Hi Joe,
It depends on how much you have to spend and how high a quality you want.
Since you want to scan Photos and Negs, a scanner that does both is an ideal
way to go.
You said 'old family negs' so some are likely to big larger than 35 mm.
A dedicated neg scanner for larger than 35 mm is expensive and it cant scan
photos either.
Buy a decent flatbed ($1000plus) and that should do your needs.
If all or most a the negs are 35mm, you'll need both. (especially if
archiving etc)
Mark K.
Phil
"Mark Kelepouris" <wmarkw...@wbigpond.com> wrote in message
news:bGx3j.18449$CN4....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
As the other comments have said it depends on the film type (35mm or larger,
colour or black&white, all negatives or some slides too), it also depends
on the condition of the negatives - if dirty or scratched you'll want to
look for a scanner that has ICE (or FARE on canon scanners) technology,
basically as well as getting a normal scan of the image it also scans with
infrared light to give a scan only containing the damage and uses this as a
mask to automate removal of defects (quicker than manually retouching each
one).
If only have negatives and prints then a flatbed scanner would be best but
slides are trickier - most flatbeds can't handle the wide contrast and
you'll get no detail in the shadows and washed out highlight areas.
Others here can offer suggestions about what current scanners to buy but let
me suggest one thing to avoid - don't get one of widely-advertised 5m pixel
film scanners, they're little more than a low-end 5 megapixel camera (with
cheap plastic lenses) mounted in a case with an LED light box, you'll get
better results using virtually any flatbed scanner with film attachment.
Another option is using a tripod-mounted digital camera to re-photograph
prints and use a slide copier over the lens (the type that used to be sold
for duplicating slides on film cameras) to photograph negatives and slides.