's a private server. he's the moderator for a reason, whether you
> On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>
>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>> ? OT up.
>>>> []'s
>>>
>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups
>>> on the <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>
>> So respect his moderation.
>
> Most certainly not.
like or agree with that or not. If you cannot respect that, feel free
to discontinue abusing the server.
> People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never
command my respect.
them to do, or you'll blackmail and slime them on usenet and
elsewhere. Going so far as to create a totally bogus blog, and/or
facebook page. Really David, you're beyond what qualifies for a
normal pathetic sorry piece of shit.
It's just as well that your kid died so long ago, if you were my
parent, I'd be more than slightly ashamed of you. There's nothing
okay about what you do and have been doing for years to people you
don't know, David. Stalking isn't okay. Sliming people isn't okay.
Posting their copyrighted material to usenet, isn't okay.
Threatening to file fake dmca notices and counter notices, isn't
okay.
> There's 'something of the dark' about him too.
established track record of stalking, sliming, and copyright
infringing those you elect to have a problem with.
I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the TBI
concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your
bullshit didn't I?
From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
infact.
That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite similiar,
except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine
typically does not.
--
The female gangbang world record is owned by a woman named Houston
who had intercourse with 620 men in one day! A video was made of this
historic event. As it took about 10 hours (with a few very brief
breaks) to do it, the average time of intercourse was less than 58
seconds.
Char Jackson
Feb 20, 2019, 5:04:41 AM2/20/19
to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:34:06 +0000, David in Devon
except in your alcohol-fueled mind? Out here in the real world, there is
no moderator. This is an unmoderated alt newsgroup. Does that really
have to be pointed out to you?
>*Never*! In fact, I welcome all and sundry here, both good AND bad.
Who cares what or who you welcome? You're not in charge here. You do
realize that this is an unmoderated alt group, right? Do you know what
that means?
BTW, have you had time to figure out what PLONK means?
>And I have NEVER deleted anybody's posts. *Not once*! :-P
Dude, this is an unmoderated alt newsgroup. There is no deleting here.
Not by you and not by anyone else.
>> Funny how you see that in others, but can't see it in yourself.
>
>The thing is, Miss Jackson, I'm a *GOOD* guy! :-)
Horse shit. You're among the worst of the worst.
--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190205091456/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 19/02/2019 23:23, Char Jackson wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>>>
>>>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>>>> ? OT up.
>>>>>> []'s
>>>>>
>>>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>>>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>>>
>>>> So respect his moderation.
>>>
>>> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
>>> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
>>> too.
>>
>> Hmm, sort of like how you pretend to be a moderator of this group, or
>> how you pretend that this is 'your' group? Yeah, you'll never command my
>> respect. There's definitely 'something of the dark' about you, that's
>> for sure.
>
>You've never seen me abuse my status of moderator of this group.
Not sure what you mean. How can you abuse a position that doesn't exist
>On 19/02/2019 23:23, Char Jackson wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:-
>>>>>
>>>>>> How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to
>>>>>> ? OT up.
>>>>>> []'s
>>>>>
>>>>> The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the
>>>>> <private> server reads and posts in the Windows10 group.
>>>>
>>>> So respect his moderation.
>>>
>>> Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power
>>> will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him
>>> too.
>>
>> Hmm, sort of like how you pretend to be a moderator of this group, or
>> how you pretend that this is 'your' group? Yeah, you'll never command my
>> respect. There's definitely 'something of the dark' about you, that's
>> for sure.
>
>You've never seen me abuse my status of moderator of this group.
except in your alcohol-fueled mind? Out here in the real world, there is
no moderator. This is an unmoderated alt newsgroup. Does that really
have to be pointed out to you?
>*Never*! In fact, I welcome all and sundry here, both good AND bad.
realize that this is an unmoderated alt group, right? Do you know what
that means?
BTW, have you had time to figure out what PLONK means?
>And I have NEVER deleted anybody's posts. *Not once*! :-P
Not by you and not by anyone else.
>> Funny how you see that in others, but can't see it in yourself.
>
>The thing is, Miss Jackson, I'm a *GOOD* guy! :-)
--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190205091456/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Diesel
Feb 20, 2019, 9:45:40 PM2/20/19
to
Char Jackson <no...@none.invalid>
news:3v8q6eh9qqn88ut3h...@4ax.com Wed, 20 Feb 2019
He's had over a decade to learn what VX meant. He still thinks it's
virus writer as of a post a few days ago. That should answer your
question. But, in the event it hasn't, the answer would be no, he'll
need several more years to process the information he acquired by
googling the word. <G>
--
'A gift of humanity is what I want for Christmas!!' - Opus
news:3v8q6eh9qqn88ut3h...@4ax.com Wed, 20 Feb 2019
virus writer as of a post a few days ago. That should answer your
question. But, in the event it hasn't, the answer would be no, he'll
need several more years to process the information he acquired by
googling the word. <G>
--
'A gift of humanity is what I want for Christmas!!' - Opus
David in Devon
Feb 21, 2019, 3:59:15 AM2/21/19
to
discussion, one on one, on his home turf.
You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP!
David in Devon
Feb 21, 2019, 4:05:09 AM2/21/19
to
On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
[....]
> I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well
> established track record of stalking, *sliming*, and copyright
> infringing those you elect to have a problem with.
>
> I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the *TBI*
>
> concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your
> bullshit didn't I?
>
> From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
> violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
> get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
> chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
> enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
> carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
> local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
> infact.
>
> That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
> I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite *similiar*,
> bullshit didn't I?
>
> From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear
> violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't
> get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food
> chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law
> enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will
> carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a
> local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory,
> infact.
>
> That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And,
> except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine
> typically does not.
What on earth are you smoking, Dustin?
> typically does not.
What is the TBI?
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Feb 22, 2019, 10:02:25 AM2/22/19
to
the history of the Navy and the number of drunks and incompetents and
even drunk incompetents that the Navy has tolerated over the last 300
years, he must have been truly spectacular.
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Feb 22, 2019, 10:06:11 AM2/22/19
to
On 2019-02-20 03:34, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>
> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
> or the server admin appointed him those duties.
Quite correct. You cannot just appoint yourself to be a moderator on one
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>
> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server,
> or the server admin appointed him those duties.
of those services. Someone must grant you proper access, and that
someone must themselves be someone who has proper access.
>
> As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your
> part. As is most things you write.
because Winston did his duty (something David Brooks knows nothing
about) and enforced moderation.
Diesel
Feb 22, 2019, 11:16:38 PM2/22/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:ALtbE.166620$Hn2.1...@fx19.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
> MVP!
I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
to hack his server for your benefit. I'll provide him your full
contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. <G>
Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
explain that?
--
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
news:ALtbE.166620$Hn2.1...@fx19.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>>
>> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
>> server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.
>>
>> As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
>> your part. As is most things you write.
>
>
> The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
> discussion, one on one, on his home turf.
I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
> On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>>
>> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
>> server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.
>>
>> As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
>> your part. As is most things you write.
>
>
> The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
> discussion, one on one, on his home turf.
that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
> MVP!
the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
to hack his server for your benefit. I'll provide him your full
contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. <G>
Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
explain that?
--
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Diesel
Feb 22, 2019, 11:16:39 PM2/22/19
to
Panthera Tigris Altaica <northe...@outlook.com>
news:q4p352$gil$2...@dont-email.me Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:06:11 GMT in
I know. Winston and the server he runs is one of the targets David
Brooks tried to hire me to not only hack, but, obtain data from said
target as well. That's two seperate felonies, right off the bat. And
that so called 'Christian' so called, 'good guy', tried to publish a
google street map view of my house as blackmail when I declined to
break federal laws on his behalf.
Yet, somehow, I'm the bad guy. Pfft.. right. And pigs fly at great
fucking altitudes, too.
--
Poetry is an echo, asking a shadow to dance.
news:q4p352$gil$2...@dont-email.me Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:06:11 GMT in
Brooks tried to hire me to not only hack, but, obtain data from said
target as well. That's two seperate felonies, right off the bat. And
that so called 'Christian' so called, 'good guy', tried to publish a
google street map view of my house as blackmail when I declined to
break federal laws on his behalf.
Yet, somehow, I'm the bad guy. Pfft.. right. And pigs fly at great
fucking altitudes, too.
--
Poetry is an echo, asking a shadow to dance.
Dan Purgert
Feb 23, 2019, 7:38:23 AM2/23/19
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Diesel wrote:
> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
Only when they have a helicopter. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxxPrsACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooGOXQf9ExCkNHYOICsyt3WJ46xDR7UzrUvBmEHWrGvv6aUZVx28mKeSZv2YBFSO
D6BZxYam+aKTf8nMkwm1BZbqXyfs3WUWNg7CcFDeQnZH9DoQsY6ptRzGdA4CWNI5
OG/xEbu8pZrfMVhOk9Kevk/2pxKtKFNiK0+ZVEP+lqj4dUga9uXKUqf6k1EUZTWH
7wbs5dw0yUwSMFeZMs+ExqrWXIgqb7F5mwtKZe9+HKZmA60H/ODSGCTa1tOKN7au
cqvOR8SKEiYgOuBeXGgG/vupPWGuenuf0ki/koODLzqWa6cGyb6qqwzto9ffKIjm
Ao1i9wINXHZ1olfWLIeLPmP1+IJqhg==
=f32b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
Hash: SHA256
Diesel wrote:
> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
Only when they have a helicopter. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxxPrsACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooGOXQf9ExCkNHYOICsyt3WJ46xDR7UzrUvBmEHWrGvv6aUZVx28mKeSZv2YBFSO
D6BZxYam+aKTf8nMkwm1BZbqXyfs3WUWNg7CcFDeQnZH9DoQsY6ptRzGdA4CWNI5
OG/xEbu8pZrfMVhOk9Kevk/2pxKtKFNiK0+ZVEP+lqj4dUga9uXKUqf6k1EUZTWH
7wbs5dw0yUwSMFeZMs+ExqrWXIgqb7F5mwtKZe9+HKZmA60H/ODSGCTa1tOKN7au
cqvOR8SKEiYgOuBeXGgG/vupPWGuenuf0ki/koODLzqWa6cGyb6qqwzto9ffKIjm
Ao1i9wINXHZ1olfWLIeLPmP1+IJqhg==
=f32b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
David in Devon
Feb 23, 2019, 10:31:59 AM2/23/19
to
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ...
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:ALtbE.166620$Hn2.1...@fx19.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
>>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>>>
>>> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
>>> server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.
>>>
>>> As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
>>> your part. As is most things you write.
>>
>>
>> The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
>> discussion, one on one, on his home turf.
>
> I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
> that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
> when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
> now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
> with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware,
HAVE a site for you to explore.
>> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
>> MVP!
>
> I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
> the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
> to hack his server for your benefit.
Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.
> I'll provide him your full
> contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
> solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
> or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
> recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. <G>
How can you a hack a server which does not exist?
> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
> country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
> data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
> benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
> explain that?
You're making things up again!
Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet
Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
http://www.phillipmjones.net/
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:ALtbE.166620$Hn2.1...@fx19.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT
> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
>>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>> news:AG%aE.70758$Rq1....@fx21.fr7 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT
>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news.
>>>
>>> The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the
>>> server, or the server admin appointed him those duties.
>>>
>>> As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on
>>> your part. As is most things you write.
>>
>>
>> The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in
>> discussion, one on one, on his home turf.
>
> I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
> that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site
> when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so
> now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt
> with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
HAVE a site for you to explore.
>> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an
>> MVP!
>
> I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share
> the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times
> to hack his server for your benefit.
> I'll provide him your full
> contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your
> solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer,
> or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your
> recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. <G>
> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my
> country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with
> data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your
> benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you
> explain that?
Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet
Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
http://www.phillipmjones.net/
David in Devon
Feb 23, 2019, 10:44:48 AM2/23/19
to
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-denied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having been
made by "A. User" . *WOW*
That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread -
posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
Shadow
Feb 23, 2019, 11:06:29 AM2/23/19
to
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
><CUT_DENIALS>
>You're making things up again!
Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you to
ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his STALKING
TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and BANNED him.
Is that what you meant, "commander" ?
Since Diesel is a "good guy" he refused, of course. Even after
he was threatened and blackmailed. And became a STALKING TARGET
himself.
Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
I and the "commander" say TIA
Read all about the "commander" here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
><CUT_DENIALS>
>You're making things up again!
ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his STALKING
TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and BANNED him.
Is that what you meant, "commander" ?
Since Diesel is a "good guy" he refused, of course. Even after
he was threatened and blackmailed. And became a STALKING TARGET
himself.
Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
I and the "commander" say TIA
Read all about the "commander" here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
David in Devon
Feb 23, 2019, 12:08:56 PM2/23/19
to
On 23/02/2019 12:38, Dan Purgert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Diesel wrote:
>> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
>
> Only when they have a helicopter. :)
As far as I'm aware, Winston has never had a server for anyone to hack.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Diesel wrote:
>> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
>
> Only when they have a helicopter. :)
Diesel
Feb 24, 2019, 2:55:42 AM2/24/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in
in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
>> I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
>> that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his
>> site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think
>> I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit
>> of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
>
> Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm
> aware, HAVE a site for you to explore.
Either you've really lost some brain cells hitting that bottle and
forgot what you told me via email (and asked of me), or, you're
seeking my help via a phishing attempt since directly asking me
(again) won't work. You know you aren't getting any favors with the
recent shit you've pulled. Or, you should know that.
>>> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is
>>> an MVP!
>>
>> I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to
>> share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me
>> several times to hack his server for your benefit.
>
> Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.
See above. You think you're so fucking slick don't you, David?
Forget your recent Winston posts? You think you'll con me into
confirming one or more things you asked in them do you?
I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing any
specific details (I already have actually) that might help you do
what I think you're upto.
>> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In
>> my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for)
>> along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do
>> both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
>> David. How do you explain that?
>
> You're making things up again!
Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times during
various discussions; how else would I know you didn't intend to make
good on payment for services rendered had I done it? Because you told
me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to hire me to hack into
sites for you, David?
> Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
> Usenet
David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies about
another person?
MID: <sa6cE.6$Ci...@fx26.fr7>
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel wrote:
> Nah, you just lie
Nope!
--
David B.
Devon, UK
** end paste
Not only do you lie freely with ease, you lie about the dumbest
things possible too!
> Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
Any particular reason someone else should do this?
You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going back
years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a few
things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should be the
one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved. You got
yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself out of it.
I don't know why you keep forgetting about the things you've written
about me and the things you've done repeatedly with copies of some of
my items you lifted from my website... But you must, because you
continue to write garbage about me (you did it again in the post I'm
writing this reply for) and in the same fucking post no less, ask me
to do something... A
As if we have no problems and no issues of any sort between us that
need to be resolved in a manner both parties find acceptable. Have
you really (all fun and games aside, serious time now) drank so much
during your life that you actually do have, measureable, permanent
brain damage in one or more regions? The black legion effect, if i'm
not mistaken. You are of the right age...
David, Your friends in all actuality (I've told you this before, so
it's no surprise to you now, unless you've forgotten for the
aforementioned reasons) emailed me due to a real concern for you.
Your behaviour continues to be off irl. And I know you haven't
completely stopped drinking, just yet, too. So quit bsing the good
doc Shadow on that. You've cut down, considerably, you aren't
drinking daily, but you are most certainly still having a nip now and
then. You were partially telling the truth about the date you quit.
You did quit, for the next three days in a row afterwards. So, the
date is only right for a period of three days. Any sentence that
contains that date followed up by didn't touch it since is a lie from
just past the date. A bold faced, fucking lie. And a stupid one too!
Nobody really gives a shit about the drinking, David! it's just
ANOTHER EXAMPLE of you lying, and, it's not even an important one.
I've left some details out, I don't want to toss any source(s) under
a bus; I can just imagine how obnoxious you'd be towards them in real
life if you ever found out they provided me information on you, and
not the other way around as you'd originally intended and planned
for! You *are a fucking prick*, btw, for having tried that. I knew
you've tried to sick people online on me for your revenge, but, I
wasn't aware you'd been soliciting people you knew locally in real
life to help get your sorry ass out of my frying pan, too.
I just wanted to give you enough so you can confirm (I don't expect
you to do that on usenet. <G> just you knowing I'm giving your balls
a gentle squeeze is enough satisfaction for me... for now) that I
updated my information on you recently. In other words, comms link
between your friend(s) remains open for business.
Matter of fact, it's really nobodies business but your own at the end
of the day what you do/don't do in your own personal life. The only
time that it's not, is when whatever it is you're doing causes
interference in anothers and they have a problem with it.
You're a fucking coward, David. You picked a fight with the wrong
person. Rather than accept the righteous 0wnage you received, and
move on, you opt to try and solicit help from others under the guise
of you being a harmless soul who was picked on by a mean old Hacker.
You lie to them, outright, lie to them about the entire thing for
their sympathy and what you hope, is their help.
I'm not the only one you've tried this shit with either. I'm one of
several, infact. You tried (and failed miserably) to solicit my help
to deal with some people and servers you had an issue with; an issue
you no doubt (based on what I know of you) caused yourself! And
you've tried to solicit others help in forcing me to either do your
bidding, and/or be 'hung out to dry' as you so eloquently put it to
Savageduck when you tried to recruit him. I suspect you won't turn on
him as you've done others so quickly if at all is because you're
aware of the fact he actually is a retired Police officer, and can
easily acquire full contact details of yourself and police dept
simply by reviewing old posts, or asking. People like you so much,
anyone who knows your details will happily share them on a moments
notice with anyone who wants it.
I have no sympathy for this, because you've tried to do the same
exact thing to me for the past decade or so now without any concern
or thought about potential outcomes for myself and others who may
reside with me. You don't consider personal safety and seem to think
your idea of privacy (none) applies to all. Instead, you knowingly
and willingly, try placing myself and others in potential harms way
with address after address you think is mine, phone numbers when
possible, family members names, etc.
You spare no nothing and no-one. You are not a good guy, you are not
some unfortunate lost soul who's picked on by a Hacker and needs
another to run to his rescue. You're an evil fucking manipulative
sociopath who gets off on stalking people and if at all possible,
using them to stalk others and/or further abuse other
individuals/companies/servers you feel have wronged you in some way
shape or form. It's all about you and how you feel, fuck everything
and everyone else. That's exactly how you are, David!
You, being the coward you are - feel it necessary to try and recruit
others to help you out. You just neglect to mention that it's not a
case of someone picking on poor harmless David. It's a case of David
taking a swing at someone, getting put on his ass for his trouble,
and having to ask another person to stand in his place and take
another swing for him, since he missed the first time AND got decked
for his effort. Since you got your ass put on the ground with a
quickness for your trouble, you somehow think it's unjust and you
need to get even for it. Sorry ass, cowardly, piece of shit.
Not only did you start the problem you have with me, you couldn't
handle the response, and you can't finish the problem yourself. All
you can do is continue getting your arse kicked. Can we say, dumb ass
fucking coward? Yes, yes we can.
--
Cats must toss their poop out of the litter box and play hockey with
it.
news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again
> ...
Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done better
> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again
> ...
in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
>> I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
>> that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his
>> site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think
>> I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit
>> of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
>
> Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm
> aware, HAVE a site for you to explore.
forgot what you told me via email (and asked of me), or, you're
seeking my help via a phishing attempt since directly asking me
(again) won't work. You know you aren't getting any favors with the
recent shit you've pulled. Or, you should know that.
>>> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is
>>> an MVP!
>>
>> I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to
>> share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me
>> several times to hack his server for your benefit.
>
> Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.
Forget your recent Winston posts? You think you'll con me into
confirming one or more things you asked in them do you?
I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing any
specific details (I already have actually) that might help you do
what I think you're upto.
>> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In
>> my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for)
>> along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do
>> both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
>> David. How do you explain that?
>
> You're making things up again!
various discussions; how else would I know you didn't intend to make
good on payment for services rendered had I done it? Because you told
me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to hire me to hack into
sites for you, David?
> Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
> Usenet
another person?
MID: <sa6cE.6$Ci...@fx26.fr7>
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel wrote:
> Nah, you just lie
Nope!
--
David B.
Devon, UK
Not only do you lie freely with ease, you lie about the dumbest
things possible too!
> Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going back
years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a few
things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should be the
one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved. You got
yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself out of it.
I don't know why you keep forgetting about the things you've written
about me and the things you've done repeatedly with copies of some of
my items you lifted from my website... But you must, because you
continue to write garbage about me (you did it again in the post I'm
writing this reply for) and in the same fucking post no less, ask me
to do something... A
As if we have no problems and no issues of any sort between us that
need to be resolved in a manner both parties find acceptable. Have
you really (all fun and games aside, serious time now) drank so much
during your life that you actually do have, measureable, permanent
brain damage in one or more regions? The black legion effect, if i'm
not mistaken. You are of the right age...
David, Your friends in all actuality (I've told you this before, so
it's no surprise to you now, unless you've forgotten for the
aforementioned reasons) emailed me due to a real concern for you.
Your behaviour continues to be off irl. And I know you haven't
completely stopped drinking, just yet, too. So quit bsing the good
doc Shadow on that. You've cut down, considerably, you aren't
drinking daily, but you are most certainly still having a nip now and
then. You were partially telling the truth about the date you quit.
You did quit, for the next three days in a row afterwards. So, the
date is only right for a period of three days. Any sentence that
contains that date followed up by didn't touch it since is a lie from
just past the date. A bold faced, fucking lie. And a stupid one too!
Nobody really gives a shit about the drinking, David! it's just
ANOTHER EXAMPLE of you lying, and, it's not even an important one.
I've left some details out, I don't want to toss any source(s) under
a bus; I can just imagine how obnoxious you'd be towards them in real
life if you ever found out they provided me information on you, and
not the other way around as you'd originally intended and planned
for! You *are a fucking prick*, btw, for having tried that. I knew
you've tried to sick people online on me for your revenge, but, I
wasn't aware you'd been soliciting people you knew locally in real
life to help get your sorry ass out of my frying pan, too.
I just wanted to give you enough so you can confirm (I don't expect
you to do that on usenet. <G> just you knowing I'm giving your balls
a gentle squeeze is enough satisfaction for me... for now) that I
updated my information on you recently. In other words, comms link
between your friend(s) remains open for business.
Matter of fact, it's really nobodies business but your own at the end
of the day what you do/don't do in your own personal life. The only
time that it's not, is when whatever it is you're doing causes
interference in anothers and they have a problem with it.
You're a fucking coward, David. You picked a fight with the wrong
person. Rather than accept the righteous 0wnage you received, and
move on, you opt to try and solicit help from others under the guise
of you being a harmless soul who was picked on by a mean old Hacker.
You lie to them, outright, lie to them about the entire thing for
their sympathy and what you hope, is their help.
I'm not the only one you've tried this shit with either. I'm one of
several, infact. You tried (and failed miserably) to solicit my help
to deal with some people and servers you had an issue with; an issue
you no doubt (based on what I know of you) caused yourself! And
you've tried to solicit others help in forcing me to either do your
bidding, and/or be 'hung out to dry' as you so eloquently put it to
Savageduck when you tried to recruit him. I suspect you won't turn on
him as you've done others so quickly if at all is because you're
aware of the fact he actually is a retired Police officer, and can
easily acquire full contact details of yourself and police dept
simply by reviewing old posts, or asking. People like you so much,
anyone who knows your details will happily share them on a moments
notice with anyone who wants it.
I have no sympathy for this, because you've tried to do the same
exact thing to me for the past decade or so now without any concern
or thought about potential outcomes for myself and others who may
reside with me. You don't consider personal safety and seem to think
your idea of privacy (none) applies to all. Instead, you knowingly
and willingly, try placing myself and others in potential harms way
with address after address you think is mine, phone numbers when
possible, family members names, etc.
You spare no nothing and no-one. You are not a good guy, you are not
some unfortunate lost soul who's picked on by a Hacker and needs
another to run to his rescue. You're an evil fucking manipulative
sociopath who gets off on stalking people and if at all possible,
using them to stalk others and/or further abuse other
individuals/companies/servers you feel have wronged you in some way
shape or form. It's all about you and how you feel, fuck everything
and everyone else. That's exactly how you are, David!
You, being the coward you are - feel it necessary to try and recruit
others to help you out. You just neglect to mention that it's not a
case of someone picking on poor harmless David. It's a case of David
taking a swing at someone, getting put on his ass for his trouble,
and having to ask another person to stand in his place and take
another swing for him, since he missed the first time AND got decked
for his effort. Since you got your ass put on the ground with a
quickness for your trouble, you somehow think it's unjust and you
need to get even for it. Sorry ass, cowardly, piece of shit.
Not only did you start the problem you have with me, you couldn't
handle the response, and you can't finish the problem yourself. All
you can do is continue getting your arse kicked. Can we say, dumb ass
fucking coward? Yes, yes we can.
--
Cats must toss their poop out of the litter box and play hockey with
it.
Diesel
Feb 24, 2019, 2:55:42 AM2/24/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you ask
yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give you the
answer to the question you asked.
Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
someone who's since had their account deleted?
Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
> That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread
> - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
I disagree based on the evidence you've shared so far. At this point,
based on the limited evidence you've provided, I'm reasonably certain
if you ask yourself the aforementioned, two questions and acquire the
answers yourself, you'll realize that what you shared has confirmed
NOTHING of the sort.
