Marked as read!

[David Brooks]

Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
Record. They have provided not one scrap of evidence.

Why not? Because they have both *LIED* - there *IS* no such evidence.

*NONE* - not anywhere!

Neither of them expected to meet someone as upstanding as me on Usenet!

I only came to ruffle the feathers of bad guys. I've done just that! :-)

--
David B.

[Willy Lobo]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:KLDMH.26608$Hy7.9010
@fx34.iad:

>
> Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
> Record. They have provided not one scrap of evidence.

Buggery?

> I only came to ruffle the feathers of bad guys. I've done just that! :-)

Buggery?

Asking for a friend.

[Snit]

On Jan 16, 2021 at 8:38:17 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<KLDMH.26608$Hy7....@fx34.iad>:

They lie to get a rise out of you. I saw Apd's post where he quoted Gremlin
wondering why he is not seen the same as those who do at least appear to be
honest. He answers his own question.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Kelly Phillips]

On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 15:38:17 +0000, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>
>Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
>Record.

They actually said you were offered, and you accepted, early retirement to
AVOID having a blemished Service Record. Your claim above is incorrect.

>They have provided not one scrap of evidence.
>
>Why not? Because they have both *LIED* - there *IS* no such evidence.
>
>*NONE* - not anywhere!
>
>Neither of them expected to meet someone as upstanding as me on Usenet!
>
>I only came to ruffle the feathers of bad guys. I've done just that! :-)

And got your own feathers ruffled a bit, as well. The icing on the cake is
your 'love me' page at tekrider.net, where you get called out for the slimy
dishonest nymshifting stalker that you are. Great job, mate.

[Ozzie The Homo]

In article <m0860g57rkagr00qg...@4ax.com>,
KF...@podcasts.org says...

>
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 15:38:17 +0000, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
> >Record.
>
> They actually said you were offered, and you accepted, early retirement to
> AVOID having a blemished Service Record. Your claim above is incorrect.

Buggery????

[Wolffan]

On 16 Jan 2021, Kelly Phillips wrote
(in article<m0860g57rkagr00qg...@4ax.com>):

> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 15:38:17 +0000, David Brooks<D...@nomail.afraid.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
> > Record.
>
> They actually said you were offered, and you accepted, early retirement to
> AVOID having a blemished Service Record.

Yep.

> Your claim above is incorrect.

He can’t post without lying.

>
>
> > They have provided not one scrap of evidence.
> >
> > Why not? Because they have both *LIED* - there *IS* no such evidence.

Sure there is.

> >
> >
> > *NONE* - not anywhere!

Multiple people have reported the same events.

> >
> >
> > Neither of them expected to meet someone as upstanding as me on Usenet!

‘upstanding’? BWA-HA-HA-HAA! You’re just having a bit of fun again.

> >
> >
> > I only came to ruffle the feathers of bad guys. I've done just that! :-)

nope.

>
> And got your own feathers ruffled a bit, as well. The icing on the cake is
> your 'love me' page at tekrider.net, where you get called out for the slimy
> dishonest nymshifting stalker that you are. Great job, mate.

he’s running away as fast as he can waddle.

And, oh... troll-boy Brooks, why do you refuse to answer the simple
questions:

1 when was the last time that Supernews replied to you?

2 what did they say?

3 how’s that DMCA takedown going?

Come on, arsenuggetwhy won’t you abswer? Is it because you _can’t_
answer? Is it because Supernews hasn’t replied beyond an autoreply since
September... or perhaps August? Is it because Supernews has nothing to say to
you? Is it because you _can’t_ mount a DMCA takedown of anything I’ve
posted because you have no case? Is it because you’re an idiot, a drunkard,
a troll, a stalker, and a serial homosexual sexual harasser? Oh. Wait. Yes it
is!

[David Brooks]

On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.

<SNIP>

MID <R6wwH.4164$VfRc...@fx07.ams1> refers

[Wolffan]

On 17 Jan 2021, David Brooks wrote
(in article <UnVMH.42073$Ad1....@fx33.iad>):

> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> MID <R6wwH.4164$VfRc...@fx07.ams1> refers

run away, pervert, run away.

why do you refuse to answer the simple questions:

1 when was the last time that Supernews replied to you?

2 what did they say?

3 how’s that DMCA takedown going?

Come on, arsenugget, why won’t you answer? Is it because you _can’t_

[Steve Carroll]

On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.

You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple of
others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You used to
unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched that trust
erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a person not known
for being trustworthy. So the question boils down to the obvious: When
you say "trust" do you actually mean 'loyalty'?

[David Brooks]

On 17/01/2021 13:02, Wolffan wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2021, David Brooks wrote
> (in article <UnVMH.42073$Ad1....@fx33.iad>):
>
>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>> MID <R6wwH.4164$VfRc...@fx07.ams1> refers
>
> run away, pervert, run away.
>

> why do you refuse to answer the simple questions:?


I no longer want you in my team.

You are RUDE and you a LIAR.

I fear I will never be able to trust you.

Do you actually HAVE a genuine LinkedIn page as I do?

Post a link to demonstrate to others reading here that YOU are genuine.

Or are you a chicken-shit?!!!

=

Ashok (Supernews)
Aug 23, 2020, 14:47 CDT

Hello David,

Thanks for getting back with the snippet of the conversation and the
header details.

A preliminary check of the details shared by you shows that the
communication was not linked to the Supernews servers. Please note that
Supernews is a Usenet provider that allows you to post content only in
newsgroups.

While uploading/downloading content in our newsgroups would need an
active account, the account isn't tagged to the Usenet username in any
way. Also, I could not find the account with the email address
"akwo...@zoho.com." I've requested a streamlined search internally for
similar accounts, and I'll reach out to you once I've heard from them.

