Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PaX, the ball's still in your court...

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Brien Barlev

unread,
Aug 18, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/18/00
to
Well Dalton, why are we still all awaitin'…? Do not keep us in the
dark!

Is your guardian angel presently not lookin' over your shoulder - like
has she gone away on holiday?

PaX [SlaM]

unread,
Aug 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/19/00
to
>>>>Is your guardian angel presently not lookin' over your shoulder - like
has she gone away on holiday?<<<<<<<<<<<


Hummmmm,strange comment....

to be honest Bri im just a bit busy lately,Got some real piggish CNC
programs to do,Katelin to think of,Kids,recreation amongst other things.
You would actually be supprised by how little of my life the VX scene takes
up,but I did say I'd do a repost just cant promise it will be in the next
couple of days..

regards Dalt / PaX [SlaM]

PaX [SlaM]

unread,
Aug 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/22/00
to
=] ok Bri you wanted a reply well here it is..;)

O6666(:P);
GO G30 X0.0 Y0.0;
N1 T1 (BS2 CTR DRL);
M06;
G0 G90 G55 X0.0 Y0.0 S3500 M03;
G43 Z4.8 H01 M08;
G01 G91 X3.0 F100;
G01 Z-5.0 F50
X-3.0;
Y-6.0;
Y3.0;
X2.0;
G0 Z5.0;
G0 X4.0 Y3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
Y6.0;
G0 Z5.0;
G0 X6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
X-3.0;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
Y-3.0;
Y3.0 X3.0;
Y-3.0 X-3.0;
Y-3.0 X3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X3.0 Y6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
X1.5 Y-2.5;
X1.5 Y2.5;
X-1.5 Y-2.5;
Y-3.5;
G0 Z5.0;
X4.5;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
X3.0;
Y-6.0;
X-3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X6.0 Y6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
Y6.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X39.0 Y-9.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
Y6.0;
X-3.0;
Y-3.0;
X3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y-3.0 X3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
X3.0;
Y-6.0;
Y3.0;
X-3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y-3.0 X6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
X3.0;
Y-3.0;
X-3.0;
Y-3.0 X3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y6.0 X3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
X-3.0;
Y6.0;
X3.0;
X-3.0;
Y-3.0;
X2.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y3.0 X3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0 X1.5;
Y6.0 X1.5;
G0 Z5.0;
Y-15.0 X-31.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
X3.0;
Y-6.0;
Y3.0;
X-3.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y-3.0 X6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y6.0;
X3.0 Y-6.0;
Y6.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X6.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
X-3.0;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
Y2.0;
X-1.0;
G0 Z5.0;
Y4.0 X7.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
X-3.0;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
X-3.0;
Y3.0;
X2.0;
G0 Z5.0;
X4.0 Y3.0;
G01 Z-5.0 F50;
Y-6.0;
X3.0;
G0 G90 Z50.0 M09;
G91 G28 Z0.0;
G91 G28 Y0.0;
G49 H00;
M30;%

best wishes Dalt / PaX [SlaM]

Deniz Oezmen

unread,
Aug 22, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/22/00
to
"PaX [SlaM]" schrieb:

> =] ok Bri you wanted a reply well here it is..;)
>
> O6666(:P);
> GO G30 X0.0 Y0.0;
> N1 T1 (BS2 CTR DRL);

[snip]

> best wishes Dalt / PaX [SlaM]

Dalt, do I have to understand this? =)

--
Regards, Deniz Oezmen
eMail: <Quantensprung [at] GMX [dot] net>

PaX [SlaM]

unread,
Aug 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/23/00
to
>>>>Dalt, do I have to understand this? =)<<<<

Heya Deniz,
Hope your keeping well=].Na you could waste time and
effort on it but I wouldnt bother.It is genuine code and I have a feeling at
least one person here that I know of will know what it means/is.In your case
my friend it's not worth the effort.It's more of a personel thing with Mr
Barlev..;)

best wishes Dalt

Deniz Oezmen

unread,
Aug 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/24/00
to
"PaX [SlaM]" schrieb:

> >>>>Dalt, do I have to understand this? =)<<<<
>
> Heya Deniz,

Hi Dalt!

> Hope your keeping well=].

Sure! Hope you do as well!

> Na you could waste time and
> effort on it but I wouldnt bother.It is genuine code and I have a feeling at
> least one person here that I know of will know what it means/is.In your case
> my friend it's not worth the effort.

It looked somehow structured to me, but I couldn't match it to any code I've
seen before, thus... ;o)
But thanks.

> It's more of a personel thing with Mr
> Barlev..;)

Ah, I see. OK, that's nothing for me. =)

> best wishes Dalt

Dito.