The only thing you've confirmed (we already knew and it's already
been confirmed, but, thanks) is that you're a bit of a dumb shit -
possibly the incurable kind, as your basic troubleshooting skills are
a joke on a lovely day outside. Is that your personal fault, or are
you going to blame it on the royal navys poor training?
--
Another smooth escape disguised as a dramatic exit...
news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-de
> nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>
> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
How to find out basic answers to simple questions with a little
> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-de
> nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>
> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you ask
yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give you the
answer to the question you asked.
Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
someone who's since had their account deleted?
Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
> That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread
> - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
based on the limited evidence you've provided, I'm reasonably certain
if you ask yourself the aforementioned, two questions and acquire the
answers yourself, you'll realize that what you shared has confirmed
NOTHING of the sort.
The only thing you've confirmed (we already knew and it's already
been confirmed, but, thanks) is that you're a bit of a dumb shit -
possibly the incurable kind, as your basic troubleshooting skills are
a joke on a lovely day outside. Is that your personal fault, or are
you going to blame it on the royal navys poor training?
--
Another smooth escape disguised as a dramatic exit...
Diesel
Feb 24, 2019, 2:55:43 AM2/24/19
to
Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:rpq27edgf63jbku1e...@4ax.com
another newsgroup with me (and various others, some of which are
RIP), multiple times, some years ago. He knows I can pull those
MIDs, share links, etc. But that isn't what he wants me to prove.
<G>
He isn't sure at this point what Winstons role is, and is actually
on a phishing expedition to find out. You're not privvy to the full
background (if you took the large amount of time required to read
the emails I've shared you would be) concerning David and Winston so
you didn't see this for what it is, and had you been able to provide
him useful information, would have done so, without even giving it a
second thought.
Be more careful next time. I don't call David a slimeball and snake
just because I find the names amusing. He really is a slippery
fucker sometimes.
> Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
> I and the "commander" say TIA
I'll shorten it up as follows, then.
You got duped into asking me to help David, without realizing what
he was asking for help with. David is on a phishing expedition. Be
more careful next time. <G>
> Read all about the "commander" here:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
> []'s
ROFL
--
We already have enough youth -- how about a fountain of 'smart'?
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:06:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>><CUT_DENIALS>
>
>>You're making things up again!
>
> Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you
> to
> ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his
> STALKING TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and
> BANNED him.
> Is that what you meant, "commander" ?
No, he didn't. He's had these discussions via email and in public on
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>><CUT_DENIALS>
>
>>You're making things up again!
>
> Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you
> to
> ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his
> STALKING TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and
> BANNED him.
> Is that what you meant, "commander" ?
another newsgroup with me (and various others, some of which are
RIP), multiple times, some years ago. He knows I can pull those
MIDs, share links, etc. But that isn't what he wants me to prove.
<G>
He isn't sure at this point what Winstons role is, and is actually
on a phishing expedition to find out. You're not privvy to the full
background (if you took the large amount of time required to read
the emails I've shared you would be) concerning David and Winston so
you didn't see this for what it is, and had you been able to provide
him useful information, would have done so, without even giving it a
second thought.
Be more careful next time. I don't call David a slimeball and snake
just because I find the names amusing. He really is a slippery
fucker sometimes.
> Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof.
> I and the "commander" say TIA
You got duped into asking me to help David, without realizing what
he was asking for help with. David is on a phishing expedition. Be
more careful next time. <G>
> Read all about the "commander" here:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> He's the pride of many "sailor boys"
> []'s
--
We already have enough youth -- how about a fountain of 'smart'?
Diesel
Feb 24, 2019, 2:55:44 AM2/24/19
to
Dan Purgert <d...@djph.net> news:slrnq72fl...@djph.net Sat, 23 Feb
--
Cats must cuddle mom's dress shoes and drool in them.
2019 12:38:21 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Diesel wrote:
>> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
>
> Only when they have a helicopter. :)
<G>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Diesel wrote:
>> [...] And pigs fly at great fucking altitudes, too.
>
> Only when they have a helicopter. :)
--
Cats must cuddle mom's dress shoes and drool in them.
Diesel
Feb 24, 2019, 2:55:45 AM2/24/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:6RtbE.99739$kn2....@fx24.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:05:06 GMT in
A Marlboro red from a freshly opened pack that's been freezer kept.
> What is the TBI?
All the time you've spent stalking me, that's never came up? I
thought my semi candid description was sufficient, but, I suppose in
your case it wasn't. That'll just make the results you are so not
expecting that much better then, won't it. All I'm going to tell you
at this point since I'm going ahead with this, is that it's not going
to go down for you like it did the last time the police had to pay
you a visit in person over something you did online.
--
A relationship is like a shark. It has to keep moving forward or it
dies.
news:6RtbE.99739$kn2....@fx24.fr7 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:05:06 GMT in
> What is the TBI?
All the time you've spent stalking me, that's never came up? I
thought my semi candid description was sufficient, but, I suppose in
your case it wasn't. That'll just make the results you are so not
expecting that much better then, won't it. All I'm going to tell you
at this point since I'm going ahead with this, is that it's not going
to go down for you like it did the last time the police had to pay
you a visit in person over something you did online.
--
A relationship is like a shark. It has to keep moving forward or it
dies.
David in Devon
Feb 24, 2019, 7:44:03 AM2/24/19
to
On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>>
>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-de
>> nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>>
>> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
>> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
>
> How to find out basic answers to simple questions with a little
> trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you ask
> yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give you the
> answer to the question you asked.
>
> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>
> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
Why would an MVP have had his account deleted, Dustin?
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>>
>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-de
>> nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>>
>> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
>> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
>
> How to find out basic answers to simple questions with a little
> trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you ask
> yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give you the
> answer to the question you asked.
>
> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>
> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
Winston STILL claims to be an MVP in the groups he moderates on the
news.myplugbox.com server groups
You might like to compare the A. User post to THIS one which I copied
way back:-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3yj8ujxzbmic816/Winston%20MVP.tiff
>> That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread
>> - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
>
> I disagree based on the evidence you've shared so far. At this point,
> based on the limited evidence you've provided, I'm reasonably certain
> if you ask yourself the aforementioned, two questions and acquire the
> answers yourself, you'll realize that what you shared has confirmed
> NOTHING of the sort.
>
> The only thing you've confirmed (we already knew and it's already
> been confirmed, but, thanks) is that you're a bit of a dumb shit -
> possibly the incurable kind, as your basic troubleshooting skills are
> a joke on a lovely day outside. Is that your personal fault, or are
> you going to blame it on the royal navys poor training?
You've just made Dustin Cook look like an idiot (although I'm well aware
that you aren't).
Shadow
Feb 24, 2019, 10:21:08 AM2/24/19
to
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
><CUT_USUAL_STALKING>
>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
"I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
><CUT_USUAL_STALKING>
>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>>
>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
David in Devon
Feb 24, 2019, 2:04:26 PM2/24/19
to
On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>
> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and Linux
too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>
> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
Thanks for confirming for all to see.
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>
> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>
> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
Thanks for confirming for all to see.
John McWilliams
Feb 24, 2019, 4:04:01 PM2/24/19
to
David in Devon
Feb 24, 2019, 6:31:49 PM2/24/19
to
On 18/02/2019 00:00, David in Devon wrote:
> On 17/02/2019 23:03, Joelle wrote:>
>
> > As if you hadn't guessed..
> > Winston is not that easily fooled, thank goodness.
> >
> > Joëlle
>
> A simple question for you, Joëlle
>
> Can you explain why *Winston has actually been downright rude*?
>
> He has simply ignored Pierre's 'Ping'; you responded instead.
>
> Those two fellows are, supposedly, pretty good friends here.
>
> Have you any idea what happened to Omaha® (Mr James Shepherd)?
>
> He used to be the moderator of this group until forced out by Winston.
>
> https://www.shepherd.org/about/history-and-mission
>
> =
>
> Is there any way to check the company accounts of an organisation like
> The Shepherd Centre?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ol3nfa34qdtnnh/Screenshot%202019-02-24%2023.28.45.png?dl=0
We'll see if all posts remain!
> On 17/02/2019 23:03, Joelle wrote:>
>
> > As if you hadn't guessed..
> > Winston is not that easily fooled, thank goodness.
> >
> > Joëlle
>
> A simple question for you, Joëlle
>
> Can you explain why *Winston has actually been downright rude*?
>
> He has simply ignored Pierre's 'Ping'; you responded instead.
>
> Those two fellows are, supposedly, pretty good friends here.
>
> Have you any idea what happened to Omaha® (Mr James Shepherd)?
>
> He used to be the moderator of this group until forced out by Winston.
>
> https://www.shepherd.org/about/history-and-mission
>
> =
>
> Is there any way to check the company accounts of an organisation like
> The Shepherd Centre?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ol3nfa34qdtnnh/Screenshot%202019-02-24%2023.28.45.png?dl=0
We'll see if all posts remain!
p-0''0-h the cat (coder)
Feb 25, 2019, 3:42:50 AM2/25/19
to
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
I've been called worse. Much worse.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
punk ass dole whore troll, no nothing innumerate religious maniac,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.
NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist
Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.
Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky
Dusty Bin
Feb 25, 2019, 3:47:46 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>
>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>
>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
Pooh, this is such important work that David is doing don'tcha think.
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>
>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>
>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
Love to all the cats from undisclosed occupants of blurred tufty plant
villas and the ever present spirit of Bug the cat R.I.P
XXX
--
Ectoplasm, because it makes me think about beating my bishop.
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 3:54:30 AM2/25/19
to
No comment about C.Winston Natoli MVP losing his status and becoming
simply 'A.User'?
Dusty Bin For Real
Feb 25, 2019, 3:56:24 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:47:52 +0000, Dusty Bin <MeM...@privacy.net>
wrote:
This is a FORGERY by Pooh. I never said nuttin. I was out running a
gazzlion watts from my rig man. Spreading good music cos I can. Fook the
RINARP or whatever they are called. Nazis man. Just listen to this 'our
long guitar solo man. Wow oooh, wah wah, diddle lille diddle sum dutty
dutty wah wah. Takes me back man. Gotta go play air guitar and top up
the snot on my keyboard. Keep an eye out for Pooh peeps. He's dangerous.
wrote:
gazzlion watts from my rig man. Spreading good music cos I can. Fook the
RINARP or whatever they are called. Nazis man. Just listen to this 'our
long guitar solo man. Wow oooh, wah wah, diddle lille diddle sum dutty
dutty wah wah. Takes me back man. Gotta go play air guitar and top up
the snot on my keyboard. Keep an eye out for Pooh peeps. He's dangerous.
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 5:51:29 AM2/25/19
to
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
file. What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
I read all about it here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
value.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>
>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>
>Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and Linux
>too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>
>>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>>
>> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
>> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
>
>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
I didn't go there, you fool. I block all M$ site with my hosts
>On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>
>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>
>Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and Linux
>too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>
>>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>>
>> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
>> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
>
>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
file. What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
I read all about it here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
value.
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 6:03:46 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>
>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>
>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
Did i get on a list ?
><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>
>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>
>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 6:05:46 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:54:26 +0000, David in Devon
No.
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 25/02/2019 08:47, Dusty Bin wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
>> <super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>>
>>> I've been called worse. Much worse.
>>>
>>> Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
>>
>> Pooh, this is such important work that David is doing don'tcha think.
>>
>> Love to all the cats from undisclosed occupants of blurred tufty plant
>> villas and the ever present spirit of Bug the cat R.I.P
>>
>> XXX
>
>Great to see that you're following the story! :-D
>
>No comment about <CUT_STALKING>
>On 25/02/2019 08:47, Dusty Bin wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
>> <super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>>
>>> I've been called worse. Much worse.
>>>
>>> Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
>>
>> Pooh, this is such important work that David is doing don'tcha think.
>>
>> Love to all the cats from undisclosed occupants of blurred tufty plant
>> villas and the ever present spirit of Bug the cat R.I.P
>>
>> XXX
>
>Great to see that you're following the story! :-D
>
No.
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 6:34:19 AM2/25/19
to
On 25/02/2019 10:50, *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>>
>>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>>
>>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>>
>> Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and Linux
>> too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>>
>>>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>>>
>>> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
>>> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
>>
>> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
> I didn't go there, you fool. I block all M$ site with my hosts
> file.
Now you are admitting that you a *LIAR* too!
> What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
I've heard on the grapevine that you were once involved in a murder.
How much truth is there in that rumour?
> I read all about it here:
No, Shadow - you didn't. <sigh>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker
*NEVER ASSUME - CHECK*!
Read here too: MID <vcQcE.34$TE...@fx13.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155109439100
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>>
>>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>>>>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>>
>>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>>
>> Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and Linux
>> too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
>>
>>>>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>>>
>>> You'd be the expert on deleted accounts. I see that A.User is
>>> one of your "favorite" nicks on the M$ forums.
>>
>> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
> I didn't go there, you fool. I block all M$ site with my hosts
> file.
> What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
How much truth is there in that rumour?
