Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sniffnet

43 views
Skip to first unread message

Ninou

unread,
May 28, 2023, 3:19:00 PM5/28/23
to
What is Sniffnet?
Sniffnet is a network monitoring tool to help you easily keep track of
your Internet traffic.

Whether you want to gather statistics, or you need to inspect more in
depth what's going on in your network, this app will get you covered.
What makes Sniffnet unique?
Sniffnet is a technical tool, but at the same time it strongly focuses
on the overall user experience: most of the network analyzers out
there are cumbersome to use, while one of Sniffnet's cornerstones is
to be usable with ease by everyone.

Furthermore, Sniffnet is completely free and open-source,
dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0: if you are interested you can
find the full source code on GitHub.
https://www.sniffnet.net/
--
Ninou
Gratilog, le catalogue des logiciels gratuits
http://www.gratilog.net/

KenW

unread,
May 28, 2023, 3:38:13 PM5/28/23
to
On Sun, 28 May 2023 21:17:15 +0200, Ninou <sylvie....@free.fr>
wrote:

> What is Sniffnet?
>Sniffnet is a network monitoring tool to help you easily keep track of
>your Internet traffic.
>
>Whether you want to gather statistics, or you need to inspect more in
>depth what's going on in your network, this app will get you covered.
>What makes Sniffnet unique?
>Sniffnet is a technical tool, but at the same time it strongly focuses
>on the overall user experience: most of the network analyzers out
>there are cumbersome to use, while one of Sniffnet's cornerstones is
>to be usable with ease by everyone.
>
>Furthermore, Sniffnet is completely free and open-source,
>dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0: if you are interested you can
>find the full source code on GitHub.
>https://www.sniffnet.net/

If it would install with wpcap.dll I may try it again. On the other
hand I don't play with wannabe programs


KenW

D

unread,
May 28, 2023, 5:05:57 PM5/28/23
to
out of curiosity...
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wpcap.dll+winpcap

https://npcap.com/vs-winpcap.html
"Npcap runs great on Windows 11. Npcap is under active development and
continues to support the latest Windows networking features."

https://npcap.com/#download
"Npcap 1.75 installer for Windows 7/2008R2, 8/2012, 8.1/2012R2, 10/2016,
2019, 11 (x86, x64, and ARM64)." https://npcap.com/dist/npcap-1.75.exe

afaict, npcap-1.75.exe (1.09 MB) installed fine under Windows 11 and 7,
but after doing this, instead of "Sniffnet" failing to run because of a
missing "wpcap.dll" file, next it said "the program can't start because
vcruntime140.dll is missing" https://duckduckgo.com/?q=vcruntime140.dll

seems that "Sniffnet" is apparently not "usable with ease by everyone",
albeit others testing this program may not encounter such difficulties.

VanguardLH

unread,
May 28, 2023, 5:28:25 PM5/28/23
to
Ninou <sylvie....@free.fr> wrote:

> What is Sniffnet?
> Sniffnet is a network monitoring tool to help you easily keep track of
> your Internet traffic.
> ...
> Furthermore, Sniffnet is completely free and open-source, ...

Well, not according to the author's threat to abandon without donations.

> https://www.sniffnet.net/

To me, this is yet another of those "free" projects pasted together with
the intent to generate revenue through donations.

https://github.com/GyulyVGC/sniffnet
If you appreciate Sniffnet, please consider donating: this is the only
way for me to keep working on this project, constantly improving and
expanding it.
In scarcity of sponsors, I will be forced to quit my contributions to
this project (sadly).

The coercive connotation is that donations are required to keep this
product alive. No one should be starting a FOSS project with the intent
that it self destructs without donations. Github is free (there are
paid plans). TuCows, the domain registrar for sniffnet.net, doesn't
sell domain registrations directly to customers. They only do wholesale
domain registrations which means you have to buy through a reseller;
e.g., Hover (.net domains are $17/yr). www.sniffnet.net resolves to
gyulyvgc.github.com. The gyulyvgc is the author's project name at
Github. It's also to where the download links point at the web site.
Github provides webhosting. So, on just what is the author spending
money for his SniffNet product? Must be for the electricity to power
his computer.

