You may be able to write quite adequately at 32x on 16x media. It depends on
how much leeway there is in the spec of the media. Equally you may not.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<>
Graham Mayor
<>>< ><<> ><<>
"La Parka" <lap...@email.com> wrote in message
news:cde52ad1.0208...@posting.google.com...
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hanc...@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
"La Parka" <lap...@email.com> wrote in message
news:cde52ad1.0208...@posting.google.com...
"Graham Mayor" <gma...@noonehome.com> wrote in message
news:ajv8md$1e8ruk$1...@ID-88807.news.dfncis.de...
LP
\\"Graham Mayor" <gma...@noonehome.com> wrote in message news:<ajv8md$1e8ruk$1...@ID-88807.news.dfncis.de>...
No it is not. It *might* be, but it doesn't follow. The optimum speed is
simply that - the speed that produces the cleanest signal on a given type of
media. You have to experiment in circumstances where your readers are
struggling. Usually there is sufficient leeway for this not to be a major
problem.
>Also, I take it you mean the problems are with older CD
> players that weren't meant to read CDR disks -- how does this problem
> arise if my Burning program (Nero) claims to be able to verify the
> data on the disk after it is burned?
It is nothing to do with the age of a CD player. CD players were never
intended to deal with CDR. It is not part of the spec. though some recent
designs have been modified to improve the reading of copies and to enable
the reading of CDRW. On others, the reading of of CDR is more good fortune
than design.
As for Nero verifying the data - this is because here it is using a Writer
to read the disc and not a CD player. There are different factors involved.
Just because a PC drive can read a disc, it doesn't necessarily mean that a
CD player can.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<>
Graham Mayor
MV
"La Parka" <lap...@email.com> schreef in bericht
news:cde52ad1.0208...@posting.google.com...
"Linea Recta" <mar...@Linea-Recta.myweb.nl> wrote in message
news:ak36u3$8h9$1...@cyan.nl.gxn.net...