> I read all about it here:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker
>>
>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
> value.
Never take ANYTHING at face value.
>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
> value.
*NEVER ASSUME - CHECK*!
Read here too: MID <vcQcE.34$TE...@fx13.fr7>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155109439100
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 8:00:13 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:34:16 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker
>>>
>>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>
>> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
>> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
>> value.
>
>Never take ANYTHING at face value.
I don't. I immediately noticed that you had tampered with the
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker
>>>
>>> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>
>> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
>> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at face
>> value.
>
>Never take ANYTHING at face value.
URL. Which proved my statement.
"(in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it)"
It's
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 9:46:59 AM2/25/19
to
On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again
>> ...
>
> Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done better
> in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
*No LIE*!
> news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again
>> ...
>
> Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done better
> in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
Copy/paste - Dustin Cook said ...
I was caught in 2003 for possession of marijuana, an illegal stop. i
got that part thrown out, but tn has an authentic kangaroo court; so I
got a year of probation and a few grand in fines, FOR POT. No viruses.
I have never been charged with any crimes other than simple possesion
that one time. The Feds never caught me to discuss Melissa with me. I
was given advance notice they were coming, I had time to split the
state for awhile. When I returned, they had the author of the virus and
two of our major sites offline, they backed off.
Message-ID: <Xns9F5B887FE9C88HHI2948AJD832@no>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155110545800
>>> I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you
>>> that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his
>>> site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think
>>> I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit
>>> of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person.
>>
>> Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm
>> aware, HAVE a site for you to explore.
>
> Either you've really lost some brain cells hitting that bottle and
> forgot what you told me via email (and asked of me), or, you're
> seeking my help via a phishing attempt since directly asking me
> (again) won't work. You know you aren't getting any favors with the
> recent shit you've pulled. Or, you should know that.
As far as I'm aware, he's never had one.
>>>> You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is
>>>> an MVP!
>>>
>>> I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to
>>> share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me
>>> several times to hack his server for your benefit.
>>
>> Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack.
>
> See above. You think you're so fucking slick don't you, David?
> Forget your recent Winston posts? You think you'll con me into
> confirming one or more things you asked in them do you?
> I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing any
> specific details (I already have actually) that might help you do
> what I think you're upto.
>>> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In
>>> my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for)
>>> along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do
>>> both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
>>> David. How do you explain that?
>>
>> You're making things up again!
>
> Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times during
> various discussions; how else would I know you didn't intend to make
> good on payment for services rendered had I done it? Because you told
> me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to hire me to hack into
> sites for you, David?
>> Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
>> Usenet
>
> David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies about
> another person?
Message-ID: <Xns9F5B887FE9C88HHI2948AJD832@no>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155110545800
> MID: <sa6cE.6$Ci...@fx26.fr7>
>
> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel wrote:
>> Nah, you just lie
>
> Nope!
>
> --
> David B.
> Devon, UK
>
> ** end paste
>
> Not only do you lie freely with ease, you lie about the dumbest
> things possible too!
>
>> Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
>
> Any particular reason someone else should do this?
>
> You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going back
> years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a few
> things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should be the
> one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved. You got
> yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself out of it.
You don't like losing do you? :-(
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 9:56:51 AM2/25/19
to
On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a great deal
about a young Dustin J. Cook!
Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in any event.
It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
p-0''0-h the cat (coder)
Feb 25, 2019, 11:59:15 AM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:03:23 -0300, Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
><super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
>><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>>
>>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>
>>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>>
>>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>>
>>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
>
> Did i get on a list ?
Scaly Ron's silver surfer's list has been removed. It wasn't us cats so
>On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:42:55 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
><super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 +0000, David in Devon
>><BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>>>
>>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>>
>>I've been called worse. Much worse.
>>
>>Small steps *SHADOW*. You have to earn your sig man.
>>
>>Nevertheless, it's a big thumbs up from all of us in cat town.
>
> Did i get on a list ?
the only other team with that capability is the APT10 mob. Dusty might
be able to hack them but you'll have to go through his hiretohack0rise
agent the infamous floater Dave. Don't directly contact Dusty for help
with hack0rising he can get very irate and forget to water the cute
little fuzzy plants. Leave contact to the experts like the floater.
Bear Bottoms haters list is still open. You could email him your resume
but a special flight from South America would definitely clinch the
deal.
Good luck. I hope you get a result. You sooooo deserve it.
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 4:05:43 PM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>I was caught in 2003
So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>I was caught in 2003
archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
forget everything else.
Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
knew that.
Now THIS is up-to-date AND describes illegal activity:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
You should read it. Try clicking instead of memorizing the
URL. The alcohol you consume daily seems to be affecting your typing.
You've complained in the past that the URL is not valid. It is.
HTH
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 4:10:44 PM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>When I get my next visit
<from the police - note it's NOT the first time>
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>When I get my next visit
>they're certainly going to learn a great deal
Why would they want to ? He doesn't have a criminal record.
Why are you STALKING someone you obviously don't know ?
Are you in love ?
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Shadow
Feb 25, 2019, 4:23:36 PM2/25/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:59:20 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>Bear Bottoms haters list is still open.
I've been on that list for ages.
<super...@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:
>Bear Bottoms haters list is still open.
>You could email him your resume but a special flight from South
>America would definitely clinch the deal.
"But those who turn to crooked ways the BIG DOG will banish
with the evildoers".
BD will probably be sent here too.
Dog makes them invisible, afasic, and they're not even allowed
to fart, cough or sneeze, so they don't bother us much.
>
>Good luck. I hope you get a result. You sooooo deserve it.
I know. TY
>Good luck. I hope you get a result. You sooooo deserve it.
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 6:02:33 PM2/25/19
to
On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was caught in 2003
>
> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
> forget everything else.
> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
> knew that.
It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was caught in 2003
>
> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
> forget everything else.
> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
> knew that.
I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
David in Devon
Feb 25, 2019, 6:05:49 PM2/25/19
to
On 25/02/2019 21:09, Shadow wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When I get my next visit
>
> <from the police - note it's NOT the first time>
>
>> they're certainly going to learn a great deal
>> about Dustin Cook
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When I get my next visit
>
> <from the police - note it's NOT the first time>
>
>> they're certainly going to learn a great deal
>
> Why would they want to ? He doesn't have a criminal record.
He will have after they raid his property and discover the evidence.
> Why would they want to ? He doesn't have a criminal record.
Shadow
Feb 26, 2019, 9:57:03 AM2/26/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
You seem to have inadvertently cut my message:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I was caught in 2003
>>
>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>> forget everything else.
>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>> knew that.
>
>It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I was caught in 2003
>>
>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>> forget everything else.
>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>> knew that.
>
No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>
>I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
*SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
>I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
You seem to have inadvertently cut my message:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
Shadow
Feb 26, 2019, 9:59:03 AM2/26/19
to
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:05:45 +0000, David in Devon
The only PROVEN criminal in this thread is:
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 25/02/2019 21:09, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When I get my next visit
>>
>> <from the police - note it's NOT the first time>
>>
>>> they're certainly going to learn a great deal
>>> about Dustin Cook
>>
>> Why would they want to ? He doesn't have a criminal record.
>
>He will have after they raid his property and discover the evidence.
Why on Earth would they do that ?
>On 25/02/2019 21:09, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When I get my next visit
>>
>> <from the police - note it's NOT the first time>
>>
>>> they're certainly going to learn a great deal
>>> about Dustin Cook
>>
>> Why would they want to ? He doesn't have a criminal record.
>
>He will have after they raid his property and discover the evidence.
The only PROVEN criminal in this thread is:
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:15 PM2/28/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:YUBcE.35067$7M4....@fx02.fr7 Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 GMT in
An investigator wouldn't have needed me to explain what was going on
with the forum, an Investigator would have known. You did not.
> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
I've received no such confirmation. Quite the opposite, infact.
You've made accusations against Shadow, Myself, Char, etc, with no
proof to support them. You continue doing this. Had you any
credibility, it would have sustained damage. As you have none
remaining and haven't in quite sometime in these newgroups, you have
little to be concerned with there. It's only your own ignorance on
display for us all to see and laugh at, once again.
--
We don't know who discovered water, but we're pretty sure it wasn't a
fish.
news:YUBcE.35067$7M4....@fx02.fr7 Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:04:23 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>
>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written
>>>> by someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>
> Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and
> Linux too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
You are NOT an investigator. You're a stalker. There's a difference.
> On 24/02/2019 15:18, Shadow confirms his *STALKER* status.
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155103373900
>
>>>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written
>>>> by someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> "I have no idea. I use an Apple. Why on Earth would I even
>> post on M$ forums? I must have malicious ulterior motives".
>
> Absolutely not! Investigators need to use Microsoft Windows and
> Linux too! I do prefer my Apple iMac though. :-)
An investigator wouldn't have needed me to explain what was going on
with the forum, an Investigator would have known. You did not.
> It has been recorded that *SHADOW* is a *STALKER*.
>
> Thanks for confirming for all to see.
You've made accusations against Shadow, Myself, Char, etc, with no
proof to support them. You continue doing this. Had you any
credibility, it would have sustained damage. As you have none
remaining and haven't in quite sometime in these newgroups, you have
little to be concerned with there. It's only your own ignorance on
display for us all to see and laugh at, once again.
--
We don't know who discovered water, but we're pretty sure it wasn't a
fish.
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:15 PM2/28/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:kkwcE.59126$Ol6....@fx01.fr7 Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 GMT in
David?
> You might like to compare the A. User post to THIS one which I
> copied way back:-
I have no interest in going on any wild goose chase for you.
>>> That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the
>>> thread - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
>>
>> I disagree based on the evidence you've shared so far. At this
>> point, based on the limited evidence you've provided, I'm
>> reasonably certain if you ask yourself the aforementioned, two
>> questions and acquire the answers yourself, you'll realize that
>> what you shared has confirmed NOTHING of the sort.
>>
>> The only thing you've confirmed (we already knew and it's already
>> been confirmed, but, thanks) is that you're a bit of a dumb shit
>> - possibly the incurable kind, as your basic troubleshooting
>> skills are a joke on a lovely day outside. Is that your personal
>> fault, or are you going to blame it on the royal navys poor
>> training?
>
> Intelligent folk can form their own conclusions.
They sure can. It's easy enough to see that you mistook a place
holder for a deleted account as to be proof that the forums
themselves were being manipulated. That wasn't *ever* the case. It's
*all* due to your misunderstanding of basic things, such as place
holders for deleted accounts.
If you understood how a database was actually designed, you wouldn't
have come up with your half cocked conspiracy theory in the first
place.
> You've just made Dustin Cook look like an idiot (although I'm well
> aware that you aren't).
The only way I can imagine that to be true David is because someone
reading this thread knows our background and I look like an idiot for
willingly answering your questions and providing you a useful entry
level troubleshooting skill with examples. That being, how to ask the
right questions. Not that it matters, you'll forget (alcoholism
effect) and ask the same question again, later on.
It's that willfull ignorance you choose to keep that causes you to
have unfounded conspiracy theories which always lead to your
sliming/besmirching and stalking someone or something you got
'hinkies' about, because you're too damn stupid (years of alcoholism
in your past/present doesn't help) to learn how something works.
Instead, you'd rather go off half cocked and make absurd accusations
like this:
MID: <NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7>
Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted. That
doesn't mean any/all posts associated with the account are also
magically deleted right along with it, that's not how a typical
database works. See, David, you don't even understand basic data
storage and retrieval systems, let alone anything more complicated.
You're in no position to be trying to hunt for bad guys of any kind;
You don't have what it takes and you've made no effort to learn on
your own the entire fucking time I've had the misfortune of knowing
you exist.
--
Fangs, tail, fur. . . I'm ready for a night in the woods!
news:kkwcE.59126$Ol6....@fx01.fr7 Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:43:59 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>>>
>>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-
>>> de nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>>>
>>> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
>>> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
>>
>> How to find out basic answers to simple questions with a little
>> trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you
>> ask yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give
>> you the answer to the question you asked.
>>
>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>
> Why would an MVP have had his account deleted, Dustin?
Since when is it proper to answer multiple questions with a question,
> On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:44:41 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> Here's an interesting turn up for the book!
>>>
>>> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-
>>> de nied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
>>>
>>> The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having
>>> been made by "A. User" . *WOW*
>>
>> How to find out basic answers to simple questions with a little
>> trouble shooting. It's a freebie, on me, David. This is what you
>> ask yourself and seek answers for. When you do this, it'll give
>> you the answer to the question you asked.
>>
>> Q1: What is the default name given to posts that were written by
>> someone who's since had their account deleted?
>>
>> Q2: If it's not "A. User" then what is it?
>
> Why would an MVP have had his account deleted, Dustin?
David?
