Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Malwarebytes v1.60 released
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Shadow
Dec 28, 2011, 7:30:00 AM12/28/11
to
http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
# New Features:
* Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
running even when blocked by infection.
* Incremental updates (paid version only).
* Ability to password protect key program settings (paid version
only).
# Improvements:
* Improved reliability and performance of the update process.
* Detection and removal engine enhancements.
* System tray icon now dynamically displays selected language.
* Settings for Protection Module behavior can be changed without
protection being active.
* Improved DOR (Delete On Reboot) technology to enhance threat removal
process.
* Restructured log formats to include greater detail on system
information and detected threats.
* Improved error messages to make them more user friendly.
* Scheduled updates now occur within 15 minutes of scheduled time.
* Custom log locations now displayed in Logs tab.
* Protection logs can be saved in custom locations.
* Program version release date now displayed on About tab.
# Issues Fixed:
* Fix for database not updating properly on Czech installations of
Microsoft Windows.
* Fix for certain scenarios where scans failed to complete.
# New Features:
* Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
running even when blocked by infection.
* Incremental updates (paid version only).
* Ability to password protect key program settings (paid version
only).
# Improvements:
* Improved reliability and performance of the update process.
* Detection and removal engine enhancements.
* System tray icon now dynamically displays selected language.
* Settings for Protection Module behavior can be changed without
protection being active.
* Improved DOR (Delete On Reboot) technology to enhance threat removal
process.
* Restructured log formats to include greater detail on system
information and detected threats.
* Improved error messages to make them more user friendly.
* Scheduled updates now occur within 15 minutes of scheduled time.
* Custom log locations now displayed in Logs tab.
* Protection logs can be saved in custom locations.
* Program version release date now displayed on About tab.
# Issues Fixed:
* Fix for database not updating properly on Czech installations of
Microsoft Windows.
* Fix for certain scenarios where scans failed to complete.
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 8:05:04 AM12/28/11
to
Shadow presented the following explanation :
> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>
> # New Features:
> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
> running even when blocked by infection.
> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
> # New Features:
> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
> running even when blocked by infection.
> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
--
Zo
!CAUTION! Taglines may be hazardous to your disk space
Shadow
Dec 28, 2011, 8:28:01 AM12/28/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:05:04 -0500, Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote:
>
>Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
>Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
I believe they mean the non-free version updates itself, the
>
>Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
>Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
free version you have to manually download the installer, when a new
version comes out.
They are not referring to the signature files. These update in
both versions.
[]'s
Message has been deleted
s|b
Dec 28, 2011, 9:26:44 AM12/28/11
to
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:30:00 -0200, Shadow wrote:
> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>
> # New Features:
Tnx!
> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>
> # New Features:
--
s|b
David H. Lipman
Dec 28, 2011, 9:47:35 AM12/28/11
to
From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
>
> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
How is that a rip-off when the free version works the same way as it always had.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 10:16:44 AM12/28/11
to
David H. Lipman laid this down on his screen :
> From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
>
>>
>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>
>
> How is that a rip-off when the free version works the same way as it always
> had.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I was with understanding that "incremental
>
>>
>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>
>
> How is that a rip-off when the free version works the same way as it always
> had.
updates" were minute ones that updated the database only and not what
amounts to downloading something that is the size of the entire program
for each update. (and by the way, they have been promising to institute
it for only the last 6-7 years, so that is what I thought this addition
was. But from what I see per the demonstration on the site, what they
are talking about is really auto scheduling, that is only available in
the pay version. Maybe you can explain the difference between "auto
scheduleing" and "incremental"?
And why pay for something that you can do for free by using the
windows scheduler and a little freeware app by the name of PTFB (push
the freakin button).
And for your information, the OT program that I use, does have real
"incremental" updates, you know, minute ones that download so fast that
you barely notice it, together with auto scheduling and real time
protection.
--
Zo
The Silent Majority of today are the slaves of tomorrow.