Glebe

unread,
Aug 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/26/00
to
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:11:04 +0100, "PaX [SlaM]" <P...@SlaM-VT.org.uk>
wrote:

>>>>>Dalt, do I have to understand this? =)<<<<
>
>Heya Deniz,

<snip>

>In your case my friend it's not worth the effort.

Nor mine. Besides, the babbling code breaks the established protocol
of this NG to communicate via English, for better or worse.

>It's more of a personel thing with Mr Barlev..;)

I disagree. Dalton's comments as responded to by Randy are of a wider
relevance, IMHO...

Also, on this matter I have not initiated any private comms with nor
received any from Mr What'shisname. Yes, being likewise hellishly
busy, Dalton's surname and phone # did not even register. Nor did I
write them down.

So unless PaX cares to translate, he has said still nothing of note.

Regards,
Brien


PaX [SlaM]

unread,
Aug 27, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/27/00
to
>>>I disagree. Dalton's comments as responded to by Randy are of a wider
relevance, IMHO...
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Can you repost them Brien....ima not so good when it comes to checking
threads beforte deleting them...im a bit that that with mail too....300+
mails a day mostly from idiot Aolers tends to make me a bit unilateral when
it comes to deleting things without reading them=]

Regards Dalt / PaX

kurt wismer

unread,
Aug 27, 2000, 11:18:02 PM8/27/00
to
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Glebe wrote:

[snip]


> Nor mine. Besides, the babbling code breaks the established protocol
> of this NG to communicate via English, for better or worse.

since when? there's nothing wrong with other languages being used in
here... this isn't an english only newsgroup, the majority of the regulars
just happen to speak english is all..

--
"i raise my hand, i got another question
if i start a riot, will i get protection
'cause i'm a kid who's got a lot of problems
if i throw a brick maybe the brick will go and solve them"

Brien Barlev

unread,
Aug 28, 2000, 2:15:57 AM8/28/00
to
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 20:07:36 +0100, "PaX [SlaM]" <P...@SlaM-VT.org.uk>
wrote:

>>>>I disagree. Dalton's comments as responded to by Randy are of a wider


>relevance, IMHO...
><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>Can you repost them Brien....

Deja to the rescue.

>ima not so good when it comes to checking
>threads beforte deleting them...im a bit that that with mail too....300+
>mails a day mostly from idiot Aolers tends to make me a bit unilateral when
>it comes to deleting things without reading them=]

I'm content to let the matter drop. You're obviously got your plate
full, dealing with idiots already I see. However if you have a spare
moment, the following may help your recall?

Regards,
Brien

Jumping the gun before Raid had much time to consider whether or not
to enter the ring of the Inuit like drum dance, on 9 Aug 2000, PaX in
response to the thread entitled "Raid's Provocation", said for
starters...

Ok Ok,
Ive seen some pretty lame bullshit type of actions over
the years,on the part of both Virus Writers and AVers but there has
always been a reason behind it.

<snip>

for fucks sake you arent helping anybody......now be a good little
child and go play in another sandpit before a less gracious VXer takes
exception to you and Innocent users pay the price...

<snip>

And much more was said within that thread by many others, in
particular Patricia Shaffer, that it's almost a crime to omit the full
context. But however, a couple of days later Randy said...

>>>>>I think you need to reread your post PaX. What you printed must be
interpreted as saying that if people exercise their freedom of speech
in a manner Vx doesn't like, Vx will punish innocent users. Vx is
contrary to free speech quite obviously. The only time Vx defends
freedom of speech is when they are afraid they might get punished for
invading people's privacy.<<<<<<<<<<

To which PaX replied...

Yup I must agree Randy it does look a little out of sync with what I
was trying to say...

ill give it some more thought and post it more clearly..

reegards Dalt

<aside>
Interestingly that thread had a "happy ending"???... :o)
</aside>

Brien Barlev

unread,
Aug 28, 2000, 2:21:20 AM8/28/00
to
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:18:02 GMT, kurt wismer <g9k...@cdf.toronto.edu>
wrote:

>On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Glebe wrote:
>
>[snip]
>> Nor mine. Besides, the babbling code breaks the established protocol
>> of this NG to communicate via English, for better or worse.
>
>since when? there's nothing wrong with other languages being used in
>here... this isn't an english only newsgroup, the majority of the regulars
>just happen to speak english is all..

Indeed Kurt. That's why I specifically said "for better or worse"
before! While I might be bi-lingual, posting here in Danish for
example would be very limiting in scope.