> You might like to compare the A. User post to THIS one which I
> copied way back:-
>>> That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the
>>> thread - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
>>
>> I disagree based on the evidence you've shared so far. At this
>> point, based on the limited evidence you've provided, I'm
>> reasonably certain if you ask yourself the aforementioned, two
>> questions and acquire the answers yourself, you'll realize that
>> what you shared has confirmed NOTHING of the sort.
>>
>> The only thing you've confirmed (we already knew and it's already
>> been confirmed, but, thanks) is that you're a bit of a dumb shit
>> - possibly the incurable kind, as your basic troubleshooting
>> skills are a joke on a lovely day outside. Is that your personal
>> fault, or are you going to blame it on the royal navys poor
>> training?
>
> Intelligent folk can form their own conclusions.
holder for a deleted account as to be proof that the forums
themselves were being manipulated. That wasn't *ever* the case. It's
*all* due to your misunderstanding of basic things, such as place
holders for deleted accounts.
If you understood how a database was actually designed, you wouldn't
have come up with your half cocked conspiracy theory in the first
place.
> You've just made Dustin Cook look like an idiot (although I'm well
> aware that you aren't).
reading this thread knows our background and I look like an idiot for
willingly answering your questions and providing you a useful entry
level troubleshooting skill with examples. That being, how to ask the
right questions. Not that it matters, you'll forget (alcoholism
effect) and ask the same question again, later on.
It's that willfull ignorance you choose to keep that causes you to
have unfounded conspiracy theories which always lead to your
sliming/besmirching and stalking someone or something you got
'hinkies' about, because you're too damn stupid (years of alcoholism
in your past/present doesn't help) to learn how something works.
Instead, you'd rather go off half cocked and make absurd accusations
like this:
MID: <NTdcE.669$WX2...@fx16.fr7>
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/access-
denied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having been
made by "A. User" . *WOW*
denied/561900f2-28a7-45c8-ad41-be014e8a8810
The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having been
made by "A. User" . *WOW*
That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread -
posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
**** end snippit
posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'!
Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted. That
doesn't mean any/all posts associated with the account are also
magically deleted right along with it, that's not how a typical
database works. See, David, you don't even understand basic data
storage and retrieval systems, let alone anything more complicated.
You're in no position to be trying to hunt for bad guys of any kind;
You don't have what it takes and you've made no effort to learn on
your own the entire fucking time I've had the misfortune of knowing
you exist.
--
Fangs, tail, fur. . . I'm ready for a night in the woods!
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:16 PM2/28/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:AdTcE.35$TE2...@fx13.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 GMT in
> As far as I'm aware, he's never had one.
You recently learned what A. User meant, too. Or so you say, despite
yourself having the same name bestowed upon you when your own
accounts were purged. How did you manage to forget that, David?
>> I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing
>> any specific details (I already have actually) that might help
>> you do what I think you're upto.
>
> Do as you please. You've got things rather muddled.
No, I don't.
>>>> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is?
>>>> In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me
>>>> for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to
>>>> do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
>>>> David. How do you explain that?
>>>
>>> You're making things up again!
>>
>> Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times
>> during various discussions; how else would I know you didn't
>> intend to make good on payment for services rendered had I done
>> it? Because you told me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to
>> hire me to hack into sites for you, David?
>
> I've never failed to pay folk their dues. Ask Philo.
You aren't denying what you I though. That's most likely because you
know I'd just fork over the MID, a url and a snippit of your own post
where you made the statement if you had. :-)
Since you aren't denying that what I wrote is true, David, why not
explain in detail what was meant by services rendered? In your own
words, tell your audiences what you asked me to do, upto the point of
offering to pay me to do it. Go ahead, tell them. :-)
>>> Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
>>> Usenet
>>
>> David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies
>> about another person?
>
> *NO* *LIES*
Yep, a lie. You claimed I was under the influence of drugs when I
wrote a post not long ago. I asked for proof of your claim. 2003
isn't 2019 David. I didn't write the post you made the accusation
with in 2003, David.
>>> Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
>>
>> Any particular reason someone else should do this?
>>
>> You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going
>> back years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a
>> few things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should
>> be the one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved.
>> You got yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself
>> out of it.
>
> Oh dear.
>
> You don't like losing do you? :-(
David, stop hitting the booze before you visit usenet. You make less
sense than usual when you have a few drinks before you post. Take
that response to my comment about Winston as a fine example of your
known alcoholism. fucking moron.
--
In times like these, it's helpful to remember that there have
*always* been times like these. --Paul Harvey
news:AdTcE.35$TE2...@fx13.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs*
>>> again ...
>>
>> Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done
>> better in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
>
> *No LIE*!
>
> Copy/paste - Dustin Cook said ...
>
> I was caught in 2003 for possession of marijuana, an illegal stop.
> i got that part thrown out, but tn has an authentic kangaroo
> court; so I got a year of probation and a few grand in fines, FOR
> POT. No viruses.
So yes, you lied then. 2003 isn't 2019, David.
> On 24/02/2019 07:55, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:NHdcE.4561$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs*
>>> again ...
>>
>> Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done
>> better in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you.
>
> *No LIE*!
>
> Copy/paste - Dustin Cook said ...
>
> I was caught in 2003 for possession of marijuana, an illegal stop.
> i got that part thrown out, but tn has an authentic kangaroo
> court; so I got a year of probation and a few grand in fines, FOR
> POT. No viruses.
> As far as I'm aware, he's never had one.
yourself having the same name bestowed upon you when your own
accounts were purged. How did you manage to forget that, David?
>> I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing
>> any specific details (I already have actually) that might help
>> you do what I think you're upto.
>
> Do as you please. You've got things rather muddled.
>>>> Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is?
>>>> In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me
>>>> for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to
>>>> do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS,
>>>> David. How do you explain that?
>>>
>>> You're making things up again!
>>
>> Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times
>> during various discussions; how else would I know you didn't
>> intend to make good on payment for services rendered had I done
>> it? Because you told me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to
>> hire me to hack into sites for you, David?
>
> I've never failed to pay folk their dues. Ask Philo.
know I'd just fork over the MID, a url and a snippit of your own post
where you made the statement if you had. :-)
Since you aren't denying that what I wrote is true, David, why not
explain in detail what was meant by services rendered? In your own
words, tell your audiences what you asked me to do, upto the point of
offering to pay me to do it. Go ahead, tell them. :-)
>>> Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on
>>> Usenet
>>
>> David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies
>> about another person?
>
> *NO* *LIES*
wrote a post not long ago. I asked for proof of your claim. 2003
isn't 2019 David. I didn't write the post you made the accusation
with in 2003, David.
>>> Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old
>>
>> Any particular reason someone else should do this?
>>
>> You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going
>> back years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a
>> few things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should
>> be the one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved.
>> You got yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself
>> out of it.
>
> Oh dear.
>
> You don't like losing do you? :-(
sense than usual when you have a few drinks before you post. Take
that response to my comment about Winston as a fine example of your
known alcoholism. fucking moron.
--
In times like these, it's helpful to remember that there have
*always* been times like these. --Paul Harvey
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:16 PM2/28/19
to
Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:5rh77elp014kdb10s...@4ax.com
page can be independently verified as factual.
--
Of course it's the murder weapon. Who would frame someone with a fake?
Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:50:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> I didn't go there, you fool. I block all M$ site with my
> hosts
> file. What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
>
> I read all about it here:
>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at
> face value.
What could he possibly dispute? Every single thing written on the
> I didn't go there, you fool. I block all M$ site with my
> hosts
> file. What do you think I am, a criminal like you ?
>
> I read all about it here:
>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>>
>>Thanks for confirming for all to see.
>
> Since you have NEVER disputed any of the information on that
> page (in fact, you go to great lengths to hide it), I take it at
> face value.
page can be independently verified as factual.
--
Of course it's the murder weapon. Who would frame someone with a fake?
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:17 PM2/28/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> news:au_cE.7025$Up5.4653
@fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
wrote:
> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I was caught in 2003
>>
>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>> forget everything else.
>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>> knew that.
>
> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
It proved no such thing. Infact, it proved that you accused me of
writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed I
wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't 2019,
David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
I can't confirm or deny the former, but I can confirm you are lying
about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days, three days
in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry since that
period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't do you any good,
anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You give yourself away.
--
Line noise provided by the FBI's BBS monitoring service.
@fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
wrote:
> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I was caught in 2003
>>
>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>> forget everything else.
>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>> knew that.
>
> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed I
wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't 2019,
David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days, three days
in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry since that
period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't do you any good,
anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You give yourself away.
--
Line noise provided by the FBI's BBS monitoring service.
Diesel
Feb 28, 2019, 11:23:18 PM2/28/19
to
Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:oaja7etth0flspmhf...@4ax.com
>>
>>I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>2018
>
> *SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
Agreed. And confirmed on the liar about drinking part. He's still
drinking!
> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
It would have to be.
--
Friends come and go, enemies accumulate.
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:55:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>
>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>> to forget everything else.
>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>> you
>>> knew that.
>>
>>It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>
> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
Correct. I wasn't under the influence of anything. David lied, again.
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>
>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>> to forget everything else.
>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>> you
>>> knew that.
>>
>>It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>
> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>>
>>I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>2018
>
> *SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
drinking!
> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
--
Friends come and go, enemies accumulate.
David in Devon
Mar 1, 2019, 5:50:44 AM3/1/19
to
On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel claimed ...
> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
*WHY* has the account of a prominent MVP been deleted, Dustin?
Has he been 'rumbled' by Microsoft at last, after all my emails and
messages to them?
You never think deeply enough about such matters. <sigh>
Tell me about this malicious finding:-
"One engine detected this URL"
https://www.virustotal.com/#/url/e8f2ce1f2c0c57786600d4356ece6dd9dc9b0feb1b640f733397e285602e49e0/detection
Pierre is Winston's 'mate' on U2U!
> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
Has he been 'rumbled' by Microsoft at last, after all my emails and
messages to them?
You never think deeply enough about such matters. <sigh>
Tell me about this malicious finding:-
"One engine detected this URL"
https://www.virustotal.com/#/url/e8f2ce1f2c0c57786600d4356ece6dd9dc9b0feb1b640f733397e285602e49e0/detection
Pierre is Winston's 'mate' on U2U!
Shadow
Mar 1, 2019, 8:36:15 AM3/1/19
to
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:50:39 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel claimed ...
>
>> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
>
>*WHY* has the account of a prominent MVP been deleted ?
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel claimed ...
>
>> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
>
*WHY* does it matter to ANYONE ?
I frequent a forum, and I sometimes post as A.Guest because
I'm bothered by off-topic trash. My personal mailbox is at max
capacity.
Lots of the old moderators on the PRIVATE forum I subscribe to
delete their accounts and start new ones so they won't be bothered by
"personal questions" made by psychos.
Maybe he or she just got tired of all the STALKING. Which
would be a tragic LOSS to the community, reliable MVPs are hard to
come by.
David in Devon
Mar 1, 2019, 3:26:49 PM3/1/19
to
On 01/03/2019 13:35, Shadow wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:50:39 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel claimed ...
>>
>>> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
>>
>> *WHY* has the account of a prominent MVP been deleted ?
>
> *WHY* does it matter to ANYONE ?
Bad apples in a barrel must be removed whenever possible.
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:50:39 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel claimed ...
>>
>>> Nothing was being manipulated, moron. The account was deleted.
>>
>> *WHY* has the account of a prominent MVP been deleted ?
>
> *WHY* does it matter to ANYONE ?
> I frequent a forum, and I sometimes post as A.Guest because
> I'm bothered by off-topic trash. My personal mailbox is at max
> capacity.
> Lots of the old moderators on the PRIVATE forum I subscribe to
> delete their accounts and start new ones so they won't be bothered by
> "personal questions" made by psychos.
> Maybe he or she just got tired of all the STALKING. Which
> would be a tragic LOSS to the community, reliable MVPs are hard to
> come by.
They are supposed to be the crème de la crème - 100% trustworthy - but
Winston's late friend, PA Bear/Robear Dyer MVP, was a liar and NOT to be
trusted.
Birds of a feather .....?
David in Devon
Mar 1, 2019, 3:33:44 PM3/1/19
to
On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
> Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:oaja7etth0flspmhf...@4ax.com
> Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:55:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>
>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>>> to forget everything else.
>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>> you
>>>> knew that.
>>>
>>> It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>>
>> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
>> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>
> Correct. I wasn't under the influence of anything. David lied, again.
You *appeared* to be under the influence of *something*!
> Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:oaja7etth0flspmhf...@4ax.com
> Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:55:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>
>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>>> to forget everything else.
>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>> you
>>>> knew that.
>>>
>>> It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>>
>> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under the
>> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>
> Correct. I wasn't under the influence of anything. David lied, again.
>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>> 2018
>>
>> *SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
>
> Agreed. And confirmed on the liar about drinking part. He's still
> drinking!
>> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
>
> It would have to be.