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 10:26:27 AM12/28/11
to
FredW used his keyboard to write :
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:05:04 -0500, Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote:
>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
> Maybe you can look at ALL differences between free and paid versions
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
> before crying "Wolf"?
> https://malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
> :-(
Who's crying Wolf? I see a new feature that says "incremental"
(something that they have promising to institute for at least the last
6-7 years) and I"m thinking, at last and then see you have pay for it.
As in my reply to David, It appears that they are talking about "auto
schedule". How is that incremental,when the size of the downloads are
just about the size of the application. (Ask the dial up customers and
see if they consider those downloads incremental?)
--
Zo
Nothing adds Excitement like something that is none of your business.
David H. Lipman
Dec 28, 2011, 10:55:09 AM12/28/11
to
From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
Incremental updates means you only download new, changed or delta, updates.
Auto updaing means there is a facility withing the stub application that will
automatically periodically obtain updates.
Since upon updating the both the paid-for and the free versions of MBAM can remove the
same malware, that is not even near being a rip-off.
The fact that Malwarebytes reserves their incremental updates fopr the Professional
version isn't a rip-off. It is making sure their is extra value in purchasing a license.
Those Professional version payments allow Malwarebytes to keep a free version as a viable
option.
What would be a rip-off is if Malwarebytes took a capability away from the free version.
What is an "OT program" ?
Auto updaing means there is a facility withing the stub application that will
automatically periodically obtain updates.
Since upon updating the both the paid-for and the free versions of MBAM can remove the
same malware, that is not even near being a rip-off.
The fact that Malwarebytes reserves their incremental updates fopr the Professional
version isn't a rip-off. It is making sure their is extra value in purchasing a license.
Those Professional version payments allow Malwarebytes to keep a free version as a viable
option.
What would be a rip-off is if Malwarebytes took a capability away from the free version.
What is an "OT program" ?
David H. Lipman
Dec 28, 2011, 10:57:31 AM12/28/11
to
From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
LOL
Malwarebytes anti malware has not existed that long and incremental updates was never
promised.
BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
Malwarebytes anti malware has not existed that long and incremental updates was never
promised.
BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
Message has been deleted
Mark Warner
Dec 28, 2011, 11:23:55 AM12/28/11
to
Zo wrote:
> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
Maybe you should ask for a refund.
> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>
>> # New Features:
>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>> running even when blocked by infection.
>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>
> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
--
Mark Warner
MEPIS Linux
Registered Linux User #415318
...lose .inhibitions when replying
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 11:33:03 AM12/28/11
to
on 12/28/2011, Mark Warner supposed :
> Zo wrote:
>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
> Maybe you should ask for a refund.
Why? My freeware version is updated automatically daily at 5:00PM
>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>
>>> # New Features:
>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>
>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>
> Maybe you should ask for a refund.
followed with a scan without me ever clicking a button until its all
over.
--
Zo
"Please leave your values at the front desk." -- A sign in a Paris
hotel.
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 11:34:32 AM12/28/11
to
Shadow pretended :
--
Zo
FRIEND - always there when they need you
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 1:00:16 PM12/28/11
to
David H. Lipman wrote :
> From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
>
>>
>> David H. Lipman laid this down on his screen :
>>> From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>>>
>>>>> # New Features:
>>>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>>>
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>>
>>>
>>> How is that a rip-off when the free version works the same way as it
>>> always had.
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong, but I was with understanding that "incremental updates"
>> were minute ones that updated the database only and not what amounts to
>> downloading something that is the size of the entire program for each
>> update. (and by the way, they have been promising to institute it for only
>> the last 6-7 years, so that is what I thought this addition was. But from
>> what I see per the demonstration on the site, what they are talking about
>> is really auto scheduling, that is only available in the pay version. Maybe
>> you can explain the difference between "auto scheduleing" and
>> "incremental"?
My bad on the 6-7 years, About three years.
>
>>
>> David H. Lipman laid this down on his screen :
>>> From: "Zo" <hom...@newsbill.net>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>>>
>>>>> # New Features:
>>>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>>>
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>>
>>>
>>> How is that a rip-off when the free version works the same way as it
>>> always had.
