Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Don't Steal Our Software

166 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

VanguardLH

unread,
Jun 28, 2009, 9:36:09 AM6/28/09
to
ASCII wrote:

> New defs in MBAM hit on commonly available gens for SAS & MBAM.
> That suggests that after you register either, if you choose to do so,
> that you delete or encrypt the gens. Of course I don't use either for
> resident protection, only an occasional novelty scan, so I'm not really
> stealing anything.
> BTW: SAS doesn't hit on any gens.
> Another annoyance in MBAM if someone has defeated the notify (nag) keys
> for updates it will flag it as malware.

Why is a keygen required if you are not using the resident protection of
MBAM but only using it for *scans*? Your story needs work.

Anonymous

unread,
Jun 28, 2009, 10:06:16 AM6/28/09
to

"VanguardLH" <V...@nguard.LH> wrote in message news:h27ros$u27$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

ROTFLMFAO!

Gratters, Vanguard Old Chap! You caught the cheap
Aussie cuntard in another of his prolific lies! (I
missed it!)


Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jun 28, 2009, 10:10:02 AM6/28/09
to

"ASCII" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:4a474642.3594187@EBCDIC...

> New defs in MBAM hit on commonly available gens for SAS & MBAM.
> That suggests that after you register either, if you choose to do so,
> that you delete or encrypt the gens. Of course I don't use either for
> resident protection, only an occasional novelty scan, so I'm not really
> stealing anything.
> BTW: SAS doesn't hit on any gens.
> Another annoyance in MBAM if someone has defeated the notify (nag) keys
> for updates it will flag it as malware.

Defeating nag prompts is just as bad as stealing!
Thieving bastards like you disgust honest men! Pay
for what you use or put up with the nags you cheap
Aussie CUNT!

Dustin Cook

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 4:42:32 AM7/1/09
to
ASCII <m...@privacy.net> wrote in news:4a474642.3594187@EBCDIC:

> New defs in MBAM hit on commonly available gens for SAS & MBAM.

That's not entirely true. We don't specifically target just SAS or MBAM
keygens, but a general variety. That was decided amongst much discussion
among the researchers and those higher up in command. In short, we scan
for some keygens.

> That suggests that after you register either, if you choose to do so,
> that you delete or encrypt the gens. Of course I don't use either for

I do not know how SAS responds to keygen provided keys, but MBAM does not
disable itself if it finds a keygen on your computer. The Don't Steal our
software ONLY comes up with keygens directed towards us, everything else
has another name. MBAM and likely SAS as well have the ability to
blacklist keys which are known to be pirated, but we're not anal about
it; and no police are going to come to your door.

The only things which come online if you register a onetime fee (for non
technicians license) of 25 dollars (not per year, just once...sheesh,
cheap if you ask me) are scheduling (you can choose what hour mbam checks
for an update to definitions and what hour mbam will automatically do a
standard scan just to keep things kosher) and the resident protection
monitor. If you don't intend to use any of those specific features, then
you really have no valid reason to insult our intelligence or the time
and effort we've (the mbam team) have put into the program by using a
keygen on it. It's not a f*cking trial copy, It won't expire, and won't
force you to pay for it to clean up your machine.

> resident protection, only an occasional novelty scan, so I'm not really
> stealing anything.

Bullshit.

> Another annoyance in MBAM if someone has defeated the notify (nag) keys
> for updates it will flag it as malware.

What nag screens? We don't even have any! The GUI isn't even different
for registered vs non registered, ONLY a few features on one tabmenu are
greyed out. No time delay, no "buy me". There is a purchase button on non
registered copies, but it's just a normal button, and you aren't forced
to click it at any time or see any ads. No system startup delays,
nothing. What the hell are you even talking about?


--
Regards,
Dustin Cook
Malware Researcher
MalwareBytes - http://www.malwarebytes.org
BugHunter - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk


Message has been deleted

VanguardLH

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 11:11:24 AM7/1/09
to
ASCII wrote:

> The part you snipped was where I said I "didn't" use the resident
> protection, (which is the advantage that a gen would have enabled)
> Therefore, using free features isn't stealing.
> Unless your comment was an insider's evaluation of MBAM's worth.

What is the difference for a scan with a free version of MBAM and a scan
using a cracked version of MBAM?

"Activating the full version unlocks realtime protection, scheduled
scanning, and scheduled updating."
(http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php)

There is no difference in the *scan*. The MBAM keygen gives you nothing
that you CLAIM that you are only using from just the free version. Your
story still needs work.

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 5:40:05 PM7/1/09
to

Expect more lying "explanations" from this thieving Aussie
cuntard. He will not cease his lies until he convinces a.c.v
that the software thief and crony of Leslie The Paedophile
hiding behind the m...@privacy.net nym is YOU.


0 new messages