David in Devon
Mar 1, 2019, 3:38:07 PM3/1/19
to
On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> news:au_cE.7025$Up5.4653
> @fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
> wrote:
>
>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>
>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>>> forget everything else.
>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>>> knew that.
>>
>> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
>
> It proved no such thing. Infact, it proved that you accused me of
> writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
> something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed I
> wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't 2019,
> David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
Your slurred speech? You *KNOW* you are a drug addict. Why lie about it?
> @fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
> wrote:
>
>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>
>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem to
>>> forget everything else.
>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but you
>>> knew that.
>>
>> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
>
> It proved no such thing. Infact, it proved that you accused me of
> writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
> something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed I
> wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't 2019,
> David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March 2018
>
> I can't confirm or deny the former, but I can confirm you are lying
> about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days, three days
> in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry since that
> period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't do you any good,
> anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You give yourself away.
No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018. *NONE*!
You cannot change the truth - EVER.
David in Devon
Mar 1, 2019, 3:44:51 PM3/1/19
to
You are a complete and utter *LUZER* Dustin Cook!
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=luzer
EVERY definition fits you to a 'T'.
Char Jackson
Mar 1, 2019, 6:26:02 PM3/1/19
to
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 20:38:02 +0000, David in Devon
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018. *NONE*!
So what are you calling it now? Jesus juice? Yum-yum? The good stuff?
<BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018. *NONE*!
>You cannot change the truth - EVER.
--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
John McWilliams
Mar 1, 2019, 7:15:56 PM3/1/19
to
John McWilliams
Mar 1, 2019, 7:16:28 PM3/1/19
to
John McWilliams
Mar 1, 2019, 7:17:24 PM3/1/19
to
On 3/1/19 PDT 12:44 PM, David in Devon wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
Too many xposts.
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon
Mar 2, 2019, 7:18:05 AM3/2/19
to
> news:QmTcE.4106$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 GMT in
> reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with some
> verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal with. I
> wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your computers while
> they visit; you'll just make it easier to make your life much more
> difficult if you leave evidence of being a pir8 on your machine. [g]
Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply everything
I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been formally punished
for his wrongdoing.
>> Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in any
>> event. It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
>
> No rush. I want this done right and proper. I want you to be proper
> fucked as a result. I'm not Aardvark, I'm not going to stop with the
> first visit, I want you prosecuted for stalking and repeated copyright
> infringements against my protected works. And, I fully intend to make
> this happen for you, this year, David.
>
> If all goes as planned and I don't presently see why it wouldn't, 2019
> will be the year you legally answer for a small amount of the rat
> bastard things you've done to people for years online. Starting with
> me. In case I wasn't clear, allow me to be blunt. I am out to get you,
> David. And, I will get you.
Don't be too surprised at the answers I get once I've published this
posting of yours on Quora and asked for advice on how best to deal with
your threat.
https://www.quora.com/about
It's all about how your threat makes me *FEEL*, Dustin.
People reading there have no need to understand Usenet; they can simply
read here:-
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155152844700
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a great
>> deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>
> It's a very wise idea to confirm you've been stalking me - That's the
>
>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a great
>> deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>
> reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with some
> verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal with. I
> wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your computers while
> they visit; you'll just make it easier to make your life much more
> difficult if you leave evidence of being a pir8 on your machine. [g]
Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply everything
I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been formally punished
for his wrongdoing.
>> Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in any
>> event. It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
>
> fucked as a result. I'm not Aardvark, I'm not going to stop with the
> first visit, I want you prosecuted for stalking and repeated copyright
> infringements against my protected works. And, I fully intend to make
> this happen for you, this year, David.
>
> If all goes as planned and I don't presently see why it wouldn't, 2019
> will be the year you legally answer for a small amount of the rat
> bastard things you've done to people for years online. Starting with
> me. In case I wasn't clear, allow me to be blunt. I am out to get you,
> David. And, I will get you.
Don't be too surprised at the answers I get once I've published this
posting of yours on Quora and asked for advice on how best to deal with
your threat.
https://www.quora.com/about
It's all about how your threat makes me *FEEL*, Dustin.
People reading there have no need to understand Usenet; they can simply
read here:-
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155152844700
David in Devon
Mar 2, 2019, 8:13:41 AM3/2/19
to
On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
> No. He was booted out of the Navy
No, I wasn't.
I volunteered for release on redundancy terms following the Defence
Review in 1981. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Defence_White_Paper
I took early retirement after more than 20 years service and have drawn
a small monthly pension ever since. It's good that it is index-linked
and increases each and every year. :-)
> No. He was booted out of the Navy
No, I wasn't.
I volunteered for release on redundancy terms following the Defence
Review in 1981. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Defence_White_Paper
I took early retirement after more than 20 years service and have drawn
a small monthly pension ever since. It's good that it is index-linked
and increases each and every year. :-)
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Mar 2, 2019, 12:13:48 PM3/2/19
to
On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>
>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>
> No, I wasn't.
Yes, you were.
> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>
>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>
> No, I wasn't.
David in Devon
Mar 2, 2019, 1:12:43 PM3/2/19
to
On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
Why can't you provide proof?
Because you are lying.
*WHY are you lying*?
Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
Why can't you provide proof?
Because you are lying.
*WHY are you lying*?
Shadow
Mar 2, 2019, 3:45:31 PM3/2/19
to
In fact, the opposite is true.
So, by your own admission, you have ALWAYS lied.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
No wonder they kicked you out of the navy.
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Mar 2, 2019, 4:57:20 PM3/2/19
to
On 2019-03-02 13:12, David in Devon wrote:
> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>>>
>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>
>>> No, I wasn't.
>>
>> Yes, you were.
>
> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>
> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
experience has shown that everything you post is a lie.
> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>>>
>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>
>>> No, I wasn't.
>>
>> Yes, you were.
>
> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>
> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Mar 2, 2019, 4:57:48 PM3/2/19
to
On 2019-03-02 15:44, Shadow wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 18:12:34 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>>>>
>>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>>
>>>> No, I wasn't.
>>>
>>> Yes, you were.
>>
>> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>>
>> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
>>
>> Why can't you provide proof?
>>
>> Because you are lying.
>
> You have NEVER provided PROOF that you only stalk "bad guys".
> In fact, the opposite is true.
> So, by your own admission, you have ALWAYS lied.
>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> No wonder they kicked you out of the navy.
> []'s
>
That would be my assessment.
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 18:12:34 +0000, David in Devon
> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't know)
>>>>
>>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>>
>>>> No, I wasn't.
>>>
>>> Yes, you were.
>>
>> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>>
>> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
>>
>> Why can't you provide proof?
>>
>> Because you are lying.
>
> You have NEVER provided PROOF that you only stalk "bad guys".
> In fact, the opposite is true.
> So, by your own admission, you have ALWAYS lied.
>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>
>
> No wonder they kicked you out of the navy.
> []'s
>
David in Devon
Mar 2, 2019, 5:40:08 PM3/2/19
to
On 02/03/2019 21:57, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
> On 2019-03-02 15:44, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 18:12:34 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>>>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't
>>>>> know)
>>>>>
>>>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I wasn't.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you were.
>>>
>>> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>>>
>>> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
>>>
>>> Why can't you provide proof?
>>>
>>> Because you are lying.
> On 2019-03-02 15:44, Shadow wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 18:12:34 +0000, David in Devon
>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/03/2019 17:13, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* *AGAIN* <sigh>
>>>> On 2019-03-02 08:13, David in Devon wrote:
>>>>> On 22/02/2019 15:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica *LIED* (why, I don't
>>>>> know)
>>>>>
>>>>>> No. He was booted out of the Navy
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I wasn't.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you were.
>>>
>>> It's important to provide evidence of your assertion.
>>>
>>> Something you can *NOT* provide - proof.
>>>
>>> Why can't you provide proof?
>>>
>>> Because you are lying.
>> No wonder they kicked you out of the navy.
>> []'s
> That would be my assessment.
Then just like the liar called 'Shadow', you'd be wrong, *again*.
>> []'s
> That would be my assessment.
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:42 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:588eE.548$zD3...@fx14.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 10:50:39 GMT in
know WTF you were writing about and could not complete basic
troubleshooting 101 tasks without help (as you demonstrated years ago
with email correspondence) I corrected your stupidity on the subject
with a follow up post and disregarded any other concerns you expressed
as that of a sociopathic stalker. In hindsight, I should have dismissed
you via email a long long time ago. I knew something was off with you
the moment you tried getting personal.
> Tell me about this malicious finding:-
You've continually failed to demonstrate any understanding of a
technical matter, so I have no present interest in further discussion
of this subject with you.
> Pierre is Winston's 'mate' on U2U!
That remains your problem. I have no issues with them.
--
Tactics: breathmints for dyslexics
news:588eE.548$zD3...@fx14.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 10:50:39 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> You never think deeply enough about such matters. <sigh>
Sure I do. I gave it considerable thought. When I determined you didn't
> You never think deeply enough about such matters. <sigh>
know WTF you were writing about and could not complete basic
troubleshooting 101 tasks without help (as you demonstrated years ago
with email correspondence) I corrected your stupidity on the subject
with a follow up post and disregarded any other concerns you expressed
as that of a sociopathic stalker. In hindsight, I should have dismissed
you via email a long long time ago. I knew something was off with you
the moment you tried getting personal.
> Tell me about this malicious finding:-
technical matter, so I have no present interest in further discussion
of this subject with you.
> Pierre is Winston's 'mate' on U2U!
--
Tactics: breathmints for dyslexics
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:43 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:aAgeE.4228$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:26:43 GMT in
> They are supposed to be the crème de la crème - 100% trustworthy
> - but Winston's late friend, PA Bear/Robear Dyer MVP, was a liar
> and NOT to be trusted.
I can't confirm any of your statements. Based on knowledge concerning
you, I cannot rely on anything you post as being truthful. Independent
verification is required. You have no credit with me.
--
We'll make him listen to whiny protest songs from the sixties!!!
news:aAgeE.4228$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:26:43 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> Bad apples in a barrel must be removed whenever possible.
When do you plan to leave?
> Bad apples in a barrel must be removed whenever possible.
> They are supposed to be the crème de la crème - 100% trustworthy
> - but Winston's late friend, PA Bear/Robear Dyer MVP, was a liar
> and NOT to be trusted.
you, I cannot rely on anything you post as being truthful. Independent
verification is required. You have no credit with me.
--
We'll make him listen to whiny protest songs from the sixties!!!
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:44 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:GGgeE.4229$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:33:39 GMT in
being under the influence of drugs (pot would be one, but let's not
nitpick over the fact you stated more than one as in a druggie), you
claimed I lied when I stated otherwise and provided a post discussing
a matter in 2003 as your evidence to support your accusation. The
post from 2003 didn't even support the druggie accusation. Pots not
pills nor is it alcohol, David. The latter two are far more dangerous
to individuals who consume it and society as a whole.
Although I haven't messed with it in nearly two decades now, my
opinions and views of the subject haven't changed. I don't have a
problem with those who smoke grass. It's not bothering me.
>>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>>> 2018
>>>
>>> *SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
>>
>> Agreed. And confirmed on the liar about drinking part. He's still
>> drinking!
>
> I've had *NO* alcohol since 21st March 2018 - nearly a year! :-D
Sorry, but, my sources haven't mislead me the entire time I've been
in contact with them. As with last time, I'll be taking their word at
face value. if you want me to believe they are lying on you (for what
possible reason?), you'll have to submit proof that clearly shows it.
Due to your non existant credibility as a truthful, honest poster,
your words have no value on their own. Collateral is required. What
can you offer up?
>>> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
>>
>> It would have to be.
>
> I'm fine, Dustin. Thanks for caring.
You clearly aren't, David. Try reading some of your posts lately.
--
'You will always be lucky if you know how to make friends with
strange cats.' Colonial American proverb
news:GGgeE.4229$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:33:39 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> Shadow <S...@dow.br>
>> news:oaja7etth0flspmhf...@4ax.com Tue, 26 Feb 2019
>> 14:55:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>>
>>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you
>>>>> seem to forget everything else.
>>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>>> you
>>>>> knew that.
>>>>
>>>> It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>>>
>>> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under
>>> the
>>> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>>
>> Correct. I wasn't under the influence of anything. David lied,
>> again.
>
> You *appeared* to be under the influence of *something*!
That's not going to work either, David. You not only accused me of
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> Shadow <S...@dow.br>
>> news:oaja7etth0flspmhf...@4ax.com Tue, 26 Feb 2019
>> 14:55:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 +0000, David in Devon
>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>>
>>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you
>>>>> seem to forget everything else.
>>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>>> you
>>>>> knew that.
>>>>
>>>> It *PROVED* that <cut stalking target> *LIED*
>>>
>>> No it proves you *LIED* when you affirmed he was under
>>> the
>>> influence of drugs this week. You had no idea.