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong, but I was with understanding that "incremental updates"
>> were minute ones that updated the database only and not what amounts to
>> downloading something that is the size of the entire program for each
>> update. (and by the way, they have been promising to institute it for only
>> the last 6-7 years, so that is what I thought this addition was. But from
>> what I see per the demonstration on the site, what they are talking about
>> is really auto scheduling, that is only available in the pay version. Maybe
>> you can explain the difference between "auto scheduleing" and
>> "incremental"?
>>
>> And why pay for something that you can do for free by using the windows
>> scheduler and a little freeware app by the name of PTFB (push the freakin
>> button).
>>
>> And for your information, the OT program that I use, does have real
>> "incremental" updates, you know, minute ones that download so fast that you
>> barely notice it, together with auto scheduling and real time protection.
>>
>
> Incremental updates means you only download new, changed or delta, updates.
That's a very general definition. But most associate incremental as one
>> And why pay for something that you can do for free by using the windows
>> scheduler and a little freeware app by the name of PTFB (push the freakin
>> button).
>>
>> And for your information, the OT program that I use, does have real
>> "incremental" updates, you know, minute ones that download so fast that you
>> barely notice it, together with auto scheduling and real time protection.
>>
>
> Incremental updates means you only download new, changed or delta, updates.
that is small in size. In fact, someone ask about the "new incremental"
feature in their forum; wanted to know the size of the downloads now.
I used to have a real problem with Avira when I was using it on dial
up, because of your definition method, everytime the auto updater was a
size of over 2MB, the server would become overloaded and I would then
have to manually download a 29+MB update. You can imagine what a pita
that was.
Have had no such problems since switching to Avast 2years ago.
> Auto updaing means there is a facility withing the stub application that will
> automatically periodically obtain updates.
>
> Since upon updating the both the paid-for and the free versions of MBAM can
> remove the same malware, that is not even near being a rip-off.
It is when you can do the same with the windows scheduler and another
> Since upon updating the both the paid-for and the free versions of MBAM can
> remove the same malware, that is not even near being a rip-off.
freeware app to push the buttons for you.
>
> The fact that Malwarebytes reserves their incremental updates fopr the
> Professional version isn't a rip-off. It is making sure their is extra value
> in purchasing a license. Those Professional version payments allow
> Malwarebytes to keep a free version as a viable option.
You are beginning to sound like you have or had interest in the
> The fact that Malwarebytes reserves their incremental updates fopr the
> Professional version isn't a rip-off. It is making sure their is extra value
> in purchasing a license. Those Professional version payments allow
> Malwarebytes to keep a free version as a viable option.
company.
>
> What would be a rip-off is if Malwarebytes took a capability away from the
> free version.
Why would that be a rip-off? They don't have to provide anything for
> What would be a rip-off is if Malwarebytes took a capability away from the
> free version.
free. Only a rip off, if you paid for it and didn't get all the
features.
>
> What is an "OT program" ?
Spyware Terminator, I've been using it since it came off the Spyware
> What is an "OT program" ?
Alert list. Updates daily, scans automatically and provides real time
protection, and as far as the ads go, I never see one unless I open the
program for some reason; otherwise I don't even know it's there until
some app attempts a strange behavior that it blocks. I have the Hips
turned off because it became very anoying with the frequent popups.
--
Zo
"Please take one step forward and crap twice." -- A sign in a temple in
China.
Zo
Dec 28, 2011, 1:58:15 PM12/28/11
to
FredW was thinking very hard :
Your reply deserves no answer. You haven't a clue..............
>
> You can get a very good product for free, but all you do is complaining
> that the product is not perfect for you.
> If you don't like it, don't use it.
Hey my freeware version get's updated automatically daily at 5:00 PM
followed by an auto scan and it doesn't cost me a cent or the click of
a button and NO I haven't altered the program in any way. Now why
would I want to pay for something that I already get for FREE? Like I
said, you haven't a clue..........
