Comodo System Cleaner 2.1
Bear Bottoms
feature. Advanced users only. Could cause problems for beginners.
http://system-cleaner.comodo.com/
http://www.comodo.com/home/download/download.php?prod=system-cleaner
--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website: http://bearware.info
Bear Bottoms
news:Xns9CFA5357EC2BCbe...@69.16.185.247:
> Comodo System Cleaner has a huge amount of cleaning options with back up
> feature. Advanced users only. Could cause problems for beginners.
>
> http://system-cleaner.comodo.com/
>
> http://www.comodo.com/home/download/download.php?prod=system-cleaner
>
FORGERY
Bear Bottoms
> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CFA5357EC2BCbe...@69.16.185.247:
>
>> Comodo System Cleaner has a huge amount of cleaning options with back
>> up feature. Advanced users only. Could cause problems for beginners.
>>
>> http://system-cleaner.comodo.com/
>>
>> http://www.comodo.com/home/download/download.php?prod=system-cleaner
>>
>
> FORGERY
FORGERY
You are using my email.
Bear Bottoms
> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CFA49860B1DBbe...@69.16.185.250:
>
>> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CFA5357EC2BCbe...@69.16.185.247:
>>
>>> Comodo System Cleaner has a huge amount of cleaning options with back
>>> up feature. Advanced users only. Could cause problems for beginners.
>>>
>>> http://system-cleaner.comodo.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.comodo.com/home/download/download.php?prod=system-cleaner
>>>
>>
>> FORGERY
>
> FORGERY
>
> You are using my email.
>
You are a liar and forger.
My header (others are forged)
Path: s03-b14.iad!npeersf01.iad.highwinds-media.com!
npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-
me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!
newsfe02.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Chrome 4.0.288.1
From: Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com>
References: <Xns9CFA524AA5A83be...@69.16.185.247>
Organization: Bearware.info
Message-ID: <Xns9CFA491248D2Cbe...@69.16.185.250>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: 4fA>I;d++#`8Eptd4[C$nPpE$/&=S~R=x5/irT!i$0:lpZE{)MXQk/j-ga3#/7^p?
D2fYRD5j{Lc2Er>xpI2!9`P|d2RE%WrX)Q:.+1sgLz4F9&c]AWRS+zCJB'ioU&_]*;6s"V-
i8PC9Q}:{fgHxE/y{HkMp0-dD1^p;r@cDg?ZWyp(XKw(0S<^:1n:L;K[^(*w-:y-@;\;Pdm
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.177.43.61
X-Complaints-To: newsm...@cox.net
X-Trace: newsfe02.iad 1262956191 70.177.43.61 (Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:09:51
UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:09:51 UTC
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:09:51 GMT
Xref: Hurricane-Charley alt.comp.freeware:545910
X-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:10:52 MST (s03-b14.iad)
za kAT
> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CFA49860B1DBbe...@69.16.185.250:
>
>> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CFA5357EC2BCbe...@69.16.185.247:
>>
>>> Comodo System Cleaner has a huge amount of cleaning options with back
>>> up feature. Advanced users only. Could cause problems for beginners.
>>>
>>> http://system-cleaner.comodo.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.comodo.com/home/download/download.php?prod=system-cleaner
>>>
>>
>> FORGERY
>
> FORGERY
>
> You are using my email.
If you feel the guy's passing off on your good reputation, you could sue
for any financial loss incurred, and any inconvenience caused, by filling
your inbox with rubbish.
I hate forgers.
--
za kAT
za kAT
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>"I hate forgers."
>
>
>
> Naturally, most socialists are self-haters :-)
Just fess up the proof tosser.
--
za kAT
doggy
But, who is the Forger- Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
injects?
za kAT
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:57:39 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>>"I hate forgers."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Naturally, most socialists are self-haters :-)
>>
>>Just fess up the proof tosser.
>
> Already posted, wanker :-)
Not up your arse, post it here.
--
za kAT
za kAT
Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's certainly not
the person who has access to the postbox REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
See test results, and make up your own mind.
--
za kAT
Bear Bottoms
news:34337e811d62b0d8...@aracari.org:
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
> 1. I've seen no test results.
>
> 2. are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
> <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and got the required response?
>
> ...or what are you saying?
>
>
He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
unmunged. It is easy enough to prove. If he is saying he made an account
with gmail with that exact addy (including the REMOVE), then he is truly
demented.
Bear Bottoms
> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>>hummingbird <hummingb�r...@127.0.0.1> wrote in
>>news:34337e811d62b0d8...@aracari.org:
>>
>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:20:14 -0600, doggy wrote:
>>>>> But, who is the Forger- Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
>>>>> injects?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's
>>>>certainly not the person who has access to the postbox
>>>>REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>See test results, and make up your own mind.
>>>
>>> 1. I've seen no test results.
>>>
>>> 2. are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
>>> <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and got the required response?
>>>
>>> ...or what are you saying?
>
>
>>He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
>>unmunged.
>
> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
> created an account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and
> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address and got a suitable reply.
> Duh! Well of course he would!