Meanwhile, I'd like to point out that we don't monitor the Usenet
content, we meagrely host the Usenet, relying on the Usenet moderators
and users to respect each other, their privacy, and the DMCA norms.

Support is available 24x7 via chat or email, and you can always search
our extensive Help Center at https://www.supernews.com/docs/support.html.

Regards,

Ashok
Supernews Customer Success Team
Level 2 Representative

=

David B.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/boaterdave/

[Wolffan]

On 17 Jan 2021, David Brooks wrote

(in article <KkYMH.10683$oN2....@fx15.iad>):

> On 17/01/2021 13:02, Wolffan wrote:
> > On 17 Jan 2021, David Brooks wrote
> > (in article <UnVMH.42073$Ad1....@fx33.iad>):
> >
> > > On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
> > >
> > > <SNIP>
> > >
> > > MID <R6wwH.4164$VfRc...@fx07.ams1> refers
> >
> > run away, pervert, run away.
> >
> > why do you refuse to answer the simple questions:?
>
> I no longer want you in my team.

I never was on your team, troll-boy. I don’t swing your way.
>
>
> You are RUDE

damn right, thou pervert and scumbag
> and you a LIAR.

nope.

>
>
> I fear I will never be able to trust you.

you fear a lot of thing, not least the truth. THE TRUTH WILL OUT! And you
have been outed.

>
>
> Do you actually HAVE a genuine LinkedIn page as I do?

yep.

>
>
> Post a link to demonstrate to others reading here that YOU are genuine.

nope.

>
>
> Or are you a chicken-shit?!!!

nah. I’m not a young black recruit that you can attempt to order around,
thou perverted arsenugget. You _know_ that I will _never_ let you near my
personal information, and you know why. (Unless you’re drunk again, or
rather, still, and have ‘forgotten’. Again.) Come on, troll-boy,
‘report’ me to my employers. God-damn, but you’re an idiot.

It might be that you’re just having a bit of fun... so am I.

run away, pervert, run away.

why do you refuse to answer the simple questions:

1 when was the last time that Supernews replied to you?

2 what did they say?

3 how’s that DMCA takedown going?

Come on, arsenugget, why won’t you answer? Is it because you _can’t_
answer? Is it because Supernews hasn’t replied beyond an autoreply since
September... or perhaps August? Is it because Supernews has nothing to say to
you? Is it because you _can’t_ mount a DMCA takedown of anything I’ve
posted because you have no case? Is it because you’re an idiot, a drunkard,
a troll, a stalker, and a serial homosexual sexual harasser? Oh. Wait. Yes it
is!

>
>

so... nothing since August. I thought so.

[LePluma]

Wolffan <akwo...@zoho.com> wrote in
news:0001HW.25B492F809...@news.supernews.com:

Buggery?

[Snit]

On Jan 17, 2021 at 8:44:56 AM MST, "Wolffan" wrote <0001HW.25B492F809...@news.supernews.com>:
>


You homophobic and racist rant has no place in any reasoned discussion.

[LePluma]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:9DZMH.14436$ac1....@fx48.iad:

> On Jan 17, 2021 at 8:44:56 AM MST, "Wolffan" wrote
> <0001HW.25B492F809...@news.supernews.com>:
>>
>
>
> You homophobic and racist rant has no place in any reasoned
> discussion.

[Wolffan]

On 17 Jan 2021, LePluma wrote
(in article <XnsACB576C...@46.165.242.75>):

Snit just admitted that troll-boy Brooks is gay...

[Snit]

I never even suggested anything of the sort.

I noted, correctly, your homophobic and racist attacks are reprehensible.

[Johnson Mallory]

Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Fc_MH.15124$gs1....@fx26.iad:

> Wolffan <akwo...@zoho.com> wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2021, LePluma wrote
>> (in article <XnsACB576C...@46.165.242.75>):
>>
>>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:9DZMH.14436$ac1....@fx48.iad:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 17, 2021 at 8:44:56 AM MST, "Wolffan" wrote
>>>> <0001HW.25B492F809...@news.supernews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You homophobic and racist rant has no place in any reasoned
>>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> Buggery?
>>> Asking for a friend.
>>
>> Snit just admitted that troll-boy Brooks is gay...
>>
>>
>
> I never even suggested anything of the sort.

You sound like a homo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKNRTf_j6jg

And with that long girly hair you look like a homo.

Conclusion is you are a homo.

[Wolffan]

On 17 Jan 2021, Johnson Mallory wrote
(in article <XnsACB57DC...@46.165.242.75>):

Snit’s a suck-up, not a homo. Troll-boy Brooks is a serial homosexual
sexual harasser. He’d be a serial sexual harasser even if he wasn’t as
queer as a three-dollar bill. He’s scum. Snit’s just an enabler of serial
sexula harassing perverted trolling stalking filicidial scum, that’s all.

[David Brooks]

I invariably mean what I say. I meant trust.

If I were you, Mr Carroll, I'd avoid having anything to do with
'Gremlin' - you'll never be THAT bad, no matter how hard you might try! ;-)

[Snit]

On Jan 17, 2021 at 2:00:31 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<Qz1NH.7180$p04....@fx08.iad>:

> On 17/01/2021 13:19, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>>
>> You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple of
>> others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You used to
>> unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched that trust
>> erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a person not known
>> for being trustworthy. So the question boils down to the obvious: When
>> you say "trust" do you actually mean 'loyalty'?
>
>
> I invariably mean what I say. I meant trust.

