Too_Much_Coffee ®
"Der Spankster" <lai...@marion.net> wrote in message
news:yvIn4.208$QM4.4812@news...
The mobo either works or it doesn't with the Promise Ultra66. There is
nothing special needed in the mobo setup for it to work.
> I have an ibm 20 gig ata drive
>and it works great as ide. A really good ata 66 card may come out soon . At
the
>moment there is none that I know of.
Nope, the Promise Ultra66 and FastTrak66 are excellent.
Good Idea. Why pay money for another IDE connector offering
little or no improvements?
>The mobo either works or it doesn't with the Promise Ultra66.
>There is nothing special needed in the mobo setup for it to
>work.
>
>
It works, his problem is getting the *other* IDE devices working
on IDE1 as non bootables. If your board doesnt support IDE1
devices as nonboots then put the boot HD back on IDE1 and then
your problem is gone! OHHHH but your *UDMA 66* is gone too :(
>
>>I have an ibm 20 gig ata drive
>>and it works great as ide. A really good ata 66 card may come
>>out soon . At the moment there is none that I know of.
>
>Nope, the Promise Ultra66 and FastTrak66 are excellent.
>
The cards work but how can a horse buggy be helped by increasing
the speed limit to 120mph?
Excellent at what? Are you running your drives at **UDMA 66**
on Promise cards? If so why? Are they running faster than they
were at non-UDMA 66 configuration ? Are you saying he should
keep the Promise card in his machine because it will provide his
HD a faster speed than it would otherwise have if installed on
his IDE1 ? That is after all what he is trying to accomplish
buy using it...not simply substituting it in there as an equal
replacement for an onboard IDE connector, which the promise may
be "excellent" at doing BTW for current HDs.
I suggest to the original poster to benchmark your drive while
installed on IDE1 for yourself, then connect to the Promise
using the 40 pin 80 conductor cable and repeat same benchmark.
You may want to consider the possibility that your current HD
will not be any faster when using **"UDMA 66"** than otherwise
so why use it for your *current* HD at all ??
Dirk
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!