> But without him posting the test results we have to assume he
> never sent an e-mail at all and is just blustering.
>
>>It is easy enough to prove. If he is saying he made an account
>>with gmail with that exact addy (including the REMOVE), then he is
>>truly demented.
>
> ISTM he's trying to obfuscate and blow out a smoke screen.
>
BTW, I posted on the eternal-september forum about the forger. You are
very limited in number of lines you are able to post however.
Bear Bottoms
> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>> hummingbird <hummingb�r...@127.0.0.1> wrote in
>> news:34337e811d62b0d8...@aracari.org:
>>
>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:20:14 -0600, doggy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> But, who is the Forger - Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
>>>>> injects?
>>>>
>>>> Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's
>>>> certainly not the person who has access to the postbox
>>>> REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> See test results, and make up your own mind.
>>>
>>> 1.I've seen the test results.
>>>
>>> 2.are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
>>> <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and got the required response?
>>
>> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
>> unmunged.
>
> Indeed you do my dearest Bear. Everyone in the world knows that.
>
> However it is possible that the cunning forger created an account
> thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and Stubbo sent the e-mail to
> that address and got a suitable reply. Well of course he would test
> out everything!
>
> But without him posting the test results we have to assume he never
> sent an e-mail at all and is just blustering.
Hummer it's me, the real Bear. That was an attempted character
assasination by the cultists. You can send me an email and prove they
are wrong.
There is a right(nice) way and a wrong(rude) way to approach this. They
are rude and contribute very little to the group but for showing up
every now and then.
I've demonstrated much more character than any of the ACF posters and
brought much more quality of contribution to this group than the rest of
the entire group combined (excluding you).
Send me an email from one of your special accounts.
za kAT
> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
> created an account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and
> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address
Er! are you accepting now, that I am /not/ the person who /you/ deem to be
a forger? and that I did send an email, and that I had no idea where it was
going?
--
za kAT
za kAT
> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer.
I know exactly what I'm saying. I knew exactly what I was doing. I even
clarified the point with you, and I can prove it.
Me
Message-ID: <hi7d53$n95$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
OK, I'll have to set up a super secret email account of my own. I'll let
you know later the addy.
Can you gentlemen just clarify for the record the addy we are claiming.
Many thanks.
The one who still claims to be Bottom replies
Message-ID: <Xns9CFA50956BA37be...@69.16.185.250>
you don't have to do anything but send an email to that account with any
check phrase you like....no need to James Bond it.
<shrug>
--
za kAT
Bear Bottoms
> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>>hummingbird <hummingb�r...@127.0.0.1> wrote in
>>news:34337e811d62b0d8...@aracari.org:
>>
>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:20:14 -0600, doggy wrote:
>>>>> But, who is the Forger- Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
>>>>> injects?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's
>>>>certainly not the person who has access to the postbox
>>>>REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>See test results, and make up your own mind.
>>>
>>> 1. I've seen no test results.
>>>
>>> 2. are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
>>> <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and got the required response?
>>>
>>> ...or what are you saying?
>
>
>>He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
>>unmunged.
>
> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
> created an account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and
> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address and got a suitable reply.
> Duh! Well of course he would!
> But without him posting the test results we have to assume he
> never sent an e-mail at all and is just blustering.
>
>>It is easy enough to prove. If he is saying he made an account
>>with gmail with that exact addy (including the REMOVE), then he is
>>truly demented.
>
> ISTM he's trying to obfuscate and blow out a smoke screen.
>
Heh, he created an account with gmail REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com.
So I created one with REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com which I will now
use in my headers. What a dork.
Bear Bottoms
news:Xns9CFB5FF463E56be...@69.16.185.250:
> hummingbird <hummingb�r...@127.0.0.1> wrote in
> news:9c966ca692b67ad5...@aracari.org:
>
>> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>>
>>>hummingbird <hummingb�r...@127.0.0.1> wrote in
>>>news:34337e811d62b0d8...@aracari.org:
>>>
>>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:20:14 -0600, doggy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, who is the Forger - Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
>>>>>> injects?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's
>>>>> certainly not the person who has access to the postbox
>>>>> REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
>>>>> See test results, and make up your own mind.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I've seen no test results.
>>>>
>>>> 2. are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
>>>> <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and got the required response?
>>>>
>>>> ...or what are you saying?
>>>
>>> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
>>> unmunged .
>>
>> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
>> created an account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and
>> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address and got a suitable reply.
>> Duh! Well of course he would!
>> But without him posting the test results we have to assume he
>> never sent an e-mail at all and is just blustering.
>>
>>>It is easy enough to prove. If he is saying he made an account
>>>with gmail with that exact addy (including the REMOVE), then he is
>>>truly demented.
>>
>> ISTM he's trying to obfuscate and blow out a smoke screen.
>
> Heh, he created an account with gmail REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com.
> So I created one with REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com which I will
> now use in my headers. What a dork.
Thank you William for stopping confusion. Didn't want to ask Cox but you
left no choice.