Regards,
Brien

kurt wismer

unread,
Aug 28, 2000, 10:24:41 PM8/28/00
to
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Brien Barlev wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 03:18:02 GMT, kurt wismer <g9k...@cdf.toronto.edu>
>

> >On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Glebe wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >> Nor mine. Besides, the babbling code breaks the established protocol
> >> of this NG to communicate via English, for better or worse.
> >
> >since when? there's nothing wrong with other languages being used in
> >here... this isn't an english only newsgroup, the majority of the regulars
> >just happen to speak english is all..
>
> Indeed Kurt. That's why I specifically said "for better or worse"
> before! While I might be bi-lingual, posting here in Danish for
> example would be very limiting in scope.

but it's still the best way to reply to a dane looking for help...

Raid

unread,
Sep 1, 2000, 9:34:44 AM9/1/00
to
In article <tkt9qs8t6ckopo5v2...@4ax.com>,
cos...@privacy.net says...

> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:11:04 +0100, "PaX [SlaM]" <P...@SlaM-VT.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Dalt, do I have to understand this? =)<<<<
> >
> >Heya Deniz,
> > Hope your keeping well=].Na you could waste time and

> >effort on it but I wouldnt bother.It is genuine code and I have a feeling at
> >least one person here that I know of will know what it means/is.In your case
> >my friend it's not worth the effort.It's more of a personel thing with Mr
> >Barlev..;)
> >
>
> Thank God for small mercies then. And I though that there was a
> problem with my character set showing your posting as a garbled
> incomprehensible mess :-))))
>
>
> >best wishes Dalt
> >
> Regards,
>
> Costas
>
> ==========================
> Costas Giannakenas MD, PhD
> ==========================
>

Heya Costas,

PaX posted DeCSS source code. It's a dvd decoder; so you can rip em, and
convert the lovely things into DivX (forget ASF!) and trade them. ;p
Originally tho, it was meant so that linux machines could play dvds...
The warez scene just adapted it to other purposes. Very nice software.

--
Regards,
Raid
www.coderz.net/Raid
(Home of raids VX website and the RSHaCK utility for rainbow six
rogue spear. The only saved campaign editor you'll ever need)

Raid

unread,
Sep 1, 2000, 9:35:24 AM9/1/00
to
In article <8obou8$q0n$1...@gxsn.com>, P...@SlaM-VT.org.uk says...

> >>>I disagree. Dalton's comments as responded to by Randy are of a wider
> relevance, IMHO...
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Can you repost them Brien....ima not so good when it comes to checking

> threads beforte deleting them...im a bit that that with mail too....300+
> mails a day mostly from idiot Aolers tends to make me a bit unilateral when
> it comes to deleting things without reading them=]
>
> Regards Dalt / PaX
>
>
>

Which is why you don't fork email addys you need for important stuff. I
use the yahoo.com one for VX related things, so if it's bombed or
flooded, I'm not losing anything of value. :)

PaX [SlaM]

unread,
Sep 1, 2000, 12:38:42 PM9/1/00
to
>>>>So I saw in a followup posting. Fact is that I was just pulling Pax's
leg. If you do meet these days you will notice that he is limping -
the left leg is now a bit longer :-)<<<<<<<<<<<<


hehehe i'll make it easy for ya...its ISO CNC program code....

pump it into a CNC milling centre and run it...

it will mill the following to a depth of 0.1 mm ..

FUCK YOU
BARLEV
ANGEL


well thats about it for now=]

ok ok i was bored..=]

Dalt / PaX

ps:you need to exchange the first GO for a G0 or you get an invalid Gcode
error warning..

and the BS02 is the iso standard for a Brittish Standard Number 2 Centre
Drill..

Dalt


Raid

unread,
Sep 2, 2000, 4:31:59 AM9/2/00
to
In article <41kvqsciotcrni0rv...@4ax.com>,
cos...@privacy.net says...

> Hi raid,


>
> So I saw in a followup posting. Fact is that I was just pulling Pax's
> leg. If you do meet these days you will notice that he is limping -
> the left leg is now a bit longer :-)

hahaha. He lives a long ways away from me. Perhaps in a year or so we
might meet in person.

> How's the flu or whatever it was?

Diagnosis: Walking Pneumonia. Fun Stuff... Didn't even know one could get
this and still be able to just walk around. I was only feeling tired and
out of energy.. Shrug.

But, I've got some decent antibiotics and some Loratabs, so i think I'll
live. :)

Brien Barlev

unread,
Sep 2, 2000, 2:01:17 PM9/2/00
to
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:38:42 +0100, "PaX [SlaM]" <P...@SlaM-VT.org.uk>
wrote:

>FUCK YOU


>BARLEV
>ANGEL
>
>
>well thats about it for now=]
>
>ok ok i was bored..=]

And I get accused of dishin' out cryptic messages and hidden meanings.
That's sure rich... :o(

Come clean ANGEL? What gives with the heavens above?

Regards,
Brien

0 new messages