It is curious that the concept of trust is confusing to Carroll. It is not as
if you use it in an uncommon way. If someone acts in an honest and reasonable
way then they tend to be trusted by those who are trustworthy.

With Apd I have some pretty strong disagreements with him -- but I do not see
any malice in his words. I think he is overly trusting of Carroll and accepts,
as is human nature, that when he sees "many" folks many similar accusations
there is likely truth to them. Especially in an environment that is
unmoderated and where people can use socks, this natural inclination that many
trusting and good people have can lead them to be overly trusting of those who
are more likely to abuse the open nature of the medium.

> If I were you, Mr Carroll, I'd avoid having anything to do with
> 'Gremlin' - you'll never be THAT bad, no matter how hard you might try! ;-)

I do not think Carroll has made malware to spread, but what he has done is
also harmful: his harassment of my employer, his lies about my wife, his
claims of needing an anonymous Jiminy Cricket to tell him people need jobs.
Much more but those are ones he has been pretty open about in this group. He
has also lied about his interactions with the bot (his plugin to block it)...
and actually admitted very directly to at least SOME of what he was lying
about in that case.

Neither of them have a good moral compass. They see people as objects and use
them to get what they want.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2021-01-17, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2021 at 2:00:31 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
><Qz1NH.7180$p04....@fx08.iad>:
>
>> On 17/01/2021 13:19, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>>>
>>> You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple of
>>> others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You used to
>>> unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched that trust
>>> erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a person not known
>>> for being trustworthy. So the question boils down to the obvious: When
>>> you say "trust" do you actually mean 'loyalty'?
>>
>>
>> I invariably mean what I say. I meant trust.
>
> It is curious that the concept of trust is confusing to Carroll.

It's curious that a pathological liar like you would believe he could
sell such BS after 15 years of rejections.

> It is not as if you use it in an uncommon way.

It's not as if it fits the fact pattern.

The minute Apd disagreed with DB out came the 'I'm disappointed in you'
guilt trip. That Apd rightfully pointed out DB's BS was evident. BTW,
that's what "evidence" consists of... not just posting a link of a tiger
that's not at all relevant to the topic of a thread, like you're
goofishly suggesting in the "Anti-YT" thread. But then, no one ever
said you were well tethered to reality.

[David Brooks]

I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)

[Steve Carroll]

Which may have something to do with why people believe you still drink.

[David Brooks]

People may believe that ....... but they are mistaken. I don't drink.

I've never delved into your history with Snit. Which things which Snit
claims about you do you refute? Let's clear the air so we can all 'start
over'.

[Snit]

On Jan 17, 2021 at 5:46:08 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<lT4NH.29944$hTof...@fx35.iad>:

This is a fine example of what I was talking to Apd about... Carroll
repeatedly makes up stories of substance abuse and the like. He is flat out
making up nonsense accusations. Yes, Carroll tends to focus his nonsense on
me, but I am not the only one. I have seen in other groups where -hh had
AMAZING patience with Carroll... and Carroll just tossed out anything dealing
with reason to push his hyper-partisan nonsense. Carroll just gets things
stuck in his head and the evidence about that topic means nothing to him.

> I've never delved into your history with Snit. Which things which Snit
> claims about you do you refute? Let's clear the air so we can all 'start
> over'.

Part of Carroll's game is to get folks focused on 2004. Be ready.

[Snit]

On Jan 17, 2021 at 4:20:11 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<LC3NH.21904$P26....@fx06.iad>:

Thanks. I will add the I share Apd's trusting nature... and have been taken in
by such nonsense repeatedly. Heck, based on what Apd said I gave Carroll
*another* chance, as I did when you spoke of my doing so. I do not pretend to
be better than Apd in this area, though we might have different areas of
weakness in our tendencies to be overly trusting.

[Kelly Phillips]

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:46:08 +0000, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org>

I checked the Magic 8 Ball and it said, "Very doubtful".

[Steve Carroll]

Why do you think Shadow is trying to cover for F. Russell? Even he sees some
reality. He can not comment on any of the stuff I quote because he sees it's
proved.

Dropping support for DOS programs is common sense. You can say I am Snoop
Dogg for all I care.

We're all sorry F. Russell's a paranoid, narcissistic, delusional liar but
that's not gonna change anything <shrug>.

Now Shadow on the other end of the line doesn't matter. All that matters
is F. Russell gets to deliver the punchline. So how to win? Don't do anything
but ignore the nonsense. Logic isn't part of ruse and never will be. F. Russell
is plainly lying, he got caught and he's doing the standard defensive BS
taught in Trolling 101 as he endeavors to retain what Shadow already has...
but it will not work. Are people still debating this?

--
My Snoring Solution
Automate Google Groups https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/Petruzzellis$20or$20Carroll
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

[Carl Ringhoffer]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Ct6NH.29946$hTof....@fx35.iad:

> This is a fine example of what I was talking to Apd about...
> Carroll repeatedly makes up stories of substance abuse and the
> like. He is flat out making up nonsense accusations. Yes, Carroll
> tends to focus his nonsense on me, but I am not the only one. I
> have seen in other groups where -hh had AMAZING patience with
> Carroll... and Carroll just tossed out anything dealing with
> reason to push his hyper-partisan nonsense. Carroll just gets
> things stuck in his head and the evidence about that topic means
> nothing to him.

Stop trying to drag others into your circus snit. I have seen the
threads in COLA between hh and Carroll. They disagree on politics,
the vaccine, COVID and other topics.

It's nothing like the typical circus that surrounds you 24x7 so stop
it.