>>
>> Correct. I wasn't under the influence of anything. David lied,
>> again.
>
> You *appeared* to be under the influence of *something*!
being under the influence of drugs (pot would be one, but let's not
nitpick over the fact you stated more than one as in a druggie), you
claimed I lied when I stated otherwise and provided a post discussing
a matter in 2003 as your evidence to support your accusation. The
post from 2003 didn't even support the druggie accusation. Pots not
pills nor is it alcohol, David. The latter two are far more dangerous
to individuals who consume it and society as a whole.
Although I haven't messed with it in nearly two decades now, my
opinions and views of the subject haven't changed. I don't have a
problem with those who smoke grass. It's not bothering me.
>>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>>> 2018
>>>
>>> *SUCKER* to the first and *LIAR* to the second.
>>
>> Agreed. And confirmed on the liar about drinking part. He's still
>> drinking!
>
> I've had *NO* alcohol since 21st March 2018 - nearly a year! :-D
in contact with them. As with last time, I'll be taking their word at
face value. if you want me to believe they are lying on you (for what
possible reason?), you'll have to submit proof that clearly shows it.
Due to your non existant credibility as a truthful, honest poster,
your words have no value on their own. Collateral is required. What
can you offer up?
>>> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
>>
>> It would have to be.
>
> I'm fine, Dustin. Thanks for caring.
--
'You will always be lucky if you know how to make friends with
strange cats.' Colonial American proverb
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:45 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:NKgeE.309$dc4...@fx09.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:38:02 GMT in
is a text based communications platform. We haven't been discussing
anything using speech. Proof of drug addict acccusation, please?
Remember, your words alone have no value with me, collateral is
required. What can you offer for collateral?
>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>> 2018
>>
>> I can't confirm or deny the former, but I can confirm you are
>> lying about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days,
>> three days in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry
>> since that period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't
>> do you any good, anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You
>> give yourself away.
>
> You absolutely, 100%, can *NOT* confirm I'm lying about not
> drinking.
Well, that's not exactly entirely true. I can confirm it for the most
part (as can most any other long time usenetter actually) all without
having to name any source(s) for you to exact retaliation on for
conversing with me.
> No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018.
> *NONE*!
Partially true, David. Partially true. No alcohol touched your lips
from March 21st, 2018 to March 24th, 2018. You made it three days
before your wife had to provide you assistance in the form of a
bottle.
It's a known fact that alcoholics are physically dependent on it, you
can't just quit cold turkey for too long - high risk of actually
killing you if you aren't under medical care or slowly weaned off of
it. Only an idiot who has no knowledge of alcohol abuse, alcoholism,
etc, would fall for your story of going sober, cold turkey. It's not
physically possible for you to do that.
In theory (but you didn't claim to do this) you could under medical
care be 'clean' within 24 hours and not suffer withdrawls, assuming
the dr induced coma to flush people who are addicted to narcotics
would also work for alcohol (this I don't know for sure). That
assumes two things: (1) the method works in both cases (I don't know)
and (2) that you sought assistance for it and a dr agreed to do it.
(I doubt you did this)
> You cannot change the truth - EVER.
That's correct. Despite your ongoing efforts to try, you will not
succeed.
--
There are forty Ł100 million notes in the Bank of England.
news:NKgeE.309$dc4...@fx09.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:38:02 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> news:au_cE.7025$Up5.4653
>> @fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>
>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>>> to forget everything else.
>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>> you
>>>> knew that.
>>>
>>> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
>>
>> It proved no such thing. Infact, it proved that you accused me of
>> writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
>> something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed
>> I wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't
>> 2019, David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
>
> Your slurred speech? You *KNOW* you are a drug addict. Why lie
> about it?
slurred speech? David, put the bottle down. You've had enough. This
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> news:au_cE.7025$Up5.4653
>> @fx22.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:02:29 GMT in alt.computer.workshop,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/02/2019 21:05, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:46:55 +0000, David in Devon
>>>> <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I was caught in 2003
>>>>
>>>> So it's a thing from long ago, long forgotten, probably
>>>> archived by some psychopath. I'd just forget about it, you seem
>>>> to forget everything else.
>>>> Cannabis is a much softer drug than alcohol BTW .... but
>>>> you
>>>> knew that.
>>>
>>> It *PROVED* that Dustin *LIED*
>>
>> It proved no such thing. Infact, it proved that you accused me of
>> writing a post in 2019 under the influence of drugs based on
>> something from 2003. That's not going to fly, David. You claimed
>> I wrote the post while under the influence of drugs. 2003 isn't
>> 2019, David. Where is your proof to support the accusation?
>
> Your slurred speech? You *KNOW* you are a drug addict. Why lie
> about it?
is a text based communications platform. We haven't been discussing
anything using speech. Proof of drug addict acccusation, please?
Remember, your words alone have no value with me, collateral is
required. What can you offer for collateral?
>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>> 2018
>>
>> I can't confirm or deny the former, but I can confirm you are
>> lying about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days,
>> three days in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry
>> since that period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't
>> do you any good, anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You
>> give yourself away.
>
> You absolutely, 100%, can *NOT* confirm I'm lying about not
> drinking.
part (as can most any other long time usenetter actually) all without
having to name any source(s) for you to exact retaliation on for
conversing with me.
> No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018.
> *NONE*!
from March 21st, 2018 to March 24th, 2018. You made it three days
before your wife had to provide you assistance in the form of a
bottle.
It's a known fact that alcoholics are physically dependent on it, you
can't just quit cold turkey for too long - high risk of actually
killing you if you aren't under medical care or slowly weaned off of
it. Only an idiot who has no knowledge of alcohol abuse, alcoholism,
etc, would fall for your story of going sober, cold turkey. It's not
physically possible for you to do that.
In theory (but you didn't claim to do this) you could under medical
care be 'clean' within 24 hours and not suffer withdrawls, assuming
the dr induced coma to flush people who are addicted to narcotics
would also work for alcohol (this I don't know for sure). That
assumes two things: (1) the method works in both cases (I don't know)
and (2) that you sought assistance for it and a dr agreed to do it.
(I doubt you did this)
> You cannot change the truth - EVER.
succeed.
--
There are forty Ł100 million notes in the Bank of England.
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:46 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:9DDeE.182$x%6....@fx12.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:40:03 GMT in
The problem (for you) is that Shadow has credit where as you do not.
You must prove everything you state is actually the truth by
providing supporting evidence. If you're unable to do so, then, by
default, anything you do post claiming to be truthful will be auto
flagged as most likely, a lie.
Some of this is based on your post here where you've admitted in no
un certain terms that you lied about everything you ever told me in
email and online and you'll always lie to anyone you believe is a bad
guy. You selectively tell your version of the truth only to those you
deem to be good guys and nobody has any way of knowing your criteria
for that.
In case you forgot abmitting the above, here's your words again with
some questions (that you continue to duck - I enjoy seeing you do
that so much, I can't help but post the questions again <G>) asking
for clarification so that there wouldn't be any possible
misunderstanding on my part. As you've continually refused to address
them, I can only reach the logical conclusion that did do what I
asked you about with the questions. So, logic dictates, you're a
liar.
Message-ID: <_KA9E.86455$Xl2....@fx20.fr7>
> I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same
> email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no
> accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on
> usenet.
That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd
scored a bullseye.
> Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you
> aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to
> that paste?
I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?
*** end paste
To which I responded:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200
> I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
> tell any newbies about you?
You're about as honest as you are sober, David.
Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I
accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view
of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with
Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to
his face?
Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me,
to be my friend, etc via email were all lies?
Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a
cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would
void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have
any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard.
Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace
arrangements in play?
Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write
as being in any way truthful?
So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both,
then David?
Any reason you neglected to respond to this, days ago, David? You've
been active on usenet and the www. Are you avoiding the reply
because, you don't have any answers to the questions that'll give
anyone the idea you're a "good guy"; rather, it'll only help to
confirm (not that anyone needs further confirmation at this point)
that you are in all actuality, a dangerous nutjob stalker amongst
other things, none of which are good. You can claim to be something
you're not (a good guy) all you like, David. It doesn't hide what you
actually are (a bad guy).
--
Truth was left world-writeable.
news:9DDeE.182$x%6....@fx12.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:40:03 GMT in
You must prove everything you state is actually the truth by
providing supporting evidence. If you're unable to do so, then, by
default, anything you do post claiming to be truthful will be auto
flagged as most likely, a lie.
Some of this is based on your post here where you've admitted in no
un certain terms that you lied about everything you ever told me in
email and online and you'll always lie to anyone you believe is a bad
guy. You selectively tell your version of the truth only to those you
deem to be good guys and nobody has any way of knowing your criteria
for that.
In case you forgot abmitting the above, here's your words again with
some questions (that you continue to duck - I enjoy seeing you do
that so much, I can't help but post the questions again <G>) asking
for clarification so that there wouldn't be any possible
misunderstanding on my part. As you've continually refused to address
them, I can only reach the logical conclusion that did do what I
asked you about with the questions. So, logic dictates, you're a
liar.
Message-ID: <_KA9E.86455$Xl2....@fx20.fr7>
> I proceeded to answer other questions you provided in the same
> email asking about it. You indicated no issue with me, no
> accusation of my being a 'bad guy' until years later, here on
> usenet.
That's correct. I didn't let on that you were a target and I'd
scored a bullseye.
> Other than your known dishonesty, is there a particular reason you
> aren't sharing the entire contents of your inquiry leading up to
> that paste?
I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
tell any newbies about you?
*** end paste
To which I responded:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155063392200
> I'm totally honest with good guys. What else would you like me to
> tell any newbies about you?
You're about as honest as you are sober, David.
Say you were setting me up the entire time. Does that mean (as I
accused you of) that you tried to provide a google street map view
of my house on purpose, then? And when you met in person with
Aardvark and discussed the matter, were you knowingly lying right to
his face?
Are you now admitting that every attempt you made to get to know me,
to be my friend, etc via email were all lies?
Are you also admitting that you told various lies to GM to have a
cease fire on jenn arranged? Under normal conditions, that would
void the agreement. Lucky for jenn, I see no reason for her to have
any issues because you're a dishonest drunkard.
Are you also admitting that you've told lies concerning other peace
arrangements in play?
Are you also admitting that I cannot trust a single thing you write
as being in any way truthful?
So have you been lying for years on usenet or the emails, or both,
then David?
Any reason you neglected to respond to this, days ago, David? You've
been active on usenet and the www. Are you avoiding the reply
because, you don't have any answers to the questions that'll give
anyone the idea you're a "good guy"; rather, it'll only help to
confirm (not that anyone needs further confirmation at this point)
that you are in all actuality, a dangerous nutjob stalker amongst
other things, none of which are good. You can claim to be something
you're not (a good guy) all you like, David. It doesn't hide what you
actually are (a bad guy).
--
Truth was left world-writeable.
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:47 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:4RgeE.310$dc4...@fx09.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:44:44 GMT in
You're making even less sense with that reply, David.
> You are a complete and utter *LUZER* Dustin Cook!
>
> https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=luzer
>
> EVERY definition fits you to a 'T'.
*yawn* See above. If you have anything specific you disagree with,
feel free to point it out and respond.
--
Half the failures in life result from pulling in one's horse when it
is leaping.
news:4RgeE.310$dc4...@fx09.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:44:44 GMT in
> You are a complete and utter *LUZER* Dustin Cook!
>
> https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=luzer
>
> EVERY definition fits you to a 'T'.
feel free to point it out and respond.
--
Half the failures in life result from pulling in one's horse when it
is leaping.
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:47 PM3/2/19
to
Panthera Tigris Altaica <northe...@outlook.com>
news:q5eu7v$tgv$3...@dont-email.me Sat, 02 Mar 2019 21:57:20 GMT in
Further evidence, including admissions from him confirming what you
wrote:
A hand job a day keeps arthritis away.
news:q5eu7v$tgv$3...@dont-email.me Sat, 02 Mar 2019 21:57:20 GMT in
wrote:
Diesel
Mar 2, 2019, 11:36:54 PM3/2/19
to
David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
news:_vueE.25609$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 12:17:59 GMT in
stalking me going back for years. They'll be coming to see you about
that and additional issues I've raised concerning you.
>>> Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in
>>> any event. It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
>>
>> No rush. I want this done right and proper. I want you to be
>> proper fucked as a result. I'm not Aardvark, I'm not going to
>> stop with the first visit, I want you prosecuted for stalking and
>> repeated copyright infringements against my protected works. And,
>> I fully intend to make this happen for you, this year, David.
>>
>> If all goes as planned and I don't presently see why it wouldn't,
>> 2019 will be the year you legally answer for a small amount of
>> the rat bastard things you've done to people for years online.
>> Starting with me. In case I wasn't clear, allow me to be blunt. I
>> am out to get you, David. And, I will get you.
