Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Active-X

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Fred Atkinson

unread,
Sep 3, 2007, 5:55:53 AM9/3/07
to
I just read about Active-X. I am told that it only comes for
Windows, MacIntosh, and UNIX.

Is it true that it doesn't run on Linux? Is there an
alternative for it?


Fred

ERACC

unread,
Sep 3, 2007, 10:42:15 AM9/3/07
to

Since Active-(HE)X is created *by* Micro$oft and folks *at* Micro$oft
think Linux is an anathema to them I think you can figure out the answer.

On the other hand there are alternatives to Active-X but not in the way
you likely mean. IOW and AFAIK there are no Active-X controls *for* Linux
but there *are* Active-X alternatives for developing graphical stuff. If
you want to run certain applications that require Active-X from the
Micro$oft world sadly you are /locked-in/ to Micro$oft for most of those.
In that case "they" *got* you.

Caveat: there may be some way to do what you want using WINE with its'
API layers. I have no idea if they have implemented anything for Active-
X. Check out http://www.winehq.org/ to see.

Gene (e-mail: gene \a\t eracc \d\o\t com)
--
Mandriva Linux release 2007.1 (Official) for i586
Got Rute? http://www.anrdoezrs.net/email-2546588-42121?isbn=0130333514
ERA Computers & Consulting - http://www.eracc.com/ <- get VOIP here!
eComStation, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenServer & UnixWare preloads & sales

Darrell Stec

unread,
Sep 3, 2007, 11:21:39 AM9/3/07
to
ERACC wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 05:55:53 -0400, Fred Atkinson wrote:
>
>> I just read about Active-X. I am told that it only comes for Windows,
>> MacIntosh, and UNIX. Is it true that it doesn't run on Linux? Is there
>> an alternative for it?
>
> Since Active-(HE)X is created *by* Micro$oft and folks *at* Micro$oft
> think Linux is an anathema to them I think you can figure out the answer.
>
> On the other hand there are alternatives to Active-X but not in the way
> you likely mean. IOW and AFAIK there are no Active-X controls *for* Linux
> but there *are* Active-X alternatives for developing graphical stuff. If
> you want to run certain applications that require Active-X from the
> Micro$oft world sadly you are /locked-in/ to Micro$oft for most of those.
> In that case "they" *got* you.
>
> Caveat: there may be some way to do what you want using WINE with its'
> API layers. I have no idea if they have implemented anything for Active-
> X. Check out http://www.winehq.org/ to see.
>
> Gene (e-mail: gene \a\t eracc \d\o\t com)

There is an ActiveX pluggin for Mozilla/Firefox that one can use with Wine.
But why one would use one of the most crippling and disastrous virus and
Trojan magnets for Windows I don't know. I am happy that ActiveX does NOT
run in Linux natively.

--
Later,
Darrell Stec dar...@neo.rr.com

Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages

0 new messages