>> I've never delved into your history with Snit. Which things which
>> Snit claims about you do you refute? Let's clear the air so we
>> can all 'start over'.
>
> Part of Carroll's game is to get folks focused on 2004. Be ready.

I don't see Carroll mentioning 2004 but I do see you mentioning it
over and over again.
You seem fixated on that date for some oddball reason.

Why do you project so much?
You are constantly accusing others of the very same negative traits
that you have snit.
Why is that?
You do realize it is rather obvious to readers.
Or maybe you don't?

[Carl Ringhoffer]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:uM6NH.23073$Jh1....@fx46.iad:

OMG!
Please stop the sugar and honey routine snit.
Nobody falls for it.

And while you are at it please stop the association routine. That is
where you lump some others into some description of your own
behavior. It's a form of projection and you do it all the time as a
compensating mechanism for your own faults.
It's your way of justifying your own poor behavior or in some cases
your belief that you are "normal".
You are not normal.
Not by any stretch of the imagination and even a casual reader of
your garbage will see that.

[Steve Carroll]

So if it's not just 'fun and games' (while soused) what is it that
causes you to take Snit at his word (when it's clear virtually no one
else is willing to do that)? What causes you to troll the way you do?

> I've never delved into your history with Snit.

If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
surprised by that< <shrug>.

[Steve Carroll]

... brings up an obvious point based on DB's actions/statements.

> repeatedly makes up stories of substance abuse and the like.

Acknowledging that people believe he still drinks is just reality, Snit.
No one will be surprised that you tried to launch other attack in your
ongoing jihad with me (and reality) by attempting to control the
narrative.

Notably, even *he* acknowledged the reality you were unable to see.

Think about that before you set foot near the medicine cabinet again.

[Steve Carroll]

On 2021-01-18, Kelly Phillips <KF...@podcasts.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:46:08 +0000, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org>
> wrote:

(snip a bunch of silly BS that DB pretends to agree with)

>>>> I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)
>>>
>>> Which may have something to do with why people believe you still drink.
>>
>>People may believe that ....... but they are mistaken. I don't drink.
>
> I checked the Magic 8 Ball and it said, "Very doubtful".

If you believe it, why do it?

[Steve Carroll]

On 2021-01-18, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2021 at 4:20:11 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
><LC3NH.21904$P26....@fx06.iad>:

(snip crap)

>> I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)
>
> Thanks. I will add the I share Apd's trusting nature... and have been taken in
> by such nonsense repeatedly. Heck, based on what Apd said I gave Carroll
> *another* chance,

Ever the 'victim', there you go again blaming Apd for a thing he had no
control over (you "gave" me something on *his* word... silly bullsh*t).

> as I did when you spoke of my doing so. I do not pretend to
> be better than Apd in this area,

How can you? I doubt anyone will ever see him try to claim anything like
the bullsh*t you just did (and it wasn't the first time, Mr. 'Victim').

> though we might have different areas of
> weakness in our tendencies to be overly trusting.

Stop the goofy sales pitching, DB already knows Apd isn't as stupid as
you need him to be. That Apd gives you all the rope in the world only
makes you look like the stupid one.

[David Brooks]

Do you really not know?

Are you unaware of my being scammed for £245 in 2005? Unaware of my
involvement with the (then) High Tech Crime Unit here in the UK? Being
told by the police to destroy my computer and get a new one? Learn all
that I could about malware and the bad things which go on on the
Internet? My involvement on the Microsoft Answers forums and the 'bent'
MVPs? I've told you about 'AlmostBob' on me Microsoft 'Usenet' groups.
My invitation to the Annexcafe Newsgroups (now defunct) and my closing
down of the discredited Canadian website used to promote SPAM?

Slowly gaining snippets of information is no easy task!

>> I've never delved into your history with Snit.
>
> If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
> surprised by that< <shrug>.

I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me. He's one of
the few Apple computer users I've ever bumped into on Usenet and he has
helped me in all manner of small ways.

You appear to have skills that may be useful to HELP other people but
I've seen no signs yet of just how you have done so. Would you like to
show me the other side of you which you have so far kept deeply hidden?

My wife and I bumped into Ady Cole on our way home from our walk to the
sea yesterday. As well as his influence on me before I stopped drinking
alcohol, he also provided my wife with many hours of therapy after her
heart attack last March. There really ARE good folk around, Steve. :-)

--
David

[STALKING_TARGET_01]

All that he cares about is that Chris gets to dish out his crank call
and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Shadow is an involuntary
target on the other end of the phone is his motivation. BTW, I've already
pointed out that his use of "cult-like" to describe Shadow is denigrating,
since he's likening them to farmed livestock. Shadow has gone the extra
mile, essentially hand holding Chris on coding practices only for Chris
to blindly attack him and continue to show that he has no real interest
in the subject. In all reality, it's too hard for snit. Shadow and the
advocates suggest looking for advice for an open source application is
wrong.

Chris is being controlled by a corporation.

--
This broke the Internet!
<https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin>

[Steve Carroll]

Outside of what I just mentioned? How would I?

> Are you unaware of my being scammed for £245 in 2005?

So, in your mind, that means it's OK to troll everyone in ACW the way
you do? If your goal is to show that you've not only stopped drinking
but haven't suffered any long term damage, do you see why that might
fall short?

(snip 'Awhile ago we were walking down the yellow brick road' story)

>> If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
>> surprised by that< <shrug>.
>
> I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me.

Incorrect, he gives anyone a reason, every day.

> You appear to have skills that may be useful to HELP other people but
> I've seen no signs yet of just how you have done so.

That's also incorrect... so... something is clearly up with you.

[David Brooks]

Research and a genuine interest.

