>
>WAMY Series: On Islam No.9.Introduction
>God's Attributes
>The Oneness of God
>The Believer's Attitude
>Introduction
>It is a known fact that every language has one or more terms that are
>used in reference to God and sometimes to lesser deities. This is not
>the case with Allah. Allah is the personal name of the One true God.
>Nothing else can be called Allah. The term has no plural or gender.
>This shows its uniqueness when compared with the word "god," which can
>be made plural, as in "gods," or made feminine, as in "goddess." It is
>interesting to notice that Allah is the personal name of God in
>Aramaic, the language of Jesus and a sister language of Arabic.The One
>true God is a reflection of the unique concept that Islam associates
>with God. To a Muslim, Allah is the Almighty Creator and Sustainer of
>the universe, Who is similar to nothing, and nothing is comparable to
>Him.
>
Please explain to me and to anyone else who is interested,
why/how the Islamic teachings impose such restrictions upon God.
If, indeed, God is omnipotent, why/how is He limited to only one
manifestation at one location at any time?
>
>The Prophet Muhammad was asked by his contemporaries about Allah;
>the answer came directly from God Himself in the form of a short
>chapter of the Qur'an, which is considered to be the essence of the
>unity or the motto of monotheism. This is chapter 112, which reads:"
>In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate. Say (O
>Muhammad), He is God, the One God, the Everlasting Refuge, who has not
>begotten, nor has been begotten, and equal to Him is not anyone".
>
No written documentation remains of the life history of Muhammad
or his teachings, dating earlier than Ibn-Ishaq's writing, dated
about 136 years after Muhammad's death. This writing was later
edited by Ibn-Hisham about 201 years after Muhammad's death. All
that is available is based upon oral tradition, and there is no
reason to believe these oral teachings were/are even close to
accurate. In fact, it is more rational to think that those who
were pushing to establish and expand Islam shortly after
Muhammad's death were very much inclined to dramatically
embellished these oral traditions.
A very easy way to conceptualize God's power of omnipresence and
His ability to manifest in the form of Jesus, the Christ of God
is to think of a very large corporate computer system, as
follows;
One large, central computer (analogous to God) has all the
corporate operational programs and information files on it, and
the small individual desktop computers (analogous to we
individuals) have access to only a limited amount of this
information.
But, there is one small computer (analogous to Jesus) that has
complete, total access to all programming and information files
that are on the large central computer. To this extent, this
small computer is one and the same as the large central computer.
But, the large central computer was not replaced or otherwise
diminished in its roll.
My God would not rely upon word of mouth, prophets, messiahs, holy
books, etc. to provide His creatures with information needed to "save"
their alleged souls.
My God, the God that created the multiverse, would hold religion in
contempt. Religion, which is man-made, is only useful for one human to
control another and therefore is unholy and evil.
Just my $.02.
Ed Cregger
>I would not have a God that did not make every creature born already
>knowing everything that He wanted it to know.
>
>My God would not rely upon word of mouth, prophets, messiahs, holy
>books, etc. to provide His creatures with information needed to "save"
>their alleged souls.
>
>My God, the God that created the multiverse, would hold religion in
>contempt. Religion, which is man-made, is only useful for one human to
>control another and therefore is unholy and evil.
>
>Just my $.02.
>
>
>Ed
>
Ed, I'm not crossing swords with you, but I do have one major
question...How would your God mature us hominids up to that level
where we could be trusted with absolute sovereignty and
immortality? Created as you suggest seems incongruent with
absolute sovereignty. That is, if we knew all that God wants us
to know, and had no questions or curiosity, would we be anything
more than puppets?
On the other hand, with no experience...just pre-conditioned
knowledge/reflexes, wouldn't we likely, one by one, follow the
same path that Lucifer took?
We will get to the level of knowledge you describe, but it will
take some hands-on experience throughout the mortal phase of our
existence. But, what's 80 to 100 years or so compared to
eternity?
Gordon
----------
Lucifer is a construct of man-made religion and does not exist. Lucifer
and the concept of Hell is used to manipulate/motivate folks to bend to
the will of another human (cleric) to suit the cleric's own purposes.
Enough, of this on this forum. My apologies to all.
Ed Cregger
I think Old Testament is more trust-worthy. The New Testament is too
human...
--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.23.1
^ ^ 20:37:01 up 5 days 7:08 2 users load average: 0.08 0.04 0.00
news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk
THE ONLY GOOD RAG HEAD IS A DEAD RAG HEAD.
(snip)
>
>THE ONLY GOOD RAG HEAD IS A DEAD RAG HEAD.
>
It isn't prudent to call them a "RAG HEAD" since that isn't a rag
they wear wrapped around their head. It is a little sheet.
MY BAD, I SHOULD HAVE SAID SHEET HEAD.