At the Github project site, Required Dependencies lists (for Windows):
- Install Npcap (in WinPcap compatibility mode).
- Download the Npcap SDK, and copy libs to the correct folders.

KenW wanted to know about WinPcap presumably meaning it isn't included
in SniffNet, yet Npcap is included (well, maybe you have to get the libs
from the SDK). WinPcap is needed only if the product is used back on
Windows XP since Npcap doesn't support that OS.

https://npcap.com/vs-winpcap.html

WinPcap was developed by the Nmap project, got dumped back in 2013, and
replaced with Npcap also developed by Nmap. So, on what did the
SniffNet author spend money to qualify his threat that he needs
donations to prevent abandoning his project?

Maybe on the non-free version of Npcap? The non-free licenses are very
expensive. See:

https://npcap.com/oem/redist.html

The free license of Npcap grants use on up to 5 hosts (aka "systems"),
but unlimited when incorporated with Nmap, Wireshark, and MS Defender
for Identity. Presumably that means the Sniffnet author can distribute
unlimited copies of his product, but his users may only use it on up to
5 hosts. I didn't see the limitation mentioned by the author at his
[Github] web site or in his Github project.

KenW

unread,
May 28, 2023, 8:07:11 PM5/28/23
to
I always will try an "easier/simpler" program. Will stick with
Wireshark.


KenW

D

unread,
May 29, 2023, 12:33:42 AM5/29/23
to
On Sun, 28 May 2023 18:07:12 -0600, KenW <ken...@invalid.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 28 May 2023 23:05:49 +0200 (CEST), D <J@M> wrote:
>>On Sun, 28 May 2023 13:38:13 -0600, KenW <ken...@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 28 May 2023 21:17:15 +0200, Ninou <sylvie....@free.fr> wrote:
>>>> What is Sniffnet?
snips
>>>If it would install with wpcap.dll I may try it again. On the other
>>>hand I don't play with wannabe programs
>>
>>out of curiosity...
>>https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wpcap.dll+winpcap
>>https://npcap.com/vs-winpcap.html
>>"Npcap runs great on Windows 11. Npcap is under active development and
>> continues to support the latest Windows networking features."
>>https://npcap.com/#download
>
>I always will try an "easier/simpler" program. Will stick with
>Wireshark.

consensus looks unanimous "must have" "10 out of 10":
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wireshark.org+user+reviews

not too many freeware programs get 100%-positive ratings, so (again, out
of curiosity) I downloaded both Windows "Stable Release: 4.0.6" versions,
installer and portable, and they installed uniquely well, e.g. instead of
the usual "Licence Agreement" ... "I agree" legalese, it's simply "Noted";
also, the recently installed "Npcap 1.75" prompted a system-crash warning
message to run "net stop npcap...before upgrading", so I unstalled "Npcap
1.75" first before installing "Wireshark" and checked "Install Npcap 1.71"
in the "Packet Capture" window, then checked "USBPcap 1.5.4.0" in the "USB
Capture" window, then clicked "Install", clicked "I agree" to "Npcap 1.71"
with no options checked, then after "Npcap" installation finished checked
"I accept..." in "USBPcap Driver licence" window, clicked "Next", checked
"I accept..." in "USBPcapCMD licence" window, "Next", "Full" installation
(default), "Install" ... "Completed", "Close", then finally "Installation
Complete", "Next", "Reboot now", PC (running Windows 7) restarted normally,
"Wireshark" started normally afaict, and with Wireshark running sent this
reply using Omnimix w/tor, but more testing needed; these do seem to work:

>Windows Intel Installer (75.1 MB):
https://2.na.dl.wireshark.org/win64/Wireshark-win64-4.0.6.exe

>Windows Intel PortableApps (43.4 MB):
https://2.na.dl.wireshark.org/win64/WiresharkPortable64_4.0.6.paf.exe

Shadow

unread,
May 29, 2023, 7:44:37 AM5/29/23
to
On Sun, 28 May 2023 18:07:12 -0600, KenW <ken...@invalid.net> wrote:

>I always will try an "easier/simpler" program. Will stick with
>Wireshark.