>> Are you unaware of my being scammed for £245 in 2005?
>
> So, in your mind, that means it's OK to troll everyone in ACW the way
> you do? If your goal is to show that you've not only stopped drinking
> but haven't suffered any long term damage, do you see why that might
> fall short?

Absolutely YES! :-D This was a *DEAD* Usenet group which I have claimed
as my own. If you don't like it here, simply go away.

> (snip 'Awhile ago we were walking down the yellow brick road' story)

The Wizard of Oz?

Or Doctor Who? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIFzZ91PZMs

>>> If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
>>> surprised by that< <shrug>.
>>
>> I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me.
>
> Incorrect, he gives anyone a reason, every day.

Let's put it simply:-

1. Snit is a nice guy.

2. You, Steve Carroll, are NOT nice.

>> You appear to have skills that may be useful to HELP other people but
>> I've seen no signs yet of just how you have done so.
>
> That's also incorrect... so... something is clearly up with you.

It matters not to me that you have rejected my hand offered to you in
friendship. <sigh>

Stay safe

[Steve Carroll]

On 2021-01-18, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

(snip silly crap by Snit)

>>>>>>> I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which may have something to do with why people believe you still drink.
>>>>>
>>>>> People may believe that ....... but they are mistaken. I don't drink.
>>>>
>>>> So if it's not just 'fun and games' (while soused) what is it that
>>>> causes you to take Snit at his word (when it's clear virtually no one
>>>> else is willing to do that)? What causes you to troll the way you do?
>>>
>>> Do you really not know?
>>
>> Outside of what I just mentioned? How would I?
>
> Research and a genuine interest.

I'm not your shrink. If you don't wanna say, that's fine, I can just do
what everyone else has done... draw my own conclusion.

"I do better work with videos than I do with websites." - Snit

About the same ;)

(cue Snit's 'spooky music, which was silent)

<https://streamable.com/uhzcmn>

[Snit]

On Jan 18, 2021 at 4:14:56 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<SDoNH.4004$WN7....@fx22.iad>:

Carroll is again twisting / not understanding. You have never said you have or
would give me any special consideration or trust -- what you have noted is I,
unlike folks like Carroll and Gremlin and Shadow, have not earned a LACK of
trust.

And even with that you have repeatedly told Carroll you are welcome to give
him a fresh start -- a second chance.

>>> Do you really not know?
>>
>> Outside of what I just mentioned? How would I?
>
> Research and a genuine interest.

Carroll insists I should know any skill he posts about. You and I post with
examples of honesty and kindness -- why can't he learn those far more
important skills?

I did, today, look at a few of his posts. I was curious if he was still as
focused on me and lying as much as I predicted he would. DAMN! If anything I
underestimated how much he would be lying. Perhaps my favorite:

Carroll, actively posting misleading characterizations about me and my chat
bot:
-----
You've proven, to me, that you didn't write it alone
-----

And when called out, he replied:
-----
How can an opinion be a "lie"?
-----

Thus, by his standard, he has proven, to me, that he is the one behind the
bot. Unlike him, though, I have evidence to back what I call proof (and even
then admit it is "only" proof beyond a reasonable doubt).

Then in response to my noting how he lied when he said I was denying GG could
be scripted, he turns that around and asks if *I* can script it -- doing
EXACTLY what I predicted in terms of the one bit of code Apd and I worked on.
Carroll is now going to use that against me and say that because I can do that
NOW, and could not before, it proves I did something in the past. Carroll
repeatedly lies about what I can and cannot do in -- and is grossly
inconsistent about it (insisting I did not write something I did, but then
saying I did write something I did not).

He has failed to learn how to be honest.

>
>
>>> Are you unaware of my being scammed for £245 in 2005?
>>
>> So, in your mind, that means it's OK to troll everyone in ACW the way
>> you do? If your goal is to show that you've not only stopped drinking
>> but haven't suffered any long term damage, do you see why that might
>> fall short?
>
> Absolutely YES! :-D This was a *DEAD* Usenet group which I have claimed
> as my own. If you don't like it here, simply go away.

As long as I am here you can be sure he will not. He CANNOT. He literally
cannot stop himself from trolling me.

>> (snip 'Awhile ago we were walking down the yellow brick road' story)
>
> The Wizard of Oz?
>
> Or Doctor Who? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIFzZ91PZMs
>
>>>> If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
>>>> surprised by that< <shrug>.
>>>
>>> I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me.
>>
>> Incorrect, he gives anyone a reason, every day.
>
> Let's put it simply:-
>
> 1. Snit is a nice guy.
>
> 2. You, Steve Carroll, are NOT nice.

Great, and perfect, summary.

>>> You appear to have skills that may be useful to HELP other people but
>>> I've seen no signs yet of just how you have done so.
>>
>> That's also incorrect... so... something is clearly up with you.
>
> It matters not to me that you have rejected my hand offered to you in
> friendship. <sigh>

Exactly what I noted above -- he cries about why he is not trusted where
others are, but even when you offer him a hand in friendship and allow him to
accept a new beginning he just bites the hand.

>
>
> Stay safe

[John Doe]

Thanks my friend! :-)

Check my header info.

[Snit]

On Jan 18, 2021 at 4:49:01 PM MST, "John Doe" wrote
<N7pNH.24629$ac1....@fx48.iad>:

I assume I know who this is... and if I am right it is a "new" person who will
not be just attacking people. :)

[Kelly Phillips]

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 23:49:01 GMT, John Doe <john...@myemail.invalid>
wrote:

Is that a new nym, DB?

