"Thomas Hobbes" <wyni...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b055966f.02033...@posting.google.com...
I'm designing a small network for a small office and am trying to get
the cheapest possible set of equipment and I don't want to waste any
money/time on a VPN if it doesn't work. In my experience, with things
like this, the bandwidth limitation really causes some unexpected
problems. I think I'll go with a VPN anyway...the VPN has many other
uses as well. Thanks!
"George Chung" <georgeREMOVET...@verizonANDTHIS.net> wrote in message news:<ngKp8.13145$9d3....@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
I wouldn't run this over a modem, in file sharing.
I would run this in a terminal server and connect to the TS server via
dialup (its very usable!) and you will have no speed issues.
Win2k AS has this built in for free, you can use a 2 user terminal server
for free. its meant for remote admin, but you are not breaking there licence
by running it!
The other way would be a pc anywhere setup, but I think the TS is a bit
faster. as you don't tie up a machine waiting for you to dial in.
> According to the Quickbooks User's Manual (chapter 9 of 2002 Fin. SW.
> for small Business) it is possible.
<snip>
The original poster is looking to share *Quicken* files, not QuickBooks
files. At least that is how he worded his post...
--
Peter J. Ricciardiello
(omit 'x' to reply)
Quicken is not designed to be a multi-user program and therefore you will
not be able to have multiple users accessing the same data file at the
same time.
The problem is: two people are trying to update account information
from different computers. This is a small business application. The
owner has a LAN (via cable modem) and the remote location only has a
dial-up. What would be the easiest way to keep the account
syncranized? Any ideas? How well does the import/export feature
work. I cannot have two divergent files. Also, with the
export/import method, the computers must be nearby OR a person must be
at each computer. I would really like it all working together with
only one person required to update the account information. Thanks
for the help so far!!!
Peter J. Ricciardiello <prgr...@twcny.rrx.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.17123c2fc...@Spamkiller.newsfeeds.com>...
Thomas Hobbes typed ...
> The version that I have does support sharing the data file. It's
> Quickbooks 2002 for small biz Premium.
<snip>
[Sigh] With all due respect, kind sir, you indicated in your original
post that you were referring to Quicken, not QuickBooks. There is a big
difference between the two software products. Since this is a Quicken
newsgroup, I had no reason to question the software to which you were
originally referring, even after seeing others mention QuickBooks. After
all, posts that ask about Quicken's network abilities do appear here
routinely.
However, now that you have indicated that you are using QuickBooks, you
would probably be better served by posting your question to the
QuickBooks-dedicated newsgroup. It is:
alt.comp.software.financial.quickbooks
You will most likely receive more answers there, since technically 100%
of that newsgroup's participants are using QuickBooks, unlike here, where
most of us use some flavor of Quicken.
If your ISP does not carry this newsgroup, send your ISP an email
requesting it and they should have no trouble adding it. Alternatively,
you can use Google's newsgroup archive search to search for possible
answers to your question.
Copy the above newsgroup name, then paste it into the newsgroup field on
the following web-based form. Type in a few keywords, like VPN, then
click Search to produce the results:
http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en
Good luck,
--
Peter J. Ricciardiello
(omit 'x' from email)
--
Peter J. Ricciardiello
(omit 'x' from email)
Peter J. Ricciardiello <pjr...@twcny.rrx.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1712f8f5c...@news-server.twcny.rr.com>...
> My mistake. Try to relax a little more!!!
With a resting heart rate of 58 and a BP of 108/72, I would say that I am
pretty relaxed. However, thanks for your concerns. :-)
--
Peter J. Ricciardiello
(omit 'x' to reply)