Bear Bottoms
Don't know what you are talking about concerning Cox. I've heard nothing
from them, however, I have prevented you from using the same ploy with
REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com haven't I.
Bear Bottoms
> Let's see if Mr Banana fixes it...I see our friend has posted
> at least two forgeries thru datemas today...
>
>
Ray Banana refuses to fix it.
za kAT
It would be helpful if you changed your nym as well.
As you have finally fessed up you are NOT
REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
It would be the decent thing to do, don't you think?
If you want any help with that, just ask.
--
za kAT
za kAT
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:46:00 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
>>> created an account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and
>>> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address
>>
>>Er! are you accepting now, that I am /not/ the person who /you/ deem to be
>>a forger?
>
> Absolutely not. You obviously misunderstand my comments...
What the bit that read "However it is possible that the forger created an
account thus: <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> and Stubbo sent the e-mail to
that address"
BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>> and that I did send an email,
>
> I have seen no evidence of this from you.
It's a text file. How can that /ever/ be evidence? Clueless.
>>and that I had no idea where it was going?
>
> Eh?
Simple enough statement. When I sent that email I had no idea where it was
going, or to whom. Period.
It's taken you a day to figure out the bleeding obvious. You were so
blinded by your humilation over the IP, and so convinced Bear Bottoms was
me, you have only just twigged the addy issue.
Read my posts carefully Dumb and Dumber. I don't lie. I don't need to. You
are so stupid. BAHAHAHAHA!!!!
--
za kAT
za kAT
> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
> This post of yours provides all the confirmation needed that you
> are the forger, Stubbings. It's amazing that you've spent the
> past 3 days screaming and protesting your innocence with bluff
> and bluster.
Tiny mind, you just cannot accept, that I had no idea who owned
REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com.
All I did was send an email. You just hadn't understood what the owner of
REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com was saying. Why? because you are both
stupid.
I knew what was going on. In fact I think it was /you/ or that other cretin
who actually posted some stuff you got back re a complaint where it
explained the issue.
None so blind as a dummy.
--
za kAT
Bear Bottoms
> I just checked, they're both valid addresses. Perhaps that's why
> Banana boy won't take action. IIUC it's e-mail address
> falsification that he won't accept.
>
>
Too bad...to allow such behavior through his service reduces the quality
of the service. I will block all posts from eternal-september and boycott
it.
za kAT
>> I just checked, they're both valid addresses. Perhaps that's why
>> Banana boy won't take action. IIUC it's e-mail address
>> falsification that he won't accept.
>>
>>
> Too bad...to allow such behavior through his service reduces the quality
> of the service. I will block all posts from eternal-september and boycott
> it.
Now do you mean block as in killfile. Just asking because we had a little
difficulty last time with /your/ vs everybody else's meaning of killfile.
then there's hummies legendary killfiling technique...
It takes two to tanty... BAHAHAHA!!!
--
za kAT
Bear Bottoms
> He hangs out on <alt.free.newsservers> a bit. It may be worth
> exposing him or tackling him over there.
>
I'm not interested. It was very clear to him what the case was and he
blinked.
Flann O'Connor
>> "then there's hummies legendary killfiling technique..."
>
>
> There's nothing legendary about Hamster filtering technique, only
> morons who don't understand how it works. I have explained it to
> Q a dozen times but he still struggles...apparently you do too.
I am confused, so I am now. Q showed you, sir, to move SSL files. You
didn't know how Hamster accesses SSL. I thot he knew better than you,
to be sure.
Bear Bottoms
William, before you stopped using my email I complained to Cox who
issued a ticket and were looking into it.
When you stopped I asked Cox to drop the investigation. Thank you for
complying.
Now our emails are different, everyone can tell us apart.
Bear Bottoms
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@datemas.de
>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@datemas.de
za kAT
> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbea...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CFC49241C10Bbe...@69.16.185.250:
>
>> X-Complaints-To: ab...@datemas.de
>>
>
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@datemas.de
Would you like me to send another test email?
--
za kAT
za kAT
> It means you are knowingly and deliberately trying to confuse and
> obfuscate the issue.
I knew what was happening, idiot. I just played to your confusion.
I even tried the clarify the matter with the pretender.
I couldn't believe it when he still didn't twig. I wasn't expecting that.
When I sent that email, I was crossing my fingers, I can tell you...
Really exciting...
> You have been invited to e-mail me from your regular ISP mail
> server which ought to clear it up once and for all. You decline to
> do that. We know why.
Yep, how it eats at you not to know my IP...
BAHAHAHAHA!!!!
--
za kAT
Flann O'Connor
>
>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>
>>> You're lying again, Stubbings.
>>>
>>> There's nothing legendary about Hamster filtering technique, only
>>> morons who don't understand how it works. I have explained it to
>>> Q a dozen times but he still struggles...apparently you do too.
>>
>> I am confused, so I am now. Q showed you, sir, to move SSL files. You
>> didn't know how Hamster accesses SSL. I thot he knew better than you,
>> to be sure.
>
That was a bad hangover. I'm stayin' in this Saturday to be sure. Can't
remember posting. Phhhh. Bad one.