[STALKING_TARGET_29]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty obviously has an abundance of wisdom to enlighten
others and he wishes to write tutorials. What he has not figured out,
though, is this is without a doubt the least appropriate medium for doing
that because the majority of what he will get back is whining, word twisting
and other bunkum.

LXQt is perhaps my second favorite DE and the only one I advocate to
Windows users. Primary interface is Plasma, though. Instant familiarity
to anybody who has used Windows is all you require after all.

Anyway, it should not matter because the name on a post is irrelevant,
it's the content that counts. If the content is a bunch of delusional
bullshit. We know there are only a few people who do that. I have known
infants who argue better than you do.

Um, in Graeme Wall's 'mind', that a PDF has been published is "verification"
that Beauregard T. Shagnasty designed it now?


--
One Smart Penny
<https://findwhocallsyou.com/4234911448?CallerInfo>
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud

[Apd]

circuitry is based on Linux. No debate. You've proven nothing. This is
what happens when deeply low pride takes over Graeme Wall's psyche. Too
much glue for you, Graeme Wall.

--
Live on Kickstarter
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22

[STALKING_TARGET_48]

On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 4:49:04 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Frankly I do not really have any hope. By
being taught by 'media talking heads' like that you get moral imperatives
like 'reverse racism'. Carried to its (im)moral ending, the media position
that it's 'bigoted' for a straight male to not wish to screw a child is
born.


--
Get Rich Slow!
108 Warrior Dr. Kingsport, TN 37663
https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AglvCo3dJ38&feature=youtu.be

[Dustin Kook]

On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 6:21:23 PM UTC-7, Kelly Phillips wrote:

The most obvious answer: Shadow's consumed drugs since then, and 'failed
to remember'. Ha, ha, ha! From what I've seen it looks like the trolling
nonsense got more sophisticated.

No more!

--
Get Rich Slow!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c
Dustin Cook

[Steve Carroll]

On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 6:21:23 PM UTC-7, Kelly Phillips wrote:

Script: /Users/Carroll/Library/Application\ Support/Firefox/Profiles/hdwn5ahe.default/ff-
plugin/trollkiller.js
Line: 472
message: 'undefined' is not an object (evaluating: 'responseArray.length'Why
would you want to limit all scripts on Mint to what can be done on Windows?
Almost everything David Shill Brooks says about anyone is dishonest but
he thinks he is fooling people.

Who are you even blubbering to?

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.apps/c/VMCw29DnV84>
https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Dustin Cook the Fraud

[Marek]

On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 2:22:42 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:

> > >
> > Is that a new nym, DB?
> Script: /Users/Carroll/Library/Application\ Support/Firefox/Profiles/hdwn5ahe.default/ff-
> plugin/trollkiller.js
> Line: 472
> message: 'undefined' is not an object (evaluating: 'responseArray.length'Why
> would you want to limit all scripts on Mint to what can be done on Windows?

D'fuq is that crap?

Did Carroll have a script error or did Snit have an error to shine light on himself as Carroll says? Can a programmer tell? This "tell" may be shining the light as either.

> Almost everything David Shill Brooks says about anyone is dishonest but
> he thinks he is fooling people.
>
> Who are you even blubbering to?
>
> --
> I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.apps/c/VMCw29DnV84>
> https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22

The attack on Dustin Cook suggests this is Snit. Why would Carroll posting this? Snit Clear has a cause.

> Dustin Cook the Fraud

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:KLDMH.26608$Hy7....@fx34.iad Sat,
16 Jan 2021 15:38:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Both Gremlin and Wolffan have claimed that I have a blemished Service
> Record. They have provided not one scrap of evidence.

Who said your service record was blemished? Not I. I don't recall seeing any
such claim by Wolffman either.

> Why not? Because they have both *LIED* - there *IS* no such evidence.

We haven't lied about a single thing concerning you, David.

> Neither of them expected to meet someone as upstanding as me on Usenet!

HAHAHAHAHA. Yea, drink another one, David.

> I only came to ruffle the feathers of bad guys. I've done just that! :-)

You *are a bad guy*, so you've accomplished nothing at the end of the day,
aside from getting yourself dox'd and how. No worries, snit will be joining
you shortly - and ironically for the same reason as yourself! Let this be a
lesson to you both; don't try to dox people who have a lot more reach than
either of you ever thought about.




--
Cats must supervise the painting of the guest room.

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:KkYMH.10683$oN2....@fx15.iad Sun,
17 Jan 2021 15:03:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> I no longer want you in my team.

It's not your team.

> You are RUDE and you a LIAR.

I haven't observed either from Wolffman, I've observed both from you
multiple times, for years now.

> Do you actually HAVE a genuine LinkedIn page as I do?

Are you still claiming to be a private investigator on your page, or did
you remove it due to LinkedIn policies? You can't claim to be things you
aren't.

> Post a link to demonstrate to others reading here that YOU are genuine.
>
> Or are you a chicken-shit?!!!

Why yes, it would be super smart of him or anyone else to post material for
you to be able to stalk and harrass. You're too quick to forget that your
history of online harrassment is well known. Drink less.

> While uploading/downloading content in our newsgroups would need an
> active account, the account isn't tagged to the Usenet username in any
> way. Also, I could not find the account with the email address
> "akwo...@zoho.com." I've requested a streamlined search internally for
> similar accounts, and I'll reach out to you once I've heard from them.

Don't count on any confirmation of a client, nor acquiring client records
for you to abuse as you see fit, David. :)

> Meanwhile, I'd like to point out that we don't monitor the Usenet
> content, we meagrely host the Usenet, relying on the Usenet moderators
> and users to respect each other, their privacy, and the DMCA norms.