--
Zo
"No matter what your topcoat is made of, this miracle spray will make
it really repellent."
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:26:27 -0500, Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> FredW used his keyboard to write :
>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:05:04 -0500, Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote:
>>>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>>>
>>>>> # New Features:
>>>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>>>
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>
>>> Maybe you can look at ALL differences between free and paid versions
>>> before crying "Wolf"?
>>> https://malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
>>> :-(
>>
>> Who's crying Wolf?
>
> You.
>
>>
>> FredW used his keyboard to write :
>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:05:04 -0500, Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote:
>>>> Shadow presented the following explanation :
>>>>> http://www.malwarebytes.org/products
>>>>>
>>>>> # New Features:
>>>>> * Malwarebytes Chameleon technology gets Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
>>>>> running even when blocked by infection.
>>>>> * Incremental updates (paid version only).
>>>>
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>
>>> Maybe you can look at ALL differences between free and paid versions
>>> before crying "Wolf"?
>>> https://malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
>>> :-(
>>
>> Who's crying Wolf?
>
Your reply deserves no answer. You haven't a clue..............
>
> You can get a very good product for free, but all you do is complaining
> that the product is not perfect for you.
> If you don't like it, don't use it.
Hey my freeware version get's updated automatically daily at 5:00 PM
followed by an auto scan and it doesn't cost me a cent or the click of
a button and NO I haven't altered the program in any way. Now why
would I want to pay for something that I already get for FREE? Like I
said, you haven't a clue..........
--
Zo
"No matter what your topcoat is made of, this miracle spray will make
it really repellent."
John Corliss
Dec 28, 2011, 1:55:02 PM12/28/11
to
Are you trying to cause trouble?
--
John Corliss BS206. No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share,
spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
Freeware -legally obtainable computer programs which you may use at no
cost, monetary or otherwise, for as long as you wish. Because of
Googlespam, I block almost everything. I also usually block as much as
possible from these posters, forger trolls, and nymshifters.
al
alvey
badgolferman
baynole
Bear Bottoms <bearbott...@gmail.com>
Bjorn S.
Bob S.
Bob_Villa
B. R. 'BeAr' Ederson
Brian (groups)
burnr
Cawshus
C.Joseph Drayton
CoMa
Cousin Stanley
DadiOH
Dan Goodman
Dave
Dewey Edwards
Don Kirkman
Duddits
F. Reeware
FredW
glorieux
gufus
h.godavari
H-Man (HK)
Howard Schwartz
Ian Jackson
Jeff Needle
Jim S. Witherspoon
John Fitzsimons
Johnw
JP Loken
Larry Sabo
L Vetter (Loren)
M.L.
Manatee Memories
Martin ©¿©¬
Martin Jay
Max Wachtel
Mike Dee
Mike Easter
Mike Echo
miskairal
mister2u
netman
Nicetameetya
Nicolaas Hawkins
Ninou
occam
Omar©
pcman
Phil
POKO
Poutnik
proteanthread
»Q«
REM
rich
Richard Steinfeld
Spamblk
Stephen Wolstenholme
Susan Bugher
Taf®
The Seabat
Thip
Thore
Tommy
Trevor Smith
UnsteadyKen
Vegard Krog Petersen
vince
wasbit
Whirled.Peas
Why Tea
Zo
Dave Doe
PDFrank
Craig
David H. Lipman
Gordon Darling
John Corliss (but not John Corliss (ES), sorry)
Mark Carter
Mark Warner
Ron May
s|b
Shadow
VanguardLH
Yrrah
Mathias Sereno
P.S. I don't reply to complaints about my signature file length. It's
laid out so that it's easier to see the individual rogue services (used
mainly by Pooh the Troll.)
John Corliss (ES)
Dec 28, 2011, 2:59:36 PM12/28/11
to
Somebody pretending to be me (John Corliss) forged:
post through Computer Country (an ISP in Oregon, U.S.A.) or sometimes
through my account with Eternal-September, and the forgery was sent
through dizum.com, an anonymous remailer which I never use.