+1 on Wireshark.
Bit of a learning curve, but once you've got it set up and can
remember the more useful filters, it's unbeatable.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

daniel lamack

unread,
May 29, 2023, 8:07:25 AM5/29/23
to
RECOVERY OF LOST FUNDS (BINARY OPTIONS, BITCOINS, LOAN SCAM).
THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE Pinnacle financials, hiring a professional cyber security agency has been one of the world most technical valued navigating information. High prolific information and Privileges comes rare as it has been understood that what people do not see, they will never know.
Welcome to the SWIFT FOX CODERS RECOVERY agency where every request concerning lost funds are recovered within a short period of time.
The crucial benefit of contacting The Pinnacle Financials recovery company is
• ZERO TRACES: After a successful penetration recovery is carried out by the Global-KOS, no active or passive attacks will be used to trace any of our actionns to our clients or our organization. One common practice that attackers employ to evade detection is to break into poorly secured systems and use those hijacked systems as proxies through which they can launch and route attacks. Attackers effort on this platform are useless because we use a strong proxy firewall switching and a firm security system to prevent unauthorized bodies from tracking or modifying our network accessible resources. I.e the hacker and clients are 100% safe and anonymous.

WEBSITE : https://www.swiftfoxcoder.tech/
EMAIL : recoveryexpert @ swiftfoxcoder. tech

ADVANTAGE TO CLIENTS:
after helping a client recover all money lost to fraudulent practices, most of this clients comes back requesting we provide the same service in disguise as another person. We found a way to issue serial Numbers to each clients who seeks our help and services for identification purposes because we are not interested in you
r names nor location. But we urge that individuals shouldn't abuse this opportunities as we have provided value to you.
However, on this platform of recovery, you will be assigned to a designated professional recovery platform who is systematically known for operating on a dark web protocol. The operation of these hackers is to potentially deploy a distinguished cyber security technique to retrieving back the victims stolen funds via the application of a diverse CM breacher which enables you to track the data location of a scammer and extract every data on the con database. This is achieved using the systematic courier tracking method.
Which of the uneasy situation do you find yourself in right now?
(BITCOIN INVESTMENTS, BINARY OPTIONS OR LOAN SCAM?
This shocking study points to one harsh reality we all faced with today. It saddens our mind when a client expresses annoyance or dissatisfaction of unethical behaviors of scammers. We have striven to make tenacious efforts to help those who are victims of this fleas get off their traumatic feeling of loss
WEBSITE : https://www.swiftfoxcoder.tech/
EMAIL : recoveryexpert @ swiftfoxcoder. tech

John C.

unread,
May 29, 2023, 5:11:55 PM5/29/23
to
Shadow wrote:
> KenW wrote:
>
>> I always will try an "easier/simpler" program. Will stick with
>> Wireshark.
>
> +1 on Wireshark.
> Bit of a learning curve, but once you've got it set up and can
> remember the more useful filters, it's unbeatable.

Just curious, what advantages does Wireshark have over SmartSniff by
Nirsoft?

--
John C. BS206. No ad, CD, cripple, demo, nag, pay, pirated, share, spy,
time-limited, trial or web wares for me please. I filter anything posted
through Google Groups (source of the vast majority of spam posted here),
cross-posted messages (those sent to more than one newsgroup at a time)
and all posts from several trolls (eg. "Bucky Breeder"). I recommend you
do likewise in all three cases.

Shadow

unread,
May 29, 2023, 7:44:13 PM5/29/23
to
On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:09:20 -0700, "John C." <r9j...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Shadow wrote:
>> KenW wrote:
>>
>>> I always will try an "easier/simpler" program. Will stick with
>>> Wireshark.
>>
>> +1 on Wireshark.
>> Bit of a learning curve, but once you've got it set up and can
>> remember the more useful filters, it's unbeatable.
>
>Just curious, what advantages does Wireshark have over SmartSniff by
>Nirsoft?

Wireshark can sniff out (and record) ANY packet. Even stuff
coming from outside or to and from a USB or Bluetooth device. Not
sure about serial or parallel ports.
Plus you can examine minute details of any packet
sent/received/captured.

SmartSniff just monitors the connections to/from your
Ethernet/wireless card. I think. Never used it. LOL

Microscope vs magnifying glass.
0 new messages