He's politely telling you to pound sand, but, you being you, are just too
damn stupid to know that. :)



--
Fight War, Not Wars!

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:Qz1NH.7180$p04....@fx08.iad Sun,

17 Jan 2021 21:00:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 17/01/2021 13:19, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>>
>> You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple of
>> others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You used to
>> unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched that trust
>> erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a person not known
>> for being trustworthy. So the question boils down to the obvious: When
>> you say "trust" do you actually mean 'loyalty'?
>
>
> I invariably mean what I say. I meant trust.
>

> If I were you, Mr Carroll, I'd avoid having anything to do with
> 'Gremlin' - you'll never be THAT bad, no matter how hard you might try!
;-)

The only reason you don't like me David is because you couldn't CON ME into
breaking into equipment you didn't own or have any permission to be
accessing. You had no issues whatsoever with me, or any aspect of my
background until you finally accepted the fact you couldn't CON ME (as in
bullshit me) into breaking into those machines for you, despite asking me
to do so several times and even going so far as to offer to pay me to do
it. You didn't pick me out of the blue for any of this, you were stalking
me prior to your first email.

And upto the point in which you tried to dox me with the gsv streetview of
what you thought was my house, You and I had no real issues that I was
aware of. All I did, in response to your attack was show you how to do it
properly.

Why are you so dishonest about how we know each other, David?


--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
and those who don't.

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:LC3NH.21904$P26....@fx06.iad

Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:20:11 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 17/01/2021 21:08, Snit wrote:
>> On Jan 17, 2021 at 2:00:31 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>> <Qz1NH.7180$p04....@fx08.iad>:
>>

>>> On 17/01/2021 13:19, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged
>>>>> him.
>>>>
>>>> You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple
>>>> of others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You
>>>> used to unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched
>>>> that trust erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a
>>>> person not known for being trustworthy. So the question boils down
>>>> to the obvious: When you say "trust" do you actually mean
>>>> 'loyalty'?
>>>
>>>
>>> I invariably mean what I say. I meant trust.
>>

>> It is curious that the concept of trust is confusing to Carroll. It is
>> not as if you use it in an uncommon way. If someone acts in an honest
>> and reasonable way then they tend to be trusted by those who are
>> trustworthy.
>>
>> With Apd I have some pretty strong disagreements with him -- but I do
>> not see any malice in his words. I think he is overly trusting of
>> Carroll and accepts, as is human nature, that when he sees "many"
>> folks many similar accusations there is likely truth to them.
>> Especially in an environment that is unmoderated and where people can
>> use socks, this natural inclination that many trusting and good people
>> have can lead them to be overly trusting of those who are more likely
>> to abuse the open nature of the medium.
>>

>>> If I were you, Mr Carroll, I'd avoid having anything to do with
>>> 'Gremlin' - you'll never be THAT bad, no matter how hard you might
>>> try! ;-)
>>

>> I do not think Carroll has made malware to spread, but what he has done
>> is also harmful: his harassment of my employer, his lies about my wife,
>> his claims of needing an anonymous Jiminy Cricket to tell him people
>> need jobs. Much more but those are ones he has been pretty open about
>> in this group. He has also lied about his interactions with the bot
>> (his plugin to block it)... and actually admitted very directly to at
>> least SOME of what he was lying about in that case.
>>
>> Neither of them have a good moral compass. They see people as objects
>> and use them to get what they want.
>
> I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)

I have no doubt about that, David. You have an established track record of
supporting pond scum and the lies they write about others. Pcbutts has
simply been replaced by snit, otherwise, it's the same game and the same
kind of pondscum piece of shit that you're attempting to paint in a good
light. It didn't work for pcbutts, it won't work for snit.

You can slime me for writing malware that's also older than snits entire IT
'career' all you like, it simply proves (again) that I'm so far ahead of
your friend, it's not even close to funny.


--
If I knew what I was doing, it wouldn't be called 'research.'

[Gremlin]

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> news:ru1dhk$958$1
@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Sun, 17 Jan 2021 13:19:48 GMT in

alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2021-01-17, David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> On 17/01/2021 07:05, Wolffan cannot be trusted :-( I misjudged him.
>
> You've said the same thing about me, Shadow, Gremlin and a couple of
> others in the last year (the time I've been posting here). You used to
> unequivocally state you could trust Apd but I've watched that trust
> erode recently. OTOH, you state you can trust Snit, a person not known
> for being trustworthy. So the question boils down to the obvious: When
> you say "trust" do you actually mean 'loyalty'?
>
>

He sung the praises of Pcbutts in the past too. Defended the guy actually.
Pcbutts was/is a well known code thief, but in Davids eyes, he was a stand up
individual. Just like snit. David is attracted to pondscum, you see.


--
Thank you velly much. I'm not Wan King the chef, I'm Fu King the owner.

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:HRmNH.24667$h42....@fx13.iad
Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:13:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

[snip]

>> If true, it proves you just take his word, not that anyone would be
>> surprised by that< <shrug>.
>
> I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me. He's one of
> the few Apple computer users I've ever bumped into on Usenet and he has
> helped me in all manner of small ways.

Even when he's busted flatout lying his fucking ass off about another poster?

How exactly has snit really helped you, David? aside from helping you break
DMCA with clamxav that is.



--
On the keyboard of life, always keep one finger on the escape key.

[Gremlin]

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>

news:ru52rm$6ir$2...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Mon, 18 Jan 2021

That was the same excuse he provided me via email years ago to justify his
antics towards the two sites he wanted me to break into on his behalf. He
didn't mention that he didn't own either site, nor did he tell me at the
time that he'd worn his welcome out on both sites and was no longer welcome
on either of them. I was his 'secret weapon' he was planning to sick on
them, based on what he'd read about some of the things I've done. He, like
snit, must have skimmed the word 'retired'.