To make this group readable by blocking out forgeries and trolling, I
suggest that you keep your eyes open for such garbage by checking
message headers whenever a message from somebody seems out of character.
Specifically, look for references to anonymous remailers in the path
statement. Better yet, I recommend that you set your news reader to
flag, or even better, block everything sent through Google Groups and
remailers.
--
John Corliss BS206. No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share,
spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
Freeware -legally obtainable computer programs which you may use at no
cost, monetary or otherwise, for as long as you wish.
Because of Googlespam, I block almost everything from Google Groups. I
also usually block as much as possible from anonymous remailers, feeds
and other such services because forger-trolls use them:
aioe.org
alt.net [Altopia]
anonymous (in the Path header)
datemas.de
dizum.com
ecn.org
frell.theremailer.net
mixmaster.*
mixmin (in the Path header)
open-news-network.org
Pooh or any of its variants (in the Subject or From headers)
remailer (in the Path header)
rip.ax.lt
tioat.net
usenet4all.se
xsusenet.com
x-privat.org
etc. (as they appear)
> Are you trying to cause trouble?
>
The post to which I'm replying is a forgery which I did not send. I only
>
post through Computer Country (an ISP in Oregon, U.S.A.) or sometimes
through my account with Eternal-September, and the forgery was sent
through dizum.com, an anonymous remailer which I never use.
To make this group readable by blocking out forgeries and trolling, I
suggest that you keep your eyes open for such garbage by checking
message headers whenever a message from somebody seems out of character.
Specifically, look for references to anonymous remailers in the path
statement. Better yet, I recommend that you set your news reader to
flag, or even better, block everything sent through Google Groups and
remailers.
--
John Corliss BS206. No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share,
spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
Freeware -legally obtainable computer programs which you may use at no
cost, monetary or otherwise, for as long as you wish.
also usually block as much as possible from anonymous remailers, feeds
and other such services because forger-trolls use them:
aioe.org
alt.net [Altopia]
anonymous (in the Path header)
datemas.de
dizum.com
ecn.org
frell.theremailer.net
mixmaster.*
mixmin (in the Path header)
open-news-network.org
Pooh or any of its variants (in the Subject or From headers)
remailer (in the Path header)
rip.ax.lt
tioat.net
usenet4all.se
xsusenet.com
x-privat.org
etc. (as they appear)
Shadow
Dec 28, 2011, 3:02:37 PM12/28/11
to
offer full signature files than incremental files, it eats up much
more bandwidth.
So I interpreted it as referring to the program (as in Avira,
which updates both the program and signatures automatically, but
offers an enormous update file for PCs without internet connectivity,
for "manually" updating).
The bottom line is, Malwarebytes is a very good program, with
a freeware option. I'm happy with it.
[]'s
Dustin
Dec 28, 2011, 9:58:42 PM12/28/11
to
Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote in news:mn.e2727dbc6a3c6a43.85371
@newsbill.net:
I really have nothing to say either way. I'm neutral, just excuse the
laughter in the background.
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
@newsbill.net:
laughter in the background.
--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts
Dustin
Dec 28, 2011, 10:04:13 PM12/28/11
to
Zo <hom...@newsbill.net> wrote in
news:mn.e2687dbcb...@newsbill.net:
> for each update. (and by the way, they have been promising to institute
> it for only the last 6-7 years, so that is what I thought this addition
> was. But from what I see per the demonstration on the site, what they
Hi Zo...
Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
another former employee.
news:mn.e2687dbcb...@newsbill.net:
> for each update. (and by the way, they have been promising to institute
> it for only the last 6-7 years, so that is what I thought this addition
> was. But from what I see per the demonstration on the site, what they
Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
another former employee.
occam
Dec 29, 2011, 5:01:59 AM12/29/11
to
On 28/12/2011 21:02, Shadow wrote:
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>
>>> I believe they mean the non-free version updates itself, the
>>> free version you have to manually download the installer, when a new
>>> version comes out.
