Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

HP 9150I opinions needed and questions?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sam

unread,
Nov 30, 2000, 3:00:00 AM11/30/00
to
HI,

I can't find any reviews on this drive anywhere online. Can I get some
personal opinions? Who makes it? On HP's website it says it has a 2 meg
buffer but some people here say it has a 4 meg buffer. So which is it? Also
how does the buffer size affect burning? Is 2 meg bad? And last but not
least does anyone know what company actually manufactures it?

Thanks

Doody

unread,
Nov 30, 2000, 11:53:10 PM11/30/00
to

"Sam" <fc...@us.hsanet.net> wrote in message
news:t2e90ha...@corp.supernews.com...
There are 3 versions of this drive
The first is a Sony 140 e with a 4 meg buffer. This one is identified by
windows as HP9100
If you look closely on the top label of the drive it is actually written 140
E

The second is made by LG (Goldstat) and has a 2 meg buffer. This one is
identified in Windows as 9100b

The third one is made by Philips and i don't know the specs but it shows up
in windows as 9100c

I own the Sony model and it works really well, supports DAO, Reads and
writes raw data etc.

The thing with these 3 drives is they are all sold as 9150 i, so i guess you
have to open the box to know which is which

TTL Don


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.211 / Virus Database: 100 - Release Date: 11/14/2000


noah

unread,
Dec 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM12/1/00
to Doody
i think you could tell by the country of manufacture on the outside of the box,
i think philips is Turkey, sony Malaysia, and LG not sure

Dylan F.(formerly "Me")

unread,
Dec 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM12/1/00
to
LG is Korea I think.

"noah" <ilov...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3A276ABE...@hotmail.com...


> i think you could tell by the country of manufacture on the outside of the
box,
> i think philips is Turkey, sony Malaysia, and LG not sure
>
> Doody wrote:
>

0 new messages