"Poutnik" wrote:
> I do not know MGU, but Secunia and FileHippo serve very different
> purposes each.
>
> The former is focused to security only updates across all software,
[Secunia PSI] focuses on "security only updates". Not true.
Secunia PSI considers EVERY update to an app as a security update. They
don't analyze the update to determine if it just adds, removes, or
changes functionality only (i.e., nothing to do with security). They'll
alert on every update to an app regardless of what the update addresses.
Secunia also considers every end-of-life (unsupported) apps as a
security suspects. I remember them telling me SamSpade (an ancient text
only web browser) needed "security" updates. It would list 40tude
Dialog (my long abandoned newsreader) as insecure simply because it was
no longer supported. Uh huh.
Secunia PSI alerts on every outdated or unsupported app, not just on
updates which involve security fixes. It has no clue as to which
updates are those for security issues. For example, a program update to
fix icon text that is outside the toolbar region or an update to make a
program DPI compliant is NOT a security update. They also assume an
unsupported product is an insecure product and that's not always true.
If your computing platform is stable and updates do not address security
issues then following Secunia PSI's recommendations can result in
destablizing your host. After all, updates introduce new or changed
code and that can have bugs, too.
Secunia PSI is not an security update checker. It is an update checker.
> while the letter AFAIK is focused to general updates of Filehippo
> hosted software.
Then it would be of use only by users who get ALL of their software from
FileHippo. Not of much value to the prevalent majority of users.