No, I do not think this is it.
>>>> Pay for incremental updates? What a rip off! :-(
>>>
>>> I believe they mean the non-free version updates itself, the
>>> free version you have to manually download the installer, when a new
>>> version comes out.
>>> They are not referring to the signature files. These update in
>>> both versions
not already have (small download). In the free version, you get the
whole set (currently > 7MB, used to be 3 MB when I started using MBAM)
> The bottom line is, Malwarebytes is a very good program, with
> a freeware option. I'm happy with it.
RayLopez99
Jan 13, 2012, 9:41:55 AM1/13/12
to
On Dec 28 2011, 11:57 pm, "David H. Lipman"
For the record, my free Malwarebytes updates every 2 weeks the entire
database (takes about 30 seconds) so I don't see what the fuss is all
about...I guess incremental is smaller downloads. In any event
Malwarebytes does find some stuff other programs don't. At some point
I might upgrade to the non-free version. On one of my machines I
don't get downloads from Microsoft for Windows 7 since it's a Thai
(free) version, so I have to make sure that machine is more secure by
perhaps adding a paid program to it--but for now I have not noticed
anything amiss (if I have a trojan it sure is slick because I've not
seen any damage to my bank accounts or any usual traffic to indicate
my machine is owned as a zombie).
RL
<DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>
> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>
> --
> Dave
> Multi-AV Scanning Tool -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
Why did they fire you? Incompetence maybe?
>
> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>
> --
> Dave
> Multi-AV Scanning Tool -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
For the record, my free Malwarebytes updates every 2 weeks the entire
database (takes about 30 seconds) so I don't see what the fuss is all
about...I guess incremental is smaller downloads. In any event
Malwarebytes does find some stuff other programs don't. At some point
I might upgrade to the non-free version. On one of my machines I
don't get downloads from Microsoft for Windows 7 since it's a Thai
(free) version, so I have to make sure that machine is more secure by
perhaps adding a paid program to it--but for now I have not noticed
anything amiss (if I have a trojan it sure is slick because I've not
seen any damage to my bank accounts or any usual traffic to indicate
my machine is owned as a zombie).
RL
RayLopez99
Jan 13, 2012, 9:43:55 AM1/13/12
to
On Dec 29 2011, 11:04 am, Dustin <bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Zo...
>
> Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
> another former employee.
>
>
Why did they fire you Dustin? Incompetence maybe?
> Hi Zo...
>
> Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
> another former employee.
>
>
RL
FromTheRafters
Jan 13, 2012, 2:32:17 PM1/13/12
to
RayLopez99 wrote:
> On Dec 28 2011, 11:57 pm, "David H. Lipman"
> <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>>
>> --
>> Dave
>> Multi-AV Scanning Tool -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
> Why did they fire you?
Can you cite proof that David was fired? Perhaps you should be more
> On Dec 28 2011, 11:57 pm, "David H. Lipman"
> <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>>
>> --
>> Dave
>> Multi-AV Scanning Tool -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
>
> Why did they fire you?
careful what you type? A simple comma between 'why' and 'did' would
change the whole flavor of your query to something less libelous.
> Incompetence maybe?
Speculation like this on its own may be okay, but coupled with the
above, this question just gives more credence to the idea that you are
committing libel with your first statement.
FromTheRafters
Jan 13, 2012, 2:34:47 PM1/13/12
to
...are you trying to get slapped down Ray?
Dustin
Jan 13, 2012, 5:05:55 PM1/13/12
to
FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:jeq0s2$mc5$1...@dont-email.me:
I doubt Ray knows what libel even is...
news:jeq0s2$mc5$1...@dont-email.me:
Dustin
Jan 13, 2012, 5:06:44 PM1/13/12
to
RayLopez99 <raylo...@gmail.com> wrote in news:fe57eaa6-6021-4585-b02d-
cf5f3a...@24g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
I wasn't fired. :)
You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
cf5f3a...@24g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
Dustin
Jan 13, 2012, 5:07:37 PM1/13/12
to
FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:jeq10o$mc5$2
@dont-email.me:
get slapped down? LOL! You're a nice guy sometimes. He's been bitchslapped
by the both of us on more than one occasion. Poor bastard isn't even a
script kiddy level.
@dont-email.me:
by the both of us on more than one occasion. Poor bastard isn't even a
script kiddy level.
David H. Lipman
Jan 13, 2012, 5:15:16 PM1/13/12
to
From: "Dustin" <bughunte...@gmail.com>
| FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
| news:jeq0s2$mc5$1...@dont-email.me:
|
>> RayLopez99 wrote:
>>> On Dec 28 2011, 11:57 pm, "David H. Lipman"
>>> <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave
>>>> Multi-AV Scanning Tool
>>>> -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl
>>>> /35905.asp
>>>
>>> Why did they fire you?
>>
>> Can you cite proof that David was fired? Perhaps you should be more
>> careful what you type? A simple comma between 'why' and 'did' would
>> change the whole flavor of your query to something less libelous.
>>
>>> Incompetence maybe?
>>
>> Speculation like this on its own may be okay, but coupled with the
>> above, this question just gives more credence to the idea that you
>> are committing libel with your first statement.
|
| I doubt Ray knows what libel even is...
|
Oh G-d, not that jerk again.
--
Dave
| FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
| news:jeq0s2$mc5$1...@dont-email.me:
|
>> RayLopez99 wrote:
>>> On Dec 28 2011, 11:57 pm, "David H. Lipman"
>>> <DLipman~nosp...@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> BTW: Don't forget, I was a Malwarebytes' paid employee.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave
>>>> Multi-AV Scanning Tool
>>>> -http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.ukhttp://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl
>>>> /35905.asp
>>>
>>> Why did they fire you?
>>
>> Can you cite proof that David was fired? Perhaps you should be more
>> careful what you type? A simple comma between 'why' and 'did' would
>> change the whole flavor of your query to something less libelous.
>>
>>> Incompetence maybe?
>>
>> Speculation like this on its own may be okay, but coupled with the
>> above, this question just gives more credence to the idea that you
>> are committing libel with your first statement.
|
| I doubt Ray knows what libel even is...
|
--
Dave
Bear
Jan 13, 2012, 7:02:24 PM1/13/12
to
On 1/13/2012 4:06 PM, Dustin wrote:
> RayLopez99<raylo...@gmail.com> wrote in news:fe57eaa6-6021-4585-b02d-
> cf5f3a...@24g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Dec 29 2011, 11:04 am, Dustin<bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Zo...
>>>
>>> Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
>>> another former employee.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why did they fire you Dustin? Incompetence maybe?
>
> I wasn't fired. :)
>
> You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
> and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
>
>
>
yep!
> RayLopez99<raylo...@gmail.com> wrote in news:fe57eaa6-6021-4585-b02d-
> cf5f3a...@24g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Dec 29 2011, 11:04 am, Dustin<bughunter.dus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Zo...
>>>
>>> Malwarebytes hasn't been around for 6 or 7 years yet. Just speaking as
>>> another former employee.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Why did they fire you Dustin? Incompetence maybe?
>
> I wasn't fired. :)
>
> You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
> and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
>
>
>
--
Bear
http://bearware.info
Must Do: System image and automatic real-time off-site data backup
Recommended tools: EaseUS Todo Backup and SugarSync
Quaalude
Jan 14, 2012, 1:52:13 AM1/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:02:24 -0600, Bear wrote:
>> You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
>> and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
>>
>>
>>
> yep!
>
> --
> Bear
Should I take that "yep" as authoritative by experience?
>> You should choose your words more carefully. Lawyers have teeth these days
>> and I predict it's only going to get worse for us all.
>>
>>
>>
> yep!
>
> --
> Bear
0 new messages