Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Facebook publishing child pornography
4 views
Skip to first unread message
burfordTjustice
Apr 13, 2017, 6:12:12 AM4/13/17
to
if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
Facebook publishing child pornography
Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
The social media company failed to take down dozens of images and videos that were “flagged” to its moderators, including one showing an Islamic State beheading, several violent paedophilic cartoons, a video of an apparent sexual assault on a child and propaganda posters glorifying recent terrorist attacks in London and Egypt. Instead of removing the content, moderators said that the posts did not breach the site’s “community standards”.
Facebook’s algorithms even promoted some of the offensive material by suggesting that users join groups and profiles that had published it.
this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
Facebook publishing child pornography
Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
The social media company failed to take down dozens of images and videos that were “flagged” to its moderators, including one showing an Islamic State beheading, several violent paedophilic cartoons, a video of an apparent sexual assault on a child and propaganda posters glorifying recent terrorist attacks in London and Egypt. Instead of removing the content, moderators said that the posts did not breach the site’s “community standards”.
Facebook’s algorithms even promoted some of the offensive material by suggesting that users join groups and profiles that had published it.
A. Filip
Apr 13, 2017, 6:45:16 AM4/13/17
to
--
A. Filip
| Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
| on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
| -- Linus Torvalds, about his failing hard drive on linux.cs.helsinki.fi
Shadow
Apr 13, 2017, 7:41:39 AM4/13/17
to
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:45:08 +0000 (UTC), "A. Filip" <an...@wp.eu>
wrote:
>burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>
>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>
>>
I saw some psychos defend the illegal bombing of Syria and the
killing of numerous civilians. I think the NSA should track all those
terrorists/fanatics down and shoot them.
Best censorship there is.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
wrote:
>burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>
>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>
>>
>> Facebook’s algorithms even promoted some of the offensive material by
>> suggesting that users join groups and profiles that had published it.
>
>We need better censorship, don't we?
Obviously.
>> suggesting that users join groups and profiles that had published it.
>
>We need better censorship, don't we?
I saw some psychos defend the illegal bombing of Syria and the
killing of numerous civilians. I think the NSA should track all those
terrorists/fanatics down and shoot them.
Best censorship there is.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Graham T
Apr 13, 2017, 7:46:08 AM4/13/17
to
On 13/04/2017 11:45, A. Filip wrote:
> burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>
>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>
>> Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing
>> to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content
>> despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
>>
How does that work? Can the UK prosecute a US site?
> burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>
>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>
>> Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing
>> to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content
>> despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
>>
>> The social media company failed to take down dozens of images and
>> videos that were “flagged” to its moderators, including one showing an
>> Islamic State beheading, several violent paedophilic cartoons, a video
>> of an apparent sexual assault on a child and propaganda posters
>> glorifying recent terrorist attacks in London and Egypt. Instead of
>> removing the content, moderators said that the posts did not breach
>> the site’s “community standards”.
>>
>> Facebook’s algorithms even promoted some of the offensive material by
>> suggesting that users join groups and profiles that had published it.
>
> We need better censorship, don't we?
>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Shadow
Apr 13, 2017, 7:54:44 AM4/13/17
to
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:46:06 +0100, Graham T
<removethistoco...@talktalk.net> wrote:
>On 13/04/2017 11:45, A. Filip wrote:
>> burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>>
>>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>>
>>> Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing
>>> to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content
>>> despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
>>>
>
>How does that work? Can the UK prosecute a US site?
Of course they can. The US and the UK have reciprocal law
<removethistoco...@talktalk.net> wrote:
>On 13/04/2017 11:45, A. Filip wrote:
>> burfordTjustice <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>>> if only the UK had a "bad guy" hunter or two to find and expose/stop
>>> this. Instead the one known "bad guy" hunter, david brooks (Devon)
>>> constantly promotes The Facebook....wonder why?
>>>
>>> Facebook publishing child pornography
>>>
>>> Facebook is at risk of a criminal prosecution in Britain for refusing
>>> to remove potentially illegal terrorist and child pornography content
>>> despite being told it was on the site, The Times can reveal.
>>>
>
>How does that work? Can the UK prosecute a US site?
enforcement agreements.
If you commit a crime in the UK DO NOT try to hide in the US,
and vice versa.
burfordTjustice
Apr 13, 2017, 8:31:15 AM4/13/17
to
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:53:37 -0300
Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> Of course they can. The US and the UK have reciprocal law
> enforcement agreements.
Cite specific agreement that would cover this case?
Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> Of course they can. The US and the UK have reciprocal law
> enforcement agreements.
burfordTjustice
Apr 13, 2017, 8:33:22 AM4/13/17
to
Shadow
Apr 13, 2017, 9:02:50 AM4/13/17
to
abroad. They are in every newspaper.
You'll have to learn how to comprehend them first, though. Get
back to me when you are past the first hurdle.
7
Apr 13, 2017, 9:04:53 AM4/13/17
to
A. Filip wrote:
> We need better censorship, don't we?
If you got more reputable censors and they had to pay $20 to complain,
> We need better censorship, don't we?
the complaints would be more realistic and then they get refunded.
So dumb fscks can't overwhelm the complaints procedure as a way
of exhausting the system to sneak in their crap.
Who knows, if they got $20.10 back, then they make money too
by saving the company valuable resources fighting off internet
trolls like Burpford who sneak around the internet
in support of the trolls trying to overwhelm the system.
burfordTjustice
Apr 13, 2017, 10:04:40 AM4/13/17
to
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:01:30 -0300
Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:31:09 -0400, burfordTjustice
> <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:53:37 -0300
> >Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> >
> >> Of course they can. The US and the UK have reciprocal law
> >> enforcement agreements.
> >
> >Cite specific agreement that would cover this case?
>
> Any of the dozens of reports of citizens deported to be tried
> abroad. They are in every newspaper.
> You'll have to learn how to comprehend them first, though. Get
> back to me when you are past the first hurdle.
> []'s
So you can't Cite specific agreement that would cover this case?
Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:31:09 -0400, burfordTjustice
> <burford...@tues.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:53:37 -0300
> >Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:
> >
> >> Of course they can. The US and the UK have reciprocal law
> >> enforcement agreements.
> >
> >Cite specific agreement that would cover this case?
>
> Any of the dozens of reports of citizens deported to be tried
> abroad. They are in every newspaper.
> You'll have to learn how to comprehend them first, though. Get
> back to me when you are past the first hurdle.
> []'s
Another fail for the criminal from Brazil.
Shadow
Apr 13, 2017, 10:43:09 AM4/13/17
to
https://fas.org/irp/world/uk/us-uk-mla.pdf
[]'s
>
>Another fail for the criminal from Brazil.
>Another fail for the criminal from Brazil.
burfordTjustice
Apr 13, 2017, 11:35:17 AM4/13/17
to
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:41:47 -0300
0 new messages