>> I've never had a reason NOT to believe what Snit tells me.
>
> Incorrect, he gives anyone a reason, every day.

Agreed.

>> You appear to have skills that may be useful to HELP other people but
>> I've seen no signs yet of just how you have done so.
>
> That's also incorrect... so... something is clearly up with you.

He's a stalking drunk.


--
One tentacle, one vote.

[Gremlin]

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>

news:ru2hvo$o3n$7...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Sun, 17 Jan 2021

It's a medical thing, really. I know for a fact that an alcoholic cannot
stop drinking, cold turkey. For someone who's been a drunk most of their
adult life, medical intervention is required to ween them off of it,
otherwise, they risk dying from withdrawl. David assumes nobody knows
anything when he writes such nonsense; and because of that, he expects to
be taken at his word. David hasn't given me a single reason to take
anything he's ever written at his word. He couldn't even be honest in
emails with me, and that was before he openly admitted I was a 'target'. I
bet if I'd done as he asked, I'd be his 'friend' today. Well, until another
job came up that I might have turned him down for, that is.

David didn't have a single problem with me, until he realized that I wasn't
going to break into anything he didn't own, and damn sure wasn't going to
turn over user records or anything else to him from equipment he didn't
own. It wasn't professional of him to try and recruit me for such work in
the first place. And, he lied his ass off the entire time via email about
why he wanted the cracking done. He continued to try and BS me into
thinking it was serving malware to people. I asked him several times for a
url doing as he claimed, none was ever forthcoming; instead, he continued
requesting I break into the servers and have a look around for myself. Uhh,
no.

I'm not surprised that snit would find such shady activities to be those of
a fine and morally stand up person, but things are what they are.




--
If you can't see the fnords, they can't eat you.

[Gremlin]

Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>

news:ru4op8$rh7$4...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org Mon, 18 Jan 2021

19:50:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2021-01-18, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 17, 2021 at 4:20:11 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
>><LC3NH.21904$P26....@fx06.iad>:
>
> (snip crap)
>
>>> I have no argument with anything you have said. :-)
>>
>> Thanks. I will add the I share Apd's trusting nature... and have been
>> taken in by such nonsense repeatedly. Heck, based on what Apd said I
>> gave Carroll *another* chance,
>
> Ever the 'victim', there you go again blaming Apd for a thing he had no
> control over (you "gave" me something on *his* word... silly bullsh*t).

Apd also told him that I wasn't trolling him, AND, that he was wrong in his
accusations towards me, and that he did owe me an apology for having made
them. Snit didn't like those comments from Apd, and opted to try and argue
with him about it instead. Upto and including telling Apd and myself that
we didnt' know what I was writing about, that we were the ones confused,
not snit. Fact is, snit was the one who didn't get what I was writing about
(Apd confirmed that) and it wasn't Apd or myself who was lost, it was snit,
the entire time.

>> as I did when you spoke of my doing so. I do not pretend to
>> be better than Apd in this area,
>
> How can you? I doubt anyone will ever see him try to claim anything like
> the bullsh*t you just did (and it wasn't the first time, Mr. 'Victim').

Snit isn't anything like Apd. Apd is a knowledgeable, and a highly
respected individual in most circles. Snit wishes he had such respect.

>> though we might have different areas of
>> weakness in our tendencies to be overly trusting.
>
> Stop the goofy sales pitching, DB already knows Apd isn't as stupid as
> you need him to be. That Apd gives you all the rope in the world only
> makes you look like the stupid one.

Apd isn't gulliable, or stupid, or easily taken, no. That's why he told
snit I wasn't trolling him. That's why he called Snit out on the game
playing snit likes to do when he can't hold a reasonable conversation. Apd
also corrected snits misunderstanding concerning what I wrote and what was
meant by it. Snit doesn't bring those aspects of Apd up though as he tries
hard to brown nose.





--
Cats must raid the ashtray for used pipe cleaners.

[Gremlin]

Marek <marek...@gmail.com>
news:232a6ba4-a656-48ca...@googlegroups.com Tue, 19 Jan

It's no biggie. It's the known limitations of a script kiddie who lacks a
sound understanding of how the machine in front of them works. They're a
stupid fool if they think this is really going to hurt me in some way shape
or form. I'm a former blackhat internationally recognized vxer; nothing the
asshat writes or any stories he creates could possibly do any more harm to
my reputation that my own fucking background did. rofl.

Asshats like yourself and snit, And David Brooks really don't consult the
gray matter before they opt to roll with such ignorance.


--
Half of what I know will be obsolete in five years -- I'd just like to know
which half.

[Gremlin]

David Brooks <D...@nomail.afraid.org> news:SDoNH.4004$WN7....@fx22.iad Mon,

18 Jan 2021 23:14:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Let's put it simply:-
>
> 1. Snit is a nice guy.

Hundreds of people would tend to disagree with you, there, David.

> It matters not to me that you have rejected my hand offered to you in
> friendship. <sigh>

He was wise to reject that hand while watching for the knife in your other
one. If anyone else needs to see what your idea of a friendship extended hand
is, I'd be happy to share our emails. They can see forthemselves you tried
the same exact lines of bullshit here as you did with me via email. And,
everyone knows how quickly you turned on me when you couldn't get me to do
what you really wanted done. You were lying to me via email from the start.

You aren't anyones friend, David. Anyone who needs a friend like you might as
well go ahead and suck a 12ga off. The results would be the same.



--
Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.