>
> Don't be too surprised at the answers I get once I've published
> this posting of yours on Quora and asked for advice on how best to
> deal with your threat.
I don't think the advice you're going to get will be pleasing to you.
I look forward to your sharing the url to the discussion. :)
I made no threats, David. I made my intentions to have you brought to
justice for repeated criminal acts towards me, quite clear. If that
has brought you cause for concern, it's only because you know you're
guilty of every single thing I accused you of, I can prove it, and
I'm going to proceed with the plans as laid out before you.
If you were infact innocent, you'd have nothing to be fearful of.
Since we both know you aren't, that's why you're expressing concern
and are now expressing intent to get others opinions on what you
should do next. Here's a suggestion: STOP STALKING.
> People reading there have no need to understand Usenet; they can
> simply read here:-
David, you're making a very bad assumption. :)
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155152844700
My post is self explanatory. I look forward to reading your qoura
thread about it. I'm going to take a guess and say the majority of
the advice (they need only google you and see for themselves what
you're about, David) is going to be something along the lines of,
quit interacting with me you're only going to make things worse for
yourself, maybe you shouldn't have done what I accused you of so many
times, etc etc etc. I doubt you'll find a single 'understanding' soul
there, David.
--
D.A.D.D. - Daddies Against Dirty Diapers
news:_vueE.25609$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 12:17:59 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:QmTcE.4106$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a
>>> great deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>>
>> It's a very wise idea to confirm you've been stalking me - That's
>> the reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with
>> some verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal
>> with. I wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your
>> computers while they visit; you'll just make it easier to make
>> your life much more difficult if you leave evidence of being a
>> pir8 on your machine. [g]
>
> Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply
> everything I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been
> formally punished for his wrongdoing.
Thanks for admitting that you'll turn over evidence of having been
> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>> news:QmTcE.4106$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a
>>> great deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>>
>> It's a very wise idea to confirm you've been stalking me - That's
>> the reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with
>> some verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal
>> with. I wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your
>> computers while they visit; you'll just make it easier to make
>> your life much more difficult if you leave evidence of being a
>> pir8 on your machine. [g]
>
> Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply
> everything I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been
> formally punished for his wrongdoing.
stalking me going back for years. They'll be coming to see you about
that and additional issues I've raised concerning you.
>>> Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in
>>> any event. It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
>>
>> No rush. I want this done right and proper. I want you to be
>> proper fucked as a result. I'm not Aardvark, I'm not going to
>> stop with the first visit, I want you prosecuted for stalking and
>> repeated copyright infringements against my protected works. And,
>> I fully intend to make this happen for you, this year, David.
>>
>> If all goes as planned and I don't presently see why it wouldn't,
>> 2019 will be the year you legally answer for a small amount of
>> the rat bastard things you've done to people for years online.
>> Starting with me. In case I wasn't clear, allow me to be blunt. I
>> am out to get you, David. And, I will get you.
>
> Don't be too surprised at the answers I get once I've published
> this posting of yours on Quora and asked for advice on how best to
> deal with your threat.
I look forward to your sharing the url to the discussion. :)
I made no threats, David. I made my intentions to have you brought to
justice for repeated criminal acts towards me, quite clear. If that
has brought you cause for concern, it's only because you know you're
guilty of every single thing I accused you of, I can prove it, and
I'm going to proceed with the plans as laid out before you.
If you were infact innocent, you'd have nothing to be fearful of.
Since we both know you aren't, that's why you're expressing concern
and are now expressing intent to get others opinions on what you
should do next. Here's a suggestion: STOP STALKING.
> People reading there have no need to understand Usenet; they can
> simply read here:-
> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155152844700
My post is self explanatory. I look forward to reading your qoura
thread about it. I'm going to take a guess and say the majority of
the advice (they need only google you and see for themselves what
you're about, David) is going to be something along the lines of,
quit interacting with me you're only going to make things worse for
yourself, maybe you shouldn't have done what I accused you of so many
times, etc etc etc. I doubt you'll find a single 'understanding' soul
there, David.
--
D.A.D.D. - Daddies Against Dirty Diapers
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 7:57:06 AM3/3/19
to
software
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2883692/virustotal-tackles-false-positive-malware-detections-plaguing-antivirus-and-software-vendors.html
You can read about AutoShun here:-
http://kansasdealers.org/sites/default/files/ASD-FAQ_2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3uzdIb2WzFck2V8dBBJMZelzVNpB__lPPMFQyKFVEV94vVTEdD5GwJNig
HTH
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 8:03:21 AM3/3/19
to
On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
If your 'source' has told you that I've drunk alcohol after 21st March
2018, your source is lying. QED.
>>>> Brain damaged by alcohol abuse, maybe ?
>>>
>>> It would have to be.
>>
>> I'm fine, Dustin. Thanks for caring.
>
> You clearly aren't, David. Try reading some of your posts lately.
task when you so easily bite!
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 8:19:04 AM3/3/19
to
On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:aAgeE.4228$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:26:43 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Bad apples in a barrel must be removed whenever possible.
>
> When do you plan to leave?
Hope is *NOT* a method, Dustin! ;-)
> news:aAgeE.4228$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Fri, 01 Mar 2019 20:26:43 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Bad apples in a barrel must be removed whenever possible.
>
> When do you plan to leave?
>> They are supposed to be the crème de la crème - 100% trustworthy
>> - but Winston's late friend, PA Bear/Robear Dyer MVP, was a liar
>> and NOT to be trusted.
>
> I can't confirm any of your statements. Based on knowledge concerning
> you, I cannot rely on anything you post as being truthful. Independent
> verification is required. You have no credit with me.
PA Bear *HAS* died.
>> and NOT to be trusted.
>
> I can't confirm any of your statements. Based on knowledge concerning
> you, I cannot rely on anything you post as being truthful. Independent
> verification is required. You have no credit with me.
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/insider/forum/all/thank-you-and-rip-pabear-robear-dyer/d42e1c94-9032-4447-9a39-3fb3585b86fd
Is that sufficient proof?
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 8:28:25 AM3/3/19
to
>>>> I've never smoked Cannabis and had no alcohol since 21st March
>>>> 2018
>>>
>>> I can't confirm or deny the former, but I can confirm you are
>>> lying about the latter. You stopped for a period of three days,
>>> three days in a row on March 21st, 2018. You haven't remained dry
>>> since that period of time, so stop lying about that. It doesn't
>>> do you any good, anyway. Your writing style tells the tale. You
>>> give yourself away.
>>
>> You absolutely, 100%, can *NOT* confirm I'm lying about not
>> drinking.
>
> Well, that's not exactly entirely true. I can confirm it for the most
> part (as can most any other long time usenetter actually) all without
> having to name any source(s) for you to exact retaliation on for
> conversing with me.
21st March 2018. *NONE*!
>> No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018.
>> *NONE*!
>
> Partially true, David. Partially true. No alcohol touched your lips
> from March 21st, 2018 to March 24th, 2018. You made it three days
> before your wife had to provide you assistance in the form of a
> bottle.
As I've said - *BULLSHIT*!
>> No alcohol has passed my lips AT ANY TIME since 21st March 2018.
>> *NONE*!
>
> Partially true, David. Partially true. No alcohol touched your lips
> from March 21st, 2018 to March 24th, 2018. You made it three days
> before your wife had to provide you assistance in the form of a
> bottle.
> It's a known fact that alcoholics are physically dependent on it, you
> can't just quit cold turkey for too long - high risk of actually
> killing you if you aren't under medical care or slowly weaned off of
> it. Only an idiot who has no knowledge of alcohol abuse, alcoholism,
> etc, would fall for your story of going sober, cold turkey. It's not
> physically possible for you to do that.
> In theory (but you didn't claim to do this) you could under medical
> care be 'clean' within 24 hours and not suffer withdrawls, assuming
> the dr induced coma to flush people who are addicted to narcotics
> would also work for alcohol (this I don't know for sure). That
> assumes two things: (1) the method works in both cases (I don't know)
> and (2) that you sought assistance for it and a dr agreed to do it.
> (I doubt you did this)
>
>> You cannot change the truth - EVER.
>
> That's correct. Despite your ongoing efforts to try, you will not
> succeed.
date of 21st March 2018 - the first day of spring.
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 8:49:24 AM3/3/19
to
https://www.dropbox.com/s/sv78sl59czi3jrs/Screenshot%202019-03-03%2013.46.23.png
John McWilliams
Mar 3, 2019, 10:22:50 AM3/3/19
to
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 12:59:29 PM3/3/19
to
On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel wrote:
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:_vueE.25609$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 12:17:59 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>> news:QmTcE.4106$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 GMT
>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a
>>>> great deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>>>
>>> It's a very wise idea to confirm you've been stalking me - That's
>>> the reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with
>>> some verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal
>>> with. I wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your
>>> computers while they visit; you'll just make it easier to make
>>> your life much more difficult if you leave evidence of being a
>>> pir8 on your machine. [g]
>>
>> Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply
>> everything I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been
>> formally punished for his wrongdoing.
>
> Thanks for admitting that you'll turn over evidence of having been
> stalking me going back for years. They'll be coming to see you about
> that and additional issues I've raised concerning you.
I'll get everything ready for them.
> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
> news:_vueE.25609$rS6....@fx29.fr7 Sat, 02 Mar 2019 12:17:59 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2019 04:23, Diesel wrote:
>>> David in Devon <BDo...@REMOVE.gmail.com>
>>> news:QmTcE.4106$yI7....@fx06.fr7 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:56:47 GMT
>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I get my next visit, they're certainly going to learn a
>>>> great deal about a young Dustin J. Cook!
>>>
>>> It's a very wise idea to confirm you've been stalking me - That's
>>> the reason they'll be specifically coming to see you. Along with
>>> some verified copyright infringement issues you need to deal
>>> with. I wouldn't advise you to keep copies of my things on your
>>> computers while they visit; you'll just make it easier to make
>>> your life much more difficult if you leave evidence of being a
>>> pir8 on your machine. [g]
>>
>> Nobody will have to LOOK for evidence - I'll willingly supply
>> everything I know about the guy in Kingsport who has never been
>> formally punished for his wrongdoing.
>
> Thanks for admitting that you'll turn over evidence of having been
> stalking me going back for years. They'll be coming to see you about
> that and additional issues I've raised concerning you.
>>>> Maybe they'll not come after all. They'll need to be quick in
>>>> any event. It's nearly time for boating again! :-)
>>>
>>> No rush. I want this done right and proper. I want you to be
>>> proper fucked as a result. I'm not Aardvark, I'm not going to
>>> stop with the first visit, I want you prosecuted for stalking and
>>> repeated copyright infringements against my protected works. And,
>>> I fully intend to make this happen for you, this year, David.
>>>
>>> If all goes as planned and I don't presently see why it wouldn't,
>>> 2019 will be the year you legally answer for a small amount of
>>> the rat bastard things you've done to people for years online.
>>> Starting with me. In case I wasn't clear, allow me to be blunt. I
>>> am out to get you, David. And, I will get you.
>>
>> Don't be too surprised at the answers I get once I've published
>> this posting of yours on Quora and asked for advice on how best to
>> deal with your threat.
>
> I don't think the advice you're going to get will be pleasing to you.
> I look forward to your sharing the url to the discussion. :)
>> https://www.quora.com/about
>>
>> It's all about how your threat makes me *FEEL*, Dustin.
>
> I made no threats, David. I made my intentions to have you brought to
> justice for repeated criminal acts towards me, quite clear. If that
> has brought you cause for concern, it's only because you know you're
> guilty of every single thing I accused you of, I can prove it, and
> I'm going to proceed with the plans as laid out before you.
> If you were infact innocent, you'd have nothing to be fearful of.
> Since we both know you aren't, that's why you're expressing concern
> and are now expressing intent to get others opinions on what you
> should do next. Here's a suggestion: STOP STALKING.
a great wind-up job on you.
>> People reading there have no need to understand Usenet; they can
>> simply read here:-
>
> David, you're making a very bad assumption. :)
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=155152844700
>
> My post is self explanatory. I look forward to reading your qoura
> thread about it. I'm going to take a guess and say the majority of
> the advice (they need only google you and see for themselves what
> you're about, David) is going to be something along the lines of,
> quit interacting with me you're only going to make things worse for
> yourself, maybe you shouldn't have done what I accused you of so many
> times, etc etc etc. I doubt you'll find a single 'understanding' soul
> there, David.
David in Devon
Mar 3, 2019, 1:11:49 PM3/3/19
to
On 03/03/2019 04:36, Diesel seemed not to understand. :-(
> You are a complete and utter*LUZER* Dustin Cook!
You have been lying, Dustin. LUZERS lie.
I have NOT had any alcohol since I stopped on 21st March 2018.
> You are a complete and utter*LUZER* Dustin Cook!
You have been lying, Dustin. LUZERS lie.
I have NOT had any alcohol since I stopped on 21st March 2018.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages