> Scott wrote:
>
>> et wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Do you all remember when Van's RV's were folding wings in flight?
>>>
>>> Ed
>>
>> Just the RV-3, correct? http://www.vansaircraft.com/pdf/sb96-03-1.pdf
>>
>
> IIRC licensed for experimental amateur build. Too risky for my liking.
Excellent Google there, Frankfurter.
LOL LOL LOL
--
_?_ Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
(@ @) Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-oOO-(_)--OOo-------------------------------[ Groucho Marx ]--
grok! Devoted Microsoft User
> "Franklin" <i-am-f...@usenet.com.invalid> wrote
>
>> IIRC licensed for experimental amateur build. Too risky for my liking.
>
> A bicycle without training wheels is too risky for your liking.
>
> Stop pretending you are an aviator, and be a pesk at some other newsgroup.
Stick around, Franklinslime will amaze you with his expertise...in
cardiovascular surgery.
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:26:11 -0500, Morgans wrote:
>
>> "Franklin" <i-am-f...@usenet.com.invalid> wrote
>>
>>> IIRC licensed for experimental amateur build. Too risky for my
>>> liking.
>>
>> A bicycle without training wheels is too risky for your liking.
>>
>> Stop pretending you are an aviator, and be a pesk at some other
>> newsgroup.
>
> Stick around, Franklinslime will amaze you with his expertise...in
> cardiovascular surgery.
>
> LOL
I can rip your heart out. Is that good enough? :-)
Hello sock, I can't believe you're so sore from the times you threw down
a challenge in r.a.p. which ended with you showing how limited your own
understanding is. Sorry about that.
Do you remember you invented some navigation data and when you got
rumbled you then tried to invent a mountain and some imaginary
passengers. Heh!
Then there was the time you got gulled by a hoax video of someone who
survived being sucked into a jet engine even though I tried to explain
the facts to you.
Don't blame me if you go out of your way to look foolish.
=====================================
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/4f17a7ff25fdf2dc>
David 'Bear Bottoms' W wrote:
> Here's a little something for you to solve, Franklin
>
> If you are looking at your AF/d and it says RWY xC-yL
> (you know what x and y are <chuckle> VASI(V2L)--GA3 deg
> TCH32' 90 deg up
>
> Whatcha got there, Frankie? C'mon, whatcha got there?
Franklin wrote:
Dearest socko, I've already asked to talk to the organ
grinder rather than his monkey. Could your sockmaster
arrange it for me next time.
Why do you believe there's no one else in the world apart
from you who can fly? When you next get a chance to go up
for spin, make sure the descent follows that VASI's 3 degree
glide but, with a bit of luck, your landing gear will be so
festooned with clinging stowaway socks that altogther their
dangling length exceeds 32 feet just as you clear the
threshold.
That will be a good way to get rid of a few. :)
You never told me what you are trying to hide from the SD
checks.
Rather than occupy yourself concocting basic questions, why
not read up on aircraft energy management so next time you
can impress me with your understanding. That's if you're not
called to single handedly save the troops in Afghanistan.
David 'Bear Bottoms' W replied:
Hope you don't have any pax when you smack into the side of
that mountain.
===================================
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.piloting/msg/5365e3f574f969
1d>
Franklin wrote:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4>
Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only
look at a jet engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake.
Ricky/David W/Bear Bottoms/Jeffrey Bloss wrote:
"Franklin," why don't explain and entertain us with your
theory this being a fake.
How does "looking at a jet engine for 2 seconds" convince
one to believe this accident was a fake?
Franklin, the serviceman being sucked into the jet on-deck
was real, very, very real.
Ricky
Franklin wrote:
Hello sock. Why doesn't your organ grinder ask the questions
rather than use his monkey?
For me, it's too amazing that a guy working next to an
Intruder gets sucked into one of its intakes with such massive
force that it dragged him off the ground but afterwards he
doesn't have any crush damage from jamming between the bullet
cone and cowling and doesn't look like he been squeezed hard
up against the stator vanes.
http://www.imageno.com/k3bfdhgc73i0pic.html
http://images.marketworks.com/hi/72/72196/KL37C03.jpg
Maybe he's supposed to have squeezed through the low bypass
compressor bleed channel to come out unscathed. Heh heh!
Let's have that 2 second look at what those J52s on an
Intruder really looks like ...
http://www.imageno.com/pyopisgsihhtpic.html
OK, so what passed through the engine to cause the rear flash
in the vid? If anything solid went through that turbofan
there'd likely be a blade-out which looks very different to
the brief flare out in the vid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU
The vid shows our hero posing for a photo only hours afterwards.
No shock, no crushed shoulders, no broken ribs, no split skull,
no broken nose. Seemed to me the vid showed the mannequin had
a floppy thigh bone but the guy looks fine afterwards, no
bloodied clothing, no major abrasions. ... Just an arm sling
and a bandage for a head graze. Gimme a break. He would be
undergoing tests in ICU for the rest of the day and may be the
day after that as well.
A few hours afterwards he wouldn't be posing with his pals but
he'd be filling in incidence reports, the safety officer would
be going berserk and the carrier's senior officers would be
doing some interviewing.
The vid's date is Feb 20 1991 but the quality looks like it's
from the 1960s. Most vids from 1991 are in color. Try frame
advancing the spoof using this AVI version rather than an FLV:
<http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/Videos/sucked%20in%
20engine.avi>
> Why do you believe there's no one else in the world apart
> from you who can fly?
Oh so you have your PP certification?
Fuck no you don't.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
> 'Franklin' wrote thus:
>>"I tried to explain the facts to you."
>
> How so Franklin?
>
> My time on ACF have taught me one thing about you:
> _you have no idea what a fact is_
>
> [rest binned unread]
I told you his ego is so pathetically warped that he will continue to
claim he's an accomplished, certificated aviator until he slices his
wrists.
Which, we can only hope, is soon. lol
Blossom, these days your posts repeat David W's comments. He was the
sock Bear Bottoms was using at the time and as usual Bob Adkins leant a
lot of support.
I didn't believe you when you said you had trouble getting a licence for
a remote controlled model plane.
Now I'm beginning to see it really was difficult for you. However why
snipe and bellyache at those who have their PPL. Is it because you had
difficulty with that or never got it?
> 'Franklin' wrote thus:
>>"I tried to explain the facts to you."
>
> How so Franklin?
>
> My time on ACF have taught me one thing about you:
> _you have no idea what a fact is_
>
> [rest binned unread]
The only fact that anyone needs to know about Franklin is that he's a
obsessed goofus whose aviation experience started and stopped with
Flight Simulator. Which he never got to run.
lol
> 'Jeffrey Bloss' wrote thus:
> He's one of those folks who collects buzzwords and phrases and
> strings them into sentences to fool people that he knows what
> he's blathering about. When necessary, cut/paste 1-2 website
> pages. lol.
Hummingbird, if what you write is true then it shouldn't be hard for you
to find the web sites I'm supposed to have copied from.
Then what room would be left for the rest of the posts on Usenet?
LOL